
Uttarakhand Assembly clears amendments to UCC and anti-conversion Bills, new minority education law
Among the Bills passed in the Assembly session held at Gairsain, the summer capital of Uttarakhand, was the Uniform Civil Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which increases punishments with regard to illegal live-in relationships. The amendment to Section 380(2) says a married person entering a live-in relationship can be punished with jail term of up to seven years and fine. The government has also amended sub-sections of Section 387 which now says getting into a relationship by force, pressure or fraud will attract imprisonment of up to seven years and fine.
The time limit for marriage registration, which needed to be done in six months, was extended to one year. A new Section was also inserted into the UCC. Under Section 390-A, the Registrar-General will have the power to cancel any registration related to marriage, divorce, live-in relationship or inheritance.
The Freedom of Religion and Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion (Amendment) Bill, 2025, allows jail sentences ranging from three years to life term for persons found guilty of 'forced conversions'. Previously, the maximum jail term for a 'forced conversion' was 10 years. The Bill defines 'allurement' as 'any gift, gratification, easy money or material benefit, whether in cash or kind, employment, or by invoking divine displeasure'. Human trafficking and making threats to life attract sentences ranging from 20 years to life term under the 2025 Bill.
Accused can also be booked for 'false promises of marriage' under the Bill. Hiding one's religion with the intention of marriage will attract imprisonment of three to 10 years, and a fine of ₹3 lakh. Speaking ill of one religion and praising another, and propaganda on social or digital media, will also be considered as participation in religious conversion.
The government faced maximum opposition when passing the Minority Educational Institutions Bill, 2025, which extends the benefits of minority status to educational institutions of Sikh, Jain, Christian, Parsi, and Buddhist communities. With the passage of the Bill, all madrasas running in the State will have to seek affiliation from the Uttarakhand Education Board by July 1, 2026, and then apply for minority status with the Uttarakhand State Authority for Minority Education (USAME). Only if the necessary conditions are fulfilled will the institutions be granted minority educational status and unrecognised madrasas will be shut down.
The government, however, deleted an earlier proposal on the request of Kashipur MLA Trilok Singh Cheema, who had sought the removal of the 15% reservation cap for non-minority students in educational institutions run by minorities.
Apart from these, the Assembly also cleared the Supplementary Appropriation Bill, 2025; Uttarakhand-Uttar Pradesh Shri Badrinath and Shri Kedarnath Temples (Amendment) Bill, 2025; Uttarakhand Private Universities (Amendment) Bill, 2025; Uttarakhand Witness Protection Repeal Bill, 2025; Uttarakhand Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Bill, 2025; and Uttarakhand Loktantra Senani Samman Bill, 2025.
The five-day Assembly session, which started on August 19, ended sine die within two days, amid protests by the Opposition leaders who demanded a debate on disaster management issues and law and order in the State under Rule 310. The demands were made citing the recent flash flood in Dharali, where around 68 people went missing and the alleged abduction of five of Congress members during recently held panchyat election.
Chief Minister Pushkar Dhami presented the supplementary budget of ₹5,315.89 crore during the three-hour session on Wednesday (August 20, 2025).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
36 minutes ago
- Hans India
Tharoor differs with Cong on Bill removing PM, CMs
New Delhi: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Wednesday voiced support for laying down rules to remove the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, or ministers of states and union territories from their posts if they are arrested on serious criminal charges. Taking a slightly different stance from his party colleagues on the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, which seeks to lay down said rules, Tharoor mentioned that while he does not know enough about the bills tabled by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, 'on the face of it,' it is 'reasonable' that anyone doing wrong things should not be allowed to hold a political office in the country. 'As far as I am concerned, I don't know those Bills well enough to give you a comment. On the face of it, it seems reasonable that anyone who does anything wrong should be liable to punishment and should not be holding a high constitutional office or a political office. I think that makes sense,' Tharoor told ANI at Parliament premises. The Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, seeks to remove a Central or State Minister who is facing allegations of corruption or serious offences and has been detained for at least 30 days. The Bill was tabled by Union Minister Amit Shah in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. However, Tharoor's remarks differ from the party's leadership, who has termed the bills as 'unconstitutional' and 'draconian.' Party leader Priyanka Gandhi, taking strong exception to the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill said earlier today that the bill being touted as an anti-corruption measure is just a 'veil over the eyes of people,' claiming that a Chief Minister could be arrested on fabricated charges and be removed from their post after 30 days without a conviction if the bill is passed.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Centre, Opposition Spar Over Introduction Of PM, CMs Removal Bills In Lok Sabha: 'Against Law'
