Massachusetts food banks worried about cuts to SNAP due to President Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill"
The president touted the bill's ability to significantly increase spending for boarder security, immigration enforcement and defense. It also extends the 2017 tax cuts from the president's first term and increases the child tax credit while ending tax on tips and overtime pay.
Food banks bracing for increased demand
During a speech Thursday afternoon at the Iowa State Fair, President Trump noted the bill will cut government spending by $1.5 trillion over the next decade. But local food banks said significant cuts to SNAP had them bracing for increased demand.
"This whole section behind you would be filled with replenishments," said Daniel's Table Executive Director Sandra Montesino. The organization has helped the food insecure for nearly a decade in and around Framingham.
Montesino said donations have dropped 16% recently, given the higher costs of food.
"It's way down. Donations have been really down. These cuts are going to have a significant impact on Daniel's Table," said Montesino.
Cuts to Medicaid and SNAP
The concern is that the president's budget bill will make steep cuts to safety net programs like SNAP and Medicaid. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates Medicaid could be cut by $930 billion with nearly 12 million people at risk of losing health care.
Erin McAleer is the CEO of Project Bread and said the number of people considered food insecure jumped during the pandemic and has remained high ever since.
"This [bill] is going to have huge consequences for people in our state who are already struggling to get by," McAleer said. "Frankly, I am still a little shocked it passed by how unpopular it was and how much it is going to hurt working families. But mostly just devastated that this is where we are."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Despite all the drama, trade uncertainty hasn't really hurt economic growth, Goldman Sachs says
President Donald Trump's policies may have disrupted trade, but not global economic activity. Investment, employment, and spending remain strong despite initial fears of a slowdown, wrote Goldman Sachs. Growth forecasts for this year have actually improved from earlier, more pessimistic calls. President Donald Trump's new policies may be upending the global trade order, but so far, they're not hitting the economy hard, wrote Goldman Sachs analysts. "There are very few signs that uncertainty is taking a toll on activity," analysts at Goldman Sachs wrote in a Thursday note. Even though the analysts had expected Trump's second term to slow economic activity, the numbers tell a different story. Since late 2024, investment, factory hiring, consumer spending, and broader economic activity have all stayed resilient across major developed and emerging markets. In fact, growth forecasts for both the second quarter and this full year have actually improved from earlier, more pessimistic calls. The analysts pointed out that in most economies, trade-exposed investment accounts for a small share of GDP, so the impact may just be "too small to see." New factory investment, especially in emerging markets, has dipped, but this accounts for just 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points of GDP in major economies. The analysts also wrote that uncertainty usually bites hardest when financial conditions tighten. But global liquidity has actually improved since the start of the year, making it easier for businesses to borrow money and invest. Meanwhile, activity and investment expectations that dipped in April — which coincided with Trump's "Liberation Day" announcement — have already bounced back on improved tariff news. "As such, while we continue to expect that tariffs will slow activity later this year, we expect this will be mostly driven by the direct impacts of tariffs rather than uncertainty around trade policy," they added. Goldman's report came as the US posted better-than-expected employment data in June. The economy added 147,000 jobs, and unemployment fell from 4.2% to 4.1%. Investor sentiment is upbeat, with the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq at record highs. To be sure, trade policy uncertainty remains high by historical standards, with Goldman's uncertainty index spiking after Trump's election. But that uncertainty has eased in recent months as Trump negotiates new trade deals. Some businesses did rush to ship goods to the US ahead of potential tariffs, a phenomenon known as "front-loading," which may have helped mask some issues. But even after controlling for that, Goldman analysts found little evidence of an "uncertainty drag" on growth. There were also few differences between economic activities in countries that did and didn't boost exports to the US this spring. "The uncertainty drag, therefore, appears smaller than feared," they wrote. Read the original article on Business Insider
New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: President to Sign Sweeping Domestic Policy Bill Into Law
