'Voting for a brighter future': Voters trickle into polls for primary
On a hot August day with Canadian wildfire smoke in the air, Detroiters went to the polls in a trickle with turnout expected to range between 13%-18% for the Aug. 5 primary election, according to Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey.
At Detroit Lions Academy on the city's west side around lunchtime, several voters made their way inside the school to have their voices heard.
Pablo Marcos, 24, moved to the city a few years ago after living in Grand Rapids and attending school in Ann Arbor. As a newer Detroit resident, he said he wants to be politically engaged and planned to vote for Detroit City Council President Mary Sheffield, saying that, while she's not as progressive as he might hope for, he said she feels like a 'safe choice.'
Among changes he would like to see, Marcos criticized public subsidies for developers who don't always follow through on their promises and called for more affordable housing. He also said he wants a mayor who can stand up to President Donald Trump's policies, from his deportations to funding cuts.
'I mean the list could on, but someone who wants to stand up and has a backbone for the people they serve not just the donors they get their money from,' he said of his vision for Detroit's next mayor.
Omar Deadwilder, 43, who said he works with youths with disabilities as a vocational counselor for the state, also said he planned to vote for Sheffield, touting her experience on the City Council.
'We need somebody in there who knows what they're doing day one,' he said. While he said he likes Pastor Solomon Kinloch as a pastor, he said he would have a steep learning curve if elected mayor.
'He has a good heart for the city, but I don't think he would know what to do day one,' Deadwilder said.
As for Adrianne McCutchen, 56, of Detroit, she declined to say how she planned to vote. 'I'm just looking forward to the candidates being narrowed down,' she said. She touted what has happened in the city during Mayor Mike Duggan's tenure and hopes growth in the city will continue under his successor, though she also expressed hope for some change.
'Yet, hopefully this candidate will at least enhance the neighborhoods. The city, overall, needs it,' she said.
Campaigners for different candidates at both North Rosedale Park Community House and Renaissance High School, however, expressed concern that voter turnout was unusually thin this year. Two campaigners for mayoral candidate Saunteel Jenkins said that they had been there since before 7 a.m., and by 2 p.m., they had only seen about 35 voters cast their votes.
An elderly couple at Renaissance High provided a possible explanation. Gerald and Mary Ellen Clark, 91 and 86 respectively, said Renaissance was their third polling place of the day. Though they declined to say who they were voting for, the pair said that they drove to Fick Elementary School as they had for years, only to find it closed. The next polling location they tried didn't serve their district, and they hoped to get lucky on the third try with Renaissance.
More: Detroit mayor race: Meet the 9 candidates in the 2025 August primary election
More: Detroit mayoral candidates sprint across city to squeeze in final efforts to reach voters
Though Detroit's mayoral race has garnered significant publicity, municipalities in metro Detroit, including Hamtramck, Southfield and Pontiac, have narrowed down mayoral options who will vie for a seat in November as well. Over in Southfield, the polls seemed a little busier at the New Hope Missionary Baptist Church. Fannie Tillman, 54, was accompanied to the polls by her son Jacob, 19, who attends university in Alabama. Despite the age gap, taxes and road repairs were at the top of their priorities.
"My taxes are not coming down, and I'm not getting enough city services for what I'm paying for," said Fannie. "I'm getting the silliest fines for things that are not warranted."
At the same time in Sterling Heights, Joseph Hunter, 39, turned to Chat GPT to help him winnow down the candidates he should vote for in the city council primary, looking for some guidance on who the more progressive candidates are. Only one name came up: Michael V. Radtke Jr., but he began doing some more digging from other results, being sure to check the sources the artificial intelligence relied on, he said.
Outside of Harwood Elementary School, before he went inside to vote, he said he also planned to vote for Robert Mijac, Maria G. Schmidt, Barbara A. Ziarko and Deanna Koski.
