TANSCHE to unveil first-ever model policy for academic and administrative audit of HEIs in TN
Notably, the TANSCHE had recently released a draft model policy on technology usage in HEIs, which promotes digitisation of all services and facilities available in institutions.
According to higher education department officials, TANSCHE is working on 12 such policies like policy on outcome-based education, infrastructure and equipment maintenance, among others, to improve the quality of HEIs and ensure accountability. The remaining 10 policies will be released in the next few months. Sources said TN also plans to link the release of a certain percentage of monetary grants to the HEIs on the basis of their adherence to these policies. The adherence to the policies will also be taken into account during the State Institutional Ranking Framework (SIRF) ranking.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 hours ago
- Indian Express
UGC directs universities to stop offering healthcare, allied programmes in ODL, online mode from July 2025
The University Grants Commission (UGC) has directed the higher education institutions (HEIs) to discontinue offering programmes in healthcare and allied disciplines under the National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions (NCAHP) Act, 2021, through Open and Distance Learning (ODL) or online mode from the academic session beginning July-August 2025. The decision, taken at the UGC's 592nd meeting on July 23, 2025, follows the recommendations of the 24th Distance Education Bureau Working Group meeting held on April 22, 2025. The ban applies to specialisations including Psychology, Microbiology, Food and Nutrition Science, Biotechnology, Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics. According to the directive, no colleges and universities will be permitted to offer such programmes in ODL or online mode from the 2025-26 session. Institutions that have already received recognition to run these programmes will see it withdrawn by the UGC. In cases where a programme offers multiple specialisations, such as a bachelor of arts degree with majors in subjects like English, Hindi, Punjabi, economics, history, mathematics, public administration, philosoply, political science, statistics, human rights and duties, Sanskrit, psychology, geography, sociology or women studies, only the healthcare-related specialisation will be withdrawn. The UGC has also instructed HEIs not to admit students into these programmes for the July-August 2025 session onwards. All stakeholders have been advised to strictly comply with the decision. Earlier, the higher education regulator issued a fresh public advisory cautioning students and HEIs against entering into unrecognised collaborations with foreign educational providers. The University Grants Commission (UGC) reiterated that any degree or diploma awarded through such arrangements will be considered invalid in India and treated as unrecognised by the Commission. As per UGC regulations, all foreign collaborations must receive explicit approval under the 2022 and 2023 frameworks governing joint degrees, dual degrees, and the setting up of foreign campuses in India. The latest clarification builds on a previous notice issued on December 12, 2023, which raised concerns over unapproved tie-ups between Indian HEIs and foreign institutions. Despite earlier warnings, the UGC noted that several colleges and EdTech platforms continue to offer joint or online degree and diploma programmes with foreign entities that lack its recognition.
Indian Express
14 hours ago
- Indian Express
IIT Roorkee data breach: A wake-up call for higher education institutions
By Paakhhi Garg and Nachiketa Mittal In an alarming data breach, the sensitive personal data of around 30,000 students and alumni of IIT Roorkee was reportedly found to have been compromised. The leaked database reportedly contains their mobile numbers, caste, financial status, email addresses, photographs and other data. IIT-R's administrative systems seem to have turned a blind eye to cyber safety standards. It could happen to any other higher education institution (HEI). In many cases, it may already have happened, with us remaining oblivious — exposing people to the threat of cybercrimes despite no negligence on their part. Lakhs of students, parents and employees share sensitive personal data with HEIs. However, do HEIs have cyber security standards and the requisite infrastructure, training and institutional accountability measures in place? The IIT-R episode must be a clarion call to all HEIs in the country to be steadfast in protecting data. This is no longer a choice as the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 has both the teeth and the legislative intent to penalise non-compliant institutions. Critical vulnerabilities have been allowed to grow because of the notion that academic prominence somehow correlates with digital security. The IIT-R breach was caused by a fundamental breakdown in data security. Our HEIs must take note of it. That's why a three-pronged strategy is required. First, legal safeguards. Strict compliance with legal standards must be the cornerstone of any effective cybersecurity plan. With laws like the Information Technology Act, 2000, Sensitive Personal Data or Information (SPDI) Rules, 2011 and now the DPDP Act, India has achieved significant progress. This legislation requires organisations, who are referred to as 'data fiduciaries' or 'bodies corporate' to employ 'reasonable security safeguards' to secure personal/sensitive data. This implies many things for HEIs, including that institutions must be transparent about the what, why and how of the data. All this information has to be shared in the form of a clear privacy notice and policy for external users and internal staff respectively. The HEIs must obtain explicit consent from all users whose data they are collecting and store only the data necessary for their purpose. Under the Information Technology Act, a breach must be reported to CERT-In within six hours. However, the IIT-Roorkee event shows a notable failure in this area, with a third party allegedly having found the vulnerability. Ideally, the law will hold the institution financially accountable for this 'breach' or 'contravention' in the absence of 'reasonable security practice', as stated in SPDI Rules and the IT Act respectively, with penalties. Second, technical a solid technological basis, legal