Snow Lake Comments on Maiden High Grade Mineral Resource Estimate for the Maybell Uranium Project in Colorado
Highlights
CEO Remarks
'As the cornerstone investor in GUE, we are pleased with the announcement of a significant maiden mineral resource estimate at the Maybell uranium project in Colorado,' said Frank Wheatley, CEO of Snow Lake.
'With a maiden resource estimate at Maybell, coupled with a positive scoping study at the Tallahassee uranium project in Colorado, GUE is beginning to assemble a critical mass of domestic American uranium resources, which are poised to benefit from President Trump's policies on accelerating uranium production to ensure national and energy security.'
'As a 50/50 joint venture partner with GUE on the Pine Ridge Uranium Project in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming, currently undergoing an aggressive 125,000 ft drill program, we certainly believe we are assembling an exceptional portfolio of American uranium projects that hold the potential to create significant value for Snow Lake shareholders.'
About Snow Lake Resources Ltd.
Snow Lake Resources Ltd., d/b/a Snow Lake Energy, is a Canadian mineral exploration company listed on (NASDAQ: LITM), with a global portfolio of critical mineral and clean energy projects. The Pine Ridge Uranium project is an exploration stage project located in Wyoming, United States, and the Engo Valley Uranium Project is an exploration stage project located in the Skeleton Coast of Namibia. Snow Lake also holds a portfolio of additional exploration stage critical minerals projects located in Manitoba, as well as investments in a number of public companies with critical minerals assets. Learn more at www.snowlakeenergy.com.
Forward-Looking Statements: This press release contains 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the 'safe harbor' provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained in this press release are forward-looking statements, including without limitation statements with regard to Snow Lake Resources Ltd. We base these forward-looking statements on our expectations and projections about future events, which we derive from the information currently available to us. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release may be identified by the use of words such as 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'contemplate,' 'could,' 'estimate,' 'expect,' 'intend,' 'seek,' 'may,' 'might,' 'plan,' 'potential,' 'predict,' 'project,' 'target,' 'aim,' 'should,' 'will,' 'would,' or the negative of these words or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Forward-looking statements are based on Snow Lake Resources Ltd.'s current expectations and are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Further, certain forward-looking statements are based on assumptions as to future events that may not prove to be accurate. Some of these risks and uncertainties are described more fully in the section titled 'Risk Factors' in our registration statements and annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements contained in this announcement are made as of this date, and Snow Lake Resources Ltd. undertakes no duty to update such information except as required under applicable law.
1 https://wcsecure.weblink.com.au/pdf/GUE/02972557.pdf
2 https://wcsecure.weblink.com.au/pdf/GUE/02972557.pdf
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/261447
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Silvercorp Metals First Quarter 2026 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations
Explore Silvercorp Metals's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Silvercorp Metals (TSE:SVM) First Quarter 2026 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$81.3m (up 13% from 1Q 2025). Net income: US$18.1m (down 17% from 1Q 2025). Profit margin: 22% (down from 30% in 1Q 2025). The decrease in margin was driven by higher expenses. EPS: US$0.083 (down from US$0.12 in 1Q 2025). AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Silvercorp Metals EPS Misses Expectations Revenue was in line with analyst estimates. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 8.9%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 24% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 15% growth forecast for the Metals and Mining industry in Canada. Performance of the Canadian Metals and Mining industry. The company's shares are up 4.2% from a week ago. Risk Analysis You should always think about risks. Case in point, we've spotted 2 warning signs for Silvercorp Metals you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What an Average Home Has Cost Since 2000
Nearly 25 years have passed since the year 2000 and much has changed over the last quarter century, particularly the skyrocketing cost of living and housing market in the United States. Key findings from a 2025 GOBankingRates study analyzing the national average home sale price from 1963 to 2024 revealed the average home sale price in the year 2000 was $375,461 when adjusted for 2025 dollars. By 2024, this average price had shot up to $526,993 — an increase of more than $150,000 in today's dollars. Explore More: Check Out: At this rate, could the average home sale price hover in the vicinity of $678,525 by 2050? While it's much too soon to tell, what we do know is how much the average home has cost since 2000. Take a look at home costs over the past 25 years in American real estate. 2000 Average home sale price (in year sold): $207,000 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $375,461 Try This: Be Aware: 2001 Average home sale price (in year sold): $213,200 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $380,798 Read Next: 2002 Average home sale price (in year sold): $228,700 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $398,999 2003 Average home sale price (in year sold): $246,300 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $421,777 2004 Average home sale price (in year sold): $274,500 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $455,247 Trending Now: 2005 Average home sale price (in year sold): $297,000 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $476,294 2006 Average home sale price (in year sold): $305,900 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $478,412 2007 Average home sale price (in year sold): $313,600 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $471,223 That's Interesting: 2008 Average home sale price (in year sold): $292,600 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $439,266 2009 Average home sale price (in year sold): $270,900 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $395,915 2010 Average home sale price (in year sold): $272,900 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $392,960 Find Out: 2011 Average home sale price (in year sold): $267,900 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $374,661 2012 Average home sale price (in year sold): $292,200 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $401,652 2013 Average home sale price (in year sold): $324,500 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $439,452 View More: 2014 Average home sale price (in year sold): $347,700 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $467,335 2015 Average home sale price (in year sold): $352,700 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $470,622 2016 Average home sale price (in year sold): $360,900 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $471,776 Discover Next: 2017 Average home sale price (in year sold): $384,900 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $492,757 2018 Average home sale price (in year sold): $385,000 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $483,646 2019 Average home sale price (in year sold): $383,900 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $471,490 See More: 2020 Average home sale price (in year sold): $391,900 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $474,485 2021 Average home sale price (in year sold): $464,200 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $518,797 2022 Average home sale price (in year sold): $540,000 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $554,547 View Next: 2023 Average home sale price (in year sold): $513,800 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $528,845 2024 Average home sale price (in year sold): $512,200 Average home sale price (in 2025 dollars): $526,993Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates found the national average home sale price from 2000 to 2024 in years sold dollars as well as current dollars. Using the U.S. Census's New Residential Construction Average Home Sale Price, GOBankingRates found the historical average home sales prices starting in 2000. Using the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index Inflation Calculator, the historical home price was calculated in 2025 dollars. All data was collected on and is up to date as of Feb. 3, 2025. More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact Retirees10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle This article originally appeared on What an Average Home Has Cost Since 2000 Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
My wife and I paid off the mortgage, want to ramp up savings — but home insurance is now $7.2K. Can we go without it?
