I got bum implants at 33 & the results are incredible, it's better than a BBL but trolls still make fun of how I look
COSMETIC surgery is often used to shave years off a person's appearance.
And Ashley Stobart has had a long list of procedures in a bid to look youthful - and also fix years of damage that was caused by going under the knife or having injections.
5
Ashley has always been very honest about what work she's had done to her appearance, and even co-hosts the podcast Nip, Tuck, We Don't Give A....
In a recent episode, she discussed the pros and cons of having cosmetic tweakments with her co-host Lauren Harris.
35-year-old Ashley said she Googled her name only to be faced with a barrage of hateful comments about how she looks.
Ashley recalled how online users wrote things like "Oh my God, she looks 78 years old" and "She's had so much work done".
The mum-of-three, who had her first lip fillers aged 18, went onto share her decision to have bum implants in a bid to improve her the shape of her derriere.
"It's very sore but anyway I was going to tell and share the whole process," she said shortly after undergoing the procedure at the age of 33.
She said she "couldn't lie" about the operation, adding she gets "abused for telling it and abused for not".
"You're damned if you do, damned if you don't," the two women said together.
Ashley, who joked that "hot girls don't gate-keep", said she "10 out of 10 would recommend" the procedure.
And said she "guarantees 98% of influencers or people that put up fitness videos have had this done" to improve the shape of their bottom.
Lauren praised Ashley's new look, saying it looked "incredible" and "better than a BBL".
She admitted that she was initially hesitant about her friend's procedure: "I was like 'Aw mate, bit far this now' but it looks really good, it does, I'm not going to deny."
How are bum implants different to a Brazilian Butt Lift?
A bum implant is a surgical procedure where silicon is inserted into the buttocks to add volume.
On the other hand, a BBL uses fat harvested from another area of the body, often the abdomen of thighs, and injects it into the buttocks to enhance the shape.
The key difference is bum implants use a foreign material while BBL's use the patient's own fat.
And while she was happy with the end result, Ashley was sure to share the harsh realities of the process.
"That's another reason you said you were going to talk about it because it has been quite mentally [difficult]," Lauren said.
Ashley revealed that she had spent most of her recovery period lying on her front.
She said she felt "bloated" and "horrible" after the surgery, joking that she "started questioning life."
5
The podcaster went onto suggest "a lot of people" will start getting bum implants in upcoming years.
As for all the other cosmetic procedures Ashley has undergone, the list includes:
Full face, neck and lip lift
Under eye fat transfer
Rhinoplasty
Brow lift / Blepharoplasty - twice
Breast enlargement
Botox and fillers
Liposuction
As a result, official documents no longer look like her.
Ashley revealed: "My passport, because I've had so much work done, it doesn't work [recognise her] on the barriers [in security].
"I got stopped - and they were like 'this is not [you]. Have you got credit cards on you?' And I was like 'nose job, brow lift, lip lift, face lift...'"
5
5
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
12 hours ago
- Wales Online
Youngest Omaze winner ever sells £3m mansion just months later
Youngest Omaze winner ever sells £3m mansion just months later Lauren Keene, 24, became the youngest ever winner of an Omaze prize draw last December Omaze winner Lauren Keene with her partner, Ryan Mitchell outside their £3m pound home (Image: PA ) Lauren Keene hit the headlines when she became the youngest winner of a multi-million-pound Omaze prize draw. She won a stunning £3million mansion on the Wirral Peninsula and a £250,000 cash bonus. However, six months on, the 24-year-old full-time nanny from Gloucester has decided to put the luxury home on the market for £2.5m, £500,000 below its estimated value. The modern six-bedroom property boasts panoramic views of the Irish Sea, a wraparound terrace, and an outdoor heated pool. Despite being described as "striking" and "something truly special" in its Rightmove listing, Lauren has found the dream home to be impractical. After buying the winning £20 ticket, Lauren initially considered moving into the mansion with her partner, software engineer Ryan Mitchell. At the time, she was living with her father in a modest two-bedroom flat near Gloucester. The stunning home boasted spectacular coastal views, a cinema room and a heated outdoor swimming pool (Image: PA ) The Omaze win seemed to be a complete transformation for her life, which she celebrated with a McDonald's meal, reports the Mirror. Article continues below "Only last week we were looking at houses we thought we could never afford," Lauren said after her win. "Now our first property is a £3million mansion. It's crazy to think we'll never have a mortgage. It's life-changing." Despite the initial excitement, the couple soon realised that residing nearly 200 miles away from Gloucester and the expenses linked to upkeeping a large house were impractical. They only managed a few nights in the property before choosing to sell. