Three more interest rate cuts may be on the way. But when is increasingly looking like anyone's guess
For mortgage holders, that was the most optimistic takeaway from Michele Bullock's press conference after the Reserve Bank of Australia's decision to cut its cash rate for the third time this year.
The RBA's cash rate target started the year at 4.35% and – after moves in February, May and now August – it has reached 3.6%.
'We've become increasingly confident that inflation is on track to be in our 2-3% target range on a sustainable basis,' the RBA governor said, before adding that the central bank and its board were 'determined to keep inflation down'.
Those rosy inflation forecasts depend on a key assumption, or what Bullock called the bank's 'best guess' about where rates would go from here.
That assumed path is a further rate cut by the end of this year, another by the following June, and then potentially one more by the end of 2026.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
'The forecasts imply that the cash rate might need to be a bit lower than it is today to keep inflation low and stable, and employment growing, but there is still a lot of uncertainty,' she said.
And while the direction of travel for rates looks clear, there was plenty of evidence from Bullock's press conference that the RBA is not particularly convinced when those moves need to happen.
In July the board surprised us by not cutting its cash rate. But Bullock made it clear that the RBA just needed to tick a couple of boxes before taking the plunge.
Now, the vision is much blurrier. The board is taking things 'meeting by meeting', the governor said a number of times.
What would potentially determine when we might get another cut?
She responded with a laundry list of data that the central bank's policy board considers when they make their decisions.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Another question: Is the cash rate at 3.6% a handbrake on the economy?
Maybe, maybe not, Bullock replied.
All of which is to say: again, two or three more rate cuts is the bank's 'best guess'.
Sure, it would be nice to think the bank can do more than just guess, but monetary policy this deep into a cutting cycle looks a lot more like art than science.
For now, we will have to console ourselves with the prospect that interest rates, at some stage, 'might need to be a bit lower'.
Patrick Commins is Guardian Australia's economics editor
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Fed can wait to adjust policy because job market is near full employment, Bostic says
Aug 13 (Reuters) - Atlanta Federal Reserve President Raphael Bostic on Wednesday said a U.S. job market holding near full employment offers the central bank the "luxury" of being able to avoid rushing to make any policy adjustments. The Fed should avoid policy volatility that can be troublesome to the public, Bostic said at an event in Alabama, adding that his "predisposition is to try not to do that" and to wait for "a little more clarity on where things are going." "Now I feel we have the luxury to do that today because the labor market has been pretty much at full employment," Bostic said. "Our maximum employment mandate is not at risk in the same way that the inflation mandate is," he said. That said, the recent employment report for July, which showed far fewer jobs created last month than expected and a historically large downward revision in job growth in the previous two months, could change the conversation. If the job market is substantially weaker than previously thought, "then maybe the risks are more in balance and we should be thinking about our ability to be patient is much less than it was before," Bostic said. "To me, that's the question we're going to try to have an answer for." Getting a better understanding of the health of the job market is "really our task for the next five weeks or so" ahead of the Fed's September 16-17 policy meeting, he added. Investors in recent days have come to fully price in the likelihood that the Fed next month will cut its benchmark overnight interest rate from the current 4.25%-4.50% range, where it has been since last December. Asked about the effects of tariffs on the outlook for inflation and Fed policy, Bostic said the textbook case argues that the levies cause a one-time price increase that the U.S. central bank should not respond to. But what's different with the tariffs that President Donald Trump is imposing is that they are broader and higher than expected and also have a larger policy goal of reorienting global supply chains. "You're going to see fundamental changes if this is successful, and if that's the case, then there's no reason you should expect that the post-tariff trajectory (for inflation) will look like the pre-tariff one," Bostic said. "It is actually a different economy."
