New York officials demand Amtrak repair East River tunnels without full shutdown
The rail company says it must repair the tunnels damaged during Superstorm Sandy, and the only way to do it is by closing multiple tunnels.
MTA, governor propose overnight, weekend work
The three-year project means two of the four tunnels guiding trains in and out of Penn Station from the east will be closed off.
Long Island Rail Road President Rob Free says that's a problem.
"With the limited infrastructure that we have, we will be forced to still maintain service into only one tunnel," he said.
Fewer tracks mean fewer outlets for trains to flow in and out of Penn Station.
During Wednesday's April MTA board meeting, we learned Gov. Kathy Hochul, the Nassau County executive, the MTA and some members of Congress have already sent "stern letters" to Amtrak demanding that the company find other methods to complete construction without a full shutdown of the specified tunnels.
The MTA and governor are suggesting doing the work overnight and on weekends when there are fewer trains operating.
"I don't know why we can't have the same bipartisan support out of Washington to demand what New York needs," MTA board member Neal Zuckerman said.
Amtrak still plans to begin work May 9
Amtrak, however, is now fighting back, saying the MTA, NJ Transit and the governor were well aware of this project years ago and that the finalized construction plan shouldn't come as a shock.
A new statement from Amtrak reads, in part, "Major construction work will still begin on May 9, after MTA delayed the work for more than seven months due to their lateness in completing work for their eastbound re-route project. We have been actively working with MTA to mitigate the impact of this delay."
But really, it's the riders, now tied up in a multi-rail agency beef, who will suffer the most.
The MTA continues to tout the success of Grand Central Madison, saying it essentially serves as another option for LIRR trains. But it may not work for everyone, especially the 60% of LIRR riders who rely on Penn Station specifically.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
5 things to know about cell phone bans in schools
Editor's Note: To watch the full discussion about cell phones, students and schools on 'Raising America,' click here. More and more U.S. students will be entering cell phone-free zones this year as states and school districts have implemented restrictions either in the classroom or the moment a child enters the building. Increased punishments, Yondr pouches and teacher collection baskets are just some of the ways school leaders have tried to reduce phone access, arguing they are a distraction and stymie social and academic growth. While the number of schools taking action has quickly risen across the country, opponents voice objections including personal freedom for students and safety concerns in an emergency. Here's what to know: Where are cell phone bans happening? At least 22 states have signed legislation regarding cell phone policies in K-12 schools, while some districts or schools have also acted on their own. But not all the restrictions look the same. States such as New York and Arkansas have implemented bell-to-bell cell phone bans, meaning students lack access to their phones the whole school day. Others including Kentucky and Tennessee have implemented instructional time bans, allowing students their phones between classes or at lunch. 'New York was the first state to target addictive social media feeds — and now we're the largest state to restrict smartphones in schools throughout the entire school day,' Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) said. 'I know our young people succeed when they're learning and growing, not clicking and scrolling — and that's why New York continues to lead the nation on protecting our kids in the digital age.' California and Arizona have laws requiring schools to create guidance around cell phone usage, and almost a dozen other states are considering legislation around cell phones in schools. It is hard to know the exact number of schools that have cell phone bans as even states without restrictions on the books let individuals school districts decide if they want to enact strict bell-to-bell bans. How are the policies implemented? Implementation of cell phone restrictions vary by district. The strictest districts have taken to using some version of a Yondr bag, a container that students must put their phones in at the beginning of the day that locks it inside. At the end of the day, there is a device where students can scan the bags, and the phones are released. But not all districts have the resources to invest in hard prevention methods, with some opting for teachers to collect phones either at the beginning of the day or before class starts. Other responses have been as simple as increasing punishments if a student is caught with a cell phone, such as taking the phone or detention. What pushed the surge in cell phone bans? A combination of factors led to a sweeping push to get phones out of young students' hands. The Wait Until 8 th campaign wants parents to pledge they won't give their children cell phones under after 8 th grade, hoping it will take societal pressure off others to give students cell phones younger than that. 'Parents can join together with other parents in their community and let kids be kids a little longer,' Mark SooHoo, an organizer for Wait Until 8 th, told The Hill's 'Raising America,' which he joined for a discussion on the debate over cell phones and schools. Studies have emerged showing decreased academic performance and social interaction among children with increased cell phone usage. Reliance on cell phones has also created trouble in the classroom as teachers compete for student attention with the screens, along with concerns students could cheat or bully others with their devices. What is the opposition to cell phone bans? One of the main concerns for parents is lack of access to their children, especially during tragic events such as school shootings. Another is personal freedom, as students and some parents argue schools should not be able to take away devices they have not paid for, and it should be up to the guardians' decision. While some have suggested students could have Apple Watches or other devices that give more limited access to texting capabilities, economic concerns also come into play. 'One thing I would also like to point out there are economic differences,' Annette Anderson, deputy director of Johns Hopkins' Center for Safe and Healthy Schools, told 'Raising America's' Elizabeth Prann during the discussion. Higher income students 'probably have a tablet, they probably have a laptop,' while others 'have a higher degree of reliance on their smart phones.' 'There is some dissonance in how these cell phones bans are applied' between wealthier and poorer schools, she added. Others suggest schools should be the place where students learn how to be more responsible with their technology, and teachers should be giving instructions on how to make phones an assets and not a detriment in life. 'We need more civility and teaching digital character education,' Anderson said. What's next? More cell phone bans, likely. As more and more states move on cell phone ban legislation, it is unlikely to see the trend reversed. The real story will be in a few years when data and stories from school districts with cell phone bans emerge and the impact of students' academic and social performance is seen. This experiment could shape the future of the K-12 classrooms at a time when the world is becoming more reliant on technology in the workforce.