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here Lauren's father, Daniel, aged 46 and employed as a kitchen and bathroom fitter, shared insights about her decision: "It is a lovely house, but the associated costs are significant," he disclosed to Mail Online. "For example, although the pool is heated, it's outdoors and not thermally protected, so the heat escapes very quickly. Keeping it warm in the winter would cost a fortune. They've turned it off for now, but we braved it during our visit-and I can tell you that water is very cold." The £3 million mansion was the couple's first ever property (Image: PA ) Daniel went on to say that Lauren and Ryan are settling on a more modest semi-detached home in Gloucester, investing their savings alongside a portion of the Omaze prize money to put down roots nearer to their family and workplace. He hinted at an approaching move, although Lauren is presently still living at the family home. "Every week she tells me she's moving out, and every week she's still here," he quipped. "But what's important is that she's happy and doing what's right for her. And in both cases, she is." He further remarked: "I'm sure when they do move in, I'll be asked to fit the new bathroom and kitchen. And it'll be a pleasure." Only three Omaze winners have reportedly stayed in their multi-million pound property (Image: PA ) Lauren added: "Winning this house has transformed our lives forever. Whatever we decide to do long-term, we're made for life now." Omaze's guidelines allow winners complete freedom regarding their prizes, granting the option to rent out, sell off, or inhabit the properties without any mandatory holding period. The tendency amongst winners to liquidate rather than take on the responsibility of luxurious estates is far from uncommon. Of the 14 winners, merely three opted for permanent residence in the houses they won. For instance, in 2023, June Smith, who unexpectedly came into possession of a Cornish mansion valued at £4.5 million, decided to list the property on the market with the intent of financially assisting her children and grandchildren. Article continues below Among the few who embraced the Omaze home was Becca Pott, a 32 year old finance analyst. Amidst the hustle of east London in her petite flat, fortune smiled upon her in February 2022 with the winning of a sumptuous £3.5 million abode near Ascot.
Daily Record
14 hours ago
- Daily Record
Youngest Omaze winner selling £3m mansion just six months after big win
Lauren Keene won a luxury clifftop home and £250,000 cash last year, but now, just half a year later, the 24-year-old nanny is putting her dream house on the market. Lauren Keene made headlines last December when she became the youngest-ever winner of a multi-million-pound Omaze prize draw—bagging a stunning £3million clifftop mansion on the Wirral Peninsula and an eye-watering £250,000 in cash. But just six months on, the 24-year-old nanny from Gloucester is ready to part ways with her dream home. The luxury property has now hit the market for £2.5million—half a million less than its estimated value. The six-bedroom house, perched on an elevated sandstone ridge with sweeping views over the Irish Sea, comes with a wraparound terrace and an outdoor heated pool. Rightmove describes the place as 'striking' and 'something truly special'—and it's just a short walk from Caldy Beach. However, while the prize home looked like a fantasy come true, it quickly proved to be more of a logistical headache, reports the Mirror. Lauren, who bought her winning ticket for just £20, initially planned to move into the mansion with her partner, software engineer Ryan Mitchell. At the time, she was living in a modest two-bedroom flat with her father, Daniel Keene, in Gloucester. 'Only last week we were looking at houses we thought we could never afford,' she said shortly after winning. 'Now our first property is a £3million mansion. It's crazy to think we'll never have a mortgage. It's life-changing.' The couple even celebrated their win with a McDonald's. But the fairytale soon lost its sparkle as the reality of owning a massive home nearly 200 miles away—and the cost of running it—set in. They only stayed in the house a handful of nights before deciding it wasn't a practical move. 'It is a lovely house, but the associated costs are significant,' said Lauren's dad, Daniel, 46, speaking to Mail Online. 'For example, although the pool is heated, it's outdoors and not thermally protected, so the heat escapes very quickly. Keeping it warm in the winter would cost a fortune. They've turned it off for now, but we braved it during our visit—and I can tell you that water is very cold.' Now, Lauren and Ryan are preparing to buy a more modest semi-detached home in Gloucester using some of the cash prize and savings—putting down roots closer to family and work. 'Every week she tells me she's moving out, and every week she's still here,' Daniel joked. 'But what's important is that she's happy and doing what's right for her. And in both cases, she is.' He added: 'I'm sure when they do move in, I'll be asked to fit the new bathroom and kitchen. And it'll be a pleasure.' Though she's letting go of the mansion, Lauren still walks away with the £250,000 cash prize and, once sold, the property will give the couple a strong financial foundation. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. 'Winning this house has transformed our lives forever,' Lauren said. 'Whatever we decide to do long-term, we're made for life now.' Omaze rules allow winners to do what they like with the homes—move in, rent them out, or sell up. And Lauren is far from alone in choosing to sell. Of the 14 UK Omaze house draw winners so far, only three have kept their properties. Others have cited similar reasons for selling—like high maintenance costs or distance from family. In 2023, June Smith, a widow who won a £4.5million mansion in Cornwall, sold the property to financially support her children and grandchildren. On the other hand, finance analyst Becca Pott, 32, did make her dream home permanent. She and husband Ben decided to stay in the £3.5million home near Ascot they won in February 2022. 'We always knew we were going to move in and enjoy it for at least that first summer, just to experience living in a place like this as a family,' she told The Sunday Times . 'But after a few weeks we realised we didn't want to leave so decided we should keep it.'
