Bureau Of Prisons Task Force Taking Shape, Challenges Remain
Announcement
The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) announced the formation of its First Step Act (FSA) Task Force earlier this month to target moving more inmates from federal prisons to community placement, known as prerelease custody. The BOP is also maximizing bed-space in Residential Reentry Centers (halfway houses) for those in most need of these important reentry services. The initiative is part of fully implementing the FSA, which was signed into law by Donald J. Trump in December 2018 during his first term in office. BOP Director William Marshall III stated when the Task Force was announced that, "Staff were taking the blame for delays they didn't cause. They told me their systems weren't always showing the right dates. Inmates and their families assumed they were ignoring my directive. That wasn't true for the vast majority of our staff….But let me be absolutely clear – where we find that 1% who weren't doing their jobs with integrity, we will find them and hold them accountable because accountability goes both ways.'
Task Force Leadership
Rick Stover, Sr. Deputy Assistant Director Designation and Sentence Computation Center (DSCC), has had a distinguished career with the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). With over three decades of correctional experience, he understands the importance of what he calls "getting the ship turned in the right direction" regarding FSA. He draws from his years of experience as a case manager, correctional programs administrator in Washington, DC, and Warden at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut. Stover was an active member of the committee responsible for selecting inmates for home confinement under the CARES Act. This act allowed the BOP to move inmates with underlying medical conditions to home confinement to mitigate the risks of COVID-19 in prison settings. As a result of the committee's efforts, nearly 50,000 inmates placed on home confinement successfully completed their sentences without incidents. This outcome highlighted that alternatives to incarceration can be effective.
Stover, along with a team of over 30 analysts from the DSCC, is responsible for reviewing inmates eligible for home confinement or community custody under the First Step Act (FSA). This task force was formed due to ongoing issues with the Bureau of Prisons' computer systems, which are struggling to accurately calculate FSA credits. Each month, eligible inmates can participate in programs to earn up to 15 credits, which reduce their sentences. While the maximum reduction is capped at 365 days, inmates serving sentences longer than 48 months can use these credits toward home confinement.
Since the implementation of the final rule outlining FSA guidance, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has struggled with accurately calculating the credits. The agency has focused on calculating the monthly credits without considering the projected date for earning all credits. As a result, inmates who could be placed in community halfway houses or home confinement end up staying in prison longer than necessary.
Expectations Are High
Prisoners I've spoken to about the Task Force have been confused by conflicting information about the FSA since it began. Case managers have struggled to understand how to combine the FSA with the Second Chance Act, a law signed by George W. Bush that allowed for up to a year of community placement. Former BOP Director Colette Peters strongly supported 'stacking,' which combined the benefits of the FSA with the community placement offered by the Second Chance Act. However, the BOP couldn't fully implement this due to capacity issues at halfway houses, as there was simply not enough room to accommodate inmates coming from institutions.
While Peters' administration couldn't move more inmates to halfway houses, they did provide calculations to estimate when an inmate could leave the institution for such placement. This created additional frustration, as case managers handling the paperwork often faced resistance from Residential Reentry Managers (RRMs) who coordinate community placements. As a result, inmates became frustrated with longer stays in prison, and this frustration persists today. Stover indicated, 'While the Bureau has made marked improvements in our time credit calculation applications since the onset of the FSA statute, more improvements are needed. We have changes forthcoming that will simplify the data for both staff and inmates.'
Getting The Word Out
As part of the Task Force's duties within the BOP, educating decision-makers at the Agency's 122 institutions is a priority. Stover has held meetings with wardens and regional directors to discuss FSA initiatives. Recently, video training sessions were conducted across the country to inform staff about the Task Force's role and address questions. He noted, "While training to wardens and other high ranking officials is great, the most significant training that we can provide is to the case managers who are on the front lines of this issue. If they understand how the calculations work, they can better explain the process to the inmates. Once the new time credit calculations take effect, our target audience to explain the updates will be the case managers throughout the Bureau."
Currently, the BOP is tackling these issues without an updated program statement, which serves as the rulebook for case managers overseeing FSA at the institutions. In the absence of this document, case managers have relied on internal memos and training to guide their work. FSA is just one part of their responsibilities, and numerous reports highlight staffing shortages, with case managers being reassigned to work as corrections officers due to inadequate staffing levels. Stover noted this policy is currently under review, and he is hopeful that expected changes to the policy can be adopted for the benefit of both staff and inmates.
Working Through The List
The Task Force is starting with the evaluation of those who are currently in halfway houses that could be transferred to home confinement if the inmates received the full benefit of "stacking" recommended Second Chance Act placement to FSA time credits, consistent with Director Marshall's guidance last month. The Second Chance Act limits the amount of home confinement to 6 months (or 10%) from the end of the sentence, but the end of the sentence is a moving target for some inmates because they continue to earn FSA credits each month even when they are at the halfway house. The Task Force is manually calculating these dates for inmates in halfway houses, because the BOP's own computer program currently does not calculate these dates once inmates are released from prisons into the halfway houses, although Stover indicated such calculations will occur with the recent application updates.
