This pet cooling mat is a 'game-changer' for overheating dogs — Amazon shoppers swear by it
When the summer heat hits (and it's been hitting), it's not just us humans who feel it — our furry friends struggle too. Keeping pets cool during sweltering hot days is important for their comfort and health, especially when temperatures soar. That's where this Large Pet Cooling Mat from Amazon Canada comes in handy.
Shoppers are calling it a total "game-changer" at preventing pets from overheating, whether they're lounging indoors or tagging along on summer excursions. It's designed to provide instant relief without any electricity, water or weird activation tactics — just a comfy, chilled surface they can sprawl out on. If your pet's feeling the heat, this mat is a cool solution.
Have furry friends? Keep them comfortable in sweltering heat with this under-$50 cooling pad.
If your pup or feline friends are feeling the summer heat, this cooling mat is here to help. It's thick, comfortable and cool, and there's no need for electricity or freezing to get it going — once your pet lies down, the mat will instantly start drawing away heat.
It will even change colour so you can visibly see it working. The waterproof, anti-slip design keeps things clean and safe, so they can lie on it wet or dry. Plus, it's very lightweight and easily foldable, making it perfect for road trips, hanging out at the park or hot days at home.
It's easy to clean and quick to dry, making it a no-brainer summer must-have for keeping your furry friend cool in scorching temperatures.
⭐️ 4.4/5 stars
💬 1,000+ ratings
🏆 "If my dog could write reviews, this would be a 10-paw rating."
"Best cooling mat ever," writes one customer who also calls it "fantastic." It keeps their dog "nice and cool no matter where he is," adding that they take it in their vehicle and to the cottage.
"My dog who is panting all the time has adopted her new cooling mat in a second!" shared another. They said it's a real "game-changer for her."
Another said it "keeps my dog cool and comfy!" They love that "the material stays cool to the touch and doesn't need any extra effort like freezing or wetting it." They continued, "It's lightweight and super easy to move around the house or take on trips."
While one person said it "feels cool to the touch," they did complain about it feeling "super thin" — their solution was laying it on their pup's bed. Another important note is don't leave it in the sun for too long, as that can damage the cooling fabric and colour-changing abilities.
The $47 price tag might feel a bit steep for a pet mat, but shoppers say it's definitely worth it for the cooling relief it offers their dogs on hot days. It might feel a little thin on its own, but you can always layer it over your pet's bed for extra cushioning. If you want to prevent your pup from overheating, this is a smart summer purchase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Putting IAEA inspectors on the ground
The Washington Post may use my email address to provide me occasional special offers via email and through other platforms. I can opt out at any time.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
30 Same-Sex Couples Raising Kids Get Candid About Their Experience in New Study
A new Pew Research study shares a glimpse at what life is like for same-sex parents raising kids. Researchers spoke with 30 gay, lesbian, and bisexual adults currently raising children with a same-sex partner. According to the Pew, fewer than 1% of parents in the United States are married to or living with a same-sex spouse or partner. To better understand their experiences as parents, researchers spoke with a variety of families, and many shared that they feel like any 'typical' family—trying to juggle it all. Although some of the same-sex couples they interviewed also reported dealing with expensive paths to parenthood, as well as uncertainty amidst current political turmoil. The research was not intended to represent all LGBTQ+ people, but it provides rare, valuable insight into what parenting as a same-sex couple is like today. Interesting learnings from the study included details on the emotional and logical challenges same-sex couples may face when trying to become parents, including reproductive challenges, financial stresses, and popular misconceptions about same-sex parenting. Many couples say their lives are pretty similar to everyone else's. One mom said she and her family 'live a very, very typical life. It's just us being two women who are married and raising beautiful, wonderful kids.' However, some parents flagged that they've had challenges when explaining to their children why their family is different and why some people may not accept them. The study notes that 'a few' parents said their children can be cautious when sharing about their family. Parents also shared their feelings on the current political climate; some said they've 'discussed' leaving the country, while others mentioned pursuing second-parent adoption to ensure their rights are not taken away. Despite everything, parents still have hope that things will change and that all families can thrive in the future. Same-sex parents may face expensive, and sometimes unexpected, financial and legal roadblocks when trying to start or grow their family. For families with biological children, this can include assisted reproduction, like