
Trump's old high school is in trouble (again). Can a Chinese businessman fix it?
For the second time in a decade, it is up to a Chinese entrepreneur to make President Trump's high school great again.
Like some of the 20th-century American institutions whose decline Trump laments, the 136-year-old New York Military Academy is in bad shape. Roof tiles are broken on century-old buildings and, on one recent visit, a reporter spotted a family of vultures nestled atop a chimney.
The academy sits on a forested campus in Cornwall, N.Y., a Hudson Valley town about 90 minutes' drive north of New York City that is popular for weekend getaways. It is one of the biggest properties in the town of around 13,000. NYMA, which has no government affiliation, is located 6 miles north of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.
The academy's cadets gave off a whiff of the school's glory days at Trump's inaugural parade Jan. 20, marching in their gray uniforms as the president clapped and smiled. But with enrollment of only around 50, it could muster up only about two dozen students for the procession.
Now Allen Lu, who built a chain of private schools in China, has stepped in with plans to fix up the school. At a February town-council meeting in Cornwall, a person who identified himself as Linsen Zhang said that the school had a change of ownership and that the new owner was a 'visionary on education." He said the new leadership would eventually increase the student population to 1,500.
Lu is the second Chinese magnate to attempt a turnaround at the school where Trump spent five years and graduated in 1964—and Lu will have to do it in the face of the worst U.S.-China tensions this century.
Vincent Tianquan Mo, whose company in China operates a Zillow-like real-estate site, rescued the academy from bankruptcy a decade ago. A nonprofit controlled by Mo bought the land and buildings at the campus for $15.8 million, and Mo said in 2016 he was committed to making NYMA a 'super school again."
But eight years after Mo's purchase, NYMA had racked up $7.8 million in liabilities, according to the latest tax filing by the operating entity of the school. The pandemic took a toll on enrollment and finances, previous years' filings show.
The school's ownership structure is particularly complicated and opaque, involving money flows from China to the U.S. at a time when it can be challenging for a Chinese entrepreneur to take money out of his nation and where American regulations on tax and education invite their own complexities.
Some in Cornwall have wondered about the future of the crumbling institution at the edge of downtown and whether its tax-exempt status is good for the town. 'I didn't like the idea that this large property is not contributing to the pie," said Ezra Zohar, who grew up in town and has told local council meetings that Cornwall should reap benefits from NYMA's tax breaks.
Neither the school nor Mo or Lu, the tycoons who have run it and who are both on the board of trustees, responded to questions. NYMA said it is 'in the midst of a critical transformation" to revitalize its campus, enrich the curriculum and build a vibrant future under the direction of the restructured board of trustees.
The 136-year-old New York Military Academy had more than 500 students in the 1960s compared with about 50 today.Advertisements for the New York Military Academy at the edge of campus.
The school has a storied history, having educated luminaries such as Broadway composer Stephen Sondheim and director Francis Ford Coppola, and in the 1960s it had more than 500 students.
In 'The Art of the Deal," Trump said he wasn't thrilled when his father decided to send him to military school at age 13, but 'I learned a lot about discipline, and about channeling my aggression into achievement."
Trump also referred to the school on Memorial Day weekend, delivering the commencement speech to West Point's 2025 graduates. 'This is a beautiful place,' the president began. He added, 'I have been here many times, going to high school not so far away. A good place. Also a military academy. Not quite of this distinction. But it was a lot of fun for me."
Later in an email statement, White House communications director Steven Cheung said, 'President Trump is proud of his time at the New York Military Academy. He learned important virtues that helped him become one of the greatest businessmen in the world and ultimately president of the United States twice."
One of the first press notices of the future president came in December 1963, when the front page of the Cornwall Local showed a photo of a U.S. Army major general visiting a group of academy cadets including 'Cadet Captain Donald J. Trump," shown in full dress uniform with thick white cross belts and white gloves.
But the school suffered along with the declining popularity of military-style education. It filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2015 and was on the verge of closing permanently when Mo stepped in.
The Chinese magnate was at the top of his career. Not long before his land purchase, he had made it to Forbes's billionaires list for the first and only time, with his net worth pegged at $1.9 billion in 2014. His New York Stock Exchange-listed company ran one of China's largest real-estate listing and search websites.
Real-estate brokers say buying schools abroad is a popular way for wealthy Chinese to invest outside the country because it doesn't require the Chinese government review that commercial real-estate investments abroad would normally receive.
Vincent Tianquan Mo, pictured in 2014, rescued the New York Military Academy from bankruptcy a decade ago.
Mo said he intended to revive the school and brought in a new superintendent.
In a roundtable discussion in China held in January 2024, Mo joked about the timing of his deal, a year before Trump was first elected. 'We bought the New York Military Academy. That's where Trump went to school for five years," he said. 'People said, 'You guys predicted it well.'"
One nonprofit with Mo as head of the board has operated the academy, while an additional nonprofit, called the Research Center on Natural Conservation, owns the land and buildings at the academy. The latter nonprofit, which is controlled by Mo and his family, also owns the 100,000-square-foot Arden House on 450 acres in Harriman, N.Y., where New York's blue-blooded Harriman family long had its countryside estate.
During the Mo years, the two nonprofits borrowed heavily from Mo's for-profit entities, according to an analysis of both nonprofits' tax filings. The nonprofit operating the school had negative net assets of $5.8 million as of June 2023, the most recent information available, meaning it had more liabilities than assets. The Research Center on Natural Conservation had negative net assets of $21 million at the end of 2023, according to a tax filing.
