Father criticises school admissions criteria after son denied place at chosen school
Adam Grainger says his son is only able to attend church once a month because he can find it stressful due to a diagnosed anxiety disorder.
But to be eligible for a place at a faith school, attendance should be twice a month.
Adam says his 11-year-old son has to sometimes pull his coat over his head due to his social anxiety while in church.
Despite the monthly attendance, the family say they have been told that to get a place at St James's Church of England High School, Farnworth, the youngster needed to have attended church twice a month.
More: Iconic Bolton youth club to be home to one of just 30 specialist pitches
More: First class pupils are set to become tomorrow's leaders
More: University admissions expert debunks 5 common clearing myths for students
Instead, Adam's son is set to attend Mt St Josephs School, which is a catholic school also in Farnworth.
"My son has been attending a Church of England church for 18 months, despite the fact it's a very stressful experience for him," Mathew said.
"There's irony in the fact that he has been denied a place at a Church of England school when he has been attending a church of that denomination, but he is being sent to a Catholic school, so religion clearly doesn't matter that much does it?"
Matthew believes the decision to not let his son into the family's desired school could cause further deterioration of the 11-year-old's social anxiety problems.
He added: "His brother is 13 years old, and he attends St James' so it would be better if they could be together as that would be a huge help.
"My 11-year-old's anxiety got worse after his brother started suffering from epilepsy, so he worries about him a lot, and it would help if he could see him in school.
"He's rightfully very protective."
Matthew's son's mum, who he co-parents with, lives within the catchment area for St James'.
The family have appealed the decision to turn down his entry, but were unsuccessful, meaning Matthew's son is on track to attend Mt St Joseph.
"I would just like to add, that this isn't sour grapes, we honestly believe attending the same school as his brother would drastically help with my son's anxiety," Matthew explained.
A spokesperson for Bolton Council said: 'We cannot comment on individual cases.
'However, the school places appeal process is a clear, accessible, and transparent system overseen by an independent panel."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
27 minutes ago
- Medscape
The Hidden Hazards of Generative AI in Medicine
The idiosyncrasies and inadequacies of NHS IT systems — past and present — have driven many a doctor to frustration and despair, as they grapple with yet another new software package whilst trying to manage patient demand. There is an understandable reluctance to embrace change, given that change has rarely delivered the promised efficiencies. It is perhaps unsurprising, therefore, that some healthcare professionals view artificial intelligence (AI) with suspicion. Dr Sara Jamieson Even those who have embraced it and are optimistic about its benefits admit they're unsure about the risks. AI, though, is different from anything that has come before. It is something we should consider embracing and incorporating into our practice as it develops. If we don't, we risk being left behind. Imagine how life might look if we had ignored the introduction of the World Wide Web back in the mid-90s. Similarly, think back to the rapid introduction of telemedicine at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This method of consulting with patients, previously frowned upon as too inherently risky, continued even after infection levels subsided. Any new way of practising will bring with it new medicolegal risks, and steps will need to be considered to mitigate these. Whilst beyond the scope of this article, a true understanding of the medicolegal implications of using AI in healthcare requires an understanding of what AI is and how its outputs are generated. This is particularly true for generative AI tools such as ChatGPT. Dr Lucy Hanington According to a survey of over 1000 GPs in the UK, published in BMJ Health & Care Informatics, a fifth of GPs are using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to help with day-to-day tasks such as writing letters. One in five said they had used these tools in their clinical practice, and of these, nearly a third (28%) said they had used them to suggest a different diagnosis, and a quarter said they had used them to suggest treatment options. Consider this scenario: Dr C, a GP, was running behind schedule and still had three more patients to see. During her next consultation, a 50-year-old patient, Mr B, came in with a set of vague symptoms. Dr C considered a range of possible conditions. Feeling under pressure, she discreetly opened ChatGPT and entered an anonymised summary of the patient's symptoms, requesting a differential diagnosis and possible lab tests. The AI quickly returned a detailed summary of plausible possibilities, including some that Dr C hadn't considered herself. She was impressed and used the suggestions to help her decide on the next steps for Mr B, which included arranging further tests. That night, however, the consultation weighed on her mind, and she couldn't sleep. She knew she hadn't disclosed her use of AI to the patient. She also worried whether she had inadvertently input details that could make Mr B identifiable. She also questioned whether the AI's suggested diagnoses might have influenced her clinical judgement. By morning, Dr C was feeling anxious and uneasy, and decided to call Medical Protection Society (MPS) for advice. A medicolegal consultant advised her to consider whether, objectively, she still agreed with the management plan and could justify it clinically. The GP was also advised to rectify any omissions immediately and to discuss the case with a colleague if helpful. The medicolegal consultant also explained the consent and confidentiality principles around AI use. Benefits Generative AI tools offer many potential benefits for both doctors and patients. Patients may use these tools to understand medical terminology or a diagnosis they have been given. Doctors may find that, when used safely, generative AI can aid diagnosis or identify potential drug interactions. However, generative AI is not always correct. As well as errors or omissions, it can sometimes produce 'hallucinations,' confidently presenting incorrect information as