Who is Deja Foxx? Gen Z Arizona influencer running for Congress dubbed ‘the next AOC'
Deja Foxx, a 25-year-old social media activist and abortion rights advocate, is running for Congress in Arizona's 7th District. Her campaign has quickly drawn comparisons to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC). Deja Foxx officially declared her campaign in April after the death of long-time Democratic Rep. Raúl Grijalva, who died of cancer in March at age 77.
Foxx officially declared her campaign in April after the death of longtime Democratic Rep. Raúl Grijalva, who died of cancer in March at age 77, as reported by The Washington Post.
Foxx garnered national media attention in 2017 for a viral video in which she described her confrontation with then-Sen. Jeff Flake over Planned Parenthood funding. She used that once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to accrue a large following on social media, where she continues to share advocacy-related content with her followers regularly.
Foxx is now leveraging her experience with the Harris campaign and looking to run for office in order to inspire young and progressive voters. Foxx focusing on abortion rights
Much like Ocasio-Cortez's 2018 campaign, which unseated a powerful incumbent, Foxx is running on a progressive message and is emphasizing abortion rights. One of her key talking points is the overturning of *Roe v. Wade*.
Foxx has acknowledged Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Jasmine Crockett as inspirations who she thinks 'best represent the values of the party."
Despite the comparisons, Foxx faces an uphill battle. A recent Public Policy Polling survey showed her at just 5% support in the Democratic primary, far behind front-runner Adelita Grijalva, daughter of the late congressman, who polled at 49%.
Despite all the hurdles, Foxx has asserted that she's not backing down. Like AOC, she's rejected super PAC money and is relying on small-dollar donations, with an average contribution of about $29.
She's also leaning into her age, saying it's a reason why her voice matters in politics. 'If everybody who told me I was too young went and told somebody that they were too old, we would be in a vastly different political structure right now,' as cited by a Newsweek report.
She added, 'Age is a defining factor in our political system. Like it or not, it just is,' noting that 'the seat she is running for opened up because somebody passed away while in office.'
Concerns about aging leadership in Washington have grown in recent years. Grijalva is the third Democratic member of Congress to die in office this year. Since 2022, eight sitting lawmakers have passed away. A challenging past
Foxx has been open about her difficult upbringing. Her campaign website says she experienced homelessness as a teen but became the first in her family to attend college, earning a full scholarship to Columbia University.
In her interview with Newsweek, she recalled relying on Title X funding as a teenager. 'I was a teenager living with my boyfriend, working at a gas station. We relied on Title X funding,' she said.
'Planned Parenthood centers [helped me] get the birth control that I needed to take control of my body and my future when I had no money, no parents, and no insurance.'
She further mentioned that all her early experiences made her realize how disconnected some lawmakers are from the people they represent. 'And this is just one of those ways that policymakers, often disconnected from their constituents, vote without ever thinking about the consequences for real people.'
Also Read: Trump and Kamala Harris 'saddened' by Biden's prostate cancer diagnosis Deja Foxx shares experience of working for Harris campaign
Moving further, Foxx said her time working on Harris' campaign taught her how to be bold in politics. 'What it taught me is a lesson that I took into 2024 and that I'm taking into my own special election here in 2025 as I stick my head up to lead and to run — which was what it means to be fearless.'
After Harris lost the 2024 election, Foxx said she felt compelled to step into the spotlight herself. 'It wasn't enough for me to just work behind the scenes of campaigns or in front of the cameras,' she said. 'I needed to give them someone they could get excited about, or we would stand to lose our generation.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Raghu Rai on the symbolic photo that told the story of the Emergency
I distinctly remember the day the Emergency was declared. Almost overnight, police presence intensified everywhere. Protesters were put behind bars. I was a photojournalist with The Statesman and every photograph we wanted to publish required government approval. When we were told, 'You can't print this picture,' we would sometimes leave the space blank as an act of defiance. There were several photographs that couldn't be published, including that of political leaders who were arrested and protesters. We devised ways to depict reality, with symbolic representations. For instance, one of my photographs that was published had a man riding a bicycle, taking his daughter somewhere. Behind them stood a few onlookers and a posse of police in a rather empty street — a rare sight for Chandni Chowk, which is usually bustling with people. The caption read, 'Life normal in Chandni Chowk', a blatant fallacy, as nothing was truly normal, which was also evident through the photograph. Since there were no political and cultural activities, I also used the time to travel to villages and to the Himalayas to document life there. We are here in big cities to serve the big guys, but it's crucial to look beyond. I also extensively photographed one particular wall in Old Delhi during this period, running from Daryaganj to Jama Masjid — resulting in the series 'Confessions of a Wall'. That wall seemed to possess a life of its own: a bazaar was held nearby on Sundays, children sketched on it and there were also people who scribbled abuses on it. It was interesting to see how its facade changed. The final nail in the coffin was when the wall gave me the final image of the political situation in the country. Transformed into a political canvas, this wall was plastered with posters after the Emergency was lifted and elections were announced. This included posters of Indira Gandhi urging people to vote for her, and with her now-infamous slogan: 'Hum Do, Hamare Do' — the popular interpretation of 'Do' was her and Sanjay Gandhi. At the time, elections were held on the same day across the country and I had gone to Old Delhi to photograph people standing in queues to cast their votes. By 5 pm voting was over. On my way back, I saw a man collecting posters of political leaders and shoving them into a sack to sell them as raddi (scrap). I instinctively captured that moment. When I showed it to my editor Kuldip Nayar, he appreciated it but declined to publish it, fearing that if