The United States has held eight migrants at a military base in Djibouti while court cases played out. But an official said the Trump administration would now promptly send the men to South Sudan. The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the government to deport eight men who have spent more than a month held under guard on an American military base on Djibouti to South Sudan, granting a request from the Trump administration. An administration official said it would promptly send the men, who hail from countries around the world, to the war-torn nation. Neither the United States nor South Sudan has said what will happen to the men on their arrival. This was the second time the court has ruled in the case. Last month, in a broader ruling that was unsigned and offered no reasoning, the court paused a trial judge's order that had barred the administration from deporting migrants to countries other than their own unless they had a chance to argue that they would face torture. Lawyers for the eight men rushed back to the trial judge, who blocked their removal again. The administration then asked the justices to clarify that last month's order properly applied to the men, too. Thursday's Supreme Court order, which was unsigned but included two pages of reasoning, said that it did. In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, said the ruling could have grave consequences. 'What the government wants to do, concretely,' Justice Sotomayor wrote, 'is send the eight noncitizens it illegally removed from the United States from Djibouti to South Sudan, where they will be turned over to the local authorities without regard for the likelihood that they will face torture or death.' In May, the government loaded eight men onto a plane said to be headed to South Sudan, a violence-plagued African country where only one held citizenship. After Judge Brian E. Murphy of the U.S. District Court in Boston intervened, their flight landed instead in the East African nation of Djibouti. The men, who have all been convicted of serious crimes in the United States, have been detained at Camp Lemonnier, a military base, ever since. They spend almost all their time inside a modular, air-conditioned container that the military usually uses as a conference room, according to court filings. Under constant guard, they wear shackles around their ankles, except when showering, using the bathroom or meeting remotely with their lawyers, a member of their legal team has said. Before coming to the United States, they hailed from Vietnam, South Korea, Mexico, Laos, Cuba and Myanmar. Just one is from South Sudan. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, welcomed Thursday's ruling. 'These sickos will be in South Sudan by Independence Day,' she said. Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the migrants, said the ruling comes 'at the expense of the lives of eight men who are now subject to immediate removal to a war-torn country to which they have no ties.' In a court filing last month, the administration said it had received 'credible diplomatic assurances' from the government of South Sudan that the men would not be tortured. But Ms. Realmuto said she had no direct knowledge of those assurances and did not know what the South Sudanese government in Juba intended to do with the men after they landed. In a filing by the migrants' lawyers, an expert on South Sudan said it was likely that the men would by detained by the country's security forces and then experience 'torture, or conditions that amount to torture,' at their hands. The court's first involvement with the case came last month, when the justices first paused Judge Murphy's ruling that all migrants whom the government seeks to deport to countries other than their own must first be given a chance to show that they would face risk of torture. Within hours, lawyers for the eight men returned to Judge Murphy, asking him to continue blocking the deportations of the group. Judge Murphy, who was appointed by President Joseph R. Biden Jr., denied the motion as unnecessary. He said he had issued a separate ruling last month, different from the one the Supreme Court had paused, protecting the men in Djibouti from immediate removal. He added that Justice Sotomayor had made the same point in her dissent from the ruling, which Justices Kagan and Jackson joined. 'The district court's remedial orders are not properly before this court because the government has not appealed them,' she wrote. In Thursday's ruling, the majority rejected that distinction, paused both sets of rulings and allowed the deportations to South Sudan. Justice Kagan, who dissented previously, this time issued a concurring opinion. 'I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this court has stayed,' she wrote. Justice Sotomayor, in dissent, said the court's new order continued to give Judge Murphy inadequate guidance. 'Today's order not only excuses (once again) the government's undisguised contempt for the judiciary; it also leaves the district court without any guidance about how this litigation should proceed,' she wrote. 