Hunter, who works for LGBT Detroit, moved to Sterling Heights a couple of years ago, and said that while he has had mostly positive experiences with city government, he can't say the same about the city's police, detailing questioning from an officer after Hunter said he parked his car to see a movie asking him what he was doing there and insinuating that he does drugs.
'So when I really sit back and think about what I hope city council can do, I would say something about policing to where it's not as hostile to people of color,' he said.
Back in Detroit, Previn Dixon, 60, came to North Rosedale Park Community House to vote with his wife as they had done for years. Dixon said he hopes the next mayor can do more to end violence in the community, especially in light of the recent drive-by shooting in a Detroit park that took the lives of 4-year-old Samir Grubbs and 18-year-old Daviyon Shelmonson-Bey.
"My wife and I, we have several young children. We came out to vote for a brighter future for our children," said Dixon. 'You've got violence, kids getting shot in the streets. We need some stronger leadership to combat that."
Though Dixon didn't say who he planned to vote for, he stressed the importance of showing up to the polls. "Every voting opportunity — I've never missed a vote," said Dixon. "Next four years, that's going to be very important for who's going to have the reins running our city."
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Metro Detroit voters help narrow down candidates for general election
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China Defends Buying Russian Oil After Trump's Tariff Threat
(Bloomberg) -- China said its imports of Russian oil are justified, pushing back against US threats of new tariffs after Washington slapped secondary levies on India for buying energy from Moscow. All Hail the Humble Speed Hump Three Deaths Reported as NYC Legionnaires' Outbreak Spreads Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds Major Istanbul Projects Are Stalling as City Leaders Sit in Jail What England's New National Cycling Network Needs to Get Rolling 'It is legitimate and lawful for China to conduct normal economic, trade and energy cooperation with all countries around the world, including Russia,' the Chinese Foreign Ministry said Friday in a statement to Bloomberg News. 'We will continue to adopt reasonable energy security measures in accordance with our national interests.' Donald Trump said earlier this week he could punish China with additional tariffs over its purchases of Russian oil, saying 'that may happen.' The US president has also signaled his interest in brokering a peace deal in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and views pressure on big Russian trade partners to be part of that effort. Russian President Vladimir Putin met this week with Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff for nearly three hours of talks in the Kremlin. Trump on Wednesday said there was a 'very good chance' he'd meet with Putin, though cautioned there had not yet been a 'breakthrough' in the talks. Chinese President Xi Jinping welcomed direct communications between Putin and Trump on Friday during his first known call with the Russian leader in months. Xi also set out China's position on Ukraine to Putin, describing the situation as a set of complex issues with no simple solutions, according to Chinese state broadcaster CCTV. Although Trump has warned over China's purchases of Russian oil, his top adviser Peter Navarro played down the likelihood of new tariffs on Chinese exports, saying higher duties 'may hurt the US.' When asked about Trump's comments on Thursday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News tariffs on China over oil purchases 'could be on the table at some point.' China's imports from Russia edged up in July to just over $10 billion — the highest level since March — according to the latest customs data. But overall this year, imports from Russia are still down 7.7% compared with the same period in 2024. US-China ties have steadied after the two sides agreed to put sky-high tariffs on hold as they seek to negotiate an agreement. Trump said this week he was getting 'very close' to a deal with with China to extend the truce, which is due to expire Tuesday. (Updates with Xi-Putin talks starting in fifth paragraph.) The Pizza Oven Startup With a Plan to Own Every Piece of the Pie Digital Nomads Are Transforming Medellín's Housing Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO It's Only a Matter of Time Until Americans Pay for Trump's Tariffs The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures edge higher as Wall Street eyes Trump moves on Fed
