
Spending Review 2025: What's next for Northern Ireland?
"The reality is the executive will still remain in a financially constrained position, particularly in 2026-27," he said."It is clear that significant challenges remain for our public services."Those challenges were obvious on the streets of Northern Ireland this week.
The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), which the chief constable says is "critically underfunded", had to ask for outside help after just two nights of violence.
Justice Minister Naomi Long is bidding for funding for a policing recovery plan, which is one of many competing priorities.Earlier in the week, the independent budget watchdog, the NI Fiscal Council, warned there were no easy answers to the chronic underfunding of NI Water.A lack of investment in wastewater infrastructure is already undermining other executive aims to increase housing supply and tackle pollution.
A 'needs-based' top-up for Stormont
The Spending Review confirmed that for the foreseeable future Stormont will continue to get a "needs-based" financial top-up.It was introduced when devolution returned last year and adds 24p to every £1 which comes to Northern Ireland via the standard devolution funding formula.A bid to increase the size of the top-up was not successful, though negotiations between Stormont and the Treasury continue.So with no immediate prospect of significant additional funds from London executive ministers will need to look again at how they spend what they have.A more stable Stormont means makes a strategic approach relatively easier.The intention is to use the Spending Review as an opportunity to agree a multi-year budget next year, the first time that will have happened in more than a decade.
The Audit Office, a spending watchdog, has previously concluded that single-year budgets were hampering planning and innovation across NI public services."The executive now needs to move away from single-year, crisis budgets and take more ownership of its own financial position," said Ann Watt, director of the Pivotal think tank."A multi-year settlement provides a chance for ministers to plan for the next three years, and choose how best to prioritise spending, investment, reform and workforce planning."However she warned that a multi-year budget on its own will come nowhere near to solving the problems in NI public services."Transformation is essential," she said."This is the only way that services can be made sustainable and affordable for now and the future."A focus on prevention and early intervention is key."Some relative minor transformation projects are underway, funded by the financial package which accompanied the return of devolution.There is probably only a limited window to start bolder, perhaps controversial, projects before the Stormont parties start to move into election mode in the second half of next year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Reform UK deputy Leicestershire County Council leader removed
The deputy leader of Leicestershire County Council has been removed from the role after three months in the UK's Joseph Boam has also been removed from position as cabinet member for adult social care, with a party source saying he would now be taking on an unspecified "new role".The 22-year-old was one of 25 Reform councillors elected to the authority in May's local on social media on Sunday, Boam said: "Despite the recent news, nothing's changed, I'll keep fighting for Whitwick at County Hall and doing everything I can to help get a Reform UK government and Nigel Farage as our next prime minister." County council leader Dan Harrison told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) he would not comment on the matter until after the Reform group had met later this to the LDRS, Boam previously said: "I haven't stepped down from any role. I am no longer deputy leader or in cabinet. But have been offered a cabinet support role which I'm inclined to take." After winning 25 of the 55 seats on the council, Reform took control from the Conservatives to form a minority administration.A Reform UK source added: "Joseph deserves thanks for his role in helping to establish the Reform group at Leicestershire County Council and we wish him well, as he moves into a new role, where he will continue to support the group's efforts at County Hall."The Leicestershire Conservative group - the main opposition on the authority - has now branded Reform UK's local leadership a "shambles". Their leader Deborah Taylor said it was "no surprise" to her Boam "has been shown the door after just three months".She added: "He was wholly unqualified for such a critical role and lacked the experience or judgement to bring anything of value to the position. "Those of us who have led this council know that it takes at least six to 12 months for even the most capable new councillor to properly learn their portfolio, and that's with the benefit of mentoring from seasoned colleagues."A new deputy leader and cabinet member for adult social care is expected to appointed in due course.


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump could send US troops to Ukraine to enforce potential peace deal
President Donald Trump refused to rule out the deployment of American soldiers to enforce a potential peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Speaking with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump stated he would discuss the US commitment to a future settlement with European leaders at the White House. Trump indicated that Europe would be the 'first line of defence' for Ukraine's security, albeit with some American assistance. He seemed to dismiss the prospect of Ukraine's future NATO membership, despite acknowledging no formal discussions had taken place. The meeting occurred after Trump's recent summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, where a 'peace deal' potentially involving Ukrainian territorial concessions was reportedly discussed.


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Larger families could gain more than £20,000 if Labour scraps two-child benefit cap
Tens of thousands of families with multiple children could receive thousands of pounds more in annual payments if ministers scrap the two child benefit cap, according to official figures. More than 70,000 households would be entitled to over £18,000 a year in child benefits if the policy is lifted, with the largest families gaining more than £20,000 compared with the current system. The cap, introduced under Conservative welfare reforms, blocks parents from claiming the child element of Universal Credit worth £292.81 a month for a third or subsequent child born after April 2017. Figures released in response to a parliamentary question show 71,580 families with five or more children would benefit from its removal. That includes nearly 15,000 families with six children, almost 5,000 with seven, and more than 400 with ten or more, who could be eligible for the child payments. Labour MPs are pressing Sir Keir Starmer to deliver on his pledge of fairness by abolishing the cap, which they argue is punishing children growing up in poverty. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has previously estimated that ending the policy would lift around half a million children out of hardship. But Conservatives insist the cap is a matter of fairness for taxpayers, arguing that it prevents families on benefits from receiving packages worth more than the minimum wage. Nigel Farage has also called for it to be scrapped, leaving the Conservatives increasingly isolated in defending the measure. The prime minister must find around £3.5 billion to fund the move. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is weighing proposals, including a push from Gordon Brown to raise gambling levies. Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said: 'Without a cap, Labour will end up giving households thousands of pounds in extra benefits — a top-up worth more than a year's full-time pay on the minimum wage. Not only is this unaffordable, it's also unfair. If you're in work you don't get extra pay for another child, so it doesn't make sense for parents on benefits to get more.' She added: 'Working people shouldn't see their taxes go up to fund uncapped payouts to others who've opted out of work but opted in to multiple children.'