fact. It is incumbent on the clinicians using these tools to ensure that information shared with a patient is reliable and accurate. Bias, whilst not unique to AI, also deserves consideration. The data used by AI tools may be biased due to the inclusion or exclusion of certain information. Outputs may also fail to account for the demographics of a particular patient population. The use of generative AI does not permit doctors to work outside the limits of their competence. There should be no overreliance on the software, and doctors remain ultimately responsible for the decisions they make. Data Protection and Confidentiality Data protection and confidentiality, as highlighted in the earlier scenario, are key considerations. Compliance with General Data Protection Regulation is essential when using generative AI. These tools, by their nature, store, share, and learn from the information entered into them and can be accessed by anyone. Care must be taken not to input any personal patient data. Simply removing a patient's name may not be sufficient to anonymise their information, as other details could make them identifiable. To ensure compliance with data protection legislation, we recommend seeking guidance from: Hospital Data Protection Officers, who may be able to advise on this in a secondary care setting Integrated Care Boards, who may have policies that would be applicable The Information Commissioners Office (ICO) Consent The earlier scenario also highlights the issue of consent. Consent remains a key cornerstone of all doctor-patient interactions. The ICO advises that, for consent to be a lawful basis for processing data when using AI, it must be freely given, specific, and clear. The individual must agree to it, and they must be able to withdraw their consent at any time. AI as an Aid It is important to hold in mind that AI is a tool to assist, rather than replace, the clinician. When it comes to decision-making, AI software can't readily consider the individual wishes and circumstances of the patient. The 'black box' problem — a lack of transparency in how an AI system reaches conclusions — can make it difficult to challenge outputs or detect errors. Ultimately, AI should not replace clinical reasoning, evidence-based medicine, or consultation with colleagues, peers, multidisciplinary teams, specialists, seniors, and supervisors. Training and Continued Learning Clinicians should aim to be literate in AI, understand its basis and governance, and know how to use it safely. We would encourage all clinicians to incorporate learning on the topic as part of their annual development plans. A multitude of resources on AI are available across medical colleges and institutions. We would also recommend watching the recordings of the recent MPS Foundation AI symposia. A white paper, published by the MPS Foundation, the Centre for Assuring Autonomy at the University of York, and the Improvement Academy hosted at the Bradford Institute for Health Research, offers further useful guidance for doctors to consider on AI use. Conclusion Like it or not, AI is here to stay. Readers should consider its potential benefits while remaining alive to its limitations and risks. Doctors should also ensure they continue to work in a manner consistent with General Medical Council guidance and relevant legislation. If in doubt about using AI tools and their medicolegal implications, doctors can contact MPS or their medical defence organisation to request advice. This article is published as part of an editorial collaboration between Medscape UK and MPS that aims to deliver medicolegal content to help healthcare professionals navigate the many challenges they face in their clinical practice. Dr Sara Jamieson, MBBS, trained in psychiatry before joining MPS in 2016 as a medicolegal consultant. She has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Dr Lucy Hanington, BMBCh, MRCPCH, has worked as a medicolegal consultant at MPS since 2016. She has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
41 Wildly Entitled, Infuriating, And Just Plain Dumb Customers Who Proved The Customer Is NOT Always Right
1.A free YEAR of food??? In what world did this person think that was going to happen? brother. don't do this. one gets paid enough to deal with this. 5.I'm sorry, but I can't stop laughing at "REDICULOUS!" audacity... Related: be this person. this person. flash: If you're late to class, the business has every right to refuse you entry. this guest think they're the king of England??? Also — 15 white sugars??? you have to sneak in your own alcohol because you can't afford to purchase any, maybe stay go without booze. did these people even get the idea that any company would do this? 13.I get that tipping culture is annoying, but it's how servers make a living wage. There's no excuse not to tip. part of "we're closed" did these people not understand? Related: stiffed their server, yet somehow they have the audacity to call someone else unkind? is the kind of person who doesn't want student loan forgiveness because they had to pay their loans back in the day. Over a penny? 19.A $25 tip on this over $1k bill for a private dining event is diabolical. 20.A customer getting mad at you because they're wrong is a canon event for anyone who works retail or service. the middle fingers really necessary? Related: they don't have a restroom, they don't have a restroom! It's not their responsibility to help you find one! did this person even buy this many boxes of markers in the first place? server wouldn't have to say that if you actually watched your kids! much audacity does it require to think a business should stay open for you after closing? 