Once that is done, then the Task Force will turn their efforts to those currently in prison and there it will get complicated. There are inmates who have received dates to transition to halfway houses but case managers previously have not revisited those dates based on the new guidance from BOP Director William Marshall III. The reasons for this are clear, it is more work for case managers who are reluctant to do work they have already done. However, as a person who has seen prison from the inside, a small effort from someone at the BOP can have life altering effects on an inmate who deserves a second chance. Stover noted, "As we manually calculate these dates and move inmates from the halfway houses to home confinement, we expect this to create a sizable number of open beds in many of our halfway houses across the country. This allows us to then revisit the placement dates for inmates currently in our institutions and increase the number of inmates that we can place in the community, and in many instances, allow inmates to get out of prison quicker to begin their transition to go home."
Challenges Remain
As the Task Force continues its work, some challenges persist. Unlike FSA credits, which are earned automatically, Second Chance Act community placements are discretionary and constrained by halfway house capacity. To date, the BOP has provided limited explanation to inmates about why they have not been granted full Second Chance Act placement and have offered little transparency on halfway house availability. Inmates are simply assigned a transition date with no additional details. Since placement is discretionary, pursuing relief through administrative remedies is often futile, and even taking the issue to court after exhausting remedies is unlikely to result in action. Stover said, "The plan is to change this lack of transparency. Since Day One, Director Marshall's guidance has been clear. We have an obligation to staff, inmates, and their families to be transparent, up front, and honest. FSA is a complicated statute, and we have made mistakes in the past. We own those. Moving forward, we must do better. Moving eligible inmates from prisons to the community not only saves taxpayer dollars, but it is consistent with what was expected when the FSA statute was enacted in late 2018."
The BOP seeks to preserve the resources of its contracted halfway houses by prioritizing inmates who may need housing after lengthy incarcerations. While this is a reasonable approach, it results in many minimum-security inmates with sentences under 5 years—and stable home lives—being kept in institutional settings longer. At the same time, some inmates with homes are receiving extended halfway house placements, causing frustration and resentment among the broader inmate population.
The Task Force is working, but it is a monumental task to overcome years of problems.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas' proposed congressional map dismantles districts flagged by DOJ
In early July, as President Donald Trump was pushing Texas to redraw its congressional map to better favor Republicans, the Department of Justice sent state leaders a letter. Four of Texas' congressional districts were unconstitutional, the department warned. Three, the 9th, 18th and 33rd, were unconstitutional 'coalition districts,' where Black and Hispanic voters combine to form a majority. The 29th, while majority Hispanic, was also unconstitutional, the letter said, because it was created by its two neighbors being coalition districts. 'It is well-established that so-called 'coalition districts' run afoul of the Voting Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment,' assistant attorney general Harmeet Dhillon wrote, threatening legal action if Texas didn't bring the districts into compliance. On Wednesday, Texas House Republicans released their first draft of a redrawn map designed to give the GOP five new seats in next year's midterms. As for the four districts that troubled Dhillon? In the Houston area, the 9th and the 18th districts, where no one race currently constitutes a majority of eligible voters, would be redrawn as just over half Hispanic and half Black, respectively. But as a result, the nearby 29th District — a fixture of east Houston's Latino community — would lose its Hispanic majority, becoming 43% Hispanic, 33% Black and 18% white. The 33rd District in North Texas, although entirely redrawn, would still have no single racial or ethnic group that constitutes a majority. Texas has long maintained that it drew these maps without an eye toward race. But tinkering with the lines now that these racial concerns have been raised risks triggering a Voting Rights Act complaint, legal experts said. States generally cannot redraw districts based on race without a compelling argument that it's necessary to protect voters' ability to elect their candidates of choice, said Justin Levitt, a redistricting expert at Loyola Law School. 'It sure seems like they have actually done what the DOJ, without any basis, accused them of,' Levitt said, noting that he had not done sufficient analysis to say for sure. Legal experts say the DOJ's interpretation of the law around coalition districts, and thus its legal threats to Texas, are based on faulty logic that could be backing the state into a discrimination lawsuit. 'Nothing in this decision suggests, much less holds, that the VRA prohibits the very existence of coalition districts,' Ellen Katz, a redistricting expert at the University of Michigan Law School, told the House redistricting committee at its first hearing last week. 