NC Sen. Thom Tillis' isn't running for 3rd term. What Trump, others are saying
And it drew a sharp reaction from President Donald Trump: 'Great News! 'Senator' Thom Tillis will not be seeking reelection.'
The day before, the Republican president had threatened to find a primary-election challenger to Tillis — a former speaker of the state House — over his opposition to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' The Huntersville resident argued the bill would hurt hospitals and rural North Carolinians with its Medicaid cuts.
On his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump posted Saturday night saying he was already planning to meet with possible candidates in the weeks ahead to challenge Tillis for the 2026 midterms.
'Thom Tillis is making a BIG MISTAKE for America, and the Wonderful People of North Carolina!' Trump wrote in another Truth Social post Saturday night.
The next morning, Tillis announced it was 'not a hard choice' to take a step back and focus on family.
Attention was already on the upcoming race for Tillis' Senate seat, which is sure to be an indicator of Trump's favorability among North Carolina voters.
Democrats are preparing to prioritize the campaign for the Republican-held seat in what is certain to be a costly midterm.
North Carolina is a swing state, but has not elected a Democrat to the Senate since 2008.
A Democratic political action committee, Senate Majority PAC, jumped on Tillis' announcement as an opportunity for change. The PAC's main objective is to win Senate races for Democratic candidates.
'Democrats were poised to win in North Carolina whether Thom Tillis' name was on the ballot in November 2026 or not. But his early retirement proves there is no space within the Republican party to dissent over taking health care away from 11.8 million people by destroying Medicaid and raising costs,' a spokesperson for the PAC, Lauren French, said in a press release.
However, the National Republican Senatorial Committee's chairman, Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, said in a press release that after more than a decade of GOP representation in the Senate, North Carolina Republicans' hold on Tillis' seat would not be going away. Trump also won the state in the past three presidential elections.
'That streak will continue in 2026 when North Carolinians elect a conservative leader committed to advancing an agenda of opportunity, prosperity, and security,' the press release said.
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, weighed in on X, saying that despite their political differences, he supported Tillis in voting against the 'big beautiful bill.'
'The Republican Party today is a cult. Either you do as Trump wants, or you're out,' Sanders said. 'Pathetic.'
Closer to home, Democratic Reps. Alma Adams of Charlotte and Deborah Ross of Raleigh both had positive things to say about Tillis, too.
Ross commended Tillis' time in the U.S. Senate and praised his decision to deny Trump's megabill as 'putting his commitment to the people of North Carolina above his loyalty to the leaders of the Republican Party.'
'It is imperative that our next senator is someone who will hold President Trump and his administration accountable,' her statement said.
Adams said she wanted to commend Tillis 'for his courage and commitment in doing the right thing for our country.'
His vote 'was a teachable moment to our youth about the importance of putting country before yourself,' she said.
North Carolina's former lieutenant governor, Republican Mark Robinson, was aligned with the MAGA wing of the GOP and often feuded with Tillis before losing the race for governor last year. Robinson responded to a post on X that said Tillis' decision to step down 'is the final nail in the coffin of the North Carolina Republican Party of years passed [sic].'
'I couldn't have said it better,' Robinson said.
North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson added on X that 'the time was right' for Tillis to step down. Trump's bill would be devastating to North Carolina, he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sherrod Brown officially launches U.S. Senate campaign
Sherrod Brown has launched his campaign for the U.S. Senate. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] On Monday, Brown announced that he was officially launching his 2026 Senate campaign, promising to advocate for workers and 'take on a rigged system that benefits corporations and billionaires at the expense of hardworking Ohioans.' TRENDING STORIES: 2 men hospitalized after boat crashes into beach breakwall What a new Ohio law means for students who bring their phones to school this year Officers investigating reported shooting in Vandalia neighborhood Brown served three terms in the U.S. Senate before being ousted last year by Republican Bernie Moreno. Brown will challenge Republican Jon Husted, Ohio's former Lieutenant Governor, who was appointed to the seat by Ohio Governor Mike DeWine after JD Vance was elected vice president in 2024. 'I didn't plan to run for office again, but when I see what's going on, I know I can do something about it for Ohio. That's why I'm running for Senate,' Brown said in a statement. 'Because even in these challenging times I still believe if you stand up for workers, treat people with respect and always fight for Ohio, you can actually make a difference." You can watch Brown's Campaign launch video here. News Center 7 will continue following this story. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Voices: What does Europe's ‘Z-Team' hope to get from its Trump showdown?