IUI, IVF, and surrogacy. Other families go the adoption route, which can be a time-consuming and expensive process as well. One parent interviewed said her journey to parenthood took 'nearly a decade,' while others mentioned some agencies refused to work with same-sex parents. Finances also play a major factor, whether that's paying for fertility treatments, reproductive procedures like IUI, surrogacy, or dealing with insurance—not to mention legal fees. One father in his 50s said the road to parenthood cost him $200,000—something he would not have been able to afford in his younger years. The legalities of adoption and surrogacy vary from state to state, which can complicate things for parents. According to Eric Wrubel, a partner at Schwartz Sladkus Reich Greenberg Atlas, LLP in New York who handles family law, the adoption process is 'rigorous' yet 'generally easy' for heterosexual couples or single parents looking to adopt. But things can be more complex for same-sex parents."Even today, gay and lesbian couples face discrimination when seeking to find a child to adopt, working with an agency to find a birth mother, and even in their selection by a birth mother to be the adoptive parents of her child."'Even today, gay and lesbian couples face discrimination when seeking to find a child to adopt, working with an agency to find a birth mother, and even in their selection by a birth mother to be the adoptive parents of her child,' he shares. 'Even after a child is born and received into the home of his or her adoptive parents, the adoption must be judged by a court. Accordingly, bias in the form of delays, review of submissions, and outright denial of the adoption can occur—thereby placing continued hurdles in the adoption process for LGBTQ adoptive parents.' The path to surrogacy is marked by similar legal hoops to jump through. Janene Oleaga, a fertility attorney practicing in New York, Maine, and New Hampshire, says that while some states allow same-sex couples to be listed on the birth certificate through the surrogacy and parentage process, others only allow the genetic parent. This means the non-genetic parent must adopt the child. According to John Nachlinger, a New Jersey-based family law attorney and an LGBTQ+ parent of an adopted child, 'family law was designed for a traditional mold—one mom, one dad, one home.' Though efforts have been made to modernize it, 'many policies still reflect outdated assumptions about what constitutes a 'real' family, and current political initiatives are making things worse—restricting funding to organizations that recognize only heterosexual marriages and treating same-sex families as inferior.' According to Nachlinger, even if same-sex parents are married and both are listed on the birth certificate, they should still go through the second-parent adoption process because having a legal framework to define your relationship with the child is crucial. One study participant said that even though her wife donated her embryo, because she didn't physically give birth to the child, she was not listed as the mother on the child's birth certificate, and thus had to go through second-parent adoption. 'Adoptions are recognized in every state and in most other countries in the world, even if same-sex marriage is not,' Nachlinger explains. 'If the Supreme Court decides to end the right to marry everywhere in the United States, these adoption judgments will be critical to protect families.' Whether it's friends or family—or a combination of both—many parents interviewed said their community was essential to family life. Some parents have supportive parents and siblings who are involved in their children's lives, while others recounted friction with family members with different political or religious views, with a few saying family members had 'disowned' them for their sexuality. Others shouted out their friends as key members of their parenting village. 'Our tribe, our village, our squad, whatever word you want to use. They swooped in immediately between dropping clothes off, dropping supplies off, the minute we got the call,' recounted a father. 'And that has brought a sense of gratitude that I had never felt before.' Parents also mentioned finding community with same-sex parents online or in their city or state, as well as increasing their advocacy work to support LGBTQ+ children and families. 'Becoming a parent definitely shifted my focus and [made me] want to fight to make sure that we have our rights [so that] my daughter grows up in a world where she feels protected and seen and not different, shared one father. Read the original article on Parents
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
A mother thought her baby was blown out of a plane. The FAA still allows infants on laps
