logo
Make indy great again? Why Swinney should hijack Trump's visit

Make indy great again? Why Swinney should hijack Trump's visit

But his administration is weak and anaemic. It's bereft of ideas and energy. That's what happens when you hold power for a generation.
The biggest problem for the SNP and Swinney, though, is independence. The leadership has no notion of how to achieve another referendum, and it struggles to explain precisely what independence actually means. When your flagship policy is in tatters, then you're in tatters.
If Swinney could find a way to revivify the independence campaign, then he'd see life flow back into his party. Working out how to get people interested in the Yes movement again – whether for or against, it doesn't really matter – would send a blast of electricity into the neck-bolts of this moribund party.
Read more by Neil Mackay
That means he must take some risks. The game hasn't gone his way, so he needs to grab the ball and make a mad dash for the goal: an all or nothing desperation move.
Donald Trump could be the very man to help him score. Trump's imminent arrival in Scotland is just about the last event the [[SNP]] wants to deal with: he represents everything they despise, but he's a president whom they cannot risk offending.
Swinney will meet Trump. The visit itself is rather ridiculous. It's not an official state visit, but a personal trip, where Trump will wander around his golf courses. Ozymandias surveying his statues.
The tour will have a crippling effect on policing in terms of costs and officers working brutal hours to protect MAGA's King when they could be protecting us. There will be protests. Essentially, it's aggravation that Scotland could do without.
But given we're lumbered with it, Swinney should be smart and take advantage of the circus.
After all, Trump's odious vice-president, JD Vance, took potshots at Scotland's abortion laws, so why not get something in return as payment now? That sounds fair, especially for a president renowned for the art of the deal and turning life into one inglorious transaction.
Swinney should quite simply hijack Trump's visit for the [[SNP]]'s own purposes. When he meets Trump, he needs merely to mention Scottish independence.
At the moment, he appears prepared to talk about difficult subjects: the Middle East, Ukraine and tariffs on Scotch whisky. Just add independence to the list. And don't bother telling the Labour Government. That's an important part of the Hail Mary strategy.
Swinney should shape the discussion in a way that gets inside Trump's psychology. Part of MAGA's ideological universe is the fixation with "states rights": the conflict over where the federal government's power begins and ends. This has an ugly history, all the way back to slavery and the Civil War. It plays into "deep state" conspiracies.
So Swinney could be tricksy, framing Scottish independence as an issue similar to states rights, but within the UK's borders.
Trump is also pretty free and easy when it comes to commenting on the integrity of the borders of other nations. Just ask Canada, Greenland and Panama.
Swinney doesn't need to suck up to Trump. He just needs to pour the necessary words into the ear of this very combustible man.
If Swinney then emerged from the meeting and simply mentioned in passing to the media that he'd raised Scottish independence, all he'd have to do is stand back and watch the news agenda do what it does.
Trump would at some point be asked about the issue. What he may or may not say would essentially be irrelevant as far as the SNP was concerned.
If he nixed the idea, then the Yes movement can say it is under attack by this demon from Washington. Every liberal-leftie in Britain would immediately feel some pang of sympathy, even if they hated the idea of Scotland leaving the union.
If Trump showed a smidgen of favour to independence then the debate gets rocket fuel in the tank, and the Tory Party and Reform are undercut.
If he says something diplomatic (aye, right) like "this is an internal matter for the UK", then he still pushes the debate onto the news agenda internationally.
The foreign press would start to cover it, and the SNP would find itself once more making the political weather in Scotland, rather than, as it does now, letting the weather buffet the party where it may.
Starmer would be caught on the hop, and he and the rest of the Westminster pack would have to start talking about independence.
Donald Trump is big on states rights (Image: Getty)
The UK Government would have to reiterate its refusal of a second referendum in a very different climate where the US and European media are paying much more attention.
Starmer is utterly terrified of Trump so he'd dance around the issue absurdly, adding more fuel to the media fires.
This is a Hail Mary strategy, though, so it requires real cojones and skill to pull off. Hail Marys often end in fumbling face-plants if not perfectly executed.
So Swinney cannot be seen to cosy up to Trump, he can't play the craven bootlicker like Starmer. Nor can he be seen to endorse a single MAGA policy or anything Trump stands for. Trump is toxic to the SNP's progressive brand.
All Trump is, in this case, is a bridge to a goal. The SNP is a wreck at the moment, down on its luck with a hole in the seat of its pants. It needs to find a way to turn its fortunes around.
All it's got – indeed all the party has ever had – is the power which independence can unleash if wielded correctly as a political weapon.
Trump is essentially a human Jack-in-the-Box. With the right winding-up, you're guaranteed that he will spring into the air, yammering and causing international ructions.
Swinney just has to give the handle a few subtle turns, then walk quickly from the room and leave Trump and the international media to do the rest for him.
Neil Mackay is The Herald's Writer at Large. He's a multi-award-winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New poll shows astonishing outcome in fantasy 2028 match-up between Obama and Trump
New poll shows astonishing outcome in fantasy 2028 match-up between Obama and Trump

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

New poll shows astonishing outcome in fantasy 2028 match-up between Obama and Trump

