On a Quiet Southern Border, Empty Farms and Frightened Workers
Alexandra, a 55-year-old undocumented immigrant, was on her way to work at a watermelon farm in the border city of Edinburg, Texas, recently when her oldest son stopped her before she stepped out of her aging trailer.
'Please don't go. You are going to get deported,' he told Alexandra, who asked that her last name not be used because she did not want to attract attention from federal immigration agents. Her son then showed her graphic videos of federal agents chasing and handcuffing migrants seemingly all over the Rio Grande Valley of Texas. 'That could be you,' he said.
President Trump's conflicting orders to exempt, then target, then again exempt farm workers from his aggressive immigration sweeps of work sites have caused havoc in agricultural industries across the country, where about 42 percent of farm workers are undocumented, according to the Agriculture Department.
But perhaps nowhere is fear among farm workers more palpable than on the farms and ranches along the southwestern U.S.-Mexico border, where for centuries workers have considered the frontier as being more porous than prohibitive.
Administration officials have vowed to make good on a once-popular campaign promise from Mr. Trump to deport millions of undocumented workers, in what he has said will be the largest mass deportation in U.S. history.
As workplace raids have eroded that popularity and sparked angry protests across the country, the border region has been eerily quiet.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Iran's top diplomat says talks with US ‘complicated' by American strike on nuclear sites
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Iran's top diplomat said the possibility of new negotiations with the United States on his country's nuclear program has been 'complicated' by the American attack on three of the sites, which he conceded caused 'serious damage.' The U.S. was one of the parties to the 2015 nuclear deal in which Iran agreed to limits on its uranium enrichment program in exchange for sanctions relief and other benefits. That deal unraveled after U.S. President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out unilaterally during his first term. Trump has suggested he is interested in new talks with Iran and said the two sides would meet next week. In an interview on Iranian state television broadcast late Thursday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi left open the possibility that his country would again enter talks on its nuclear program, but suggested it would not be anytime soon. 'No agreement has been made for resuming the negotiations,' he said. 'No time has been set, no promise has been made, and we haven't even talked about restarting the talks.' The American decision to intervene militarily 'made it more complicated and more difficult' for talks on Iran's nuclear program, Araghchi said. In Friday prayers, many imams stressed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's message from the day before that the war had been a victory for Iran. Cleric Hamzeh Khalili, who also is the deputy chief justice of Iran, vowed during a prayer service in Tehran that the courts would prosecute people accused of spying for Israel 'in a special way.' During the war with Israel, Iran hanged several people who it already had in custody on espionage charges, sparking fears from activists that it could conduct a wave of executions after the conflict ended. Authorities reportedly have detained dozens in various cities on the charge of cooperation with Israel. Israel attacked Iran on June 13, targeting its nuclear sites, defense systems, high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists in relentless attacks. In 12 days of strikes, Israel said it killed some 30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists, while hitting eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group. Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people. Israeli military spokesperson Brig. Gen Effie Defrin said Friday that in some areas it had exceeded its operational goals, but needed to remain vigilant. 'We are under no illusion, the enemy has not changed its intentions,' he said. The U.S. stepped in on Sunday to hit Iran's three most important strikes with a wave of cruise missiles and bunker-buster bombs dropped by B-2 bombers, designed to penetrate deep into the ground to damage the heavily-fortified targets. Iran, in retaliation, fired missiles at a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday but caused no known casualties. Trump said the American attacks 'completely and fully obliterated' Iran's nuclear program, though Khamenei on Thursday accused the U.S. president of exaggerating the damage, saying the strikes did not 'achieve anything significant.' There has been speculation that Iran moved much of its highly-enriched uranium before the strikes, something that it told the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, that it planned to do. Even if that turns out to be true, IAEA Director Rafael Grossi told Radio France International that the damage done to the Fordo site, which was built into a mountain, 'is very, very, very considerable.' Among other things, he said, centrifuges are 'quite precise machines' and it's 'not possible' that the concussion from multiple 30,000-pound bombs would not have caused 'important physical damage.' 'These centrifuges are no longer operational,' he said. Araghchi himself acknowledged 'the level of damage is high, and it's serious damage.' He added that Iran had not yet decided whether to allow in IAEA inspectors to assess the damage, but they would be kept out 'for the time being.'