It was horrifying enough for anyone when a door plug popped off an Alaska Airlines flight at more than 16,000 feet last year, causing an explosive decompression. But one mother's nightmare was particularly acute, as she thought she lost her baby out of the gaping hole in the side of the plane. It's an unimaginable horror, and one that safety regulators could have prevented by requiring that parents secure infants on board planes in a car seat, as they must be when riding in a car. But despite years of calls for just such a rule, none exists. Testimony this week at the National Transportation Safety Board hearing into the incident, and transcripts of interviews with flight attendants conducted by NTSB investigators that were released this week, tell of the panic aboard the flight. Passengers' clothing was ripped off, and their phones were blown out of their hands and sent hurtling into the night by the by the rush of air that accompanied the rapid decompression. The flight attendants weren't sure whether they had lost any of the passengers until the plane had landed. Initially, they weren't even sure if the pilots were conscious or in need of medical attention themselves due to problems communicating between the cabin and cockpit. But among the flight attendants' most serious concerns were the three infants on the flight who were being held on their parents' laps, not in a car seat. And one of those parents, a mother, told flight attendants during the incident that she had lost her son and believed he had been blown outside the plane. 'I was holding her, I said, 'What's going on, what's happening?' and she just says, 'I was holding my son and I think my son blew out the window,'' one of the flight attendants told NTSB investigators, according to a transcript of the interview. 'And that's when I lift up my head and saw the hole and I just started like shaking.' 'I didn't know at that point that that mom was freaking out because she thought her son went out the window,' another flight attendant told investigators. Fortunately, the child had not gone out the hole, although the transcripts from the NTSB did not detail where the child was during the incident or give the name of the mother involved. The plane was able to land within minutes without any serious physical injuries to the 177 people on aboard, including the three infants. Among the NTSB's recommendations following the conclusion of its investigation this week was to once again suggest that the Federal Aviation Administration require passengers ages two and younger have their own seats to protect them. The NTSB does not have the power to make such a requirement. It has been asking the FAA, which is the federal regulator that sets such regulations, for such a rule for decades. Even if parts don't often fall off planes mid-flight, infants on planes are at risk of being thrown from their parents' arms by far more common turbulence, which can occur without warning. One NTSB investigator testified Tuesday about incidents in which infants were injured during severe turbulence, in one instance landing a few rows behind the child's mother in an empty row. 'I've long believed that parents of lap children do not fully realize the serious risk to which they're exposing their young children,' NTSB board member Thomas Chapman said at the hearing. 'The experts agree that the safest place for an infant is secured in their own seat. If there's turbulence or worse, you may not be able to protect your baby in your arms.' Chapman said the NTSB has been pushing for a rule requiring infants be secured in a seat but that 'we just have not been able to persuade FAA that this is an area where they should take action.' An advisory to airlines posted on the FAA's website advises that the agency 'does not require but, because of the safety benefits thereof, does encourage the use of approved child/infant seats aboard aircraft.' When CNN asked about the lack of a rule, the FAA said in a statement: 'The FAA takes NTSB recommendations seriously and will carefully consider those issued yesterday.' The statement added: 'The safest place for a child under age two is an approved child-restraint system or device, not an adult's lap. This can go a long way in keeping children safe during a flight.' But there may be a more intricate calculus involved for the FAA. An agency spokesperson told CNN it is concerned that requiring parents to buy an extra seat for plane travel will lead more of them to drive to their destinations. And the agency believes that would create a greater risk to the children and parents, since flying is a much safer method of transportation than driving. Airlines also likely worry about lost revenue from more parents opting to drive instead. Airlines for America, the industry trade group, did not directly address whether or not there should be a rule requiring infants to have their own seat in a statement. 'The safety of all passengers and crew members is always the top priority of U.S. airlines, which is why we follow federal laws and strictly comply with the guidance and rules established by our safety regulator, the FAA,' the group said. But one expert accused the FAA of putting airline profits over safety. 'The NTSB has one job, and that's to improve safety. They're not concerned about the financial impact,' said Anthony Brickhouse, a crash investigator and US-based aerospace safety consultant. 'The FAA looks at safety, but they also look at the financial impact. Safety and money have been in conflict since the beginning of time. And if you want to know the reasons for anything they do, follow the money.' Brickhouse said if the lap babies had been in or near row 26, where the door plug blew off, they likely would have be lost. 'Why is it that you're required to be buckled in a car, but mommy and daddy can hold you on a flight?' he said. 'You would think this close call could move the needle. It's frustrating to think we need to get tragedy to get change.'