'There are hundreds of these districts nationwide in which jurisdictions relying on traditional principles create these districts.' Coalition districts Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 says states cannot engage in election or voting practices that dilute the electoral power of voters of color, including by packing them into a single district or diffusing them throughout multiple. For decades, courts held that states can satisfy the requirements of Section 2 by creating districts where multiple politically cohesive racial voting groups constitute a majority. Currently, Texas has nine districts where no one racial or ethnic group has a majority; in eight of them, Black, Hispanic and Asian voters combined create a majority. In 2024, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears Texas-based cases, reversed a prior ruling and said coalitions of different racial or ethnic groups within one district cannot claim their rights have been violated under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Citing this ruling, Dhillon told Texas that its coalition districts were 'nothing more than vestiges of an unconstitutionally racially based gerrymandering past, which must be abandoned, and must now be corrected by Texas.' But this reflects a misunderstanding of this case, legal experts say. Under this ruling, the Voting Rights Act can't require states to create coalition districts, but that doesn't mean coalition districts are inherently unconstitutional. 'All it says is that you don't have the affirmative obligation to purposely create [a coalition district] at the outset,' said Mark Gaber, a lawyer with the Campaign Legal Center who is representing a group of plaintiffs in an ongoing lawsuit against the current maps. 'It certainly doesn't say, go through the map and eliminate all of the ones you drew.' Texas leaders have contradicted themselves and each other on the question of whether the state has coalition districts and what should be done about them. Gov. Greg Abbott, days after receiving Dhillon's letter, included redistricting on his agenda for the Legislature's special session, citing 'constitutional concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Justice.' He later told Dallas' Fox 4 News that redistricting was necessary because of the 5th Circuit's ruling. 'We want to make sure that we have maps that don't impose coalition districts while at the very same time ensuring that we will maximize the ability of Texans to be able to vote for the candidate of their choice,' he said. At a House committee hearing Friday, GOP Rep. David Spiller of Jacksboro asked Rep. Todd Hunter, who carried the 2021 maps in the lower chamber, whether Texas currently has coalition districts. Hunter said 'the law was different then.' 'You had coalition districts being interpreted differently,' he said. 'Today, you have a 2024 5th Circuit case absolutely changing the law.' But in court, Texas has long argued it has not drawn coalition districts to address racial disparities, because it draws 'race blind' maps. Attorney General Ken Paxton doubled down on this argument in response to the Dhillon letter. 'The Texas Legislature has led the Nation in rejecting race-based decision-making in its redistricting process — it has drawn its current maps in conformance with traditional, non-racial redistricting criteria to ensure Texas continues to adopt policies that will truly Make America Great Again,' Paxton wrote. At the request of Democrats, the House and Senate redistricting committees have invited Dhillon to testify on the letter and her allegations against Texas, but neither she nor any representative from the DOJ has responded to the request. The Senate panel this week voted not to subpoena her. What happened to the Houston DOJ districts Three of the districts Dhillon cited in her letter are neighbors in the Houston area. All three would be radically redrawn by the House's proposed map. The 9th Congressional District is a multiracial district made up of 45% Black voters, 25% Hispanic voters, 18% white voters and 9% Asian voters. The district, which covers parts of southwest Houston and outlying suburbs, voted for Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024 by 44 points, and has reliably reelected Democratic Rep. Al Green since 2004. Under the House's proposed map, the 9th District has been redrawn around an entirely new part of Houston, retaining just 2% of Green's current district and scooping up conservative swaths of east Harris County. The Hispanic population would climb to just over 50% and the white population would almost double to 34%. Black voters would drop to 12% and Asian voters to 2%. In 2024, this new district would have voted for Trump by 15 points. Green, who is essentially drawn out of his district, condemned the proposal as racist, saying 'the DOJ demanded that the race card be played, and the governor dealt the people of Texas a racist hand.' Republicans pointed to the changing preferences of Latino voters, who swung sharply for Trump and other GOP candidates in 2024, to defend these new lines. 'Each of these newly-drawn districts now trend Republican in political performance,' Hunter said. 'it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts.' Some of Green's existing district has been pushed into the newly drawn 18th Congressional District. While this was previously a seat with no single racial majority, its electorate would become 50.8% Black, while cutting the Hispanic and white populations. It would also tilt even further to the left; Harris carried the district by 40 percentage points in 2024 and would have won it by a 54-point spread under the new lines. Next door, Rep. Sylvia Garcia's 29th Congressional District would also be reconfigured, with Hispanic residents making up 43% of its new eligible voting population — down 20 percentage points from the current makeup. The district's Black and white populations would increase to create a district without a single racial group dominating. It would become more strongly Democratic. In challenging Texas' maps, plaintiffs have contended that Houston's population justifies two majority Hispanic districts. Instead, the one strong majority Hispanic district has been eliminated, and replaced with a district that is almost exactly half Hispanic, alongside one that is almost exactly half Black. '50.5% is unlikely to perform for Latino preferred candidates, or Black preferred candidates,' Gaber said. 