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Burghley Capital: BoE Rate Cut Signals Cautious Policy Path
LONDON, United Kingdom, August 13, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Burghley Capital, opens new tab positions the Bank of England's latest interest rate decision within the broader context of monetary policy recalibration, noting the complex trade-off between inflation control and growth stability. The Monetary Policy Committee votes by a narrow 5–4 margin to reduce the Bank Rate from 4.25% to 4.00%, a move requiring a second ballot not used since 1997. Sterling appreciates to $1.35 per £1, while short-dated gilt yields edge higher and equity markets close lower, reflecting a rebalancing of expectations for the remainder of the year. Division within the committee highlights differing assessments of the economic outlook Four members support holding rates at 4.25% due to concerns over slowing disinflation and the risk of inflation expectations embedding into wage dynamics. Four others favour a 0.25 percentage point cut, citing evidence of sustained underlying disinflation, while one member initially calls for a 0.50 percentage point cut before aligning with the quarter-point reduction in the final vote. The outcome underscores what Burghley Capital describes as a deliberate, step-by-step policy stance that avoids premature easing. Household impacts are uneven For borrowers on tracker mortgages, a typical outstanding balance of £140,000 (approximately $189,000) translates into monthly repayments falling by about £28.97 (around $39.11). However, 7.1 million of the UK's 8.4 million residential mortgages are fixed-rate, meaning most borrowers will not see immediate payment relief. Burghley Capital's analysis notes that the near-term boost to household spending is therefore likely to be modest. Inflation remains the key constraint on further easing Consumer price inflation reaches 3.6% year-on-year in June 2025, up from 3.4% in May. Food prices rise 4.5% year-on-year, the highest since February 2024, while services inflation stays elevated at 4.7%, reflecting persistent domestic cost pressures. Labour market conditions show early signs of cooling, with unemployment at 4.7% for the three months to May 2025 and the vacancy-to-unemployment ratio slipping below its equilibrium level. Markets respond with a measured repricing of assets The pound strengthens 0.4% against the U.S. dollar to $1.35 and 0.6% against the euro. Two-year gilt yields increase by 6 basis points to 3.887%, reflecting reduced expectations for rapid easing. The FTSE 100 ends lower. According to Burghley Capital's analysis, these moves indicate that while investors see the Bank's decision as measured, they remain cautious about the prospect of further cuts in 2025. Current market consensus anticipates no further adjustments until early 2026 Burghley Capital projects the Bank Rate settling at approximately 3.75% in the first quarter of next year, conditional on continued disinflation and stable employment data. The firm's analysis also highlights a growing divergence between the Bank of England and the European Central Bank, which has enacted eight rate cuts since June 2024, reducing deposit rates by around 50% from their peak. This divergence has potential currency and asset allocation implications for institutional investors. Economic growth indicators present a mixed picture UK GDP is forecast to expand by 1.25% in 2025, up from earlier 1% projections, but quarterly momentum slows sharply from 0.7% in Q1 to 0.1% in Q2. Corporate insolvencies rise 13% between the first and second quarters, while small business confidence remains in negative territory. Burghley Capital's analysis suggests that such conditions favour quality balance sheets, resilient cash flows, and prudent leverage strategies in both public and private markets. Conclusion Burghley Capital concludes that the Bank's cautious, data-dependent approach will remain the dominant feature of UK monetary policy into 2026. The firm notes that rate-sensitive assets, selective credit opportunities, and currency-aware strategies could benefit from this environment, provided investors maintain flexibility and a disciplined approach to capital allocation. About Burghley Capital Founded in 2017, Burghley Capital Pte. Ltd. (UEN: 201731389D) is a Singapore-based global investment management firm specialising in long-only asset management strategies. The firm delivers institutional-grade research, tailored portfolio design, and advisory services to both institutional and private investors. By combining rigorous analytical methods with disciplined investment practices, Burghley Capital seeks to deliver consistent returns and long-term portfolio resilience. For more information, visit opens new tab or our resources page at opens new tab. Media Contact Martin ### SOURCE: Burghley Capital Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Fed grappling with impact of tariffs as it ponders rate decisions, Goolsbee says
Aug 13 (Reuters) - Chicago Federal Reserve President Austan Goolsbee said on Wednesday the U.S. central bank is grappling with understanding whether tariffs will push up inflation just temporarily or more persistently, which would inform its decision on when to cut interest rates. "As we go into the fall, these are going to be some live meetings and we're going to have to figure it out," Goolsbee told the Greater Springfield Chamber of Commerce in Springfield, Illinois. "The hardest thing that a central bank ever has to do is to try to get the timing right when there are moments of transition." Goolsbee said he is uneasy assuming tariffs will be just a one-time shock to inflation and wants to see more data including wholesale price data due out this week and broader inflation data next month before coming to a view on whether a rate cut is warranted. The Fed left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range at its meeting last month, a decision that drew dissents from Fed Vice Chair of Supervision Michelle Bowman and Fed Governor Christopher Waller. Bowman and Waller wanted to cut rates to head off what they worried was incipient weakness in the labor market. Two days after the end of that policy meeting, the U.S. Labor Department revised its earlier estimates of job growth in May and June sharply downward and reported a smaller-than-expected job gain in July. President Donald Trump called the data rigged and fired the commissioner in charge of producing it. Even so, allies including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have seized on the recent jobs report to call for rate cuts that Trump has pushed hard for all year. Some Fed officials also feel the July jobs report bolstered the case for easing policy. Goolsbee cautioned against reading too much into slowing job growth since that may reflect the sharp drop in immigration. He said he puts more weight on data like the unemployment rate, which at 4.2% is historically low. "I think the state of the labor market is pretty strong, pretty solid," Goolsbee said. Data earlier this week showed consumer prices rose 0.2% on a monthly basis in July, a downshift from the 0.3% reported for the prior month. Goolsbee said he took note of the rise in services inflation, which is not directly related to tariffs, and would be concerned if upcoming data continued to show a broadening of price pressures.
