Trump needing a distraction, demands Cleveland revert to old name
Epstein was a convicted child sex offender who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy to traffic minors for sex. Trump campaigned on releasing the so-called 'Epstein files,' or 'Epstein client list,' but he has hedged on that promise. This has displeased those who believe that powerful forces within the government are suppressing information. On this subject, some throaty influencers are rather sore.
Let us dispense with the latest invented outrage – the names of certain sports teams – so we can get back to Epstein.
'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' Trump posted on Truth Social. "There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past.
'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!'
More: Cleveland Guardians respond to Trump's post about restoring former team name
My friend Jim Underwood grew up in D.C. projects in the 1950s and '60s. He matriculated to Ohio Dominican College (now U), where he became (and remains) the all-time leading scorer and rebounder in the history of the basketball program. After a stint playing pro ball, he taught English in the Columbus City Schools system.
Underwood understands that 'Redskins' is a racial slur but, like many folks who grew up in his time and place, he once clung to the old, politically incorrect nickname when the Washington Football Team became the Commanders. But that has changed.
'It was a part of our childhood we were trying to hold on to,' Underwood said. 'Now, I'm dead set against (Redskins) and all for Commanders. In my old neighborhood, we hate Trump more than the people who changed the name to Commanders. And you can quote me on that. Hail to the Commanders! Hail victory!'
This cannot be considered a shocking response, not if you look at the president's current approval ratings. On the other side of things, there are certainly people out there who wish to embrace the racial slur as an anti-woke statement of sorts. These folks should visit Underwood's old neighborhood and test out any number of racial slurs to combat anti-wokeness. A serious clamoring will ensue.
My lawyer, Randy Kilbride, did most of his growing up in suburban Cleveland in the 1970s and '80s. He was a huge baseball fan and found it easy to switch from 'Indians' to 'Guardians' because to him, one of those was offensive.
Randy lost a battle with cancer in February. At a memorial service earlier this month, his brother, Terry, stepped up to say a few words and he brought up the 'Indians.' He was corrected – as Randy would have wished – and said that he couldn't help it because he grew up an Indians fan. It's like growing up in D.C. and being a Redskins fan, right? Terry apologized and committed himself to retooling his brain to say, 'Guardians,' as he is a man of passion and common sense.
Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Chief Wahoo was a cruel caricature of an entire race, and Cleveland is better for his riddance. As far as heritage and prestige is being systematically taken away, this is absolutely true. It started with white people taking away all the Native Americans' land. It continues today:
ICT, a nonprofit news organization focused on Indigenous issues, cited a recent report that said the 'Trump administration's proposed freeze on federal grants would cut $2.45 billion in funding to Native communities for health, law enforcement, education and key social services.' ... The cuts, 'would violate treaty obligations to tribal nations and impact nearly every tribe across the United States.'
Social truth. Wahoo!
