
3 Relationship Myths To Let Go Of For Healthier Love, By A Psychologist
Could your beliefs about love and relationships be setting you up for disappointment? Rethink these ... More three myths for a more authentic connection.
We all carry internalized beliefs about what an ideal relationship should look like, how love is supposed to feel and how the 'right' person would act in a relationship.
These beliefs usually become the guiding factor in how you judge people and show up in your relationships. Sometimes, these beliefs can be misguided, since they're often a product of suggestions from your surroundings. These might be interpretations of love based on the relationships you grew up watching, advice you may have heard in passing or the idealized versions of love you've watched in movies.
While these may seem harmless or even helpful, it helps to pause and question the standards you hold for what you think is right or ideal in a relationship. This is because often, it's not the relationship itself that causes frustration or doubt, but the assumptions you may have attached to it.
Reflecting on your assumptions can help bring awareness to whether your beliefs are setting your relationship up against an unachievable or impractical standard.
Once you begin to reflect, you may realize that some beliefs you've held onto are more limiting than helpful.
Here are three common relationship myths you should rethink.
It's common for people to believe that partners should always compromise equally in a relationship. This is natural because, in essence, it sounds fair to want a sense of evenness and balance in love. But the reality is, no matter how hard you try, love cannot be a perfectly balanced scale.
A relationship involves the coming together of two dynamic individuals, which means effort, sacrifices or needs will not always look the same.
Research published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships in 2012 supports this. Researchers explored the effects of daily sacrifices in romantic relationships on relationship satisfaction and how this might depend on a person's attachment style. They found that the more difficult someone felt their own or their partner's sacrifice was, the less satisfied they felt in the relationship that day. This may be because such sacrifices on either end can be overwhelming for both partners.
Additionally, researchers also found that when people made more sacrifices in a day, they usually felt more satisfied in their relationship. However, this largely applied to those with low attachment anxiety.
For people high in attachment anxiety — characterized by a strong desire for closeness and a need for reassurance in relationships — making more sacrifices didn't make them feel better. This was probably because they were more concerned about whether their partner appreciated what they'd done for them.
Lastly, participants' satisfaction didn't change much based on how many sacrifices their partner made. Researchers suggest that this is likely because they didn't always notice or know about these sacrifices.
The main takeaway is that more than the quantity of sacrifices, what matters is how those sacrifices are perceived and felt. Even small gestures can deepen connection when they're made with ease and emotional attunement.
It's important to keep in mind that a relationship is not about scorekeeping. Instead, it's more helpful to cultivate open communication and make space for each other's efforts, however big or small they may be.
We're often conditioned to believe that a relationship should flow effortlessly or should not feel like 'work' when it's right.
However, that's not the reality of a healthy relationship. The truth is, being willing to put in effort and working towards constantly evolving yourself and the relationship is a sign of emotional maturity.
'If it's meant to be, it should be easy' is a very common 'destiny belief;' the idea that two people are either meant to be or not. However, destiny beliefs can be detrimental to relationship longevity.
A two-year longitudinal study of over 900 couples found that those who strongly believed their relationship was 'meant to be' started out more satisfied, surely. But they also gradually experienced faster declines in satisfaction over time.
This happened because when problems arose, destiny believers often saw these as signs their love wasn't meant to last. Instead of working through difficulties, they tended to avoid tough conversations or even walk away. This is the result of having a very fixed mindset towards love and relationships.
In reality, relationships that last have often evolved with conscious effort from both partners. This happens because people who believe love is something you build through patience and growth tend to approach challenges with curiosity rather than panic.
So, a healthier approach to relationships is the mindset of 'we build this together.' This mindset helps you embrace growth in love and build a relationship that truly stands the test of time.
Another common belief is that you need to be completely healed before you enter a relationship.
You may even think, 'I'm too broken to date,' and hold back until you feel perfectly whole. But the truth is that healing is an ongoing process.
You don't have to be completely 'fixed' to build a meaningful connection. What's more important is being self-aware and willing to grow alongside your partner to build a healthier and more authentic relationship.
A supportive partner can help you become a better version of yourself. No matter how 'ready' you feel, there's still a chance that inner wounds resurface unexpectedly — and that's completely alright.
This does not mean you have to avoid being in a relationship altogether. This just means you still get to work on yourself as your relationship evolves.
A 2021 study published in Frontiers in Psychology explored whether providing daily support to one's romantic partner, specifically related to physical activity, could also benefit the provider, rather than just the receiver.
Researchers studied overweight and inactive couples, questioning if helping one's partner pursue fitness goals would improve their own health behaviors, emotional well-being and relationship satisfaction.
Sure enough, researchers found that on days when people provided more support to their partners, they engaged in more physical activity themselves (measured objectively via accelerometers). They also reported feeling happier, less stressed and more satisfied in their relationship the same day.
When your partner supports you, it can be inherently rewarding to them to be of help. It also encourages both partners to work toward shared goals.
When both partners show up with awareness, care and accountability, the relationship becomes a safe place for both partners to grow, where deeper healing can happen together.
