The real orca attack video, watch killer whale ripping apart its target; this one isn't fake like the Jessica Radcliffe and Marina Lysaro clips
Jessica Radcliffe
and Marina Lysaro being killed by
orcas
went viral on social media, the
killer whales
have grabbed eyeballs. Orcas are considered highly intelligent and social predators that are found in seas and oceans worldwide. They are usually not seen as a major threat to human beings; however, most fatal cases involving orcas have taken place in captivity.
They were named killer whales by ancient sailors who observed their groups hunting and preying on larger whale species, according to Whale & Dolphin Conservation USA. They referred to orcas as ballena asesina in Spanish, meaning killer whale.
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals
By Vaibhav Sisinity
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
But orcas are not the only ocean dwellers who have the strength and awareness to kill their prey. They have a competition in the form of
great white sharks
. The two ocean giants may seem to carry some similarities, but they are very different in the way they go about their business in the water.
The viral videos claiming that orcas killed two marine trainers might have turned out to be fake, but there are several videos present all over the internet that suggest how brutal the killer whales are when it comes to ripping apart their targets.
Watch a video shared by National Geographic showing how an orca defeated a great white shark
Live Events
Orcas vs Great white sharks
Orcas and great white sharks are both ocean dwellers. Amid all the apex predators underwater, these two stand out as the most formidable forces. They are known for ruling their respective domains with unmatched prowess.
While great whites prefer warmer temperatures, orcas thrive in cooler water. However, there have been times when both were seen in the same region. According to Discover Magazine, orcas, the killer whales, are stronger, bigger, and smarter, and can swim faster than great white sharks; hence, they outmatch the white sharks.
Orcas are the largest members of the dolphin family. They are easy to recognize due to their distinctive black and white coloration and towering dorsal fin. On the other hand, great white sharks are known for their streamlined bodies, grey coloration, and rows of serrated teeth.
As far as the diet is concerned, orcas are versatile eaters. They consume a variety of prey, including fish, seals, and even other whales, while great white sharks primarily feed on marine mammals like seals and sea lions.
Orcas live in close-knit groups called pods. They use a complex system of sounds to communicate. Great white sharks tend to be lone hunters, quietly creeping up on their prey. Orcas have a longer life span compared to white sharks. The killer whale can live up to 90 years, while white sharks have a lifespan of about 70 years.
Orcas vs Great white sharks: Size comparison
Orcas are mammals that live in groups called pods. These carnivorous animals can grow to be between 23 and 32 feet long and weigh up to 6 tons.
Great white sharks are born measuring about 1.2 m (3.9 ft) and have a growth rate of about 25 cm (9.8 in) every year, according to Shark Divers. Larger Great White females can grow up to 6.1 m (21 ft) in length and weigh in at over 2,000 kg (4,500 pounds) at maturity, according to National Geographic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
4 hours ago
- The Wire
How Did the Potato Get its Tubers?