A new poll reveals who would win in a fantasy match-up between President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama for president if they both ran for a third term. A new exclusive Daily Mail/J.L. Partners poll shows that Obama would win in a theoretical matchup. Of the respondents, 52 percent chose the former Democratic president and 41 percent chose Trump. Obama's 11-point majority over Trump stems from an enthusiastic Hispanic base, of which 73 percent selected Obama, and also 68 percent of black voters. Independent voters also preferred Obama over Trump in the hypothetical match, 50 percent for the former Democrat to just 39 percent for Trump. Past American presidents sometimes benefit from nostalgia over a president currently serving in office. Obama currently enjoys a 59 percent favorability rating while just 35 percent viewed him unfavorably. That's compared to Trump's 44 percent favorability mark. According to the exclusive poll, Trump has a 49 percent overall approval rating for his job performance as president, while 51 percent have an unfavorable view. The poll also shows that Trump would still beat Hillary Clinton if she ran for president again with 44 percent support over Clinton's 43 percent. Trump would also beat former President Joe Biden with 44 percent versus just 40 percent support for Biden. American presidents are prevented from running for a third term, after the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution was passed and ratified in 1951. Trump has teased the idea in interviews, although he has conceded he is not yet planning on running for a third term. 'I'm not joking,' Trump told NBC in March, when asked to clarify his comments on the idea. 'But I'm not — it is far too early to think about it.' When asked about how he would do so, Trump said cryptically, 'There are methods which you could do it.' He also said he would 'love' to run against Obama. 'I'd love that …. That would be a good one,' he said to Fox News reporter Peter Doocy in March. 'I'd like that. And no, people are asking me to run, and there's a whole story about running for a third term. I don't know, I never looked into it. They do say there's a way you can do it, but I don't know about that.' Trump supporters have mused on a possible loophole in the law, if Vice President JD Vance won a presidential race in 2028 with Trump as his running mate. Theoretically, a President Vance could swear in as president and then resign, allowing a vice president Trump to ascend back into power. Obama also joked about the idea of a third term as his second term was coming to a close. 'I actually think I'm a pretty good president. I think if I ran, I could win,' Obama joked during a 2015 speech in Ethiopia. 'There's a lot that I'd like to do to keep America moving. But the law is the law, and no person is above the law, not even the president.' In 2020, Obama also joked that he would be fine with a 'stand-in' president where 'they had an earpiece' and he could control them. "You know what? If I could make an arrangement where I had a stand-in, a front man or front woman, and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff, and then I could sort of deliver the lines, but somebody else was doing all the talking and ceremony, I'd be fine with that,' he joked in an interview with Stephen Colbert. The poll was conducted July 9 - July 10 among 1,013 registered voters. It has a 3.1 percent margin of error.

US, China finish talks in Stockholm as tariff truce holds for now
US, China finish talks in Stockholm as tariff truce holds for now

Reuters

time11 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US, China finish talks in Stockholm as tariff truce holds for now

STOCKHOLM, July 29 (Reuters) - U.S. and Chinese officials finished two days of talks in Stockholm on Tuesday that were aimed at tackling longstanding economic disputes and stepping back from an escalating trade war between the world's two biggest economies. While announcing no breakthroughs, China's top trade negotiator Li Chenggang said the two sides agreed to push for an extension of a 90-day tariff truce struck in mid-May, without specifying when and for how long such an extension could come into force. The talks could pave the way for a meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later in the year, though Trump denied going out of his way to seek one and Chinese officials did not mention it. After months of threatening high tariffs on trading partners, Trump has secured trade deals with the European Union, Japan, and others, but China's powerhouse economy and grip on global rare earth flows make these talks particularly complex. Both sides in May walked back from imposing triple-digit tariffs on each other in what would have amounted to a bilateral trade embargo. But global supply chains and financial markets could face renewed turmoil without an agreement. Underlining the stakes, the International Monetary Fund on Tuesday raised its global growth forecast but flagged a potential rebound in tariff rates as a major risk.

FEMA to require states use terrorism prevention funds for migrant arrests
FEMA to require states use terrorism prevention funds for migrant arrests

Reuters

time11 minutes ago

  • Reuters

FEMA to require states use terrorism prevention funds for migrant arrests

WASHINGTON, July 29 (Reuters) - The Federal Emergency Management Agency will require states to spend part of their federal terrorism prevention funds on helping the Trump administration arrest migrants, as part of the U.S. president's transformation of the agency. This is latest example of the Trump administration tying its goal to arrest migrants to federal funding for states. States must spend at least 10% of their funds from the Homeland Security Grant Program on enforcing immigration laws 'against all inadmissible and removable aliens,' according to an agency announcement. They can use it for tasks that support President Donald Trump's executive order, opens new tab on immigration, including to construct detention facilities or set up partnerships between police officers and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to the post. States have until Aug. 11 to apply for their portion of $373.3 million, according to the post. Congress established the Homeland Security Grant Program before Trump took office to help states prepare for and respond to terrorist attacks. All 50 states receive the funds annually. In the past, they have used the money to buy security cameras, firefighting foam equipment and computers, among other needs, according to statements from state officials. Reuters asked the White House press office whether Congress intended the funds be spent on migrant arrests. The office referred Reuters to FEMA.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store