compliance is pointless. The IIT-R event has exposed an essential digital hygiene breakdown. A practical approach must be much more than a firewall and antivirus program. All vital systems, such as student portals, administration databases and financial records, ought to require multi-factor authentication. To further reduce the possibility of internal data breaches, role-based access control should guarantee that employees only have access to the limited data. To monitor traffic and stop illicit activity, HEIs need to use advanced network security measures, such as modern firewalls and intrusion detection/prevention systems. Every device should have endpoint detection and response software installed to offer an extra line of defence against malware and zero-day attacks. All sensitive data, whether stored on servers ('at rest') or transmitted across networks ('in transit'), must be encrypted. This simple measure can render stolen data useless to attackers even if they manage to exfiltrate it. The practice of waiting for a breach to be discovered by an external party is a grave dereliction of duty. Institutions must conduct frequent, independent penetration testing to proactively find and address vulnerabilities. An incident response plan is a playbook for what to do before, during and after a cybersecurity incident. It should outline roles and responsibilities, communication strategies and technical steps to contain and recover from the breach. Finally, organisational safeguards. Even the most sophisticated technology can only be as effective as the people and procedures that use it. A robust organisational structure is possibly the most important component of the cybersecurity jigsaw. Every HEI must establish a clear governance structure for cybersecurity. A dedicated data protection officer (DPO) who reports directly to senior leadership needs to be part of the team. Institutions must create and implement transparent rules for handling data, managing passwords, granting remote access and responding to incidents. Effective communication and frequent updates are also required. The human element is often the weakest link. All students, faculty and staff must receive mandated and continuous cybersecurity training from HEIs. Phishing simulators may be a valuable tool for raising awareness and testing. A harsh lesson about the high cost of negligence may be learned from the IIT-R event. All Indian HEIs should take the time to reflect and acknowledge that they can no longer claim to be purely academic institutions creating knowledge — they collect the sensitive personal data of lakhs of individuals including minors, and hence are clearly responsible under the law for creating a digital infrastructure and security system for data protection. This law, the DPDP Act, will offer no immunity to HEIs when it comes to compliance. Chancellors, vice-chancellors, deans and institutional heads must act with urgency before we see a sequel. Garg is director, trainings, World Cyber Security Forum, and Mittal is registrar and professor of Law, NLU, Tripura
Hindustan Times
4 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Parl panel flags ANRF's limited focus; seeks parallel push for humanities research
A parliamentary panel, flagging the Anusandhan National Research Foundation's (ANRF) limited focus on science, technology, agriculture, and health, on Monday recommended the Centre to launch a parallel initiative to promote humanities and social sciences research in higher education and to allocate a portion of Higher Education Financing Agency (HEFA) funds specifically for research. The committee has criticised the ministry for ignoring its recommendations on tailored teacher training. (Representative file photo) Set up in 2023 in line with National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, ANRF promotes research, innovation and entrepreneurship across various fields of science, engineering, and technology. Launched in 2017, HEFA funds infrastructure and research in higher educational institutions through loans. Parliamentary standing committee on education, women, children, youth and sports in its report on review of the government's response to its September 2023 recommendations on NEP implementation in higher education, stressed that its call for research support was meant to be broad-based, covering humanities and social sciences, which it said are vital to social, cultural, and economic progress. 'However, it is concerned by the ANRF's limited focus on science, technology, agriculture, and health technology…Therefore, the committee recommends a parallel initiative to support humanities and social sciences research in higher education.' Also Read:Blueprint for becoming a global knowledge power While ministry in its action taken response stated that around 2500 HEIs and 300 universities have established Research and Development (R&D) cells at their campuses and 14,518 Institution's Innovation Council (IICs) have been set up in 28 states and 9 UTs, the panel asked the ministry to provide a report on the progress made in universal establishment of R&D cells in all HEIs. While the education ministry said HEFA funds support research facilities and provides grants to 2500 higher education institutions (HEIs) through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), the panel reiterated its call to earmark a fixed share for research and innovation to ensure consistent funding. 'The ministry has unfortunately not acknowledged this recommendation in its response. The committee therefore, reiterates this recommendation,' the committee said in its latest report. The committee has criticised the ministry for ignoring its recommendations on tailored teacher training and incentives for those working in marginalised communities, as well as on research and innovation in this area. It reiterated that training materials should meet community-specific needs, incentives should be provided, and a dedicated centre be set up to conduct community-focused education research to guide policy, curriculum, and teacher training. The panel has called for 'synergized collaboration' between ministry and states for successful implementation of the NEP 2020. It also asked the ministry to develop a formal feedback mechanism for stakeholders on the Multi Entry and Multiple Exit (MEME) scheme and other NEP initiatives, and the creation of a central tracker to monitor the policy's implementation in higher education.
