
How you could be drinking counterfeit alcohol without knowing
Illicit alcohol traders are making a fortune selling knock-off liquor to unsuspecting and desperate patrons.
Euromonitor International, in partnership with Drinks Federation South Africa (DFSA), this week revealed the runaway popularity of the illicit alcohol trade.
Between traders prioritising profits and consumers choosing cheaper options, the country is missing out on just over R10 billion, excluding Value-Added Tax (VAT), on untaxed spirits alone.
Almost 20% of all alcohol
Euromonitor's most recent study, conducted over the last six months, was presented to industry leaders virtually on Wednesday.
To gauge how illicit alcohol was distributed and consumed, the global research firm surveyed the product's prevalence in retail and independent traders, as well as the habits and preferences of consumers.
Through desk research, store visits and surveys across multiple geographic and income demographics, Euromonitor illustrated how the illicit trade makes up 18% of the country's overall alcohol market.
This 18% amounts to the consumption of 773000 hectolitres — or 77 million litres a year— with an estimated price tag of R25 billion.
'This is largely driven by counterfeit and illicit brands. This is because counterfeiting and illicit brands target premium spirits such as whiskey, as well as premium vodkas and gins,' stated Euromonitor International Project Manager Benjamin Rideout.
This translated into R16.5 billion in lost tax revenue, with South Africans' preference for white and dark spirits contributing to roughly R10 billion of the tax shortfall.
'If these drinks were taxed correctly and sold legitimately, this is what the tax value would be,' explained Rideout.
Increasing fiscal loss
Euromonitor stated that illicit traders were purchasing and manufacturing counterfeit labelling and packaging at an 'industrial scale'.
While the main driver of lost tax revenue was counterfeit and illicit brands, which are replica and unbranded products, smuggling and tax leakage were the next highest causes.
Smuggling of legitimate products is done via land, air or sea, while tax leakage was classified as compliant liquor that is intentionally misclassified or underdeclared.
Having conducted the same study in 2017 and 2020, Rideout said the illicit alcohol trade in South Africa had grown in volume consumed by 55% in the last seven years.
'It has almost doubled in value terms, which is a function of inflation in general. Finally, the fiscal loss has increased by 157%,'
Rideout said illicit alcohol was predominant in informal channels, but there was a growing trend of availability in retail and online sales.
'What this means is that the illicit market has established a distribution network, and we know this to be the case, particularly in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal.
'On average, illegal alcohol is 37% cheaper than legal alcohol per litre. In some cases, this discount can go as high as 70%, depending on the category and the brand,' he stated.
'Crime against the state'
Euromonitor noted that the financial benefits to traders and buyers were given greater consideration than the potential health risks considered by either party.
Convenor of the National Liquor Traders Council Lucky Ntimane said it was an outlets' responsibility to ensure they maintained high standards or risk ruining their reputations.
'We also know the catch of illicit alcohol is the price, so people don't really ask a lot of questions. The essence of illicit and counterfeit alcohol is that it is cheaper.
'However, a person who sells counterfeit, knowingly or unknowingly, they run the risk of their business not being supported,' Ntimane told The Citizen.
Traders caught selling illicit alcohol can be subject to a fine of up to R500 000 or between one and three years in prison, depending on the volumes sold.
Rideout stated that policing challenges included 'resource allocation and state capacity,' while Ntimane suggested a firmer hand needed to be taken with illegal traders.
'Because illicit and counterfeit alcohol robs the state of an income, maybe it should be classified as a crime against the state.
In that way, the government can clamp down hard on these unscrupulous dealers, but also harsher sentences can be meted out,' concluded Ntimane.
