Dutch intelligence agencies say Russian hackers stole police data in cyberattack
A previously unknown Russian hacker group with suspected ties to the Kremlin was responsible for a cyberattack last year on the Dutch police and has also targeted other Western nations that deliver military support to Ukraine, intelligence agencies announced Tuesday.
The agencies said in a report that the group, which they called Laundry Bear, is actively trying to steal sensitive data from European Union and NATO countries and is 'extremely likely Russian state supported.'
'Laundry Bear is after information about the purchase and production of military equipment by Western governments and Western deliveries of weapons to Ukraine,' Vice Adm. Peter Reesink, director of the military intelligence agency MIVD, said in a statement.
There was no immediate comment from Moscow on the report.
The Netherlands has been a strong supporter of Ukraine's war effort since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022 and has given military equipment, including F-16 fighter jets to Kyiv.
The Russian hackers broke into a police account and accessed work-related contact details of all Dutch police officers in September last year, in a cyberattack that sent shockwaves through the force.
The Dutch intelligence agencies published a detailed analysis of methods used by the hacker group to break into computer networks and cloud services.
Erik Akerboom, chief of the domestic intelligence agency AIVD, said that outlining the group's work means that 'not only governments, but also manufacturers, suppliers and other targets can arm themselves against this form of espionage. This limits Laundry Bear's chances of success and digital networks can be better protected.'
The attack discovered in the Netherlands is one of a growing number around the world.
Last week, the U.S. National Security Agency said that hackers working for Russian military intelligence targeted Western technology and logistics companies involved in shipping assistance to Ukraine.
And last month, the French government accused a hacking group linked to Russian military intelligence of cyberattacks over three years, targeting the Paris Olympics, French government agencies and companies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
30 minutes ago
- Sky News
Farage to pledge to reopen blast furnaces in Port Talbot
Nigel Farage will pledge to reopen Port Talbot's steel blast furnaces if in power in Wales, as his Reform UK party sets its sights on being the government in the Senedd next year. In a speech in Port Talbot later, Mr Farage will outline how next year's Welsh parliament elections will be the primary focus of his party. The MP for Clacton has already ruled out standing at the Senedd elections next year. It is unclear who will lead the Reform party in Wales. Reindustrialising Wales will be at the centre of his speech. Acknowledging the task at hand won't be quick or easy, Mr Farage is also expected to suggest a return to coal mining, if suitable, as part of Reform's "long-term ambition to reopen Port Talbot steel". A Reform source told Sky News: "We have said and say again that we think it's better to use British coal for British steel than imported coal." Port Talbot was the largest steelmaking plant in the UK until the two blast furnaces were switched off in September 2024, which saw the loss of 2,800 jobs as part of the transition to greener production methods. Electric arc furnaces are replacing both blast furnaces and are set to be operational by early 2028. 2:30 Wales is set to head to the polls in May next year and Reform hopes to end the 26-year Labour government reign in Wales. The Reform source said Mr Farage's speech "will tap into the hearts and minds of a deeply patriotic nation that feels betrayed and forgotten about by Labour". Recent polling by Barn Cymru saw the Labour vote share in Wales collapse to 18%, with Reform second in the polls on 25% behind Plaid Cymru on 30%, whereas the Conservatives who are currently the opposition in the Senedd are on 13%. Reform believes the performance of their party in Scotland confirms they can win in Wales next year. The source told Sky News: "We are the main challenger to Labour in Wales. A vote for the Conservatives is a vote for Labour."