26.I can't stand people who do this. The freezer is literally RIGHT THERE. bad enough to leave an item in a different section than where you got it, but ice cream??? You're literally just wasting this product. do people think the rules shouldn't apply to them? this person think prices were just a suggestion? did this person think closing times were only a suggestion? (BTW, the workers say they didn't even see this person trying to get their attention after closing.) If you can't read the above, it says: I realize that you close at 10 p.m. But just because the last customer of your night is needing help doesn't mean you do not go to your doors and find out what your customer needed. I've worked in public my entire life and this is by far one of the rudest things I've had done. You clearly heard me. How do y'all know I did not leave my keys to my house in your store? It's sad that no one wants to go just one little bit extra for people today. I only needed my receipt b/c I have to keep for my records. Y'all did not even have any want to see what I needed. My receipt is all I needed. I do not complain nor do I ever go out of my way to do so, but for making me wait out here at night when you could have done something right and nice and grabbed my receipt was just too much effort. The worst part is you both seeing me and hearing me. Let's see if corporate tells you that you did the right thing. Think about it that way…what if it was your mother needing help and you just didn't do it? What if no one helps your mom or daughter at 10 p.m. at night? It really isn't so bad to do little extra things for others. Please get my receipt. It's very important I keep them right now. 31.I can't believe people just walk around with this level of entitlement. Related: "do better" is exactly what I wanted to tell this lady. customers really are a special brand of entitled. takes two seconds to put things back where you found them. 35.I swear, people lose all common sense once they walk into a store. like they leave their brains at home. are not the place to proselytize. on — the customer is calling the STORE petty directly after describing the pettiest "revenge" I've ever heard? on earth would ever possess someone to do this? At least clean up after yourself. like these people just didn't want to tip. finally...I'd like to apologize on behalf of humanity to hosts and servers everywhere. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Life-threatening': Thousands of bogus online pharmacies selling fake Ozempic jabs
Warnings have been issued over fake weight loss jabs that could be 'life-threatening' after thousands of fraudulent online pharmacies were uncovered. Fake versions of Ozempic, a popular brand of weight loss jab, were being sold for as little as £13.70 per dose, along with counterfeit versions of other brands, including Rybelsus and Metformin pills, being offered from 24p. The UK's medicines regulator said taking bogus medications could not only make people ill, but in some cases could be fatal. Researchers from Avast, a cybersecurity brand of the company Gen, who conducted the investigation, warned of the 'dangerous' threat of the global scam involving more than 5,000 fake pharmacy sites this year, which they say are being run by criminal networks. It comes amid the rapid rise of weight-loss medication in the UK – with around 1.5 million people, 4 per cent of households, currently using them. Gen also found fake Viagra, a medicine used to treat erection issues, and unregulated fertility pills being sold. The company said lab tests found no active ingredient in a third of the drugs tested. Andy Morling, deputy director of criminal enforcement at the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), told The Independent: 'Buying medicines from illegal suppliers significantly increases the risk of receiving products that are either falsified or not licensed for use in the UK. Products purchased in this way will not meet the MHRA's strict quality and safety standards. 'Medicines obtained from illegally trading sources can not only fail to work, but they can also make you very sick. In some cases, they may contain toxic substances or dangerously high levels of the correct active ingredient, with potentially fatal consequences.' The researchers warned that the 'alarmingly' polished websites, complete with bogus customer service information, detailed product pages, and looked similar to legitimate online pharmacies. But many were detected as fakes because they used AI to create reviews, health blogs, live chat support and manipulated search results. As well as the health implications, the researchers said UK customers risked their details and identity being stolen by the sites. Siggi Stefnission, cyber safety chief technology officer at Gen, warned: 'Purchasing pharmaceuticals from untrusted online retailers is a serious danger, both to individual health and to someone's digital safety. 'From a public health perspective, counterfeit or unregulated drugs can be ineffective or even life-threatening. It's critical that consumers only use licensed, reputable online pharmacies to protect themselves from cybercrime and potential physical harm.' The popularity of weight-loss jabs has soared in the past year, with the NHS's top doctor, Sir Stephen Powis, saying they could soon become among the most commonly used drugs. Both Ozempic and Rybelsus, which have the active ingredient semaglutide, are not licensed as a weight loss treatment. Instead they are designed to treat people with type 2 diabetes but both are sometimes prescribed off-label to treat weight loss. However, popular weight loss jabs Wegovy, which has the same active ingredient, and Mounjaro, which uses the active ingredient tirzepatide, are both licensed in the UK for the treatment of weight loss. Gen explained that criminals are taking advantage of people looking for a fast and discreet way to get high-demand weight loss treatment, among other medications that are often sought quickly, privately, or at a lower cost. Alongside the vast network of more than 5,000 web domains selling the in-demand drugs fraudulently, Gen said, this year alone, it has already blocked 1 million attacks coming from these sites against unsuspecting online shoppers. Laura Wilson, director at Royal Pharmaceutical Society, said fake and illegal online pharmacies 'are a growing threat to patient safety'. She explained that fraudulent medicines may be out of date, substandard or contain 'dangerous' substances. Gen said its team is currently working on testing fake medications to work out what exactly they are made of. The company advised consumers to watch out for low-cost offers for prescription-only drugs, missing contact information, requests for cryptocurrency payments, unsecured checkout processes, and prompts for sensitive personal, medical, or financial data. Novo Nordisk, the company that makes Ozempic and Rybelsus, said it was aware that counterfeit Ozempic products are being sold in the UK and is working with health authorities, including the MHRA, to investigate the 'critical issue'. It advised people to examine packaging and pens closely before using them. Mr Morling said the MHRA is cracking down on the issue of fake medicines and pharmacies, with offenders potentially facing criminal investigation and prosecution. The Independent has approached Pfizer, the company that makes Viagra, for comment.
