Opinion: Automatic release must be reformed for cases involving organized crime
Montreal is in the middle of a quiet war. On one side, law enforcement scores rare wins like the June 12 arrests of alleged Mafia leaders including Leonardo Rizzuto and Stefano Sollecito in a sweeping police operation across Quebec. On the other, violence keeps erupting in incidents such as the fatal shooting of a man in a Brossard park on July 2, which Longueuil police said may have been gang-related.
The problem isn't that police aren't doing their job. It's that the law keeps handing criminal networks a second life.
Take Nicola Spagnolo. An alleged associate of the Rizzuto clan, he was serving time for a 2020 stabbing. He had been turned down for parole due in part to affiliations with organized crime denied by Spagnolo but noted by Correctional Service Canada (CSC). And yet, under Section 127 of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (CCRA), he automatically qualified for release after serving two-thirds of his sentence — until he was arrested in June as a murder suspect in the same case as Rizzuto and Sollecito, while he was still behind bars. If no new charges had been filed, he would have walked free.
This is not a flaw. It is a design failure.
The CCRA's statutory release mechanism was built on ideals of rehabilitation and reintegration. But in cases involving links to organized crime, those ideals are being exploited. CSC's assessments flagged Spagnolo as 'an active member of a security threat group or organized crime.' Yet legally, that status wasn't enough to deny his release — because in Canada, an assessment of affiliation with organized crime alone does not qualify as a sufficient reason to override statutory release.
This must change.
Parliament should amend Section 127 to create an exception to automatic release for individuals with links to organized crime. This exception should not be based on subjective suspicion, but on clear CSC assessments, intelligence, and behavioural records while in custody. This is about protecting the public, not punishing indefinitely.
In addition, Canada should implement a national threat profile registry, which would classify inmates based on their operational risk rather than just their criminal record. This registry would allow authorities to consider gang membership, leadership roles and persistent criminal associations in evaluating release eligibility. Similar models are already used in certain situations in jurisdictions like Germany and the Netherlands.
Moreover, release should not mean freedom without oversight. Canada's statutory-release system does permit curfews, halfway-house residency and other conditions, yet safeguards are limited when release itself is mandatory. For individuals flagged under the proposed registry, electronic monitoring, communication bans and mandatory reintegration plans would be imposed for at least the duration of the original sentence. Reintegration isn't passive — it requires structured conditions and accountability.
Provincial prosecutors should also be empowered to contest statutory releases when public safety is at stake. Currently, their involvement in release procedures is minimal, yet they are the most familiar with the real-life consequences of letting violent gang members return to the same neighbourhoods they helped destabilize.
Beyond legal reform, there's a societal dimension. Communities affected by violence are not just crime scenes — they are often left to pay the price for legal leniency. Residents lose faith in public institutions when the same names cycle through headlines and courtrooms year after year. Fighting organized crime must include breaking the cycle of predictable impunity.
Montreal cannot afford to wage war on organized crime with laws that seem designed for first-time offenders. This is not about being tough on crime — it's about being smart on structural threats. Organized criminal networks exploit every loophole available. It is time the law stopped helping them.
We need sentencing legislation that reflects the complexity of modern criminal networks, prioritizes sustained community protection and restores trust in the justice system. For that to happen, automatic release for documented members of organized crime must end. Anything less is an invitation to repeat the same cycle, with more victims next time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
4 days ago
- CTV News
Saskatchewan Penitentiary adapts to drone-related contraband smuggling
The Saskatchewan Penitentiary has seen some large-scale contraband seizures over the last few months, according to the Union of Canadian Correctional Officers (UCCO). 'When there's contraband in prison, especially drugs, inmates are in a condition other than normal,' said Chase Mayer, UCCO vice president for the Prairie region. 'They're intoxicated, and they do respond differently than a person who is sober and not under the influence. So, there's increased violence among the inmate population, but also violence toward our officers.' Mayer said just under $1 million worth of contraband was seized at the penitentiary in 2024. By the end of July 2025, over $969,000 worth of contraband had already been seized. 'When I looked at the information, a lot of it did come from packages that were seized in places like exercise yards,' said Mayer. 'There are only two ways that a package is really going to get there, it's either being thrown over the fence or a drone is flying over and dropping it.' He says correctional officers are seeing more instances of contraband entering federal prisons by drone. 'A lot of these facilities, penitentiaries, and institutions were built a long time ago. Perimeter fences and walls can only do so much.' In a statement to CTV, the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) said it's adopting infrastructure enhancements and new technologies to combat the threat of drones, including intrusion detection systems. The statement goes on to say that in Oct. 2024, regulations governing the use of body scanners came into force, and CSC is working on deploying these systems. In March, it was announced that CSC will have an exemption to use radiofrequency jammers in institutions to prevent unauthorized communications and contraband deliveries.