Several Opposition MPs spoke against the introduction of the Bills for removal of PM, CMs and ministers held on criminal charges, claiming they violated constitutional principles. Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday introduced three Bills in the Lok Sabha for the removal of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and Ministers under arrest for 30 consecutive days on serious charges. The introduction of the Bills came amid fierce protests from Opposition MPs, who tore up the copies of the draft law and shouted slogans. In a charged atmosphere, several Opposition MPs spoke against the introduction of the Bills, claiming they violated constitutional principles. Several political leaders claimed that the law would openly help the government misuse it for political reasons and turn the country into a police state. As soon as the Bills were introduced in Lok Sabha, the Opposition trooped into the well, raising slogans and some even tore copies in front of Shah. Union ministers Kiren Rijiju and Ravneet Singh Bittu, stepped out of their seats to prevent the opposition members from coming near Shah and waved them to go back to their side of the aisle. Opposition Raised Questions Attacking Shah over the introduction of the Bills, Congress MP K C Venugopal questioned the Union Home Minister over his claim of public morality by referring to his arrest in a criminal case when he was the Home Minister of Gujarat in 2010. Soon Shah hit back, saying that he resigned on moral grounds before his arrest on 'false" allegations and did not join a constitutional position till he was discharged by the courts. 'What are they (Opposition) teaching us about morality? I had resigned. And I want moral values to rise. We cannot be so shameless that we continue to occupy constitutional positions while facing charges. I resigned before arrest," Shah said. Opposition MPs, including AIMIM's Asaduddin Owaisi and Congress' Manish Tewari and Venugopal, spoke against the introduction the Bills and termed the proposed law against the Constitution. Rajya Sabha MP Pramod Tiwari sharply criticised the government, describing the bill as 'anti-democratic". He further warned that the proposed bill could enable the government to jail Opposition leaders on fabricated charges. Rajya Sabha MP and senior Congress leader P Chidambaram sharply criticised the government for introducing the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025 in Parliament, calling it 'an extraordinary and patently unconstitutional Bill." Chidambaram in a post on X, 'The government introduced an extraordinary and patently unconstitutional Bill in the Lok Sabha yesterday. If an arrested Chief Minister does not get bail in 30 days, he will cease to be Chief Minister! Have you heard of anything more bizarre in the legal world?" What Are The Three Bills? The three Bills are the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025; the Constitution (One Hundred And Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025; and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2025. The Bills have proposed that if Prime Minister, Chief Ministers or Union Ministers are arrested and detained in custody for 30 consecutive days for offences that attract a jail term of at least five years, they will lose their jobs on the 31st day. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 21, 2025, 11:25 IST News politics Centre, Opposition Spar Over Introduction Of PM, CMs Removal Bills In Lok Sabha: 'Against Law' Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...

Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Online Gaming Bill 2025: Which Indian apps are likely to be impacted after Parliament nod?
The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, which aims to boost e-sports and casual gaming but bans real-money gaming and online betting over concerns of addiction, financial losses, and security threats, was passed by the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The Indian market for such gaming is set to be worth $3.6 billion by 2029, according venture capital firm Lumikai.(REUTERS) Piloted by minister of electronics and information technology Ashwini Vaishnaw, the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 was passed without a debate as Opposition members raised slogans demanding a discussion on the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar by the Election Commission. Once the legislation is passed by both Houses of Parliament, offering or facilitating online money gaming will be punishable by imprisonment of up to 3 years and/or a fine of up to ₹1 crore. The bill also seeks to prohibit advertisements related to online money games and bars banks and financial institutions from transferring funds for any of such games. Why did the government bring this legislation now? 'People lose their life's savings in online money gaming,' Ashwini Vaishnaw told MPs. He said the government intends to curb the addiction and financial harm that comes with online money gaming, but will promote e-sports and social gaming. Ashwini Vaishnaw said many such platforms have been used for money laundering, financing terrorism, and as messaging channels by terrorist organisations. The minister also said that "a plethora" of online money gaming service providers that operate from offshore locations circumvent State-specific regulations, evade taxation and has also raised challenges for law enforcement officials because of cross-border concerns. Which Indian apps are expected to be impacted by online gaming bill 2025? The Indian market for such gaming is set to be worth $3.6 billion by 2029, according venture capital firm Lumikai. Dream11: Endorsements by top Indian cricketers and other marketing efforts have boosted appeal and investor interest of real money gaming apps such as the popular fantasy cricket games operated by startups Dream11, which commands a valuation of $8 billion. In fantasy cricket games on Dream11, users create their teams by paying as little as ₹ 8 (10 US cents), with a total prize pool of 1.2 million Indian rupees ($14,000). The app become more popular during the Indian Premier League season. Endorsements by top Indian cricketers and other marketing efforts have boosted appeal and investor interest of real money gaming apps such as the popular fantasy cricket games operated by startups Dream11, which commands a valuation of $8 billion. In fantasy cricket games on Dream11, users create their teams by paying as little as 8 (10 US cents), with a total prize pool of 1.2 million Indian rupees ($14,000). The app become more popular during the Indian Premier League season. Mobile Premier League (MPL): Mobile Premier League is valued at $2.5 billion, PitchBook data shows. Others apps My11Circle Howzat SG11 Fantasy WinZO Games24x7 (parent of My11Circle and RummyCircle) Junglee Games (covers Rummy & Poker) PokerBaazi GamesKraft (also known as RummyCulture) Nazara Technologies (investor in PokerBaazi, though its direct RMG revenue is minimal) Shares of Nazara Technologies Ltd., which owns a stake in online poker platform PokerBaazi, fell as much as 13% in Mumbai. Casino operator Delta Corp Ltd. pared losses and closed almost 1% up after a decline of nearly 7%, Bloomberg reported. Bloomberg News reported that Dream11 and Mobile Premier League declined a request to comment. What next? The bill, which also recommends a regulator for e-sports, educational platforms and social games, needs to be further cleared by the Rajya Sabha and signed by the President of India to become law.