Picture this: Scott and Lisa, who are in their 50s, live in Colorado and recently paid off their home. Together they make about $130,000 a year, but since they're now mortgage free, they're using that extra cash to boost their retirement savings. While they don't have any debt, they're trying to save as much as possible for an early retirement. So far, they have about $250,000 stashed away in retirement savings and investments. But a wrench was thrown into their retirement plans when they found out their home insurance will increase from $3,400 to $7,200 next year. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership Scott and Lisa can afford to make the increased payments, but it means diverting their extra money from savings to insurance. And since they've already paid off their mortgage, they're no longer required by their mortgage lender to carry home insurance. With this in mind, the couple can't help but wonder: should they keep paying for it, or does the crazy idea of living in a house without home insurance make some sense? While Lisa wants to shop around for a better rate, Scott is worried that the options in Colorado are limited and wonders if it makes more sense to self-insure. The state of home insurance in Colordo Over the past three years, American homeowners have seen their insurance premiums increase by an average of 24%, according to a report from the Consumer Federation of America. From 2021 to 2024, annual premiums increased by an average of $648, according to the report, which means homeowners were paying, on average, $3,303 annually by 2024. While the rate differs from state to state, premiums increased in 95% of ZIP codes, with one-third of ZIP codes seeing an increase of more than 30%. In Colorado, premiums are expected to jump by 11% in 2025, increasing rates from an average of $5,984 to $6,630, according to Insurify. Across the country, premiums will increase by 8% to a national average of $3,520. The culprit? Insurify says severe weather is 'putting pressure' on insurers to raise rates. 'Western wildfires, Southern hurricanes, and Midwestern hail have continued to increase in intensity and frequency, leading to larger losses and higher claim payouts,' says Insurify. In Colorado, homes are at particular risk of wildfire damage. While the 2022 Marshall Fire was the most destructive, the 10 largest fires in the state's history have all occurred since 2002, according to the Western Fire Chiefs Association. That has helped in making insurance premiums less affordable — and, in disaster-prone areas, homeowners may not be able to get coverage at all. Nearly one in seven homes in the U.S. is uninsured, according to a recent study, which translates to 11.3 million owner-occupied homes throughout the country. Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. To insure or self-insure Scott and Lisa wouldn't be alone in their predicament, as 44% of American policyholders find home insurance harder to afford than in previous years, according to a ValuePenguin survey. To save money, 58% of survey respondents said they've shopped around for a better home insurance premium, with those who successfully switched providers saving an average of $1,034 yearly. In addition, 56% of respondents said they requested a discount from their insurance provider, and those who got one saved an average of $781 annually. However, 34% said they saved money by downgrading or reducing their coverage. Furthermore, 24% said they don't believe home insurance is worth the cost, while 31% have considered self-insuring. Scott and Lisa will have to consider how forgoing home insurance could impact their financial plan. If some unfortunate event were to destroy their home, would they have the cash to rebuild it, and how would that impact their retirement savings? Say they lost their home and had to rent. Would the cost of renting a place — which averages $1,977 a month for a two-bedroom apartment in Colorado — outpace their current housing costs, including property tax and the higher insurance rate? Would renting eat into their retirement savings? These are things that Scott and Lisa should consider before making a decision. What are their options? For the argument of keeping their home insurance, Scott and Lisa may want to consider shopping around to see what their options are. An independent agent, who sells policies from multiple insurers, could provide them with a comparison of rates. If they've been loyal to the same insurer for years, they could also try to negotiate a better price or reduce their rate by bundling home and auto insurance. If those options don't work, they could also consider raising their deductible (the amount you have to pay upfront if you make a claim). A higher deductible will lower their premium, but they'll want to make sure they have enough cash in an emergency fund to cover that higher deductible. Scott and Lisa could also talk to their insurer about discounts for making their home more resilient to natural disasters. This could include reinforcing their roof or installing storm shutters. Those retrofits come with an upfront cost, though it's a cost that may be worth it if it saves their home during a natural disaster. Scott and Lisa should talk to their insurer first about what it recommends and how much they could save. Another reason for a high insurance rate? If Scott and Lisa have poor credit, then they may have a low credit-based insurance score, which some insurers use to determine your premium. While improving your credit has many benefits, one of those benefits could be improving your credit-based insurance score, which could help lower your premium. As a last resort (for those who've been denied coverage), Scott and Lisa could choose to go through their state's Fair Access to Insurance Requirements plan. 'FAIR plans offer coverage even in areas where insurance companies have decided not to sell policies,' according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 'Through FAIR plans, everyone can have a basic level of protection from catastrophes. However, it typically costs more than a standard policy.' Since Scott and Lisa don't have millions stashed away for retirement and can't afford to rebuild their home from scratch, it may be in their best interest to shop around and find out what their options are before canceling their home insurance. What to read next Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