US stock futures edged higher on Friday as Wall Street assessed President Trump's nomination of Stephen Miran to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and took in his new regime of sweeping tariffs. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) rose 0.3%, while those on the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F) gained 0.4%. Futures tied to the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) also gained 0.4%. Gold futures (GC=F) in New York rose above London prices on Friday after the FT reported that the US now plans to put tariffs on gold bar imports. In corporate earnings premarket, Pinterest (PINS) tumbled on a profit miss, while Block (XYZ) jumped after reporting upbeat guidance. Shares in Expedia (EXPE) soared 17% on Friday before the bell after raising its full-year bookings forecast. Stocks traded mixed during the day on Thursday as investors assessed a reshaped trade landscape after Trump's deadline for countries to strike deals on tariffs expired, setting in motion higher duties on dozens of countries worldwide. The indexes trimmed earlier losses following Trump's nomination of Stephen Miran, current chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, to serve on the Fed board. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Miran's nomination must pass Senate approval, and it's unclear how long that might take with lawmakers on August recess. Trump's decision on Miran also underscored his search for the next Fed chair. He has talked up the "two Kevins" — current economic adviser Hassett and former Fed governor Warsh — and a report on Thursday said current governor Christopher Waller is seen as the favorite by Trump's team. Amid all the jockeying, about 90% of bets are on the current Fed to cut rates in September. This week has been a bumpy ride for Wall Street. Monday opened with markets recovering from a disappointing slew of job data that stoked fears of broader economic troubles and while upping those rate bets. Corporate earnings and the question of how companies like Apple might weather Trump's latest tariffs largely drove investor sentiment throughout the week. Under Armour forecasts downbeat quarterly sales, shares drop Under Armour (UA) stock slumped 12% before the bell on Friday after the sportswear maker forecast second-quarter revenue below Wall Street estimates. The company is grappling with muted demand in North America due to still-high inflation and tariff uncertainty. Reuters reports: Read more here. New York gold futures spike over spot price after tariff shock Gold futures (GC=F) in New York rose above London prices after the FT reported that the US now plans to put tariffs on 1kg gold bar imports. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Oil heads for worst run since 2021 as traders discount US curbs Oil is heading for its longest losing run since 2021, as markets digested the US efforts to try and end the war in Ukraine and whether this would not impact overall supplies, alongside Trump's tariffs on India due to its purchase of Russian crude oil. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Under Armour forecasts downbeat quarterly sales, shares drop Under Armour (UA) stock slumped 12% before the bell on Friday after the sportswear maker forecast second-quarter revenue below Wall Street estimates. The company is grappling with muted demand in North America due to still-high inflation and tariff uncertainty. Reuters reports: Read more here. Under Armour (UA) stock slumped 12% before the bell on Friday after the sportswear maker forecast second-quarter revenue below Wall Street estimates. The company is grappling with muted demand in North America due to still-high inflation and tariff uncertainty. Reuters reports: Read more here. New York gold futures spike over spot price after tariff shock Gold futures (GC=F) in New York rose above London prices after the FT reported that the US now plans to put tariffs on 1kg gold bar imports. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Gold futures (GC=F) in New York rose above London prices after the FT reported that the US now plans to put tariffs on 1kg gold bar imports. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Oil heads for worst run since 2021 as traders discount US curbs Oil is heading for its longest losing run since 2021, as markets digested the US efforts to try and end the war in Ukraine and whether this would not impact overall supplies, alongside Trump's tariffs on India due to its purchase of Russian crude oil. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Oil is heading for its longest losing run since 2021, as markets digested the US efforts to try and end the war in Ukraine and whether this would not impact overall supplies, alongside Trump's tariffs on India due to its purchase of Russian crude oil. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump is right: The Census should not include illegal residents