Helping your partner may build a sense of connection and purpose, all of which enhance well-being for both partners. This shows that support strengthens relationships by making both partners feel valued.
That said, it's also important to remember that your partner can only support you. It's not their job to fix you, nor are they your 'savior.' The way you take responsibility for your triggers, communicate your needs and show up with emotional honesty is what shapes the relationship.
In the end, what truly matters is showing up with self-awareness, a willingness to grow and the ability to offer and receive support.
Letting go of rigid relationship myths isn't about lowering your standards. It's a chance to re-evaluate your idea of right and wrong in love. When you challenge outdated beliefs, you can open yourself up to greater emotional growth.
Relationships don't thrive because they meet some ideal checklist, but because both people are willing to show up as they are and are committed to co-creating something meaningful. The real magic lies in choosing each other through the discomfort and the healing, over and over again.
How many romantic myths do you subscribe to? Take the science-backed Belief In Marital Myths Scale to learn where you stand.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
20 minutes ago
- CBS News
Baldwin Park police shooting suspect faces murder and attempted murder charges
Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman announced murder and attempted murder charges for the 22-year-old man who is accused of killing two people Saturday, including a Baldwin Park police officer. Eduardo Roberto Medina-Berumen faces two counts of first-degree murder of special circumstances for the death of Baldwin PD officer Samuel Riveros and Darius Wong, a 43-year-old father from Hacienda Heights. He also has been charged with two counts of attempted murder, for allegedly firing at two other Baldwin Park police officers, one who was wounded by gunfire. Wong, 43, was shot and killed as he was attempting to park his car on the street after dropping off his daughters, wife, and sister-in-law at a Baldwin Park family party Saturday evening. Minutes later, just after 7:12 p.m., police responded to reports of a man armed with a rifle, shooting on the 4200 block of Filhurst Avenue. Sheriff Robert Luna said as two police officers arrived, they found a man lying on the sidewalk "unresponsive, that ultimately, unfortunately, was Mr. Wong." The two officers who arrived in separate cars, were "immediately fired upon by this suspect, who had a rifle" Luna said. "An officer-involved shooting occurred at that time, and Officer (Anthony) Pimentel. Riveros arrived shortly after and was struck by gunfire, Sheriff Robert Luna said. More officers responded to the scene and a second officer-involved shooting occurred with the suspect. Medina-Berumen suffered gunshot wounds and remains hospitalized in stable condition, Luna said. An AR-15-style weapon with two high-capacity magazines was recovered at the scene. "Every time I hear about an assault rifle like this being used on the street, it makes the hair on my neck stand up …" Luna said. Medina-Berumen also faces a possession of an assault rifle charge. "This tragedy is a painful reminder of the dangers that law enforcement faces daily. Officer Riveros along with his fellow officers ran towards the danger without absolutely no hesitation and that's an act of profound courage… and his sacrifice will not and should not ever be forgotten," Luna said.


Fox News
22 minutes ago
- Fox News
Fox News beats ABC, NBC, CBS during weekday primetime while CNN has lowest-rated week of year
Fox News Channel beat all broadcast networks in a key metric last week as CNN had its lowest-rated week of the year. Fox News averaged 2.7 million viewers during primetime on weekdays from May 26-30, compared to 2.4 million for NBC, 2.4 million for CBS and 2.3 million for ABC. While Fox News prevailed against the trio of broadcast networks, it also obliterated CNN. Fox News averaged 1.5 million total day viewers from May 26 through June 1, compared to a dismal 308,000 for CNN. During primetime, Fox News averaged 2.3 million viewers while CNN settled for only 374,000. It was much of the same among the advertiser-coveted demographic of adults aged 25-54, as Fox News delivered 175,000 total day demo viewers and 240,000 during primetime, compared to 49,000 total day and 61,000 primetime demo viewers for CNN. CNN finished with its worst week of the year across both primetime and total day as Fox News had its highest cable news share since inauguration week. Along the way, the top 100 cable news telecasts for the week all aired on Fox News. "The Five" averaged 3.7 million total viewers and 409,000 in the critical demo to lead cable news in both categories. "Special Report with Bret Baier," "The Ingraham Angle," "Jesse Watters Primetime," "Hannity," "FOX News @ Night," "Gutfeld!," "Outnumbered," "The Will Cain Show," "America's Newsroom," "America Reports" and Harris Faulkner's "The Faulkner Focus" all had strong weeks, too, to help Fox News crush CNN. Ratings data courtesy of Nielsen Media Research.