Fox News
5 hours ago
- Fox News
Texas GOP lawmakers poised to finalize Trump-backed map after Dem redistricting walkout ends
The Texas legislature is poised to take up a new congressional redistricting bill put forward by Republicans on Wednesday, following weeks of pushback from Democrats. It is unclear how quickly Republicans will be able to vote on the redistricting plan, as it must go through floor debate before coming to a vote. It is a victory for Republicans, nevertheless, as Democrats who fled the state in an effort to block the plan are now back in the capitol. If passed, the new congressional map would likely flip five seats currently held by Democrats over to Republicans, a reality that has unleashed cries of gerrymandering across the country. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has vowed to "fight fire with fire," saying New York Democrats will pursue their own redistricting plan. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has followed suit, with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) proposing a California congressional map that would flip five Republican seats over to Democrats. Meanwhile, more Republican states, including Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri, are moving forward with or considering their own redistricting efforts, as are Democratic states such as Maryland and Illinois. Nowhere has a redistricting battle been more dramatic than in Texas, however, where roughly 50 Democratic state lawmakers absconded from a special legislative session to block the vote in early August. Democrats fled to Illinois and New York, but they faced a $500 fine for each day they refused to return home. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, and other state officials hit the Democratic legislators with lawsuits seeking criminal charges or to have them removed from office entirely. The walkout ended when Democrats returned on Monday, saying they had accomplished their goals of blocking a vote during the first special legislative session and persuading Democrats in other states to take retaliatory steps.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Straphangers question MTA fare increase amid congestion pricing
NEW YORK (PIX11) – The MTA is hosting another public meeting on Wednesday for mass transit riders to weigh in on its newly proposed fare and toll hikes. The first meeting was held on Tuesday, with public comments ranging from civil to scathing. Many straphangers questioned why such broad hikes are on the table with congestion pricing already raking in millions. More Local News 'Why are we spending $1 billion on preventing fare evasion when wealthy New Yorkers could easily cover the cost of the entire system? I'll tell you why. It's because those wealthy New Yorkers are sitting on this board,' student Jackson said to the MTA board at the meeting. The board is considering boosting base bus and subway fares from $2.90 to $3. Reduced fares would rise to $1.50 and the 12-day fare cap would increase to $36. Express bus fares would also go up to $7.25. Both monthly and weekly LIRR and Metro North tickets could rise 4.5%, and MTA bridges and tunnels' tolls up to 7.5%. The across-the-board hikes are now under review, even as the MTA projects congestion pricing is on track to meet its first-year goal of raising nearly $500 million. 'It needs this much money to maintain the system, improve the system, and also to do what our predecessors never did, which is to stop this 100-year-old system from falling down,' said MTA chairman and CEO Janno Lieber. More: Latest News from Around the Tri-State The first meeting on Wednesday starts at 10 a.m. and the second at 5 p.m. For more information on the meetings, click here. The board is set to vote on the hikes this fall. If approved, they'll be rolled out in January. Erin Pflaumer is a digital content producer from Long Island who has covered both local and national news since 2018. She joined PIX11 in 2023. See more of her work here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
