logo
Deadly ‘pharaoh's curse fungus' could be used to fight cancer

Deadly ‘pharaoh's curse fungus' could be used to fight cancer

Yahoo2 days ago

A deadly fungus linked to deaths in archeologists excavating ancient tombs has been turned into a new cancer-fighting compound. A team at the University of Pennsylvania modified some of the chemicals in the toxic crop fungus Aspergillus flavus, aka the 'pharaohs' curse' fungus, and created a new compound that kills leukemia cells. The findings are detailed in a study published June 23 in the journal Nature Chemical Biology and are an important step towards discovering new fungal medicines for cancer.
'Fungi gave us penicillin,' said Sherry Gao, a study co-author and UPenn chemical and biomolecular engineer, said in a statement. 'These results show that many more medicines derived from natural products remain to be found.'
Aspergillus flavus is one of the most frequently isolated mold species in both agriculture and medicine. It is commonly found in soil and can infect a broad range of important agricultural crops. The toxins in this fungus can lead to lung infections, especially in those with compromised immune systems. It is named for its dangerous yellow spores and has been considered a microbial villain for at least a century.
In the 1920s, after a team of archaeologists opened King Tutankhamun's tomb near Luxor, Egypt, a series of untimely deaths occurred among the excavation team. Rumors swirled of some kind of pharoah's curse. Doctors later theorized that fungal spores that had been dormant for thousands of years might have played a role in the deaths.
During excavations In the 1970s, a dozen scientists entered the tomb of Casimir IV in Poland. Within only a few weeks, 10 of the researchers died. Investigations later revealed the tomb contained the fungus A. flavus.
The same deadly fungus is now being looked at as a potential cancer treatment. The therapy detailed in this new study is a class of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides, or RiPPs. The name 'RiPP' refers to how the compound is produced. It starts in the ribosome–a small cellular structure that makes proteins–and is later modified by peptides or intervention in the lab. In this case, the RiPP is altered to enhance its cancer-killing properties.
'Purifying these chemicals is difficult,' said study co-author and UPenn doctoral fellow Qiuyue Nie.
While thousands of RiPPs have previously been identified in bacteria, only a handful have been discovered in fungi. One reason for fewer fungal RiPP finds is because past researchers likely misidentified fungal RiPPs as non-ribosomal peptides and did not quite understand how fungi created the molecules.
'The synthesis of these compounds is complicated,' adds Nie. 'But that's also what gives them this remarkable bioactivity.'
[ Related: College student discovers mysterious fungus that eluded LSD's inventor. ]
To find more fungal RiPPs, the team first scanned a dozen strains of different Aspergillus fungi. By comparing the chemicals produced by these strains with known RiPP building blocks, the team identified A. flavus as a promising candidate for additional study.
The genetic analysis pointed to a particular protein in A. flavus as a source of fungal RiPPs. When the team turned off the genes that create that protein, the chemical markers that indicated the presence of these RiPPs also vanished. Combining both metabolic and genetic information pinpointed the source of the useful fungal RiPPs in A. flavus and could be used to find other fungal RiPPs in the future.
The team then purified four different RiPPs. They found that the molecules all shared a unique structure of interlocking rings. The researchers named these previously undescribed molecules after the fungus in which they were found: asperigimycins.
Even without genetic modifications, the asperigimycins demonstrated medical potential when mixed together with human cancer cells. Two out of the four variants had potent effects against leukemia cells.
The researchers added a fatty molecule called a lipid to another variant and found that it performed as well as cytarabine and daunorubicin, two FDA-approved drugs that have been used to treat leukemia for decades.
Next, the team wanted to understand why the lipids enhanced asperigimycins' potency. To do this, the researchers selectively turned genes on and off in the leukemia cells. One gene (SLC46A3), proved critical in allowing asperigimycins to enter leukemia cells in the right amount. That SLC46A3 gene helps materials exit lysosomes, or tiny sacs that collect foreign materials entering human cells.
'This gene acts like a gateway,' said Nie. 'It doesn't just help asperigimycins get into cells, it may also enable other 'cyclic peptides' to do the same.'
Those chemicals have medicinal properties just like asperigimycins. Nearly 24 cyclic peptides have received clinical approval since 2000 to treat diseases from cancer and lupus, but many of them need modification in order to enter cells in sufficient quantities.
'Knowing that lipids can affect how this gene transports chemicals into cells gives us another tool for drug development,' said Nie.
Further experimentation showed that asperigimycins likely disrupt the process of cell division.
'Cancer cells divide uncontrollably,' said Gao. 'These compounds block the formation of microtubules, which are essential for cell division.'
The compounds had little to no effect on breast, liver, or lung cancer cells or on a range of bacteria and fungi. According to the team, this suggests that asperigimycins' disruptive effects are specific to certain types of cells, which is a critical feature for any future medication.
In addition to showing that asperigimycins do have some future medical potential, the team pinpointed similar clusters of genes in other fungi. This means even more fungal RiPPS could be out there.
'Even though only a few have been found, almost all of them have strong bioactivity,' says Nie. 'This is an unexplored region with tremendous potential.'
The next step towards potentially becoming a therapeutic, asperigimycins need to be tested in animal models, with the hope of one day moving into regulated human clinical trials.
'Nature has given us this incredible pharmacy,' says Gao. 'It's up to us to uncover its secrets. As engineers, we're excited to keep exploring, learning from nature and using that knowledge to design better solutions.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ancient ‘pharaoh's curse' could be used to fight cancer: ‘It's up to us to uncover its secrets'
Ancient ‘pharaoh's curse' could be used to fight cancer: ‘It's up to us to uncover its secrets'