CBS News
23 minutes ago
- CBS News
Navy set to rename USNS Harvey Milk, mulls new names for other ships named for civil rights leaders
Washington — The U.S. Navy plans to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, a fleet replenishment oiler named after the slain gay rights leader and Navy veteran, and is considering renaming multiple naval ships named after civil rights leaders and prominent American voices, CBS News has learned. Norfolk Va., (Sept. 24, 2024) — Civil Service Mariners (CIVMARS) aboard Military Sealift Command's (MSC) fleet replenishment oiler USNS Harvey Milk (T-AO 206) completed their first replenishment-at-sea (RAS) with two Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) vessels. LaShawn Sykes U.S. Navy documents obtained by CBS News and used to brief the secretary of the Navy and his chief of staff show proposed timelines for rolling out the name change of the USNS Harvey Milk to the public. While the documents do not say what the ship's new name would be, the proposal comes during Pride Month, the monthlong observance of the LGBTQ+ community that also coincides with the anniversary of the Stonewall uprising of 1969. WorldPride celebrations are being held in Washington, D.C., this year. The documents obtained by CBS News also show other vessels named after prominent leaders are also on the Navy's renaming "recommended list." Among them are the USNS Thurgood Marshall, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Dolores Huerta, USNS Lucy Stone, USNS Cesar Chavez and USNS Medgar Evers. CBS News found that a December 2024 web article from Naval Sea Systems Command about the laying of the keel for the future USNS Thurgood Marshall has been deleted. File: Alissa Kamens Marshall, USNS Thurgood Marshall ship sponsor participates in the time-honored tradition of the keel laying/certification by welding her initials into the keel plate of the new ship. Sarah Cannon "The reported decision by the Trump Administration to change the names of the USNS Harvey Milk and other ships in the John Lewis-class is a shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American Dream," Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi told CBS News in a statement. She added, "Our military is the most powerful in the world – but this spiteful move does not strengthen our national security or the 'warrior' ethos. Instead, it is a surrender of a fundamental American value: to honor the legacy of those who worked to build a better country." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told CBS News the move was "an utter abomination in terms of the extreme MAGA Republican effort to continue to erase American history, and we're not going to allow it to happen." And Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on X that Hegseth "should be ashamed of himself and reverse this immediately." Following his confirmation in January, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a directive instructing the Pentagon and U.S. military services to cease hosting events tied to heritage or awareness months, citing concerns that such programs could undermine unity within the ranks. The "Identity Months Dead at DoD" guidance banned official manpower and resources from being used on such events — among them, Pride Month, Black History Month and Women's History Month. The documents obtained by CBS News were not marked with the traditional classification markers typically seen on Defense Department memos. The documents were not marked as "For Official Use Only" or "Controlled Unclassified Information," they were also not marked to indicate they were drafts. There was a "CAUTION" note, however, referring to the information as publicly sensitive. The memo said the renaming of naval ships was to realign the U.S. military with Trump administration priorities of "reestablishing the warrior culture." The documents call for Navy Secretary John Phelan to select a new name for the USNS Harvey Milk on Tuesday, with the notice of the name change going out to other senior U.S. Navy officials later in the week after undergoing legal review. Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement that Hegseth "is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos." Parnell added that any potential renaming decisions would be announced once the internal reviews are complete. first reported the name change for the USNS Harvey Milk on Tuesday, but the news of other naval vessels being considered for a name change has not yet been reported. The USNS Harvey Milk is a John Lewis-class replenishment oiler, designed to support carrier strike groups at sea. The class of ships is named after civil rights icon and Congressman John Lewis, who died in 2020. Harvey Milk, the political trailblazer, emerged in the 1970s as one of the first openly gay elected officials in the United States. After years of activism, he was elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977, where he quickly became a national symbol of LGBTQ+ political empowerment. His life was cut short in 1978 when he was assassinated in City Hall, alongside Mayor George Moscone. The USNS Harvey Milk was christened in 2021 and represented a significant step toward inclusivity within the armed forces. Before he emerged as one of the most visible advocates for gay rights in American history, Milk served in the U.S. Navy. From 1952 to 1954, he held posts as an operations and dive officer aboard two submarine rescue ships — the USS Chanticleer and the USS Kittiwake — both active during the Korean War, according to the U.S. National Archives. But his sexual orientation carried profound consequences as Milk came under scrutiny. In December 1954, Milk, who was then a lieutenant junior grade, was facing a court martial for participating in a "homosexual act" a year earlier. Instead of facing trial, Milk was drummed out of the U.S. military, like so many other gay service members of his era. In January 1954, he resigned his commission and accepted an "Other Than Honorable" discharge. In 2021, the Navy approached Milk's nephew, Stuart Milk, to see if he wanted his uncle's discharge upgraded, according to NPR. Stuart decided against it as a reminder that not everyone was treated with honor. The name change would follow two base renamings Hegseth directed earlier this year to reverse the work a congressionally mandated naming commission did to remove names honoring the Confederacy. In February, he directed Fort Liberty in North Carolina return to Fort Bragg, saying it would now be named after a non-Confederate Bragg, and then directed Fort Moore change to Fort Benning, after another Benning. The naming commission also suggested the Navy rename the guided missile cruiser USS Chancellorsville, which honors a Confederate battle victory, to the USS Robert Smalls, to recognize a slave who stole a Confederate ship and surrendered it to the Union. The Navy also renamed the USNS Maury to the USNS Marie Tharp, removing the name of a Confederate sailor and replacing it with the name of a pioneering female oceanographer. Although the Navy has renamed ships for various reasons, name changes are still an exceptionally rare occurrence, especially after the ships have entered service.