logo
HMRC hands back £48.7m in overpaid pension tax in just three months

HMRC hands back £48.7m in overpaid pension tax in just three months

Daily Mail​19 hours ago
HM Revenue & Customs is still refunding millions of pounds back to Britons in overpaid pension tax.
It repaid £48.7million in overpaid pension tax between 1 April to 30 June, new data from HMRC shows.
There were 13,000 refund forms processed by HMRC in the period and the average refund came in at around £3,800.
Between January and March, HMRC refunded £44million in overpaid tax back to pension savers.
The total number of claims for overpaid tax on pension withdrawals has now gone over half a million since the introduction of Pension Freedoms in 2015.
People taking out a lump sum from their pension for the first time are at particular risk of overpaying too much tax as they can be taxed with an emergency tax code.
Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'The overpaid pension tax saga continues to drag on.'
She said 'these refunds amount to a significant chunk of change.'
What causes the problem?
People can access money from their pensions in two ways.
First, you can take a 25 per cent lump sum of your pension tax-free. The rest is charged at your normal income tax rate.
The second option is to take a lump sum from a pension drawdown plan. If you do this, 25 per cent of your total pension savings is tax-free and any subsequent withdrawals are subject to income tax.
The issue of overpaying tax on pension withdrawals often hits people who are taking a lump sum out of their pension for the first time.
Morrissey said: 'They get taxed on what is known as a 'month one' basis, which means it's treated as though the same amount will come out every month.
'This results in a far bigger tax bill, which can come as an unpleasant surprise or even de-rail people's retirement plans.'
Since pension freedom reforms were introduced in 2015, HMRC docks extra tax off any initial sum taken from a fund on the assumption it could be 'month one' of a series over the rest of a tax year.
In essence, HMRC assumes the pension lump sum you are withdrawing will be repeated every month.
Pension providers typically collect the tax on your behalf, meaning the lump sum you get is paid net of tax.
The pension provider may not know what an individual's tax code is or have any details on their other sources of income. As a result, an emergency tax code is used on the withdrawal.
How can taxpayers get a refund?
Affected pension savers currently have to claim back their cash from HMRC themselves or wait until it is done after the end of the current tax year.
Morrissey said that while the overpaid tax can be reclaimed, 'it's an admin headache that people can well do without.'
She added: 'Ten years on from the advent of freedom and choice it's a process that should have been consigned to history.'
If you make a single lump sum pension withdrawal, check you have not paid more tax than you should.
You can apply for a tax refund online on HMRC's website.
Morrissey said: 'If you do get clobbered with a big tax bill, then you will need to fill out one of three forms so that HMRC can process the refund. Otherwise, you can wait until the end of the tax year.'
How can pension savers help themselves?
The pension saver tax saga is ongoing and should have been nipped in the bud years ago.
However, there are steps pension savers can take to mitigate the risk of overpaying tax.
Morrissey said: 'You could make your first pension withdrawal a relatively small one.
'However, if you were looking to take a lump sum to fund travel or home renovations, for instance, you would need to plan ahead to make sure the money you take isn't whittled away by tax which could delay your plans.
Is HMRC doing anything about this?
After previously defending the system and insisting 'nobody overpays as a result', HMRC has vowed to put a stop to the practice of forcing pension savers to apply for tax refunds.
In a newsletter in January, HMRC said that from April it would move much more quickly to replace 'emergency' tax codes with regular tax codes, ensuring the correct amount of tax is deducted in real time
An HMRC spokesman told This is Money in January: 'Those who, for the first time, start to receive ongoing pension payments will benefit from this change.
'We're considering options for people taking ad-hoc lump sums and will consult with the industry before taking our next steps.'
Webb said: 'How longer will all of this go on? Ten years on from the introduction of Pension Freedoms, tens of thousands of people each year are still having to fill in forms to claim back overpaid tax on their pensions from HMRC.
'This is a system designed for the convenience of the tax office, not the taxpayer.
'Given that most people in retirement pay tax at the basic rate, it would not be difficult to have a system which got things right for most people most of the time, rather than making over-taxing people part of 'business as usual'.
'It is time to that the whole system was simplified and made more predictable for pension savers looking to draw on their pensions.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Business news live: FTSE 100 reaction to Rolls Royce and Unilever profits plus latest Nationwide house price data
Business news live: FTSE 100 reaction to Rolls Royce and Unilever profits plus latest Nationwide house price data

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Business news live: FTSE 100 reaction to Rolls Royce and Unilever profits plus latest Nationwide house price data

Earnings season among notable FTSE 100 firms continues on Thursday with Rolls Royce, Shell and Unilever all in the frame - the latter being a good indicator of consumer spending power this year. There are also reports due from bank Standard Chartered, miner Endeavour and owner of the stock exchange itself, the London Stock Exchange Group. London's benchmark index finished largely flat on Wednesday and is slightly down for the week so far, but with the US economy growing more than expected in the second quarter of 2025 and further trade clarity coming with the EU and India arranging deals, it's no surprise to see many indices at or near all-time highs. Meanwhile, Thursday also brings the latest house price data from Nationwide, while CASS have revealed which UK banks benefited most from customers switching current accounts over the past three months.

