logo
All the new tax raids Rachel Reeves is planning on YOUR cash to fill £50bn blackhole – how to protect yourself

All the new tax raids Rachel Reeves is planning on YOUR cash to fill £50bn blackhole – how to protect yourself

The Sun2 days ago
RACHEL Reeves is under pressure to fill a £50billion blackhole with an all-new tax raid in the Autumn Budget.
Experts have suggested a raft of tax changes could be announced in the speech - but how could they affect you? And what can YOU do now to protect your finances. We explain.
2
The Chancellor is under increasing pressure after slow economic growth, U-turns on spending and a weak jobs market have all pushed the government finances further into the red, the National Institute for Economic and Social Research has warned.
Among the ideas on the table are changes to stamp duty, capital gains tax and council tax.
Labour has already pledged not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT in its manifesto, which means it is considering other options.
Of course, the full details of the Budget will remain under wraps until the day it is unveiled.
But here we explain what could be on the cards and what it might mean for you.
Inheritance tax
Reeves is said to be eyeing up inheritance tax changes as part of plans to fix the nation's finances.
Some of the options on the table are stopping parents from making unlimited tax-free gifts to kids by capping the value of gifts that someone can pass on to loved ones.
Currently, you can give away unlimited amounts of money and assets to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die.
If you give money away and then die within seven years then the amount of tax you pay is charged at a tapered rate.
Capping the amount relatives can give to their loved ones could raise millions of pounds for the Treasury.
2
The tax raised a record £8.2billion last year alone.
Experts have warned that if the measure was brought in it could cause 'a fundamental change to the way families pass on wealth".
Rachael Griffin, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter warned the change 'could capture not just large transfers designed to reduce tax bills but also modest, routine support between family members."
Stamp duty
It has also been suggested this week that the Chancellor is considering plans to replace the current stamp duty thresholds with a new property tax.
Earlier this week The Guardian published a story about how the Chancellor Rachel Reeves is considering a new levy on houses over £500,000.
It said the Treasury has been considering suggestions from a report by thinktank Onward.
In it, Onward recommended that if a property is worth more than £500,000 it would incur an annual tax of 0.54%.
Meanwhile, any home worth more than £1million would pay 0.81% on the proportion of its value over the threshold.
This would replace the current stamp duty thresholds, which are tiered depending on the value of your home.
Currently there is no stamp duty to pay on a home worth less than £125,000.
On homes worth between £125,001 and £250,000 stamp duty is charged at a rate of 2%.
But this rises to 5% for homes worth between £250,001 and £925,000.
The Government has not yet confirmed how the proposals would work but did not rule them out.
It is understood that only homeowners who buy a property after the tax is brought in could be affected by the change, so the tax would not be applied to properties retrospectively.
This means homeowners who already paid stamp duty when they bought their home would not be charged again.
The extra stamp duty for homeowners with more than one property would remain in place and this group would not have to pay the new tax.
Experts have described the change as 'designed to radically overhaul stamp duty'.
David Hollingworth, of L&C Mortgages, said: 'Many have called for a rethink of stamp duty which can act as a barrier to buying, moving and downsizing.
'Buyers won't shed any tears for stamp duty but may have to rethink the likely annual cost of owning their own home.
'If that sees a big increase it will have a knock on impact for affordability.'
Meanwhile, property expert Kirstie Allsopp said the Chancellor's plans to reform stamp duty would have a 'destabilising' effect and added it's 'not the place to fly kites.'
Speaking on Times Radio she warned: "It's not Rachel's to go after because it's their homes.
"It's the roof over their head. And this Government seems to want to punish people for making the sacrifices they've made to buy their own homes."
Council tax
Officials are also said to be considering whether to replace council tax with a local property tax.
This would mean a total overhaul of the current council tax system, which came into effect in 1993.
Currently council tax is an annual fee that is paid to the local council to fund services such as road upkeep and state schools.
People pay more or less depending on where they live and the size of their home.
There have been fears that council tax will be reformed after several councils declared themselves bankrupt and others warned they have just months left before they run out of funds.
But a total reform of the council tax system could take years, so it is unlikely to happen in this parliament.
Capital gains tax
Homeowners with expensive properties could be hit with capital gains tax when they decide to move house, recent reports suggest.
Rachel Reeves is said to be considering ending private residence relief, which stops people from having to pay capital gains tax when they sell their main home.
The change would mean that properties worth over a certain amount would be subject to the tax.
Higher rate taxpayers would pay 24% of the value of any gains they make, while basic rate taxpayers would have to pay 18%, The Times has reported.
If the levy was brought in with a threshold of £1.5million then it would affect around 120,000.
These wealthy homeowners would be hit with a bill of £200,000 if they tried to move house.
It is not clear from when this change could be introduced or if it would be phased in.
Pensions
Another option that could come under the microscope is tax relief on pensions.
The Chancellor has previously shied away from this option but is said to be reconsidering it as an easy option to raise cash.
Currently you get tax relief on any money you pay into your pension.
This is done through rebates from the Government and the exact amount you get depends on your income tax rate.
For example, basic rate taxpayers get 20% tax relief on any money they pay into their retirement pot.
However, for higher rate taxpayers the relief rises to 40%, or 45% for additional rate taxpayers.
As a result, the system is currently tilted in favour of more wealthy people as they pay more tax.
But reports have suggested that the Chancellor could introduce a flat rate of tax relief.
This would cut the amount of cash higher and additional taxpayers get back from the Government.
However, it could also hit hardworking teachers, nurses and public sector workers who are on modest incomes.
This move could raise billions of pounds for the Chancellor each year.
Official figures show the total cost of providing pension tax relief was £52.5billion in 2023/24, up from £50.1billion the year before, official figures reveal.
Most of this money went to higher and additional rate taxpayers.
Former pensions minister Baroness Ros Altmann thinks the measure is likely to appear in the Budget.
She said: "With a desperate need for more money to be invested in this country, it is inevitable that the Chancellor will be looking at whether this money could be better used in Britain directly, and I do think she will find ways to reduce its generosity."
But overhauling the pension system would be a major reform, so it cannot be brought in overnight.
This means the Government is unlikely to be able to use it to raise the cash it needs in the short term.
What should YOU do now
None of the potential changes being tabled have been confirmed yet.
The Government has not yet ruled them out but any measures it introduces will not happen until after the autumn Budget at the earliest - and a date has not been set yet.
Don't make any rash decisions based on the current Budget speculation.
If and when the changes are announced you can decide to act to stop your finances from being hit.
For example, if the changes to stamp duty are brought in from a certain date then you cold move house before this deadline to avoid being hit.
Or if the Government decides to charge Capital Gains tax on high value properties then you could downsize to a smaller house before the change is implemented.
Most of the suggestions on the table will only affect the very wealthy, so you may not even be hit by the tax changes.
There are some things you can do if you're worried.
Get financial advice
If you are worried about your finances then you should speak to a financial adviser.
They will be able to offer you advice about your situation and explain if any of the measures will affect you.
You can find one using unbiased.co.uk - but remember, you will pay a fee.
Make a will
First, you should ensure your money gets to the right place by making a will, according to Ms Young.
'If you die without a will, your estate will fall under the rules of intestacy, which could mean a higher IHT bill.
'This is especially key for couples who aren't married, as unmarried partners will not automatically inherit from one another, even if they have lived together for many years.'
Check how to make one in our guide.
Give your finances a makeover
It's good practice to sit down and take stock of your finances every six months and work out a plan.
Work out all your bills and outgoings and what income you have and factor in any changes, such as bills going up or new income streams.
Think about what you need to do to make the most of your money. For example, do you need to prioritise paying off debts or saving for a house deposit.
Our guide to paying less tax legally could help you avoid giving away more cash to the tax man than necessary.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4chan will refuse to pay daily UK fines, its lawyer tells BBC
4chan will refuse to pay daily UK fines, its lawyer tells BBC

