
UFC to return to Paris in September
The UFC has announced a fight night on 6 September at Accor Arena in Paris.It is the fourth year in a row the UFC has travelled to the French capital, with the country only legalising MMA in 2020.No headliner has been announced, but the UFC has several French stars to chose from.Heavyweight Ciryl Gane, lightweight Benoit Saint Denis, recent flyweight title challenger Manon Fiorot and middleweight Nassourdine Imavov will all be contenders to be the main event.None of them have a fight booked on that night. Saint Denis headlined the 2024 event, losing to Renato Moicano.The UFC travels to Azerbaijan on 21 June, with Welshman Oban Elliott in action, but is yet to announce any other European shows in 2025, having been to London in March.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Relentless clay season catches up with Musetti in Paris semi-finals
PARIS, June 6 (Reuters) - A physically and mentally drained Lorenzo Musetti paid a heavy price for his superb claycourt season as he was forced to retire from a gripping French Open semi-final against Carlos Alcaraz on Friday. The Italian craftsman threw in the towel while trailing 4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 2-0 having bagged the opening set in emphatic fashion, but a growing pain in his left leg eventually put an end to his dream of reaching a maiden Grand Slam final. "I started feeling this discomfort in the first games of the third set. I tried to manage it, but I felt I was losing more and more strength and power in that muscle, and eventually, I just couldn't keep up in the rallies," the world number seven told a press conference. "At that point, it was risky to force it — I wasn't able to stay in the match anymore." Musetti is the only player who this season made it to the last four of every top claycourt event - Monte Carlo, Madrid, Rome and Roland Garros - and the efforts he made on a very demanding surface eventually took their toll on court Philippe Chatrier. "It's been a very, very intense month. It's a month that definitely gave me a lot but also took a lot from me in terms of mental energy," he explained. "Sometimes constantly digging deep inside yourself can wear out the body, too. But of course, I'm 23, I haven't played 10 years' worth of Slams, so when you go deep in a Slam, it's not always easy to maintain a very high physical level. "I think from these matches, and even from injuries, you can learn and improve — you have to." Musetti admitted that Alcaraz pushed him to the limit and hinted his injury might have come from the physicality of the defending champion. "Definitely, Carlos pushes me to reach my limits — that's what champions do, of course. We all know he's very strong physically, one of the strongest out there, so he builds a lot of his game around his physicality," he said. "I knew I had to be in good shape to keep up with him. I don't know, maybe it's just a coincidence, but we'll definitely analyse what we could've done, what we can improve." Musetti will undergo tests on Saturday to determine the exact nature of his injury.


Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
A gentleman's guide to three-piece suit etiquette
The three-piece suit needs a bit of rescuing, the format having been hijacked by the Instagram manosphere and estate agents. We are an awfully long way from Indiana Jones in his Raiders of the Lost Ark professorial garb and, like a lot of the sartorial canon, various codes have been forgotten. The first thing to know is that a three-piece suit is the least formal of suit styles, perfectly demonstrated by Tom Hardy with his excellent and discerning use of RRL, a range from Ralph Lauren that's designed to be somewhat informal and more 'rustic'. This is the rule for both lounge suit and black tie, followed by double-breasted suits and two-piece single-breasted varieties. However, this wasn't always the case. The wearing of a waistcoat was essential in the nascent years of suiting because of a decree in October 1666 by King Charles II, mandating the wearing of a waistcoat for gentlemen. We know this because it was noted in Samuel Pepys' diary, reminding us of a time where people remembered to memorialise the more important matters. In the Regency era to much of the Victorian, order of the day for established houses was morning dress (a riding outfit - the morning was when gentlemen rode out) or frock coat in the daytime, and white tie in the evening, all requiring a waistcoat. As morning dress was replaced by the lounge suit and the frock coat was more or less isolated to the Court, the waistcoat was no longer a certainty in a man's daily wardrobe. In 1856, Edward VII commissioned Henry Poole to make him an 'evening lounge suit' in midnight blue, as he disliked dressing in white tie and preferred the growing trend of tailless jackets. Black tie was born, and waistcoats also began to fall out of favour for evening wear. More on 'Dirty Bertie' later. This heritage might explain the consensus that the wearing of a three-piece suit is occasion wear, which is why it's so prevalent at weddings. The hard-man credentials of Peaky Blinders have also made a lot of men feel confident that it's an agreeable way to dress up without losing any machismo. Whether you align with Tom Hardy and wear it casually, or want to wear the three-piece for something formal, there are rules that need to be kept in mind. Button know-how This is where we return to our wonderfully short-lived but sartorially consequential monarch, Edward VII. The question surrounding waistcoats often has to do with the bottom button. There are various disputes around the origin of this, but allow me to dispel things once and for all. Edward VII was perfectly able to wear the bottom button done up, no matter how large he was, his tailor would have taken it into account and an extra button would have made no difference at all. In fact, it was popped open for riding. This could easily have been for comfort but that is not necessarily a weight issue, rather the traditions of higher buttoning on