How much Labour's foot-dragging is costing your retirement
How much Labour's foot-dragging is costing your retirement

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

How much Labour's foot-dragging is costing your retirement

Labour promised a wide-reaching pensions overhaul in its election manifesto to improve the nation's financial security in retirement. True to its word, just a month after its landslide victory, a comprehensive two-part review was announced. Eyebrows were quickly raised, however, as phase one rolled out and it became clear the overhaul was more about generating economic growth for the Government than boosting savers' returns. Even when phase two was finally outlined earlier this month, the review shunned any immediate action and instead set up a Pensions Commission. It will take around 18 months to report back on how to tackle key issues like savings rates and auto-enrolment – the mechanism that signs workers up for a pension unless they opt out. In the meantime, ministers have confirmed that a major pillar of the reforms – the amount which savers and employers must contribute – will not increase this Parliament. It's a decision that could cost workers six figures by the time they stop working. With a fifth of Britain's 15 million pension savers on course to retire in poverty, and reliance on the state pension increasing, Telegraph Money teamed up with Hargreaves Lansdown to explain how much Labour's delays could cost you in retirement. Workers Cost to pension pot: £106,000 Under the current rules, workers must be automatically enrolled into a pension if they earn at least £10,000 and are aged between 22 and state pension age. In return for a 5pc minimum contribution from the employee, their employer must add at least 3pc. There are widespread calls from experts to increase both minimum saving rates to 6pc. With any changes ruled out for this Parliament, however, this now won't happen for at least four years, and any eventual progress is expected to be gradual. According to Hargreaves Lansdown, a 22-year-old earning £23,500 and putting 8pc into their pension until age 68 would have an eventual pot of £213,000. But if the rates were increased to 12pc overall, they would have £319,000 – meaning they would miss out on £106,000. Self-employed Cost to pension pot: £160,000 Self-employed people are not currently automatically enrolled into a pension, leaving many to fall through the cracks and at risk of struggling in retirement. In fact, researchers Nest Insight recently found that just 18pc of self-employed people pay into a pension, despite three quarters saying they want to. If they were automatically enrolled, a self-employed person earning £23,500 would contribute the minimum 5pc, since there is no employer to pay in. If they did this from age 22, they would have £133,000 in their pot by age 68. If the rate was increased to 6pc, their pot would hit £160,000. Young people Cost to pension pot: £39,000 If workers aged between 18 and 22 were automatically enrolled, it could put tens of thousands more into their pension pot. The legislation for this change has already passed but has yet to be enacted. A young worker on the minimum wage working 40 hours a week would currently be paid £20,800 a year. If the age of auto-enrolment was lowered to 18, they would have an extra four years of pension contributions, meaning their pot would hit £7,000 by age 22. Given the long period it would be able to grow for, that amount would be £26,000 by the time they retired. If the minimum contribution rates were also increased to 12pc, this would be £39,000. Low earners Cost to pension pot: £4,000 Anyone earning at least £6,240 is allowed to join a pension scheme. However, they are not automatically enrolled, nor does their employer have to pay in, until their salary passes £10,000. This also hits people with multiple low-paying jobs, as they still wouldn't be enrolled into a pension for any roles paying below £10,000 – even if their combined earnings were higher. If someone earned £9,000 at age 22 and increased their earnings by 3pc a year, they wouldn't cross the £10,000 threshold until age 26. Missing those four years of paying in would leave them with a pension pot of £77,000, rather than £81,000. There are calls to remove this lower earnings limit, which was also included in the legislation passed and is yet to be put into effect. Susan Hope, of Scottish Widows, said: 'Lowering the age to 18 and removing the lower earnings limit could be absolutely transformative for young people. 'It would move them from a retirement of having no car, takeaways and foreign holidays towards one with more financial freedom and choice – without having to rely on other people.' Helen Morrissey, of Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Changes to auto-enrolment contribution levels have the potential to transform people's retirement outcomes. However, there is nuance – if the contribution limits are raised across the board there is potential for lower earners to put themselves in financial difficulties today because they are contributing more into their pensions. 'More widely, what the Pensions Commission has shown is that there are a lot of people under-saving for retirement and not heading for the income they want or need. The commission has the potential to have an enormous impact on these people's retirement security.' The Department for Work & Pensions said Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, had addressed the rationale behind the timings in a speech. She said: 'Cost of living pressures mean many workers are more concerned about putting food on the table and keeping a roof over their heads than saving for a retirement that seems a long, long way away. And many businesses face huge challenges in keeping profitable and flexible in an increasingly uncertain world. 'That's why we have already said there will be no change to minimum auto-enrolment contribution rates during this Parliament.'

Shell beats profit expectations at $4.3 billion, keeps buybacks steady
Shell beats profit expectations at $4.3 billion, keeps buybacks steady

Reuters

time28 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Shell beats profit expectations at $4.3 billion, keeps buybacks steady

LONDON, July 31 (Reuters) - Shell's (SHEL.L), opens new tab adjusted earnings, its definition of net profit, reached $4.264 billion in the second quarter, it said on Thursday, above the $3.74 billion average in an analyst poll provided by the company but down from $6.3 billion a year ago. Shell said it would maintain the pace of its share buyback programme at $3.5 billion over the next three months, the 15th consecutive quarter of at least $3 billion. Shell had guided in a trading update earlier this month that it expected quarterly earnings to be hit by weaker trading in its integrated gas division and losses at its chemicals and products operations. Global benchmark Brent crude prices averaged around $67 a barrel during the April-June quarter, compared with $75 a barrel in the first quarter and $85 a year earlier.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store