Now, out with the Epstein files.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
'They Are Next': Trump Sends Chilling Warning To Jimmy Kimmel, Other Hosts
President Donald Trump on Wednesday fired another salvo against late-night TV hosts Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon as well as radio icon Howard Stern, saying they could soon follow in the footsteps of 'Late Show' host Stephen Colbert, who was canceled last month by CBS. 'Colbert has no talent,' he said. 'Fallon has no talent. Kimmel has no talent. They're next. They're gonna be going.' Colbert's show was canceled as CBS' parent company, Paramount, attempted to complete a merger that required federal approval. The company also paid Trump $16 million to settle a lawsuit that most legal experts believed was without merit. Critics said the company was trying to win Trump's favor to help the deal pass FCC muster. It was approved shortly after Colbert was canceled, despite being the highest-rated late-night show. CBS said Colbert was canceled because his show was losing money, with some reports claiming the show was losing between $40 million and $50 million a year ― a number Colbert has seemed skeptical of during his evening monologues. Trump predicted the other shows would follow in Colbert's footsteps. 'I hear they're gonna be going,' he said, without elaborating on where he heard that. 'I don't know, but I would imagine, because... Colbert has better ratings than Kimmel or Fallon.' A reporter in the room also said that Stern 'announced' that he was 'parting ways' with SiriusXM. That hasn't happened. However, the US Sun reported that Sirius would cancel Stern when his contract expires at the end of this year. That report has not yet been verified. Trump was a frequent guest on Stern's show years ago, but clips from those broadcasts frequently resurface and embarrass the president. Just last month, a 2006 clip went viral in which Trump said he had no real 'age limit' for dating. 'I don't want to be like Congressman Foley, with, you know, 12-year-olds,' he said, referring to a GOP lawmaker who was forced to step down in 2006 after he sent lewd messages to young male congressional pages. The clip resurfaced as Trump was trying to distance himself from late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who was once a close friend. Trump on Wednesday said he 'hasn't heard' Stern's name in a while. 'I used to do his show. We used to have fun,' he said, then added that Stern's show 'went down' when he endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in 2016. Trump has spent years railing against late-night shows and hosts that make fun of him, attacking them and threatening their corporate parents. After watching Seth Meyers in January, he called the host 'dumb and untalented' and 'merely a slot filler for the Scum that runs Comcast.' Then he took aim at the company itself. 'These are not shows or entertainment, they are simply political hits, 100% of the time, to me and the Republican Party,' Trump said. 'Comcast should pay a BIG price for this!' Trump seems to have a special degree of hatred for Kimmel. During his first term, Trump reportedly tried to have Kimmel censored.
Boston Globe
2 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ontario premier says he doesn't trust Trump and warns the US president could reopen trade pact
The new tariff, which took effect on Friday after the two countries failed to hit an Aug. 1 deadline to secure a new trade agreement, applies only to goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement that Trump negotiated during his first term. Advertisement Trump previously hailed the agreement as 'the fairest, most balanced and beneficial trade agreement we have ever signed. ' Carney has said about 85% of trade with the U.S. remains tariff-free because of USMCA. Ford said Trump likely won't wait for the scheduled review of the agreement next year. 'He's not waiting until 2026. At any given time, President Trump — not that he even follows the rules — he can pull the carpet out from underneath us,' Ford told reporters in Toronto Wednesday. 'I'm going to ask the people, do you trust President Trump? I don't.' Carney told a press conference on Tuesday that he has not talked to Trump in recent days but would speak with him 'when it makes sense.' Sector-specific tariffs on Canada, like the 50% duty on steel, aluminum and copper, remain in place. Advertisement Carney also suggested he may lift counter-tariffs if that helps Canada in the ongoing trade dispute.
CBS News
4 minutes ago
- CBS News
Higher U.S. tariffs officially in effect on dozens of nations