Indira Gandhi returned to power, both of us would be jailed. I was not a political writer, but I could feel the pulse of the people. I told him she would not return but he wasn't completely convinced. Frustrated, I tore the photograph and said I would not return to this office. The next afternoon, it was becoming clear that the Congress was losing. Mr Nayar started looking for me but I hadn't gone to the office in protest. He rang up to say the Congress was losing and my photograph can be published on the front page, in five columns. The photograph was published the very next day. When she lost the elections, the Gandhi family realised that you cannot run an ancient civilisation like India by such ruthless measures. Sure enough, the Janata Party couldn't survive long and she came back to power with full freedom for expression and democracy. When wars and terrorism are undeclared and when the Emergency and its parameters are undeclared, there remains an unknown and unmeasurable fear which retards the growth and well-being of the nation. As told to Vandana Kalra
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Congress says the BJP is delaying implementing 27% OBC reservation in Madhya Pradesh
Accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of being against the Backward Classes, the Congress on Saturday (June 28 2025), alleged that the BJP government in Madhya Pradesh has been wilfully delaying passing on the benefits of 27% reservation in State government jobs and institutions despite a law enacted by the State Assembly. The party demanded immediate implementation of 27% reservation for the OBCs in Madhya Pradesh as it has been categorically cleared by the Supreme Court of India as well. Addressing a press conference at the All India Congress Committee (AICC) headquarters, senior party leaders, including former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel, AICC in-charge for Madhya Pradesh Harish Chaudhary, MP Congress chief Jitu Patwari, and the head of the Congress's OBC department Anil JaiHind, said the delay in implementing the reservation is revealing the State government's anti-reservation and anti-Backward Class mindset. Mr. Chaudhary said in 1994, the Congress government had provided 14% reservation to the OBCs and subsequently, in 2003, proposed the quota to be raised to 27%. However, since then, the BJP has been in power in the State and it never took any decision to implement the decision. When the Kamal Nath government was formed in December 2018, it brought an Ordinance to provide 27% reservation for OBCs in 2019. 'The BJP challenged it in court, which then directed that a law be enacted on the matter. We subsequently got the Bill passed in the Assembly. But the BJP formed the government again, and it did not implement the reservation,' Mr. Chaudhary said, adding that the pleas against the 27% quota were by the High Court and the Supreme Court as well. Chhattisgarh issue Mr. Baghel said that the Congress government in Chhattisgarh had unanimously passed a law in December 2022 for providing 27% reservation to the OBCs, but the Bill is still to get the nod of the Governor. 'This is because the BJP does not want to provide 27% reservation to the OBCs,' the former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister said. 'We will not only fight the issue legally, but will raise it publicly to build pressure on the BJP government to implement it,' he added. Mr. Patwari said that it was strange that Prime Minister Narendra Modi said he belonged to the OBCs but was not providing the community its rightful due. 'The OBC Chief Ministers of MP belonging to the BJP, including Uma Bharti, Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Mohan Yadav, have all betrayed their own community,' he said.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Weekend Senate session focuses on contentious GOP tax cuts and budget reductions
Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks read more The Senate is expected to grind through a rare weekend session as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks and spending cuts by his July Fourth deadline. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators were expected to take a procedural vote Saturday to begin debate on the legislation, but the timing was uncertain and there is a long path ahead, with at least 10 hours of debate time and an all-night voting session on countless amendments. Senate passage could be days away, and the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. 'It's evolving,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as he prepared to close up the chamber late Friday. The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. 'We can get it done,' Trump said in a social media post. 'It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But the spending cuts that Republicans are relying on to offset the lost tax revenues are causing dissent within the GOP ranks. Some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he is concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. 'I'm voting no on the motion to proceed,' he said. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pushing for deeper cuts, said he needed to see the final legislative text. The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals were determined to be out of compliance by the chief arbiter of the Senate's rules. One plan would have shifted some food stamp costs from the federal government to the states; a second would have gutted the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to a Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary objections and opposition from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Most states impose the provider tax as a way to boost federal Medicaid reimbursements. Some Republicans argue that is a scam and should be abolished. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the poorest Americans would face a $1,600 tax increase, the CBO said. One unresolved issue remains the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states. The cap is now $10,000. The White House and House Republicans had narrowed in on a plan for a $40,000 cap, but for five years instead of 10. Republican senators says that's too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, said he cannot support the compromise. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. 'There's no good reason for Republicans to chase a silly deadline,' Schumer said. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington, said they are 'very close' to finishing up. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We would still like to meet that July Fourth, self-imposed deadline,' said Johnson, R-La. With the narrow Republicans majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board to ensure passage. Johnson and Thune have stayed close to the White House, relying on Trump to pressure holdout lawmakers.