CTV News
5 days ago
- CTV News
Convicted murderer who changed his name dies in B.C. prison
The Mission Institution in Mission, B.C., is seen from the air in 2019. (Pete Cline / CTV News Vancouver) Warning: This story contains disturbing details. A convicted murder has died of 'apparent natural causes' in a federal prison in B.C.'s Fraser Valley, according to the Correctional Service of Canada. Ryan Brady died Sunday at Mission Institution, a medium-security prison in Mission, B.C., the CSC said in a news release Tuesday. At the time of his death, the 59-year-old was serving a life sentence that began on April 1, 1986. The CSC did not specify the conviction that led to Brady's sentence, but news reports from 2010 in the Coast Reporter indicate that Brady was known as Darren Kelly at the time of his crimes. According to the Sunshine Coast newspaper, Brady, né Kelly, abducted a three-year-old girl named Genoa 'Genni' May from a motel in Davis Bay in December 1985, while her parents were sleeping just two metres away. He raped and murdered the child, whose body was found along a logging road the following day. Brady was arrested a week later and pleaded guilty to first-degree murder, receiving an automatic life sentence with no chance of parole for 25 years. He remained behind bars for the rest of his life. The CSC said Brady's next of kin has been notified of his death, and the Correctional Service of Canada will review the circumstances surrounding it, as the service does with all in-custody deaths.
Cision Canada
5 days ago
- Cision Canada
CBSA's designated immigrant station for high-risk detainees now operational in Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines Français
OTTAWA, ON, July 30, 2025 /CNW/ - The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) announced it began housing high-risk detainees at its temporary designated immigrant station located on the site of the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC)'s Regional Reception Centre in Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines, Quebec. As announced in September 2024, the secure facility can house up to 25 adult male detainees who cannot be housed in CBSA's existing immigration holding centres or monitored by the CBSA using alternatives to detention because they require a high degree of supervision and control. Following an individual risk assessment, detainees placed at the designated immigrant station may have prior convictions or outstanding charges for violent crimes, such as assault with a weapon, attempted murder, assaulting an officer with a weapon, and aggravated sexual assault and/or who have demonstrated violent, non-compliant or unpredictable behaviour that places themselves, staff, medical personnel, and other detainees at risk, thus requiring a higher degree of supervision and control. The designated area is separate from CSC spaces and entirely under CBSA authority. CBSA staff and CBSA contracted personnel, such as security guards and medical professionals, are solely responsible for the care and management of detainees under the authority of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. To uphold national standards and ensure transparency, the CBSA grants access to independent third-party service providers, such as the Canadian Red Cross and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, to observe and evaluate detention conditions. The Canadian Red Cross currently provides monitoring services to the CBSA's existing immigration holding centres and will continue this practice at the new designated immigrant station. In addition to the designated area, the CBSA operates three immigration holding centres located in Toronto (ON), Laval (QC) and Surrey (BC) where it continues to make infrastructure upgrades and operational changes as part of its longer-term approach to house high-risk detainees. Throughout these facilities, detainees are afforded care and access in line with domestic and international standards. Detainees have access to resources, including legal representation, enhanced medical services, recreational areas, and dedicated rooms for counsel or visits from legal representatives and non-governmental organizations. Once an individual has exhausted all legal avenues, they are required to leave Canada voluntarily. If they refuse to comply with a removal order given by the CBSA or the Immigration Refugee Board (IRB), are a danger to the public, are a flight risk or their identity is unknown, they may be subject to detention. The IRB is responsible for determining whether detention should be maintained or not. Detention reviews take place every 30 days. The CBSA has a legal duty to remove inadmissible individuals as soon as possible from Canada, and actively works to secure travel documents and finalize removal plans promptly to avoid situations of prolonged detention. Quick Facts Budget 2024 introduced amendments to the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to enable the use of federal correctional facilities for the purpose of high-risk immigration detention. Until recently, the CBSA relied on provincial correctional facilities to house high-risk immigration detainees. As provinces began withdrawing from these agreements in 2023, the CBSA responded swiftly by initiating retrofit projects to its exiting immigration holding centres to ensure continued capacity for managing high-risk individuals. The CBSA's current agreement with the province of Ontario to house high-risk detainees, will expire in September 2025. As of July 14, 2025, there are 24 high-risk individuals held in provincial correctional facilities. Under the agreement with CSC, CBSA will use a closed section, separate from inmates, within the Regional Reception Centre in Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines, CSC will provide essential services, including infrastructure maintenance, food, and sanitation. Aside from these services, their role will be limited to emergency interventions in situations of safety or security risks within the framework outlined in the legislative amendments. The agreement is in place until June 2029. Over the last years, the CBSA has significantly reduced the use of detention by increasing alternatives to detention, such as in-person reporting, remote reporting, Community Case Management and Supervision, and Electronic Monitoring. The CBSA has the authority to detain foreign nationals under specific circumstances and uses immigration detention as a measure of last resort, where an individual may present a danger to the public, is a flight risk, or where their identity has not been established. As of July 14, 2025, of the individuals requiring CBSA supervision, over 98% are enrolled in alternatives to detention, while less than 2% are detained in a CBSA immigration holding centre or provincial correctional facility. Follow us on X (@CanBorder), Instagram (@CanBorder), and join us on Facebook or visit our YouTube channel.