NOW READ: Budget speech: Here's how much more you'll have to pay for alcohol and cigarettes
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
Rhino horn trafficking: Conservationist John Hume among six accused in Pretoria court
Well-known nature conservationist John Hume, 83, is among six people accused of running a rhino horn smuggling syndicate. The accused, Hume, Clive Melville, Izak Du Toit, Elizabeth van Niekerk, Mattheus Poggenpoel, and Johannes Hennop appeared in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court on Tuesday. According to the National Prosecuting Authority, Hume was granted R100,000 bail. "Melville and van Niekerk were each granted R10,000 bail while du Toit, Poggenpoel and Hennop were granted R20,000 bail," said NPA spokesperson, Lumka Mahanjana. Mahanjana explained that the six face 55 charges for racketeering, fraud, contravention of the National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act (NAMBA), contravention of Riotous Assemblies Act, theft and money laundering. She said between 2017 and 2024, the accused allegedly operated an international rhino horn trafficking syndicate and defrauded the Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment (DFFE). "They allegedly obtained permits to trade rhino horn locally, while intending to channel the horns into illegal international markets in Southeast Asia. The fraudulent scheme is estimated to involve 964 rhino horns valued at R250 million," Mahanjana stated. After intensive investigations by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation's (DPCI) Wildlife Trafficking Section of the Serious Organised Crime Investigation Unit, based at national headquarters, the six handed themselves over at the Pretoria Central Police Station on August 19, 2025, where they were formally arrested. Former founder and owner of the Platinum Rhino Conservation Enterprise, John Hume, transport maintenance manager, Clive John Mervan Melville, practising attorney, Izak Hermanus Du Toit, Director of a non-profit organisation, Elizabeth Catharina Van Niekerk, insurance broker and part-time farmer, Mattheus Hendrikus Wessels Poggenpoel, game reserve manager, Johannes Abraham Hennop appeared in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court on Tuesday. Image: NPA Mahanjana said during bail proceedings, the accused asked to be released on bail because they were not flight risks. "They further stated that they had cooperated with the police investigations. Through their affidavits, Melville disclosed to the court that he had 2019 previous conviction for fraud and being in possession and transportation of rhino horns which he was sentenced to pay a fine," she said. Poggenpoel also disclosed to the court that he had a 2009 previous conviction of possession of a rhino horn where he paid an admission of guilt fee of R2500. "Poggenpoel also disclosed that he has a pending case that will be appearing on September 17 at Winburg Magistrates' Court because during the visit to his residence, the investigation team found ammunition that was not locked away in a safe and supposedly scheduled medicine without a permit," the NPA said. "The state, Advocate Patsy Jacobs read into the record an affidavit by the investigating officer Edward Du Plessis, confirming that the State did not oppose bail as the accused were not flight risks, their addresses had been verified, and they had cooperated with investigators. The State, however, requested bail conditions," Mahanjana said. All accused must surrender their passports and may not apply for new travel documents while the matter is pending. They must report to their nearest police station once a week. They may not interfere with investigations, tamper with evidence, or influence witnesses. They must not commit any offences while on bail. The matter was postponed to December 9 for further investigations. [email protected] IOL

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Rhino horn trafficking: Conservationist John Hume among six accused in Pretoria court
The six accused of being involved in a rhino trafficking syndicate. Image: NPA Well-known nature conservationist John Hume, 83, is among six people accused of running a rhino horn smuggling syndicate. The accused, Hume, Clive Melville, Izak Du Toit, Elizabeth van Niekerk, Mattheus Poggenpoel, and Johannes Hennop appeared in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court on Tuesday. According to the National Prosecuting Authority, Hume was granted R100,000 bail. "Melville and van Niekerk were each granted R10,000 bail while du Toit, Poggenpoel and Hennop were granted R20,000 bail," said NPA spokesperson, Lumka Mahanjana. Mahanjana explained that the six face 55 charges for racketeering, fraud, contravention of the National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act (NAMBA), contravention of Riotous Assemblies Act, theft and money laundering. She said between 2017 and 2024, the accused allegedly operated an international rhino horn trafficking syndicate and defrauded the Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment (DFFE). "They allegedly obtained permits to trade rhino horn locally, while intending to channel the horns into illegal international markets in Southeast Asia. The fraudulent scheme is estimated to involve 964 rhino horns valued at R250 million," Mahanjana stated. After intensive investigations by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation's (DPCI) Wildlife Trafficking Section of the Serious Organised Crime Investigation Unit, based at national headquarters, the six handed themselves over at the Pretoria Central Police Station on August 19, 2025, where they were formally arrested. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Former founder and owner of the Platinum Rhino Conservation Enterprise, John Hume, transport maintenance manager, Clive John Mervan Melville, practising attorney, Izak Hermanus Du Toit, Director of a non-profit organisation, Elizabeth Catharina Van Niekerk, insurance broker and part-time farmer, Mattheus Hendrikus Wessels Poggenpoel, game reserve manager, Johannes Abraham Hennop appeared in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court on Tuesday. Image: NPA Mahanjana said during bail proceedings, the accused asked to be released on bail because they were not flight risks. "They further stated that they had cooperated with the police investigations. Through their affidavits, Melville disclosed to the court that he had 2019 previous conviction for fraud and being in possession and transportation of rhino horns which he was sentenced to pay a fine," she said. Poggenpoel also disclosed to the court that he had a 2009 previous conviction of possession of a rhino horn where he paid an admission of guilt fee of R2500. "Poggenpoel also disclosed that he has a pending case that will be appearing on September 17 at Winburg Magistrates' Court because during the visit to his residence, the investigation team found ammunition that was not locked away in a safe and supposedly scheduled medicine without a permit," the NPA said. "The state, Advocate Patsy Jacobs read into the record an affidavit by the investigating officer Edward Du Plessis, confirming that the State did not oppose bail as the accused were not flight risks, their addresses had been verified, and they had cooperated with investigators. The State, however, requested bail conditions," Mahanjana said.