'Today's order,' she added, 'clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial.' Thursday's order was the latest in a series of rulings related to immigration decided by the justices in summary fashion on what critics call the court's shadow docket. Some early decisions insisted on due process — notice and an opportunity to be heard — for migrants before they are deported. More recent orders lifted protections for hundreds of thousands of people who had been granted temporary protected status or humanitarian parole, allowing them to be deported. And the rulings concerning so-called third-country deportations to places other than migrants' home nations appeared to give little weight to due process. The court's recent moves have been cheered by the Trump administration, which has been negotiating with countries around the world to get them to accept deportees to help speed its efforts to remove thousands of migrants. 'Fire up the deportation planes,' a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security said after the court's ruling on third-country deportations last month. Hamed Aleaziz contributed reporting.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Expert Who Predicted Tesla Stock Crash Reconsiders — Bitcoin and 3 More Factors To Watch
Crypto investor and analyst Tuur Demeester made a great call in August 2022: swap your Tesla shares for Bitcoin. Shortly after that call, Tesla took a massive slide and is only up by 12% since August 2022. Meanwhile, Bitcoin recovered from its 2022 lows and soared by more than 400%. Read Next: Find Out: However, his tune is starting to change. In a recent X post, Demeester pondered if now is a good opportunity to get back into Tesla stock. His chart compares how much Bitcoin you can buy with a single Tesla share. While the share price seems to present a buy-the-dip opportunity, there are a few key factors to consider before deciding if Tesla is a buy. Bitcoin's growth doesn't only play a role in Bitcoin vs. Tesla debates, but it also has a direct impact on Tesla's stock price. The EV maker has more than 11,000 Bitcoins and continues to grow its stockpile. That's well over $11 billion in Bitcoin. If the cryptocurrency gains more value and Tesla continues to build its position, Bitcoin will soon have a more sizable impact on Tesla's future price movements. Robotaxis are a key piece of Tesla's long-term bullish outlook. Tesla recently received the green light in Austin, Texas, according to Time, and its robotaxis have received mixed reviews. As the technology improves and becomes more accurate, lower prices will draw people away from services like Uber. While Waymo is the current leader in the United States, Tesla has a key advantage. The company is a widely recognized automaker, and many people buy Tesla vehicles just to drive them. Future vehicles will have a robotaxi component that lets Tesla owners earn money from their vehicles even when they aren't driving them. This type of network can grow rapidly and in a more cost-effective manner than Waymo. Tesla has Airbnb scaling potential with its robotaxi service, while Waymo isn't selling cars to the public, which makes it more expensive for them to expand operations. Humanoid robots are another long-term catalyst for Tesla investors. Optimus has made great strides and will be used in Tesla factories later this year, according to Business Insider. Tesla humanoid robots could be available for purchase as soon as 2026. These robots could potentially become revolutionary, must-own items for consumers and businesses. They may be able to perform household chores, heavy-duty jobs and other tasks. The humanoid robots haven't produced any tangible revenue yet, but they can become a big driver of future growth in the next 3-5 years. Most of Tesla's stock valuation depends on how investors feel about its future prospects. While robotaxis and humanoid robots are exciting, they mask the fact that Tesla's core electric vehicle business isn't doing well. BYD, Shenzhen-based EV brand, has been gobbling up Tesla's market share in Europe, and other Chinese EV makers are also competing for European drivers. Tesla has already found itself losing ground in a crowded Chinese EV market, making this recent development even worse. The political mismatch between Musk's stance and the typical Tesla customer's political tendencies makes matters even worse. Tesla has catered to people who want a more environmentally friendly driving solution than gas. It's a mostly liberal base that bought Tesla cars and sang high praises for Musk before he supported President Trump. Musk's stance has alienated Tesla's core audience, and liberal-leaning people outside of the United States have followed suit. Tesla sales plummeted in Germany when Musk endorsed a right-wing candidate, and it's possible that Tesla never recovers in Germany, according to Forbes. Musk is unlikely to completely bow out of politics, and that can further alienate him from the liberal customers who regularly purchased Tesla vehicles before he became more vocal. While robotaxis and humanoid robots could change the financial narrative, for now, prospects of a strong future are in the driver's seat for this Tesla stock rally. Any holes in that narrative may result in a deeper correction. More From GOBankingRates 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth This article originally appeared on Expert Who Predicted Tesla Stock Crash Reconsiders — Bitcoin and 3 More Factors To Watch