'And they know that. It's a mirage.' What happened to the North Texas DOJ district In her letter, Dhillon also said the 33rd Congressional District ran afoul of the Constitution through its coalition status. The district is currently anchored in Fort Worth, with an electorate that is 44% Hispanic, 25% Black, 23% white and 6% Asian. The district went for Harris by 34 percentage points and has consistently reelected Rep. Marc Veasey, a Black Democrat. A decade ago, Texas, and the federal courts, asserted that the 33rd was not a coalition district. 'District 33 is not a 'minority coalition opportunity district' in which two different minority groups 'band together' to form an electoral majority,' the state and plaintiffs said in a joint advisory to the court. A district court judge agreed, saying it was 'not intentionally drawn as a minority coalition district.' The revised 33rd Congressional District maintains about a third of Veasey's old district, moving out of his Fort Worth base. The proposed new lines would reduce the Hispanic and Black population and increase the white population, while maintaining about the same Democratic lean. Just like in the current map, the proposed 33rd district does not have a single racial group that dominates. Legal experts say that is not inherently a problem, despite what the DOJ letter alleged, as long as voters of color have sufficient power to elect their candidate of choice. At a House committee hearing last week, Nina Perales, the vice president of litigation at the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, one of the groups suing over Texas' current maps, testified that the Dallas-Fort Worth area, like Houston, should have an additional Hispanic-majority district on top of Veasey's Hispanic-plurality seat. 'In light of the growth of the population over the past two decades, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act does require the creation of additional districts,' Perales said. 'If the committee and the legislature decides to take up redistricting, it is certainly true that you cannot subtract from the current level of representation that we have.' Few districts in the Dallas-Fort Worth area went without major changes in the new draft map. In the reshaped downtown Dallas district of Rep. Jasmine Crockett, 50.2% of the voting population would be Black, not unlike the two new Houston districts to inch just past the majority threshold. If Hispanic or Black voters were electing their candidate of choice, there is no legal reason to move more voters of one group into the district to hit a perfunctory benchmark of 50%, Levitt said. 'It tells me you're trying really hard to hit a particular target, such that the target itself was the predominant reason for moving people in or out of the district,' Levitt said. 'That's exactly what the courts have said you can't do.' The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sha'Carri Richardson arrested earlier this week, jail records show
Sha'Carri Richardson was arrested this week after an incident at the Seattle–Tacoma International Airport, according to jail records. Richardson was booked at the South Correctional Entity in Des Moines, Washington, on Sunday, jail records show. She was released on Monday. No details were given about Richardson's arrest. 'We are aware of the reports and we have no comment at this time,' USA Track and Field said in a statement to USA TODAY Sports. Richardson competed in the 100 meters on Thursday evening of the 2025 U.S. track and field championships and advanced to Friday's semifinal. She's withdrawn from the 100 semifinal and will not run in the 200 either. Richardson has a bye into the 100 at this year's world championships because she is the defending champion. The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Sha'Carri Richardson arrested earlier this week, jail records show
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Arrests made in Gwinnett park shootings, 1 linked to gang activity
Four people have now been arrested in connection with two separate shootings at Briscoe Park in Snellville over Memorial Day weekend that left families running for cover. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The latest arrest came Thursday when Snellville Police charged 18-year-old Nasear Johnson with five counts of aggravated assault for the Saturday night shooting that injured five teenagers. Two other suspects were arrested in June in connection with the same incident. Joshua Zere, 17, was arrested June 11 and charged as a party to a crime for aggravated assault along with gang-related charges. Eric Meier-Harris, 17, was arrested June 12 on five counts of aggravated assault. Court testimony on July 23 for Zere revealed the Saturday night violence stemmed from gang rivalry between competing groups. Police say rival gangs had an argument at the birthday party that led to a shootout. Paul Williams was taking family photos when gunfire erupted that Saturday night and happened to be near where more than 100 people were at the party. 'Stray bullets were flying. My kids could have got hit. I could have got hit. My wife could have got hit,' Williams said. Williams was near the gazebo with eight children when bullets started flying just 200 feet away. 'We run. We got to the car. My kids got in the car. My kids are crying. We are rushing into the car,' Williams said. Investigators collected more than 30 shell casings from multiple caliber weapons including rifles. Five teenagers between 14 and 17 years old were shot and hospitalized. The next afternoon brought another shooting at the same park when 32-year-old Christopher Gaston allegedly shot one man near the baseball fields while families watched children play. Police have not released a motive for that shooting. He turned himself voluntarily on July 22, according to court records. Since the incidents, Snellville has increased patrols from police and private security. City leaders are also exploring lighting and security camera improvements at the park. [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