Washington — President Trump officially began levying higher import taxes on dozens of countries Thursday, just as the economic fallout of his months-long tariff threats was beginning to create visible damage to the U.S. economy. The White House said that starting just after midnight EDT, goods from more than 60 countries and the European Union began facing tariff rates of 10% or higher. Products from the European Union, Japan and South Korea are being taxed at 15%, while imports from Taiwan, Vietnam and Bangladesh are being taxed at 20%. Mr. Trump also expects places such as the EU, Japan and South Korea to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. He immediately took to his Truth Social platform to hail the levies, saying, "IT'S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!" About an hour before that, he posted, "RECIPROCAL TARIFFS TAKE EFFECT AT MIDNIGHT TONIGHT! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, LARGELY FROM COUNTRIES THAT HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR MANY YEARS, LAUGHING ALL THE WAY, WILL START FLOWING INTO THE USA. THE ONLY THING THAT CAN STOP AMERICA'S GREATNESS WOULD BE A RADICAL LEFT COURT THAT WANTS TO SEE OUR COUNTRY FAIL!" "I think the growth is going to be unprecedented," Trump said Wednesday afternoon. He added that the U.S. was "taking in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs," but he couldn't provide a specific figure for revenues because "we don't even know what the final number is" regarding tariff rates. Despite the uncertainty, the Trump White House is confident that the onset of his broad tariffs will provide clarity about the path of the world's largest economy. Now that companies understand the direction the U.S. is headed, the administration believes they can ramp up new investments and jump-start hiring in ways that can rebalance the U.S. economy as a manufacturing power. But so far, there are signs of self-inflicted wounds to America as companies and consumers alike brace for the impact of new taxes. What the data has shown is a U.S. economy that changed in April with Trump's initial rollout of tariffs, an event that led to market drama, a negotiating period and Trump's ultimate decision to start his universal tariffs on Thursday. After April, economic reports show that hiring began to stall, inflationary pressures crept upward and home values in key markets started to decline, said John Silvia, CEO of Dynamic Economic Strategy. "A less productive economy requires fewer workers," Silvia said in an analysis note. "But there is more, the higher tariff prices lower workers' real wages. The economy has become less productive, and firms cannot pay the same real wages as before. Actions have consequences." Even then, the ultimate transformations of the tariffs are unknown and could play out over months, if not years. Many economists say the risk is that the American economy is steadily eroded rather than collapsing instantly. "We all want it to be made for television where it's this explosion - it's not like that," said Brad Jensen, a professor at Georgetown University. "It's going to be fine sand in the gears and slow things down." Trump has promoted the tariffs as a way to reduce the persistent trade deficit. But importers sought to avoid the taxes by importing more goods before the taxes went into effect. As a result, the $582.7 billion trade imbalance for the first half of the year was 38% higher than in 2024. Total construction spending has dropped 2.9% over the past year, and the factory jobs promised by Trump have so far resulted in job losses. The lead-up to Thursday fit the slapdash nature of Trump's tariffs, which have been variously rolled out, walked back, delayed, increased, imposed by letter and frantically renegotiated. The process has been so muddled that officials for key trade partners were unclear at the start of the week whether the tariffs would begin Thursday or Friday. The language of the July 31 order to delay the start of tariffs from Aug. 1 said the higher tax rates would start in seven days. On Wednesday morning, Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, was asked if the new tariffs began at midnight Thursday, and he said reporters should check with the U.S. Trade Representative's Office. Trump on Wednesday announced additional 25% tariffs to be imposed on India for its buying of Russian oil, bringing their total import taxes to 50%. He has said that import taxes are still coming on pharmaceutical drugs and announced 100% tariffs on computer chips, meaning the U.S. economy could remain in a place of suspended animation as it awaits the impact. The president's use of a 1977 law to declare an economic emergency to impose the tariffs is also under challenge. The impending ruling from last week's hearing before a U.S. appeals court could cause Trump to find other legal justifications if judges say he exceeded his authority. Even people who worked with Trump during his first term are skeptical that things will go smoothly for the economy, such as Paul Ryan, the former Republican House speaker, who has emerged as a Trump critic. "There's no sort of rationale for this other than the president wanting to raise tariffs based upon his whims, his opinions," Ryan told CNBC on Wednesday. "I think choppy waters are ahead because I think they're going to have some legal challenges." Still, the stock market has been solid during the recent tariff drama, with the S&P 500 index climbing more than 25% from its April low. The market's rebound and the income tax cuts in Trump's tax and spending measures signed into law on July 4 have given the White House confidence that economic growth is bound to accelerate in the coming months. As of now, Trump still foresees an economic boom while the rest of the world and American voters wait nervously. "There's one person who can afford to be cavalier about the uncertainty that he's creating, and that's Donald Trump," said Rachel West, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation who worked in the Biden White House on labor policy. "The rest of Americans are already paying the price for that uncertainty." (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.) 8/7/2025 12:02:21 AM (GMT -4:00)
