logo
‘He praised govt abroad': After Abhishek Banerjee's criticism, members in his delegation question ‘U-turn'

‘He praised govt abroad': After Abhishek Banerjee's criticism, members in his delegation question ‘U-turn'

Indian Express6 hours ago

Reacting to Abhishek Banerjee's recent statements questioning the effectiveness of the multi-party delegations that visited different countries to explain India's position on cross-border terrorism, Janata Dal (United) working president and MP Sanjay Jha on Tuesday said the Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP had praised Operation Sindoor in all the five countries that the delegation visited. Jha led the delegation that visited Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.
'He went to all these places, and in all the five places he praised the government on Operation Sindoor,' Jha told The Indian Express, expressing surprise over Banerjee's statement. Jha also said Banerjee had spoken about the rationale behind keeping the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance.
The delegation also had former ambassador Mohan Kumar; former External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid; BJP MPs Brij Lal, Aparajita Sarangi, Pradan Baruah and Hemang Joshi; and CPI(M) MP John Brittas. A member of the delegation who did not wish to be named also questioned the TMC second-in-command's U-turn. 'Hamare saath the toh dhuaandaar desh ki taareef ki (When he was with us, he showered praises on the country),' said the MP.
Khurshid told The Indian Express that he doesn't think it is 'necessary or wise for the delegates to say anything'. 'My view has been that our parties had some agreement to send us abroad on a common issue. When we were abroad, we didn't have any problem in sharing a common point of view, which was essentially about India's response to a terror attack. Beyond that, there are, obviously, ideological and political differences of leadership here at home. Therefore, it might be that in conversations and speeches that will get reflected,' Khurshid said.
'I don't think it is necessary or wise for us to say anything. I am speaking for myself. This is the reason I didn't give interviews before or after meeting the Prime Minister. I thought it was part of the exercise we were mandated to do with the approval and participation of our parties. This is without commenting on what anyone may have said,' he added.
On Monday, less than a week after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met all the delegations, Abhishek Banerjee wrote on X: 'After reaching out to 33 countries post-Pahalgam in the last one month, how many extended explicit support to India?' He sought to know how Pakistan got IMF and World Bank loans despite the attack, and how the country was appointed vice-chair of the UN Security Council's counter-terror committee barely a month after the attack.
Banerjee sought accountability for the massive breach in national security after 55 days of the Pahalgam attack, wondering why the Intelligence Bureau (IB) chief was given a one-year extension after the intelligence failure, and asked whether the four terrorists who carried out the Pahalgam attack were dead or alive. He also sought to know when India would reclaim Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir.
Following Abhishek Banerjee's post on X, TMC Rajya Sabha MP Derek O'Brien released a video supporting him. 'Someone needed to call this government out. Someone needed to hold this government accountable. Someone needed to ask five direct questions,' he said, adding that the government's silence on these critical issues was unacceptable.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC closes proceedings against Shah after SC order
HC closes proceedings against Shah after SC order

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

HC closes proceedings against Shah after SC order

Bhopal: A division bench of MP high court, which had taken suo motu cognizance of the derogatory comments by tribal affairs minister Vijay Shah against Col Sofiya Qureshi, one of the two faces of Indian armed forces during ' Operation Sindoor ', and asked the DGP to register an FIR against the minister, closed the proceedings in the case following the supreme court directive to this effect. During the hearing of the case on Monday, the bench of Justice Vivek Agarwal and Justice S K Singh formally closed the case. The bench of Justice Arul Sreedharan and Justice Anuradha Shukla taking cognizance of Shah's address at a public function at Raikunda village in Mhow district on MJay 14 had asked that an FIR be lodged against the minister under sections 152 (endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India), 196 (1) (b) (promoting enmity) and 197 (a) (c) (harmful imputations or assertions about certain groups). An FIR was registered against the minister at Manpur police station in Mhow district the same night. Later, hearing a petition of the minister, the supreme court had formed a SIT of three IPS officers to probe the case and present a report to the supreme court. The court, while reprimanding the minister for use of 'shameful' language, however, restrained the police against the minister from taking any coercive action and also asked the MP high court to close the case.

Pakistan is more powerful than Iran and Israel, total nuclear warheads of Islamabad are..., India has...
Pakistan is more powerful than Iran and Israel, total nuclear warheads of Islamabad are..., India has...

India.com

time42 minutes ago

  • India.com

Pakistan is more powerful than Iran and Israel, total nuclear warheads of Islamabad are..., India has...