It is – and there's no way of sugaring this – a pathetic sight. Europe's leaders arrive in Washington DC as supplicants, virtually pleading with the Americans not to betray Ukraine. Half in shock (though it cannot have come as a surprise), half in denial, they cannot quite bring themselves to confront the fact that Donald Trump is not on their side – and not even a neutral mediator, but the active advocate of Vladimir Putin. As has been well observed, Trump has dropped his ambition to end the war in a day (a metaphorical day or otherwise), forgotten his demands for an immediate ceasefire, and there have been no 'severe consequences' stemming from Vladimir Putin's 'nyet' to the Trump peace plan, such as it was. Instead, we have a delegation of European leaders waiting in a side room at the White House while their friend and ally, Volodymyr Zelensky, is shaken down again by Trump. Let's call them the Z-Team. The Americans have switched sides (some might say 'again') and are now telling Zelensky to accept the settlement tabled by Putin in Alaska. Trump has gone back to being Putin's messenger, with the veiled threat that if Ukraine refuses to be dismembered, then America will cut off aid (again) and start trading with Russia. That is to say, the US will be doing precisely what Trump sanctioned India for only days ago – building the Russian war machine. In return Ukraine, what's left of it, is to be given a promise by Putin not to invade again (worthless) and an 'Article 5'-style security guarantee by Trump (also worthless). And yet the leaders sent to represent the old world order have been mostly well chosen, with some champion 'Trump-whisperers' among them. But it is they, not the US president, who should be in charge of determining the destiny of their own continent. Italy's hard-right prime minister Giorgia Meloni is an ideological soulmate of Trump, but sound on Ukraine. Keir Starmer has virtually nothing in common with Trump politically, but the president likes and respects him, and he has has long sought to act as a bridge between Europe and the United States. Much the same goes for Mark Rutte, head of Nato, who, in June – in an act of strategic self-emasculation – debased himself for the greater good, calling Trump 'daddy' and showering him with praise over Iran. Perhaps lesser known is Alexander Stubb, the golf-loving president of Finland who, while the pair played an impromptu round in Florida warned Trump about the danger of trusting Putin. Stubb can speak from the heart, as his nation knows what it is to be invaded and subjugated by a belligerent neighbour; after decades of non-alignment, the invasion of Ukraine in 2023 convinced it to join Nato. Chancellor Friedrich Merz brings German financial heft, while Emmanuel Macron is there because he has to be, as the de facto leader of the EU. Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, will be in the curious position of advocating for strongly pro-Ukraine Poland and the Baltic states, while knowing that Hungary's Viktor Orban is a virtual Russian 'spy in the cab' at EU meetings. It will be heartening to see this show of solidarity for Ukraine. But it should not have come to this. Europe should be determining its own borders, not Russia and America. It's demeaning, but that's not the main problem. It's dangerous. At its simplest, Trump is telling Zelensky and his European minders that he can have peace if he surrenders. That's not noble, nor honourable, nor practical. We may wonder how it came to this. There's more dark rumours about kompromat. Maybe that played some role. More likely is that Putin understood that, in the case of Trump, flattery will get you everywhere. Tell him he won the 2020 election 'by lots', and he'll give you anything you want – a job in the cabinet or large swathes of another country. Putin sees in Trump a man who doesn't understand the Russians, fatally so. Trump thinks that if he gets along with Putin and gets him interested in what he, Trump, is interested in – peace, money, deals – then everything will be fine: they can trust one another, and that that is all in America's interests. That's not how it works, as successive American administrations have found. The Russians aren't into personal diplomacy, much more into power. You cannot trust the Russians, and especially this one, who's blown every peace agreement he's ever signed and has described the collapse of the Soviet Union as the greatest geopolitical tragedy of the 20th century. He doesn't bother to discuss his world view. The Alaska summit really was appeasement – just as at Munich in 1938, the dictator has been given a reward for aggression, and in return he's offered a useless promise not to do it again. We know he will, sooner or later, even if he's polite enough to wait until Trump leaves office. He senses that the Americans – the people as well as their government – have turned isolationist. They will no more fight for Estonia or Poland or Britain than they would Ukraine. That world, the one that saw them in long, arduous struggles for 'freedom' in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq, is over. They don't want 'forever wars'. That's their prerogative. Putin is only doing what comes naturally to him – taking best advantage of this golden, historic opportunity of American moral and military retreat. It should not be like this, and it's Europe's own fault. In a better, alternative universe, today the American president would be flying to Europe as a lauded friend and observer of the final, formal stages of the Ukraine process brokered by the leadership of Europe. The Ukraine-Russia treaty would see Putin retreat to the lines prevailing in 2022, with an agreement to further talks on the status of Crimea and the eastern Donbas. Vienna would be an excellent venue for such an event – still outside Nato and neutral, and with better hotels and conference facilities than Alaska. With Europe's far larger economy, industrial might, technological edge and military potential, it should have been able to defend Ukraine, to give Zelensky the tools to finish the job. That Europe finds itself divided and dependent on an erratic American president is a shameful affair.