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

Ancient ‘pharaoh's curse' could be used to fight cancer: ‘It's up to us to uncover its secrets'

From curses to cures — an ancient hex might just be modern science's secret to battling leukemia. In the 1920s, archaeologists blamed a string of bizarre deaths following the excavation of King Tutankhamun's tomb in Egypt on the 'pharaoh's curse.' 3 British archaeologist Howard Carter and his patron, Lord Carnarvon, made history by entering the tomb of the Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun in the Valley of the Kings in 1922. Getty Images Advertisement Decades later, in the 1970s, it happened again when a group of scientists entered the tomb of Casimir IV in Poland. Out of a team of 12, 10 died within weeks. They didn't know it then, but the tomb contained Aspergillus flavus, a fungus that can cause lung infections. Advertisement Now, University of Pennsylvania researchers have modified this microbial villain and tapped into its potential as a biomedical hero. Their new study — published this week in the journal Nature Chemical Biology — revealed that Aspergillus flavus could transform into a cancer-fighting agent that rivals traditional medicines approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Their work highlights the ability to rebrand a historically toxic substance into a groundbreaking drug. 3 Carter examines King Tut's sarcophagus. AP Advertisement 'Fungi gave us penicillin,' Sherry Gao, an associate professor in chemical and biomolecular engineering and bioengineering, said in a statement, referring to the world's first successful antibiotic. 'These results show that many more medicines derived from natural products remain to be found,' she added. First study author Qiuyue Nie called it an 'unexplored region with tremendous potential.' Advertisement Gao's group isolated and purified four RiPPs from Aspergillus flavus, with these molecules showing killer results against leukemia cells. But there are obstacles to greater success. 'Purifying these chemicals is difficult,' Nie said. And while scientists have identified thousands of RiPPs in bacteria, far fewer have been found in fungi. This might be in part because researchers used to confuse them with a different class of molecules and didn't fully understand how fungi produced them. 'The synthesis of these compounds is complicated,' Nie noted. 3 Mummy in the UK is shown before it goes on display in a centenary exhibition commemorating the discovery of Tutankhamun's tomb 100 years ago on Nov. 2, 2022. Getty Images 'But that's also what gives them this remarkable bioactivity,' she continued. Advertisement The new research confirms that much of our environment and nature are not yet fully understood — and this exploration could benefit contemporary medicine. 'Nature has given us this incredible pharmacy,' Gao said. 'It's up to us to uncover its secrets.'

ASCO 2025: Reshaping the Landscape in Endometrial Cancer
ASCO 2025: Reshaping the Landscape in Endometrial Cancer

Medscape

time7 hours ago

  • Medscape

ASCO 2025: Reshaping the Landscape in Endometrial Cancer

Reflecting on data delivered at ASCO 2025, Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, reports that there has been remarkable progress in the treatment landscape for endometrial cancer, particularly for patients with advanced or recurrent disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab, dostarlimab, and durvalumab are now available, with some approved in combination with chemotherapy for mismatch repair-deficient or all-comer advanced disease. ASCO and other recent meetings have highlighted the urgent need to address more aggressive endometrial cancer subtypes — such as serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcomas — with targeted therapies including WEE1 and CDK2 inhibitors, as well as antibody-drug conjugates. Promising new data, including the use of abemaciclib with letrozole and metformin for ER-positive, low-grade cancers, underscores the growing momentum in precision therapy and the importance of ongoing clinical trial participation.

To Make Better Choices, Understand How Your Brain Processes Values
To Make Better Choices, Understand How Your Brain Processes Values