riding garments - see morning coats, paddock-cut jackets and hunting pinks - which all need raised buttons for comfort in a sedentary position. The unbuttoning of the waistcoat therefore indicated you were a man of good standing who rode, and so everyone wanted to follow suit. Just to confuse things a bit, this does not apply to double-breasted waistcoats; they must all be done up. The smartest button stance is a three-button (six altogether) angled stance in a V shape, rather than the straight buttoning you see often from fashion designers. Fit check One of the biggest fashion faux pas is the sight of a man's shirt peeking out beneath the lapel and above the trousers. It is as much of a sartorial shortfall as the triangle of death – the triangle of white above the waistline and single-breasted jacket button, betraying the jacket as too small. This is very much how a certain tight-suited, Love Island hopeful might dress. One issue is that many brands make trousers that have what is called 'a low rise', i.e. the distance between the crotch and the top of the zip is short. What a man needs are trousers that are cut higher, ideally with pleats and held up by braces, to avoid this sloppy look. The lapel debate Old school aesthetes like my father, the kind that see everything through the prism of what is allowed in the officer's mess, would die on the hill against lapels on waistcoats. The lapel debate has more to do with opinion rather than actual etiquette, and truthfully, far be it from me to speak ill of my father's opinions on style, I think this is a misstep. It is true that a single-breasted lapel should have a very small lapel, if one at all, but a double-breasted waistcoat must have one, and the prouder the better. Accessorising The Roaring Lion by Yousuf Karsh is considered one of the greatest portrait photographs of all time; Winston Churchill's moody look is because just before it was taken, Karsh removed Churchill's cigar from his mouth. What stands out the most in this image is the chain which travels across the pockets, dipping to create a W shape. Whether a pocket watch, a lighter, a Champagne swizzle stick or cigar cutter, the chain is legitimate accessorising for waistcoats. The chain should travel from the left pocket to the first button hole that sits above the line of the pocket, and then if there is a fob, it should dangle down. If long enough, it can then be passed to the opposite pocket. One form of accessorising is a more outre design of waistcoat. This is, and should remain, the domain of the prefects of Eton College, known as 'Pop', who are allowed to wear whatever design of waistcoat they like in order to distinguish their authority (and boy do they take advantage of that freedom). You also had Sixth Form Select who were the 'other' prefects, selected due to academic achievement, and they could wear silver buttons. Keep it simple on civvy street; yours should match the jacket and trouser of the suit, and with morning dress should be a pastel colour such as sky blue. Where to find inspiration Watch every episode of Jeeves & Wooster for a categoric reminder of proper classic style, and there is plenty of three-piece action in there for you to see. Further watching should be the aforementioned Indiana Jones, Jude Law as Dumbledore in the Harry Potter offshoot Fantastical Beasts (seriously, a great men's style reference), and the original Great Gatsby. For non-fiction references, look to Churchill of course, and then his Tory successor Anthony Eden. Tom Hardy is definitely a solid inspiration for men who want to avoid the dandyish look. Just remember that tweed and heavier wools are much more preferable for a three-piece suit, so in the summer look for what are known as 'high twist wools', which allow for breathability. Full linen will crease too easily, so travel fabrics like Fresco wool are ideal. The three-piece suit may feel like dress up, but perhaps with a little bit of historic enlightenment and better knowledge of the rules, you can channel your Bertie or Tom Hardy and never let anyone take your cigar without asking permission.


Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Live Jannik Sinner vs Novak Djokovic: Score and updates from French Open semi-final
Good evening and welcome to coverage of the second men's semi-final at Roland Garros between Jannik Sinner and Novak Djokovic. Sinner, the world No 1, is on a 19-match winning streak at the majors dating back to his victory at the US Open last summer. The 23-year-old Italian, who also won the Australian Open at the start of the year before serving a three-month suspension, has looked flawless in Paris. Last year, the then world No 2 lost to Carlos Alcaraz in the semi-finals. The Spaniard of course went on to win the title and he awaits the winner of this contest after coming through his semi-final earlier against Lorenzo Musetti – the Italian was forced to retire in the fourth set with the score at 4-6, 7-6, 6-0, 2-0. Getting back to Sinner, the Italian's path to the last four has been seamless. He has not dropped a set in any of his five matches and ended his last outing in statement fashion – bagelling Jack Draper's conqueror Alexander Bublik in the third of the quarter-final. The three-time grand slam champion also handed out chastening beatings to Richard Gasquet in the Frenchman's final match before retiring in the second round (6-3, 6-0, 6-4), talented Czech Jiri Lehecka in round three (6-0, 6-1, 6-2) and 17th seed Andrey Rublev in round four (6-1, 6-3, 6-4). As for Djkovic, a three-time winner here, the 38-year-old has looked just as impressive as his Italian opponent. Before his quarter-final victory against Alexander Zverev, Djokovic had won all of his four matches in straights. The Serbian deployed the drop-shot play more than 30 times against Zverev in what turned out to be a tactical masterclass from the 24-time grand slam champion. After his victory on Wednesday, Djokovic, who was quite rightly pleased with his masterful performance, said: 'Tonight is one of the reasons why I still keep playing.' Scary.