DNA studies have provided an answer. Samosa, paratha, tikki, poori-bhaji and masala dosa are among the myriad ways the Indian palate liaises with the humble potato. And then there are chips, fries, wedges and mashed potatoes. Potatoes are a major chunk of our caloric intake. The potato has a close evolutionary relationship to another popular favourite, the tomato. Both crops were domesticated about 7,000 to 10,000 years ago by the indigenous people of the Andean regions of South America. Then, in the late 15th and early 16th centuries, Portuguese and Spanish colonisers introduced them to the rest of the world. The potatoes we buy in the market are the tubers of the potato plant. Tubers are swollen portions of the plant's underground stem. That is where the plant stores its nutrient reserves. Tubers bear buds from which new plants can arise. Potato plants are most often propagated from the buds on the tubers. This is called vegetative propagation. In contrast, the tomatoes we buy in the market are the tomato plant's fruits (berries). Tomato plants do not develop tubers. The berries develop after the flower is pollinated, and contain the seeds. Their equivalents in the potato are called 'true potato seeds' (TPS) which develop inside the berries produced by the potato plant. Potato berries look a lot like small, green tomatoes. They are not consumed because of their mild toxicity. Also, many cultivated potatoes either do not flower, or their flowers are infertile, and do not produce berries. Varieties that make fertile flowers can be sexually propagated using the TPS. Why do potatoes, but not tomatoes, develop tubers? The answer has now been found by a research team led by scientists from the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. They reported this on July 31, in the journal Cell. The potato tuber's origin story they unravelled had an element of surprise. DNA and speciation When any species splits to give rise to two new species, the genomes of the new species begin diverging from each other, and continue doing so with time. If we know the rate of DNA sequence divergence, we can estimate approximately how long ago the split occurred. Why do the genomes diverge? One view of this process goes like this: Imagine we begin with a single species spread over a land mass which has two hills. A rise in the sea level then leads to geographical isolation of the hills from each other on two newly formed islands. Now the two hill populations are unable to interbreed. Mutations arising in one are unable to spread to the other. Over time the two populations accumulate distinct mutations in their genomes. It is as though one genome changes its 'colour' to red, while the other changes it to green. After say tens to hundreds of thousand years, pollen borne on a wind-blown insect fortuitously wafts over the waters from one island to other and fertilises the flowers there. It is quite likely that the fertilisation results in sterile seeds, or that the emergent hybrid plant is unable to efficiently produce pollen or ova. This is because the accumulated DNA differences make a few genes in one genome incompatible with their counterparts in the other. Now the two populations can be said to have become distinct species. Thereafter, both geographic isolation and suboptimal fertility leads the two species to continue the genome divergence. The researchers sequenced the genome of multiple species of wild potatoes, wild tomatoes and etuberosum. Etuberosum is a group of three plant species that is closely related to potato and tomato but none of these species have been domesticated. By comparing the sequences, they inferred that the tomato and etuberosum genomes diverged at the earliest about 13-14 million years ago. Also read: Cracking the Code of Inheritance: Mendel's Traits Get a 21st-Century Twist A riddle The sequences also told them the potato and tomato genomes diverged nine million years ago, while potato and etuberosum diverged 8.5 million years ago. These findings presented a conundrum. Since the tomato and etuberosum split was the earliest, how could the potato have split from both these species so much later? In conventional thinking, the subsequent splitting off of potato should either be from tomato or etuberosum, not both. To solve the riddle, the researchers postulated that about 8-9 million years ago, the potato ancestor had descended from a tomato-etuberosum hybrid. Support for this came from the fact that the tomato- and etuberosum-related genome segments were distributed and evenly interdigitated on all the chromosomes of the potatoes. This unusual relationship is most easily explained by hypothesising that the ancestral genome of all potato species is descended from that of an ancient tomato-etuberosum hybrid. Their hypothesis found support when they examined the genome sequences at a higher resolution. The potato genome was subdivided into smaller segments and they found that 51% of the segments were most closely related to corresponding segments in the tomato genome, while 37% were most closely related to the corresponding segments in the etuberosum genome. The remaining 12% were equally related to segments of both tomato and etuberosum. The tomato- and etuberosum-related segments were distributed evenly throughout the genome and were interdigitated on all the chromosomes of the potato. This unusual pattern was consistent with the idea that the potato genome has descended from the genome of a tomato-etuberosum hybrid. Also read: A Tiny Insect is Revealing How Larger Animals Sense Electric Fields Tubers and seeds The tomato-etuberosum hybrid likely had infertile flowers or produced non-germinating seeds, as is the case in most inter-species hybrid plants. However, if the ancient tomato-etuberosum hybrid was fortuitously able to store its nutrient reserves