Scientific American

time11 hours ago

  • Scientific American

To Make Better Choices, Understand How Your Brain Processes Values

Much has been made of the power of habit. We're encouraged to make healthy choices our default and to understand the way that the brain sets certain tasks, such as our morning commute, on autopilot to improve our efficiency. But what about our more intentional, conscious day-to-day choices? The decisions we ponder—over seconds or lengthy deliberation—rely in part on the value system, which weighs in on the subjective evaluations we make, tipping the scales toward one choice over another. 'When we understand how the value system works, we can recognize many possible paths to our goals,' says Emily Falk, a neuroscientist at the University of Pennsylvania and author of What We Value. As the book explores, many people feel frustrated when they find themselves making choices that run counter to their big-picture goals—things like exercising more, visiting older relatives or cutting back screen time. Falk introduces readers to the brain systems that calculate our priorities in the moment and the strategies for weighting those decisions toward what matters most to each person. In the process, she offers a compassionate framework for recognizing how we make choices and why change can be so challenging. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Scientific American spoke with Falk about how the brain sifts through options and how reflecting on our priorities can help align our behaviors with long-term aims. [ An edited transcript of the interview follows. ] So how does the brain assign value? When we're making a decision, the brain first identifies the different things that we might be choosing the brain's valuation system takes input from many other systems, including the ones that help us process emotions, think about ourselves, and help us understand other people's thoughts and feelings. It integrates that information and assigns a subjective value to each option. Then we choose the one that we expect will be most rewarding. Finally, after we make the choice, the brain keeps track of how things went to see whether something we thought would be rewarding was as good as we predicted. Ultimately, that valuation system provides a final common pathway in arriving at our subjective evaluations across very different things—whether relationship partners, food choices or financial decisions. As just one example of factors that influence these value calculations, in January my colleagues and I published findings that showed people are more likely to share news stories with others when they reflect on why that article is relevant to themselves and their social worlds. And we've seen, in this and in past research, how that desire to share news relates to activity in the brain's self-reference and social cognition systems. How might understanding these systems change the way people think about their choices or behavior? We know that one important input for the value system is self-relevance, or how much something feels psychologically meaningful or close to oneself. And we tend to confound self and value. Neuroscientific research shows a deep intertwining of these self and values systems. Sometimes that is good in terms of maintaining a coherent sense of self and a positive sense of self. The problem is that we may hold on to notions of what we did and who we are beyond the point when they are useful. As another example, people prefer rewards that are close in time or instantly gratifying. Understanding how the brain works also highlights how other kinds of psychological [closeness or] distance work in a similar way. Scientists have studied how the medial prefrontal cortex, which is important to both the value and self-relevance systems, handles multiple kinds of psychological distance in a similar way. For instance, people are more motivated to choose something when you expect the rewards will come sooner or involve something geographically close or people who feel socially close. But you can make rewards feel psychologically closer. Scientists have done that by asking people to imagine otherwise distant scenarios in concrete ways. You can vividly imagine how your future self will spend money in retirement as an incentive to save now or envision the transformative consequences for a specific child of donating to UNICEF to increase your giving. In your research, you've looked at another strategy, what psychologists call values affirmation, and found it can help people make better decisions for themselves in the long term. Can you explain more? Lots of research shows that when we are reminded of the things that are most important to us—'capital-V' values such as kindness or friendship and family—we are more open to changing our behaviors. For example, in studies that our team has run, sedentary people are more likely to become physically active after being asked to affirm their values by identifying the most important ones on a list and then envisioning themselves in various scenarios that tap into those values. So if you choose friends and family, we might ask you to imagine a time in the future when you connect with a family member, and they help you with a challenge. When we look at brain activity, we see that when thinking about what matters most, core parts of the value and self-relevance systems become active. We also find people are less defensive and more open to change after reflecting on their most important values. So if we have people do this type of values affirmation before we give them messages intended to coach them toward healthier choices—such as reminders to exercise—we see that the people who affirmed their values show more activity in the value and self-relevance systems in the brain than others who did not do that affirmation. And then when we follow our participants over the next month—sending out more value-reflection prompts and reminders to be active—the ones who showed that greater brain activation were ultimately less sedentary. Why would thinking about family and friends change someone's inclination to exercise? In many value affirmation studies, the value does not have an obvious connection to the behavior. Instead the idea is that thinking about what really matters to you helps you zoom out and consider the big picture. Affirming your values—by writing about what you care about most, choosing values from a list or imagining situations that involve those values—can ground you. In addition, self-transcendent values, which connect you to something outside of yourself, such as friends and family or spirituality, are more effective than purely self-focused values at helping people make changes. People who connect with those self-transcendent values on a regular basis, and people who have a stronger sense of purpose, get health and well-being benefits that don't accrue when we focus on more self-focused values such as personal money, fame and power. All of this suggests that people who keep their big-picture ideas and goals top of mind—for example, through regular reminders of their big-picture values—gain some advantages when it comes to decision-making, right? Yes. Feeling purposeful means having a clear picture of what you're trying to do and why. It can be like a North Star that helps us think about the path from where we are now to where we want to be. But it isn't just that some people are purposeful and others are not. People's sense of purpose fluctuates, on a day-to-day basis, around whatever their baseline is. This is helpful to keep in mind because it highlights that we can do things that might change how purposeful we feel on a given day and what benefits we get as a result. For example, day-to-day choices and physical health relate to purpose. Exercise, sleep, mood, connecting with other people and sense of purpose relate to one another in a web of wellness. When we actively choose to prioritize one of these, we can get benefits in lots of other areas for free.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store