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
Force Design 2028 will expand Coast Guard's national security capabilities
Early on May 23, U.S. Coast Guard watchstanders at the Joint Harbor Operations Center in San Diego tracked a vessel crossing into U.S. waters off Southern California. A Maritime Safety and Security Team in the area intercepted the vessel. Assisted by USCGC Halibut, the Seattle-based small boat team detained 10 foreign nationals without authorization to enter the U.S. and transferred them to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Halfway across the country, USCGC Joseph Doyle had intercepted a boat with four Mexican men illegally fishing off Texas inside the U.S. exclusive economic zone. The catch included about 200 red snappers. The crew transferred the men to CBP on return to Coast Guard Station South Padre Island. The two operations marked the start of a busy summer season for the Coast Guard, which is tasked with safeguarding the nation's borders, facilitating commerce and supporting maritime safety. Since Jan. 21, its national security role has taken on greater focus as the Trump administration beefed up military forces along the U.S. land and maritime borders to thwart illicit and illegal activities and stop inflows of dangerous drugs and unauthorized people. In the first three-plus months of the new administration, Coast Guard personnel detained more than 860 aliens and stopped as much illicit cocaine as was interdicted at sea during fiscal 2024, Adm. Kevin E. Lunday told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security on May 14. 'We surged forces, tripling the number of forward-deployed air and surface assets in that area.' Off Southern California, for example, migrant interdiction increased 54 percent between late January and early May, and 'this year, we are on track to exceed our bulk cocaine interdiction goal,' says Lt. Cmdr. Steve Roth, chief of media relations for the Coast Guard. 'This operational surge is a great example of what the Coast Guard is capable of doing, meeting the need — but it's a surge. It''s not sustainable,' Roth says. 'The Coast Guard has been an incredible bang for the buck for the taxpayer. Look at what you''re getting out of them. We''ve got to give them the attention that they need and get them whole after decades of under-funding.' The 55,000-member force has long grappled with the need to modernizing its fleet, force and infrastructure. Top officials hope that changes under Force Design 2028, the plan developed by the Coast Guard and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to bolster national security and commit resources to both capabilities and facilities. Four lines of effort Force Design 2028 was developed to strengthen, expand, reshape and modernize the Coast Guard, with focus on four key areas: people, organization, acquisition and contracting and technology. The Coast Guard 'is more in demand than ever before. We are on the edge of transformational change, and we will become a stronger, more capable and agile force to meet the challenges ahead,' Lunday said at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy graduation May 21 in New London, Connecticut. The Force Design executive report outlines numerous changes across its headquarters and the force. The Coast Guard plans to improve training systems, expand medical care access and modernize reserve and civilian management systems. It revamps organizational structures and decision-making processes. It aims to eliminate or minimize bureaucratic acquisition and contracting delays to get forces what they need faster. It wants to accelerate getting state-of-the-market technology that enhances data sharing, situational awareness and operational effectiveness. The campaign underscores the need for action, Roth says. 'The report makes an alarming assessment of the service's current state, describing it as facing a readiness crisis that is fragile … and on a path to failure, stemming from decades of under-investment, neglect and strategic drift,' he says. 'The report highlights a significant workforce shortage and aging assets on the verge of collapse, warning that, without change, the Coast Guard will fail. It proposes a bold and urgent transformation blueprint aimed at fundamentally changing the service from a reactive posture to a proactive strategy relying on innovation.' DHS Secretary Kristi Noem affirmed those commitments in remarks to the Academy's Class of 2025, adding: 'We're going to build a more agile, capable and responsive fighting force. A new chapter for America's Coast Guard, one like we have never seen before, starts right now,' Noem said. The secretary in recent months met with Coast Guard leaders and crews in visits to several Coast Guard stations, cutters and maritime security units. 'The Coast Guard's vital role in our safety and security is paramount,' she said, highlighting investments that include more icebreakers to address needs in the Arctic and adding 15,000 new personnel by 2028. Many of this year's 200 academy graduates, now commissioned as Coast Guard officers, will serve and lead missions around the globe as the service expands and modernizes. Service and Hill advocacy At Congressional hearings, Coast Guard leaders have detailed the service's needs that will be supported by Force Design 2028. 'We maintain a persistent presence in the maritime domain — from coastal ports and inland waters to the high seas —– to control, secure and defend the U.S. border and maritime approaches from maritime threats; facilitate the flow of safe and secure commerce; respond to maritime disasters; and save lives,' Lunday testified in May. The campaign has several goals, Roth says. These include delivering an execution plan; commencing a Force Posture and Operational Concepts Campaign focused on reinventing ways the Coast Guard employs forces and delivers results; and delivering the first semiannual update to the DHS secretary on FD2028's implementation. Unclear yet are the costs to modernize, change and expand the Coast Guard, as much of its funding is part of broader DHS budgets. But flat budgets have long plagued the service, leading to underfunded requirements, aging infrastructure, maintenance backlogs and lags in modernization, despite bipartisan efforts last year. Complicating the service's budget and authorization is that Coast Guard jurisdiction falls to multiple congressional committees and subcommittees. Force Design also proposes a Senate-confirmed service secretary for the Coast Guard. Establishing a new secretary would provide a senior political appointee who 'can advocate for us in a way that a member of the uniformed armed services could not politically,' Roth says.