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves is about to do more damage to pensions than Gordon Brown
When in 1997, Gordon Brown raided pension funds by removing their tax credit on dividends, it was arguably the most egregious blunder of economic self-harm by any chancellor in history. At that time, pension funds and institutional investors owned almost half of the UK's quoted shares. Now it is only 4pc. To most people, it seemed innocuous and may only have raised around £5bn at the time, but it did more than reduce income for pensioners – more importantly it meant the compounded earnings from reinvested dividends never happened. The cumulative cost has been estimated at £250bn to pension funds over the next 20 years. Now in 2025, we have a Chancellor who is doing her best to be more damaging to pensions than Brown – and with Labour's huge majority she has every chance of doing so. Reeves's first move of her four-step barn dance was to make private pensions subject to inheritance tax. That means in some estates the total tax deducted from a pension could be 72pc for basic-rate taxpayers, 84pc for higher-rate and 87pc for additional-rate payers. The next step Reeves is believed to be considering is to remove any tax incentives that encourage salary sacrifice into pensions. An HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) report has already laid the ground for this move which could cost an extra £500 a year on the average earner's tax bill and reduce the size of their pension pot. That's still not enough to satisfy Reeves's appetite for meddling, next comes asserting state control over where pensions are invested, believing, as she and her comrades do, that the state can pick winners. Although please understand, the intention is not to reward pensions with successful returns but to use pension funds to provide investment in Labour's favoured industries without having to raise taxes further or borrow at high rates in the markets. It is essentially a way of subsidising risky government interventions in the economy. We can see pension funds already seeking to please the Government with Torsten Bell, the pensions minister, congratulating one company for committing 15pc of its investments towards government targets, including 5pc on renewables. This is not Viagra to boost the economy, it's Valium to stupefy it. Finally, Reeves is looking at companies with defined benefit schemes being allowed to spend the surplus. Why? So she can then tax any drawdown by 25pc, of course. The collective impact of these changes, even if they do not happen all at once, will be to make all pensioners poorer through lower returns. People will be discouraged from saving through pension funds for their retirement and find other means of investing – all causing British pension funds and the highly complex superstructure of expertise, services jobs and physical support behind the pension industry to waste away like it is being eaten by a cancer. Instead of making UK equities more attractive, it will hasten their decline because they will no longer be bidding for support in a competitive market. Performance will become less important than geographical location or state favouritism. It is a recipe for disaster that will work its way through our private sector like a monstrous tapeworm. It doesn't have to be this way. The alternative that should have been grasped when the Conservatives won (with Liberal Democrat support) in 2010 will still be available to the next government. Whoever has that task should aim to encourage (never force) greater saving into pensions by providing a more stable and secure pension system for future retirees. Yes, it would be brilliant if a greater percentage of pension funds invested in the UK – but it should be because our private sector becomes world-beating and offers attractive returns, not because of a ministerial Wizard of Oz pulling the wrong lever behind a green velvet curtain. A new chancellor should first reverse Reeves's death tax assault on pensions, making pension investment attractive again. By encouraging private provision for our futures, the state gains from a more dynamic economy (raising tax revenues) but also benefits from lower welfare costs in the future. Next – and this is crucial – the UK should restore the dividend tax credits for pension funds that were abolished by Gordon Brown. For a cost of just a few hundred million pounds, this step will encourage retirement schemes to increase substantially the amounts they allocate to UK equities. It is relatively inexpensive to do because Brown's policy so damaged the pension industry's UK investments it will not cost the £5bn it raised in 1997. Then scrap stamp duty on shares. This 0.5pc charge on every transaction on British capital markets depresses both share values and investment into UK equities. It is a long-overdue reform only held back by outdated class war prejudices. Finally, the country has to face up to the dire need to leave behind our unfunded state pension Ponzi scheme (where current taxes pay today's pensions in the fingers-crossed hope that future taxes will pay future pensions – thus requiring constant mass immigration to outpace the nation's demographic challenges). We need a funded pension system that actually invests in real assets so future generations have pension pots they can rely upon. The British people get a very poor implied rate of return on what they pay into National Insurance. Evidence shows they would be three times better off putting the same money as their National Insurance contributions (NICs) in a private pension fund. Money put into Britain's pay-as-you-go state system is paid out straight away in current benefits. Over the years, those benefits can grow only as fast as the NICs that finance them – roughly the annual growth of real earnings – but this has been negligible in recent years. ONS data for 2024 indicated median weekly pay for full-time employees in the UK was 2pc lower in real terms compared to 2010. By contrast, the real rate of return on invested funds is more than 5pc. Indeed, from 1900 to 2021, UK equities delivered an average annual real return of approximately 5.4pc, while over the same period, global equities achieved around 5.3pc in real annual returns. This difference between state and private systems, compounded over a 40-year working life, means the average worker's NICs would have to be six times higher than the sum required to buy the same benefits privately. A phased change would be required and one-way of helping finance the transition is to tackle the absurdly generous and costly system of public sector pensions – but that story is for another day. Reeves is on a mission; she needs desperately to fund the pepper-pot of black holes she has created in the public finances. By raiding our pensions and decimating the sector with taxes, she will only generate fast-diminishing returns as her scorched-earth policies kill our private sector that generates wealth.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
From Keir Starmer's position on immigration to an old non-stick pan: Edith Pritchett's week in Venn diagrams
From Keir Starmer's position on immigration to an old non-stick pan: Edith Pritchett's week in Venn diagrams – cartoon