President Trump made a dramatic announcement on Truth Social recently: 'I have instructed our Department of Commerce to immediately begin work on a new and highly accurate CENSUS based on modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024.' He added, 'People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS.' It is not clear what impact 'modern day facts and figures' would have on the nation's headcount, but Trump's determination to exclude undocumented persons from the count will change the numbers significantly. You can bet there will be a great deal of attention paid to this proposal. Democrats who will howl that the shift is illegal, immoral, and probably racist. But Trump is correct. It is clear the census needs drastic improvement and that undocumented people should not be included. The 2020 count was a mess, with even the Census Bureau's own research arm concluding eight states were over-counted and six were undercounted. The census took place during COVID, and most likely the pandemic took a toll on the efficiency and accuracy of the report. The errors in the headcount are especially newsworthy today, in light of the skirmish taking place in Texas over redistricting. Democrat legislators there have fled to blue cities around the country to avoid having to vote on the new political map, which reportedly would hand Republicans in the state an additional five seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The fugitive Democrats are hiding mainly in Chicago, at the invitation of Illinois governor JB Pritzker (D), who is presumed to be contemplating a run for president in 2028. Like Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and other Democratic hopefuls, Pritzker evidently considers performance politics likely to enhance his chances. Ironically, Pritzker presides over what National Review's Rich Lowry has described in a recent column as the most gerrymandered state in the union, citing the distorted configuration of District 13 as evidence. Lowry points out that in 2022, Republican congressional candidates in Illinois won almost 44% of the popular vote but only secured 18 percent of the state's House seats. Illinois is not alone. California, too, has skewed political representation, with some 40 percent of votes in the most recent election going to Republicans but only 17 percent of the seats. Lowry says that if Texas Republicans pass their new map, the state will only be roughly as imbalanced as California. Democrat officials in other states have threatened retaliation for Texas' maneuver, but in a number of big states, like California, Democrats have already pushed their advantage about as far as they can. The Republicans have been gaining control over state houses and legislatures in recent elections, which helps them force a remap. Republicans have 23 so-called 'trifectas', where they control both houses of state legislatures and the governors' mansions, as in Texas; Democrats have only 11. Following Texas' lead, there is talk of a similar effort being considered in Nebraska and also in Indiana, where Vice President JD Vance recently met with Gov. Mike Braun (R) and Republican legislators to encourage the measure. Redistricting is done usually once a decade in response to the Census. But the 2020 headcount was so flawed that some political leaders consider it appropriate to redo their maps mid-decade. Of the eight states that were overcounted, 6 lean left. Of the six that were undercounted, all but one lean right. Some of the errors are significant; New York was overcounted, for example, by 3.4 percent, and Hawaii by nearly 7 percent. Ditto with the undercounts — they missed on Florida's population by 3.5 percent. Consequently, Republicans argue that they should have picked up more House seats, Electoral College votes and also won more federal funds. Given the slim seven-seat margin that Republicans currently hold in the House, the mistakes in the 2020 census loom large, as does the fight currently underway in Texas. Looking to next year's midterm elections, redistricting could well change the balance of power. Normally the party that occupies the White House loses seats in the midterms; the Texas fight and others could prevent that, allowing the Trump agenda to roll forward. Longer term, President Trump's desire to eliminate undocumented people from the census could have similar repercussions. It is inappropriate for the decennial headcount to include non-citizens; those people are not allowed to vote and by the same token should not have representation in Congress. Leading up to the 2020 count, Wilbur Ross, who was Commerce Secretary under then-President Trump took steps to make the change by adding a citizenship question to the census form, but he was blocked by the courts. Opponents claimed the question would deter illegals from participating in the census, which could cost Democrat-run states House seats, Electoral College votes, and federal funding. It was a poor excuse, since the Census Bureau's American Community Survey, which annually asks some 3.5 million households questions about citizenship status, place of birth and year of arrival, scores about the same response in states with a high illegal population as those that do not. Including undocumented people in the census incentivizes state officials to welcome people in the U.S. illegally. California, where high taxes and anti-business regulations have driven people and firms to flee the state, has been able to keep most of its House seats because it harbors more than 2 million non-citizens. This is wrong. Bad policies should be penalized, not rewarded. The Census is established under Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution which reads: 'Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers….' 'Indians' were not part of the tally at that time because they were 'not taxed' and therefore not considered legal citizens. Trump is correct; we should follow that lead, and exclude people in the U.S. illegally.