The Citizen
10 hours ago
- The Citizen
Treasury shuts door on ‘honest mistakes' as tax penalty rules tighten
Treasury publishes proposals to tighten tax laws. National Treasury published several legislative amendments over the weekend that will give effect to tax announcements made in the 2025 Budget, which was eventually presented to Parliament for the third time in May. One rather controversial amendment relates to taxpayers' reliance on the scope of a 'bona fide inadvertent error' to escape paying huge understatement penalties. The amendments also pave the way for real-time reporting of value added tax (Vat) and an extension of the voluntary disclosure program to include defaults under the Customs and Excise Act. Treasury says in a statement it also intends to reduce the threshold for the ring-fencing of assessed losses to prevent abuse and promote fairness. This is to ensure that losses from non-commercial trades cannot be used to evade paying taxes. Other changes include the removal of the current tax-free limit on imported goods, which means that low-value imports will become subject to Vat. Read more Cybersecurity an 'economic and safety imperative' ALSO READ: Sars makes changes to eFiling for easy use It is also proposed that a senior official from the South African Revenue Service (Sars) may conduct unannounced inspections of business premises when a taxpayer applies for a tax registration. Joon Chong, tax partner at Webber Wentzel, says in terms of the proposed amendment to understatement penalties, the remission of a penalty will only be available for substantial understatement, as it will now be 'explicitly' linked with a substantial understatement. The triggers for understatement penalties include failing to submit a tax return, omissions from a return, an incorrect statement in the return, not paying the correct amount of tax, or being involved in an 'impermissible avoidance arrangement'. According to the Sars guide, the actions or inactions of these triggers must result in prejudice to Sars or the fiscus for an understatement to arise. ALSO READ: Unjustified debt collection measures cause unnecessary taxpayer distress The understatement table: Chong says if the amendment is accepted as is, Sars will be a lot 'tougher on taxpayers.' 'It will be necessary for taxpayers to get detailed and considered tax opinions for any risky tax positions they adopt.' Nico Theron, founder of Unicus Tax Specialists, says as he reads the amendment, the intention is to remove 'bona fide inadvertent error' as the 'gatekeeper' and instead include it as a remittance ground, but only for penalties where there is a substantial understatement. Theoretically, this limits taxpayers' ability to rely on 'bona fide inadvertent error,' he adds. ALSO READ: Estimated assessments: Sars's new 'cash-cow-grabbing' norm? There have been concerns that taxpayers make themselves guilty of 'opinion shopping'. Currently, Sars must remit an understatement penalty if a taxpayer relied on the advice from a legal or tax expert. In some instances, the advice has been 'questionable'. 'It is going to make disputes on understatement penalties more difficult to get them remitted. In terms of the proposed amendment, there will only be one understatement penalty that can be remitted and that is for a substantial understatement.' All the other penalties are now exposed, regardless of whether it was a 'bona fide inadvertent error' or not, says Theron. ALSO READ: SA losing nearly R30bn to illicit cigarettes as Sars tools face delays, says Godongwana New VDP rules Chong adds that the introduction of rules for voluntary disclosure of defaults under the Customs and Excise Act must be welcomed. The Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP) rules were introduced in terms of the Tax Administration Act that did not apply to the Customs Act. Now, it will be possible to apply for relief under the separate rules proposed under the Customs Act itself. Successful applicants may receive relief from understatement penalties, administrative penalties, and even criminal prosecution – provided the disclosure is both valid and complete. ALSO READ: Vat vendors: Be aware of the different types of tax assessments Vat modernisation Treasury has also published amendments to the Vat Act to support the Vat modernisation project. 'The project forms part of a broader effort to transform tax processes, improve customer service and engagement, reduce the Vat gap, and streamline tax administration for Vat traders, businesses, and Sars,' Treasury said in its statement over the weekend. Chong says the modernisation project is aimed at greater transparency and to simplify compliance. 'It is meant to reduce errors, improve administrative efficiency, and, I assume, to improve collections as well.' The deadline for public comments on the range of proposed amendments in the Taxation Laws Amendment Bill as well as the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill is 12 September 2025. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.