Plans to demolish Birmingham market submitted for third time
The market is located on the ground floor of Edgbaston Street Car Park, which is owned by property giant Hammerson. It is run by Birmingham City Council and the local authority provides traders with their leases.Developers have revealed plans for a temporary alternative market site at the location of the city's former wholesale market, to which traders would be moved.The plan would then see them relocate into a new permanent building within the wider development site there, Smithfield.Plans for the indoor market were submitted for a second time in February, and were also recommended for approval. The council said it would submit an application for funding to secure the replacement markets, but some members were concerned the new space could not be guaranteed, and a decision was deferred.
Ahead of the proposal being considered for a third time next week, an update within council documents said there was now "an increased level of certainty over future market provision".The update revealed that meetings between council leaders, applicant Hammerson and the firm behind the Smithfield development had secured an extension of the lease on the current indoor market until March 2027.This provided the "necessary time" to deliver a temporary market ahead of the transition to a permanent one, the report stated.The council added a business case for funding had been approved by the Enterprise Zone Partnership Board, and would be presented to cabinet prior to a formal bid.
The council added it was negotiating with Lendlease over delivering the temporary market and that the plan provided a "credible" way forward and continuity for traders.
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations.
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Building societies making bigger mortgages more accessible
Mortgage borrowers could find it easier to access bigger loans under changes announced by building societies. Both Leeds Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society have announced changes. Yorkshire Building Society has launched new higher loan-to-income (LTI) mortgage options for customers who apply direct to the lender. The new 'income lifter' offering will enable first-time buyers to borrow up to 5.5 times their income with a 5% deposit, if their household income is at least £50,000. Non first-time buyers can borrow at up to 90% LTV (loan-to-value), the society said. Earlier this month, the society reduced its minimum household income threshold for people borrowing up to five times their income, from £75,000 to £50,000. Ben Merritt, director of mortgages for Yorkshire Building Society, said: 'We know from experience that many people can well afford to borrow more than 4.5 times their income to secure their desired home, and now we can help more of them do just that.' Meanwhile, Leeds Building Society said it is lowering the minimum household income needed to borrow more than 4.5 times annual income. Joint or single applicants earning £30,000 per year will now be able to apply for a mortgage at that level with the lender. The amount has been reduced from £40,000. Earlier in July, it emerged that lenders could have the ability to offer more mortgages at high loan-to-income levels, if they choose to. The Bank of England said its Financial Policy Committee (FPC) had discussed the current operation of its LTI limits. The developments mean that individual lenders may choose to have more than 15% of their lending at a high LTI ratio. Different lenders will have different risk appetites. Leeds said the changes on minimum income include 5% deposit mortgages and its 'income plus' range which is designed specifically to support first-time buyers. Leeds Building Society's director of mortgages and savings, Matt Bartle, said: 'We welcomed the decision to consider allowing more high loan-to-income on a lender-by-lender basis and are very pleased to have gained the Bank of England's permission. 'Lowering our minimum income requirements brings the dream of homeownership a step closer for more borrowers, including many earning below national average earnings. 'We understand the importance of being a prudent and responsible lender. We carry out detailed affordability checks to make sure borrowers can realistically afford repayments and not over-extend themselves financially.' Applicants can make appointments direct with Leeds or apply through brokers.
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
HMRC hands back £48.7m in overpaid pension tax in just three months
HM Revenue & Customs is still refunding millions of pounds back to Britons in overpaid pension tax. It repaid £48.7million in overpaid pension tax between 1 April to 30 June, new data from HMRC shows. There were 13,000 refund forms processed by HMRC in the period and the average refund came in at around £3,800. Between January and March, HMRC refunded £44million in overpaid tax back to pension savers. The total number of claims for overpaid tax on pension withdrawals has now gone over half a million since the introduction of Pension Freedoms in 2015. People taking out a lump sum from their pension for the first time are at particular risk of overpaying too much tax as they can be taxed with an emergency tax code. Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'The overpaid pension tax saga continues to drag on.' She said 'these refunds amount to a significant chunk of change.' What causes the problem? People can access money from their pensions in two ways. First, you can take a 25 per cent lump sum of your pension tax-free. The rest is charged at your normal income tax rate. The second option is to take a lump sum from a pension drawdown plan. If you do this, 25 per cent of your total pension savings is tax-free and any subsequent withdrawals are subject to income tax. The issue of overpaying tax on pension withdrawals often hits people who are taking a lump sum out of their pension for the first time. Morrissey said: 'They get taxed on what is known as a 'month one' basis, which means it's treated as though the same amount will come out every month. 