in portions of its underground stems, thus swelling them to make incipient tubers, then the buds in these portions would be better able to vegetatively propagate the hybrid plant. Since the tubers impart a better ability to persist via vegetative propagation, there would be a selection for genes that improved tubers formation. By conferring the ability to persist via vegetative propagation, the tubers also bought some offspring of the hybrid plants the time to undergo additional mutations that restored their ability to make fertile flowers, and seeds (the TPS). These tuber-making plants thus regained the ability to sexually propagate. Interestingly, among the genes with a role in tuber formation, some turned out to be from tomato-related segments of the potato genome, while others were from the etuberosum-related segments. This suggested that novel juxtaposition of unrelated related genes might also have contributed to triggering incipient tuber development in the hybrid. The findings provide much food for thought. As scrumptious as a batata vada. Durgadas P. Kasbekar is a retired scientist. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Dangerous virus on the prowl? Scientists investigate Colorado rabbits with tentacles after alarming mutation fears
Colorado wildlife officials are urging calm after a spate of unusual sightings, rabbits with dark, horn-like growths sprouting from their heads and faces, has stirred public unease and speculation online. While experts say the condition, known as cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV), is not currently transmissible to humans, some epidemiologists are warning that close monitoring is essential to guard against any future spillover. The disease, spread by biting insects such as mosquitoes and fleas, causes grotesque, wart-like tumors on infected rabbits. In recent days, residents across Northern Colorado have reported seeing the animals in alarming numbers, sometimes with growths obstructing their vision or mouths. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Although CRPV has been documented for decades and is considered largely benign in wild rabbit populations, veterinary virologists note that papillomaviruses have a history of evolving. In rare cases, similar animal viruses have jumped species barriers, raising questions about whether climate change, urban expansion, and surging insect populations could create conditions for mutation. Possible impacts on domestic animals The virus is more dangerous for domesticated rabbits, where it can cause malignant tumors. Pet owners are advised to keep rabbits indoors if infected wildlife are present nearby and to seek veterinary care immediately if symptoms appear. Live Events There is currently no vaccine or treatment for CRPV, either for wild or domestic rabbits. Colorado wildlife officials stress that the public should avoid touching, feeding, or attempting to capture the infected animals. For now, the official message remains clear to keep your distance, protect your pets, and let scientists do their work. FAQs What is the horned rabbit virus ? The horned rabbit virus, formally known as cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV), is a wildlife disease that causes wart-like or horn-like growths on rabbits' heads and faces. Can the horned rabbit virus infect humans? Currently, there is no evidence that CRPV can infect humans or most household pets. Scientists say it is species-specific, but they continue to monitor for potential mutations. How does the virus spread? CRPV spreads mainly through biting insects such as mosquitoes, fleas, and ticks, making infections more common in warmer months.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Missouri reports rare Naegleria fowleri brain-eating amoeba infection possibly linked to water skiing
A Missouri resident has been hospitalized with a confirmed Naegleria fowleri brain-eating amoeba infection, possibly contracted after water skiing in the Lake of the Ozarks , the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services said Wednesday, August 13. The patient, whose identity has not been released, is receiving treatment in an intensive care unit. Health officials said the illness developed days after the patient visited the lake. The source of exposure is still under investigation. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Also read: Deadly brain-eating amoeba kills Texas woman: how to be safe? The Lake of the Ozarks State Park has two public beaches, according to its website, though officials did not specify which location the patient visited. Naegleria fowleri is a microscopic amoeba found in warm freshwater. The infection it causes, primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), is rare but severe. The organism can enter the brain when water is forced up the nose during activities such as swimming, diving, or water skiing, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). From 1962 to 2024, there have been 167 reported PAM cases in the United States, the Missouri health department said. Live Events Last month, 12-year-old Jaysen Carr of South Carolina died after contracting the amoeba. It was the state's first known case since 2016, according to the South Carolina Department of Public Health. His family has spoken publicly, urging awareness to prevent similar cases. The CDC advises precautions to reduce risk, including wearing a nose clip or holding the nose shut when jumping or diving into freshwater and keeping the head above water in hot springs. Early symptoms of infection can include nausea, vomiting, fever, severe headache, stiff neck, seizures, altered mental status, and hallucinations. The CDC notes that Naegleria fowleri infections cannot be contracted from swallowing contaminated water or through person-to-person transmission.