The Hill
32 minutes ago
- The Hill
Congress considering borrowing limits on federal student loans
(NewsNation) — Congress is still hashing out the details of President Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill, but one thing seems clear: Whatever passes will have major implications for student loans. Both the House-passed version and the proposal still being debated in the Senate include several changes to the federal student loan system, an overhaul Senate Republicans say could save taxpayers at least $300 billion. A central feature of both plans: new caps limiting how much money people can borrow from the federal government to finance their education. Some say the loan limits, specifically those on graduate school and parent borrowing, are long overdue. 'Study after study has shown that colleges exploit these unlimited loans to hike tuition,' Preston Cooper, a senior fellow at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, wrote in a recent op-ed. But advocacy groups warn that Republicans' proposed changes will make it harder for low-income students to afford college — and push more borrowers to private lenders, whose loans generally offer fewer protections. Professional organizations like the American Medical Association have also raised concerns, saying the borrowing cap could deter qualified medical students and worsen the physician shortage. Here's what to know about the proposed caps on federal student loans. While the House and Senate proposals differ in details, both would limit how much parents can borrow through the federal Parent PLUS loan program to help pay for their children's college. Under the House plan, parents of undergraduates would be limited to borrowing $50,000 total, while the Senate plan would cap parent borrowing at $65,000 per student. Currently, there is no limit, and parents can borrow up to the full cost of attendance. Parent PLUS loans let families help pay for their children's education without saddling the student with additional debt in their name. But they often come with less favorable loan terms and have caused many parents to sacrifice their financial stability to help their children. In 2022, parents in more than 3.7 million families owed over $104 billion through the federal Parent PLUS loan program, according to the Century Foundation, a progressive think tank. By the time a student completes their program, the median Parent PLUS debt burden carried by parents who used the loan is roughly $29,600, the report found. After ten years, more than half of the original balance (55%) still remains, on average, per the Century Foundation. The legislation would cap the amount students can borrow for graduate school at a total of $100,000 for most master's programs. For professional degrees, like law or medical school, the total cap would be $150,000 under the House plan or $200,000 under the Senate's. As it stands now, those students can borrow up to the full cost of attendance through Grad PLUS loans. Cooper called the proposed maximums a 'good start' in his op-ed and said they should help rein in 'predatory' lending practices. 'Universities have used graduate loans as a cash cow to finance expensive master's degree programs of dubious value, while many schools have foisted tens of thousands of dollars in parent loans on low-income families,' he wrote. But the loan ceiling, along with other proposed changes, has also raised concerns. 'The potential impact of these student-loan changes would be to worsen a growing physician workforce shortage that is already making it difficult for people to access timely care in vast areas of the country, especially in high-demand specialties,' Dr. Bruce Scott, recent president of the American Medical Association, wrote earlier this month. According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, the median cost of attending four years of medical school for the class of 2025 is $286,454 for public institutions and $390,848 for private schools. Both totals are well above the proposed borrowing caps. Nearly 43 million borrowers collectively owe $1.7 trillion in federal student loan debt. That amount represents more than 92% of all student loan debt, meaning roughly 8% is private, according to the Education Data Initiative. Some worry that capping federal student loans will steer more borrowers to the private market, which often comes with higher costs and fewer protections. 'Students and parents will be forced to turn to expensive, high-risk private lenders — many of whom have a sordid history of exploiting borrowers,' the Century Foundation warned in a recent commentary. The article pointed out that even though private student loans only account for 8% of debt, more than 40% of student-loan-related complaints submitted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are about private loans. Still, Senate Republicans argue that sweeping student loan changes — including borrowing caps — are needed to fix what many see as a broken system. 'American higher education has lost its purpose. Students are graduating with degrees that won't get them a job and insurmountable debt that they can't pay back,' U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, R-La., said in a statement announcing the Senate plan earlier this month. President Trump is urging Congress to pass the megabill by the Fourth of July, but federal lawmakers are still debating the details.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Atlanta homeowner says he spent $200K on building a house for resale — and then the city knocked a hole in it
An Atlanta property owner says he found part of his home demolished and alleges city workers were responsible, causing extensive damage just as he was planning additional work before he put the property on the market. WSB-TV 2 Atlanta reported that Ronaldo Norman and his brother, who co-own a real estate investment company, had spent about $200,000 building a home in Southwest Atlanta. But when Norman arrived at the site in May, he says he found a large hole in the side of the house and bulldozers on the property. "I saw demo bulldozers and a big hole in the side of the property," Norman said to Channel 2 investigative reporter Ashli Lincoln. According to Norman, the damage was caused by city workers — but so far, Atlanta officials haven't publicly commented on the incident. Here's what Norman says happened, and what legal options property owners may have in similar situations. I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Norman says he arrived at the site to find demolition equipment and a gaping hole in one of the walls. "Just think about it, come pulling up to your property, and you see a big hole in the wall, and no one can give me an explanation as to why," Norman complained. Norman alleges city workers took action because they thought his permit had expired. "May 22, the day after they expired, they came out here and put a hole in my property," Norman told reporters. He maintains the property was still in compliance, claiming he had filed for and received a six-month permit extension before the incident. Whether a home is under renovation or fully built, city governments must follow a legal process before demolishing a structure. Generally, a property owner would receive notice along with time to rectify any issues. Norman says he never received any such notice. City official's only response, he claims, has been to advise him to seek legal counsel. "This right here is a major setback because now we may have foundation issues," Norman said. Read more: You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to . In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how While rare, incidents like this show how important it is for property owners to protect their investments and to act quickly if something goes wrong. With no answers from Atlanta officials, the Normans may have to pursue legal action to recoup their losses. Here's what that process could look like — and what other homeowners should know if they ever find themselves in a similar situation. Consult a lawyer Because of a legal concept called sovereign immunity, suing a city can be complicated, but Georgia law does allow homeowners to file claims for damages, as long as they follow the right process. File a notice of claim This is a formal document notifying the city that you intend to pursue compensation. The time for doing so varies by State and Municipality and can be relatively short; your local lawyer should know this. Missing this deadline could prevent your case from moving forward. Collect all documentation This includes: Building permits and extension filings Photos or videos showing the damage Invoices and receipts for materials and labor Emails or letters from city agencies Any inspection reports or code violation notices (or proof that none were issued) Request records from the city Filing an Open Records Request may reveal internal miscommunications or mistaken permit data that triggered the demolition. Get a damage assessment A structural engineer or contractor can help assess whether foundational damage occurred and provide estimates to use in a claim. This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