BBC News
21 hours ago
- BBC News
Tinder new height filter: 'It doesn't matter that my boyfriend is 5,6"'
Joe is somewhat shorter than the average American man, at 5'6" (1.6m) - but when Ashley came across his Tinder profile last year, the last thing she was thinking about was Joe's height."We were talking about our hobbies and passions," Ashley says, "not superficial things."News that the dating app where Ashley and Joe found love is trialling a new feature - allowing some premium users to filter potential matches according to their height - was met with mixed reactions earlier this daters like Ashley worry it might stifle possible connections, others say the feature might actually help shorter men find a match. Tinder's trial is running in "limited" parts of the world, excluding the UK, with the feature only available to those who pay for its two highest subscription tiers. Tinder has not told the BBC which countries it is being trialled works by informing the app's matching algorithm based on a user's stated preference, rather than filtering out certain users altogether. But online reaction to its launch has ranged from amusement to outrage."Tinder just declared war on short kings," wrote one social media user, while another said they'd be "using the Tinder height filter to filter out all men taller than 5ft 9in (1.7m)".Another commented: "I don't care what Tinder says - short kings are elite."Ashley, from Wisconsin, says she understands why height can be a deal-breaker for some daters - but that wasn't the case for her."I've heard people talk: 'I can't wear heels or my partner will look shorter,'" the 24-year-old says, "but that's never mattered to me".Joe is "just such an amazing person", she says, it wouldn't matter to her "if he was six feet tall or five feet tall".Using a height filter might actually have prevented her and Joe from ever meeting, she adds - and she reckons others could be missing out too. Joe, meanwhile, says Tinder's height filtering feature could actually make dating harder for shorter men."Limiting yourself to physical things about someone will lessen your opportunities and chances of finding a partner," he says. "Height shouldn't matter when you're looking for forever."The 27-year-old says his own dating experience hadn't "all been so bad" and that his matches had judged him based on his personality, rather than his he thinks the new Tinder filter might affect other users' chances of meaningful is not breaking new ground here - seasoned swipers will be familiar with various kinds of filter, which are now common features of dating apps including in the a key Tinder competitor, already allows paying users to filter matches according to their height. Other filters include education level, religion, and checking whether potential matches smoke, drink or take allows premium users to avoid matches with certain star signs, while paying Grindr users can filter by body as the world's largest dating app, Tinder's experiment with height filtering still has huge significance, and has sparked discussion in Britain too. At 5'9, Matt Heal, from Manchester, says he feels jaded about the online dating scene. Matt's around average height for a man in the UK, but says some daters' preferences for taller men have disadvantaged him on the apps. "As someone who is neither very tall nor financially well off, I have definitely felt desensitised about dating [using apps]," he 28-year-old thinks it's understandable that apps like Tinder try to optimise their matching algorithms, though."People have preferences based on all sorts of things," Matt says, adding these features help people "see others they are interested in, rather than swiping for hours on people you don't consider compatible".However, he thinks daters shouldn't be too rigid about what they're looking for."If you were into people who are over six feet, would you really not date someone who's 5'11" - if they were good looking and had similar interests?"Matt feels it's easier for men his height to meet people offline, explaining that meeting someone in person, through mutual friends, for example, can mean a less prescriptive approach. But Beth McColl, 31, thinks the Tinder height filter may offer shorter men some reassurance. The London-based writer and podcaster says it could help people avoid "women who only want to date really tall men". Whether or not women will actually use this feature, Beth is uncertain."Women typically don't have a problem with dating a shorter man," Beth says, "but they do, maybe, have a problem with dating a shorter man who is really hung up on it."Aside from the filters, Beth believes the real problem of modern dating lies with the dating apps themselves."It encourages us to treat dating like picking something from the menu," she says, adding, "there's nothing in being a little bit taller that will make that man a better partner - but I think we've tricked ourselves into thinking that there's truth in that."As to whether the Tinder move will prove popular with users on a mass scale - that remains to be seen. "Features like this capitalise on a well-known preference - some women desire taller partners," says Lara Besbrode, managing director at MatchMaker UK. "They don't address the deeper issues at the heart of online dating fatigue."But, she says, attraction is "not static" and can evolve over time."A man who is 5ft 7in (1.7m), but confident, kind, and emotionally attuned can be far more attractive than someone who ticks the 6ft (1.8m) box but lacks substance," Lara told the BBC its new filter demonstrates it is "building with urgency, clarity, and focus" and that it is "part of a broader effort to help people connect more intentionally" on the app.A spokesperson said: "Not every test becomes a permanent feature, but every test helps us learn how we can deliver smarter, more relevant experiences and push the category forward."And that fleeting moment when stumbling across each other's profiles on a dating app can be vital, as Ashley and Joe worries that people who use Tinder's new filter "might be cutting themselves off from people who're a potential match for them, rather than someone who's their preferred height".But for now her swiping days are over, and her relationship with Joe is blossoming. He's "phenomenal", Ashley says, "super sweet".