BBC News

time13 minutes ago

  • BBC News

4chan will refuse to pay daily UK fines, its lawyer tells BBC

A lawyer representing the online message board 4chan says it won't pay a proposed fine by the UK's media regulator as it enforces the Online Safety to Preston Byrne, managing partner of law firm Byrne & Storm, Ofcom has provisionally decided to impose a £20,000 fine "with daily penalties thereafter" for as long as the site fails to comply with its request."Ofcom's notices create no legal obligations in the United States," he told the BBC, adding he believed the regulator's investigation was part of an "illegal campaign of harassment" against US tech has declined to comment while its investigation continues. "4chan has broken no laws in the United States - my client will not pay any penalty," Mr Byrne began investigating 4chan over whether it was complying with its obligations under the UK's Online Safety in August, it said it had issued 4chan with "a provisional notice of contravention" for failing to comply with two requests for said its investigation would examine whether the message board was complying with the act, including requirements to protect its users from illegal content.4chan has often been at the heart of online controversies in its 22 years, including misogynistic campaigns and conspiracy are anonymous, which can often lead to extreme content being posted. 'First Amendment rights' In a statement posted on X, law firms Byrne & Storm and Coleman Law said 4chan was a US company incorporated in the US, and therefore protected against the UK law."American businesses do not surrender their First Amendment rights because a foreign bureaucrat sends them an email," they wrote."Under settled principles of US law, American courts will not enforce foreign penal fines or censorship codes. "If necessary, we will seek appropriate relief in US federal court to confirm these principles."They said authorities in the US had been "briefed" on their response to Ofcom's statement concludes by calling on the Trump administration to invoke all diplomatic and legal levers to protect American businesses from "extraterritorial censorship mandates".Ofcom has previously said the Online Safety Act only requires services to take action to protect users based in the UK. UK backs down Some American politicians - particularly the Trump administration, its allies and officials - have pushed back against what they regard as overreach in the regulation of US tech firms by the UK and EU. A perceived impact of the Online Safety Act on free speech has been a particular concern, but other laws have also been the source of 19 August, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the UK had withdrawn its controversial demand for a "backdoor" in an Apple data protection system - saying she worked with the President and Vice President to get the UK to abandon its days later, US Federal Trade Commission chairman Andrew Ferguson warned big tech firms they could be violating US law if they weakened privacy and data security requirements by complying with international laws such as the Online Safety Act."Foreign governments seeking to limit free expression or weaken data security in the United States might count on the fact that companies have an incentive to simplify their operations and legal compliance measures by applying uniform policies across jurisdictions," he 4chan does successfully fight the fine in the US courts, Ofcom may have other options."Enforcing against an offshore provider is tricky," Emma Drake, partner of online safety and privacy at law firm Bird and Bird, told the BBC. "Ofcom can instead ask a court to order other services to disrupt a provider's UK business, such as requiring a service's removal from search results or blocking of UK payments."If Ofcom doesn't think this will be enough to prevent significant harm, it can even ask that ISPs be ordered to block UK access." Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.

Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison
Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison

Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for stirring up racial hatred against asylum seekers online on the day of the Southport murders, is expected to speak out on Friday for the first time since being released from prison. The 42-year-old, wife of Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly, left HMP Peterborough on Thursday morning and it is understood she will be doing limited media interviews a day after walking free. She spent time with her husband, daughter and parents on the day of her release and was pictured walking her dogs in the evening, the Daily Mail reported. Ms Connolly was handed a 31-month sentence after she posted on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' She pleaded guilty to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X and was jailed at Birmingham Crown Court in October last year. The former childminder, from Northampton, was ordered to serve 40% of her sentence in prison before being released on licence. It is understood that Ms Connolly was a passenger in a white taxi which left HMP Peterborough via the vehicle airlock, a set of two gates exiting the prison, shortly after 10am on Thursday. Her case has sparked debate, with some criticising her sentence as excessive. Reacting to her release, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Connolly's sentence was 'harsher than the sentences handed down for bricks thrown at police or actual rioting'. In a post on X, Ms Badenoch compared Ms Connolly's case with that of Ricky Jones, a suspended Labour councillor who was found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder at an anti-racism rally in the wake of the Southport murders. Writing on X, Mrs Badenoch said: 'Juries are a cornerstone of justice, but we shouldn't have to rely on them to protect basic freedoms. 'Protecting people from words should not be given greater weight in law than public safety. If the law does this, then the law itself is broken – and it's time Parliament looked again at the Public Order Act.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described Ms Connolly's case as a 'symbol of Keir Starmer's authoritarian, broken, two-tier Britain'. A bid to challenge her sentence at the Court of Appeal was dismissed in May, which was described by Mr Connolly as 'shocking and unfair'. The Northampton town councillor, and former West Northamptonshire district councillor, said his wife had 'paid a very high price for making a mistake'. But Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer defended it earlier this year. He was asked in May about Ms Connolly's case after her Court of Appeal application against her jail term was dismissed. Asked during Prime Minister's Questions whether her imprisonment was an 'efficient or fair use' of prison, Sir Keir said: 'Sentencing is a matter for our courts and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. 'I am strongly in favour of free speech, we've had free speech in this country for a very long time and we protect it fiercely. 'But I am equally against incitement to violence against other people. I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe.' Ms Connolly was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account, but other messages which included further racist remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. The post was viewed 310,000 times in three and a half hours before she deleted it.

Fresh wave of asylum hotel protests expected after Epping ruling
Fresh wave of asylum hotel protests expected after Epping ruling

ITV News

time31 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Fresh wave of asylum hotel protests expected after Epping ruling

A wave of protests outside hotels used as temporary accommodation for asylum seekers is expected in the coming days. It comes as the latest figures showed there were more than 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels, marking a rise of 8% during Labour's first year in office. Stand Up To Racism is preparing to hold counter-protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers on Friday, including in Bournemouth, Cardiff and Leeds, with further demonstrations expected on Saturday. Meanwhile, councils across the country controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK are investigating whether they could pursue legal challenges against asylum hotels. This follows a judge granting Epping Forest District Council a temporary injunction on Tuesday that blocked asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Essex. The council had argued the injunction was needed amid 'unprecedented levels of protest and disruption' in connection with asylum seeker accommodation. Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said the people of Epping who protested and its council have 'led the way', writing in The Telegraph that 'our country's patience has snapped'. His Conservative colleague Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said on Thursday that people have 'every right' to protest over asylum hotels in their areas. Labour has pledged to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this parliament in 2029. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper insisted Labour had taken 'crucial steps' in the past year towards this by cutting the asylum backlog and money spent on the asylum system, increasing returns of failed asylum seekers and overhauling appeals. While the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels has risen, Government spending on asylum in the UK is down 12%, data published on Thursday showed. The number waiting on an initial decision on an asylum application in the UK at the end of June dropped below 100,000 for the first time in four years. Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office – which has a legal obligation to provide accommodation to asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute – can move people to alternatives such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. Amid hotel protests, campaigners including Rape Crisis and Refuge have warned conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' which they argued fuels divisions and harms survivors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store