Pakistan is more powerful than Iran and Israel, total nuclear warheads of Islamabad are..., India has... Amid the escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, Pakistan, which faced defeat by India during Operation Sindoor, has made its entry and again reiterated its old threat of nuclear weapons. Iran's National Security Council member and IRGC General Mohsen Rezaei recently stated that Islamabad had assured Iran that it would launch nuclear retaliation against Israel if the Middle Eastern country were attacked by a nuclear weapon. During a televised interview, Mohsen Rezaei said, 'Pakistan has assured us that if Israel uses a nuclear bomb on Iran, they will retaliate with a nuclear bomb on Israel,' Rezaei stated. However, Islamabad has firmly denied this claim. The ongoing missile exchanges between Iran and Israel have claimed around 248 deaths, 230 in Iran and 18 in Israel. It is worth mentioning that this is not the first time that Pak's nuclear weapons have been highlighted and referred to during a conflict. Earlier in April this year, Pak Minister Hanif Abbasi openly threatened India with nuclear retaliation, stating that missile systems—Ghori, Shaheen, and Ghaznavi- along with 130 nukes are 'kept only for India.' According to a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, here is detailed information on Pakistan's nuclear strength. Pakistan's Nuclear Arsenal: The country has 100-120 nukes. Delivery Methods: These nuks are designed to deliver through aircraft and land-based missiles. Storage Protocols: It's believed that during peacetime, Islamabad stores its nuclear weapons separately from their delivery systems. Official Stance: The Strategic Plans Division, responsible for managing the country's weapons stockpile, has not publicly acknowledged the reported deployment plans. Warhead Material: Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is reportedly based on highly enriched uranium. HEU Stockpile (2014): It is estimated that HEU stockpile is at 2.7 to 3.5 tonnes for military purposes.

Reshaping West Asia's strategic map
Reshaping West Asia's strategic map

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Reshaping West Asia's strategic map

The immediate global concern is for energy and maritime security. Even a limited conflict near the Strait of Hormuz can send oil prices surging, rattle insurance markets and provoke panic. A price rise of $10 per barrel has already been reported. Iran, despite its rhetoric, is unlikely to deliberately disrupt traffic through the strait, as it would be suicidal for its already sanctions-battered economy. Yet, calibrated retaliation, such as using proxies to harass Gulf shipping lanes or launch drone attacks near infrastructure, could be used as capability projection. If this conflict stretches beyond 10 days, global supply chains will feel the tremors. A war of over three weeks could create a full-blown energy crisis, especially for economies such as India and China. In the broader international arena, Russia, China and Turkey all have stakes. Russia, already embroiled in Ukraine, will avoid direct entanglement. China, having recently brokered a thaw between Iran and Saudi Arabia, will push for restraint— more out of economic self-interest than moral calculus. Turkey will try to play both sides, issuing rhetorical support for Palestine while maintaining quiet ties with Israel and NATO. Global multilateral forums remain ill-equipped to manage such rapidly escalating regional wars. For India, the stakes are significant. Its energy security, maritime trade routes and diaspora interests are all in play. Israel has become one of India's closest strategic partners, offering critical intelligence and defence support—including during Operation Sindoor. Iran also remains vital to India's plans for regional connectivity through the Chabahar port and as a counterweight to both Pakistan and China in the western neighbourhood. India must avoid the appearance of passive neutrality, but also refrain from overt alignment—a challenging call. Strategic autonomy remains the main consideration. Backchannel diplomacy, quiet engagement with both Tel Aviv and Tehran, and readiness to protect Indian interests in the Gulf must shape our response. Arab countries find themselves in an awkward position. Violent containment of Iran could be counterproductive in the long run. Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain, signatories to the Abraham Accords, would prefer neutrality. Yet, they would fear public unrest and a possible spillover of conflict onto their own territories. Egypt and Jordan will worry about public reaction more than state-level consequences. Overall, the Arab Street, although insufficiently supportive of the Palestinian cause, would find itself struggling for choice. What follows now is uncertain. Iran has chosen to target Israeli urban centres, which has invited a similar response from Israel. I anticipate a subsequent Iranian drawdown, similar to the one after Soleimani's assassination. The conflict could also drag into a prolonged suicidal exchange. However, its effects will definitely go far beyond redrawing the regional security map. The world may be witnessing just another episode in the Iran-Israel hostility, but the shaping of a new West Asian balance of power could also be on the cards. Lt Gen Syed Ata Hasnain (Retd) is the former Commander, Srinagar-based 15 Corps; Chancellor, Central University of Kashmir (Views are personal) (atahasnain@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store