'This results in a far bigger tax bill, which can come as an unpleasant surprise or even de-rail people's retirement plans.' Since pension freedom reforms were introduced in 2015, HMRC docks extra tax off any initial sum taken from a fund on the assumption it could be 'month one' of a series over the rest of a tax year. In essence, HMRC assumes the pension lump sum you are withdrawing will be repeated every month. Pension providers typically collect the tax on your behalf, meaning the lump sum you get is paid net of tax. The pension provider may not know what an individual's tax code is or have any details on their other sources of income. As a result, an emergency tax code is used on the withdrawal. How can taxpayers get a refund? Affected pension savers currently have to claim back their cash from HMRC themselves or wait until it is done after the end of the current tax year. Morrissey said that while the overpaid tax can be reclaimed, 'it's an admin headache that people can well do without.' She added: 'Ten years on from the advent of freedom and choice it's a process that should have been consigned to history.' If you make a single lump sum pension withdrawal, check you have not paid more tax than you should. You can apply for a tax refund online on HMRC's website. Morrissey said: 'If you do get clobbered with a big tax bill, then you will need to fill out one of three forms so that HMRC can process the refund. Otherwise, you can wait until the end of the tax year.' How can pension savers help themselves? The pension saver tax saga is ongoing and should have been nipped in the bud years ago. However, there are steps pension savers can take to mitigate the risk of overpaying tax. Morrissey said: 'You could make your first pension withdrawal a relatively small one. 'However, if you were looking to take a lump sum to fund travel or home renovations, for instance, you would need to plan ahead to make sure the money you take isn't whittled away by tax which could delay your plans. Is HMRC doing anything about this? After previously defending the system and insisting 'nobody overpays as a result', HMRC has vowed to put a stop to the practice of forcing pension savers to apply for tax refunds. In a newsletter in January, HMRC said that from April it would move much more quickly to replace 'emergency' tax codes with regular tax codes, ensuring the correct amount of tax is deducted in real time An HMRC spokesman told This is Money in January: 'Those who, for the first time, start to receive ongoing pension payments will benefit from this change. 'We're considering options for people taking ad-hoc lump sums and will consult with the industry before taking our next steps.' Webb said: 'How longer will all of this go on? Ten years on from the introduction of Pension Freedoms, tens of thousands of people each year are still having to fill in forms to claim back overpaid tax on their pensions from HMRC. 'This is a system designed for the convenience of the tax office, not the taxpayer. 'Given that most people in retirement pay tax at the basic rate, it would not be difficult to have a system which got things right for most people most of the time, rather than making over-taxing people part of 'business as usual'. 'It is time to that the whole system was simplified and made more predictable for pension savers looking to draw on their pensions.'
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
GSK expects sales, profit toward top of 2025 forecasts despite tariff, pipeline pressures
July 30 (Reuters) - GSK (GSK.L), opens new tab expects to deliver annual sales and profit growth towards the top end of its forecasts after beating second-quarter expectations on Wednesday, in a boost to its efforts to fuel growth despite product development and tariff challenges. The British drugmaker is hoping to reach annual sales of over 40 billion pounds ($53.44 billion) by 2031, even as it faces potential pharmaceutical tariffs and drug pricing pressure in the world-leading U.S. market. "We're very well positioned and continue to be part of investments so that our portfolio in the U.S. is more and more supplied from the U.S.," CEO Emma Walmsley told journalists. She added that GSK was also in talks with President Donald Trump's administration, which is pushing drugmakers to cut prices, but offered few details. The U.S. pharmaceuticals market - worth around $635 billion - makes up slightly over half of GSK's sales and is central to its growth plans. GSK said it had accounted for levies already implemented by Washington and expected tariffs on Europe's exports under a new U.S.-EU trade deal, as well as possible duties resulting from a U.S. investigation into pharmaceutical imports. It expects 2025 revenue to increase between 3% and 5%, with core profit per share growth of 6% to 8% at constant currency rates. GSK is focusing on expanding its product pipeline as it faces rising competition and declining sales of top drugs and vaccines. It expects five new major approvals this year. While second-quarter turnover growth of 6% to nearly 8 billion pounds and earnings of 46.5 pence per share beat analyst estimates, investors are focused on GSK's pipeline as it awaits a final U.S. approval verdict on cancer drug Blenrep. Analysts say a rejection might force GSK to rethink its 2031 sales target as it is also bracing for patent expirations in its HIV portfolio. The company's HIV business, as well as specialty medicines, respiratory, and oncology divisions, recorded double-digit revenue growth in the quarter. But Barclays analysts cautioned HIV sales growth would be slower in the second half due to the timing of stock sales and availability. GSK expects currency headwinds to be a drag of 4% and 7% on 2025 sales and profit growth, respectively, on a reported basis. Its shares rose as much as 2% and were trading 1.5% higher at 1127 GMT. ($1 = 0.7486 pounds)