Accounting specialists not involved with the school described the transactions as unusual. Most U.S. nonprofits avoid letting debt outweigh assets and rely on funding from donors. The Research Center on Natural Conservation has said in its Internal Revenue Service filings that it will research preservation of the environment, including issues like global warming, and promote environmental issues, though it is unclear how those goals are satisfied by owning historic properties. The IRS filing specifically says the center won't operate a school; and indeed, NYMA is a separate legal entity.
'Nonprofits, because of the public subsidies they receive, owe it to the public to be very transparent about what they're doing and why," said Thad Calabrese, a professor at New York University who specializes in nonprofit financial management, adding that tax breaks are a form of government support.
The school drew a different kind of attention in Congress from then-Rep. Michael Waltz (R., Fla.), who expressed concern in a 2023 letter to then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin about activities at a Chinese-controlled school so close to U.S. defense installations. Waltz served briefly earlier this year as Trump's national security adviser.
Under Mo, locals said the dilapidation of the school and its property continued, and enrollment fell even further during the pandemic.
On visits this year, rusted army cannons marking the school entrance sat on deflated tires and a brick pedestal appeared to once display a statue.
Grass sprouted through cracked tennis court pavement near the Troop D Stables where all cadets once learned horsemanship. Rusted flagpoles stood unused in front of the ashen walls of the 1970s-era Dickinson Hall. And the yellow paint was faded on the 275-foot long Jones Barracks built as a main campus structure after a 1910 fire.
Dilapidated tennis courts at the New York Military Academy.The academy says it is revitalizing its campus, enriching the curriculum and building a vibrant future under its new board.
Lu, the new investor who is also known as Lu Yuzong, holds a Ph.D. in finance from China's Fudan University and founded Shanghai-based Guanghua Education Group.
Unlike Mo, the 56-year-old Lu is a veteran school operator, owning more than a dozen private schools in China.
In China, the overwhelming majority of students attend public schools, where the curriculum is approved by the Ministry of Education and directs the brightest students toward preparing for college entrance exams heavy on rote memorization. Lu's private schools instead say they aim to foster critical thinking that will help students excel at foreign universities, particularly those in the U.K. and the U.S.
Lu's company said in February this year that its students had received 20 offer letters from the University of Oxford and 37 from the University of Cambridge in the past academic year.
Lu has given almost no media interviews, even in China, but in 2017 he told a magazine featuring successful Fudan University alumni that he wanted to reform Chinese education and provide students and parents with alternatives to public schools.
Lu is now chairman of the board of trustees at the New York Military Academy, according to its website. Two of his associates from Guanghua also hold seats on the five-member board, and Mo retains his trustee seat.
The status of the transfer of power couldn't be determined, and county real-estate records don't show any transfer of the land and buildings at the academy from the nonprofit controlled by Mo and his family. Ahead of graduation in June, fresh indications of attention to the school grounds included new slats to repair a toppled section of fence. Posters advertised an athletic competition and drone training, carrying the tagline 'Inspire Leaders for Tomorrow."
Zhang, Lu's associate, said at the February meeting: 'We are here to make the commitment to fixing everything."
Write to Rebecca Feng at rebecca.feng@wsj.com and James T. Areddy at James.Areddy@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why do India's brightest find Harvard easier to enter than IITs?
It sounds different at first, how could one of the world's most prestigious Ivy League institutions be more accessible than India's own engineering strongholds? But for thousands of Indian students each year, that's the sobering reality. Harvard, with its global reputation and ultra-selective admissions, is seen as the pinnacle of academic achievement. Yet for many top Indian students, clearing the difficult Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) for the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) feels even harder. Statistically, they're right. While Harvard accepts about 3% to 5% of applicants, the top IITs admit less than 0.2%, a competition so fierce it borders on the impossible, according to The Economist. And the pressure isn't just numerical, it's cultural, psychological, and systemic. A test of endurance, not excellence India's entrance exams are unforgiving. Students begin preparing years in advance, often sacrificing adolescence for a shot at a seat in IITs or IIMs. In coaching towns like Kota, teenagers live regimented lives, measured not in experiences but in mock tests, cutoffs, and daily rankings. Contrast that with American universities like Harvard, which adopt a holistic admissions process, one that considers essays, recommendation letters, extracurriculars, and personal character alongside academic merit. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo In short, they assess potential, not just performance. Rejection at home, recognition abroad This paradox plays out year after year: Students who are denied entry into India's top institutes end up accepted by Ivy League schools. It isn't that they're less intelligent; it's that India's system is designed as a sieve, not a searchlight. It filters ruthlessly, often overlooking creative thinkers, late bloomers, and non-conformists. Over 60% of the top 100 IIT rankers still leave India for graduate studies abroad. And now, many who fail to enter IITs at all are finding prestigious opportunities in the West, because, in many ways, they are finally being seen. A pipeline built on pressure According to The Economist, nearly one-third of all international students in the US are Indian. Many pursue STEM fields, drawn by flexible curricula, research opportunities, and comparatively less cut-throat undergraduate admissions. It's no surprise, then that even with volatile visa policies and occasional political hostility, like those during Donald Trump's presidency, Indian students continue to look West. Germany, Canada, and even the Netherlands are emerging as new favourites for Indian families wary of the IIT rat race. These countries offer not just quality education but a reprieve from the emotional toll exacted by India's hyper-competitive model. What does this say about India's system? That Harvard might be more accessible than an IIT is not a compliment to American universities; it's an indictment of India's own educational gatekeeping. Our brightest minds should not have to seek validation from abroad because their potential wasn't shaped into the narrow mold demanded by entrance tests. The question isn't whether Indian students are capable enough for the Ivy League. Clearly, they are. The question is: Why must they leave India to feel worthy? Until we reimagine our idea of merit—from a single number on an answer sheet to a fuller picture of capability and creativity, India will keep exporting talent it fails to nurture. Harvard may keep opening its doors. But shouldn't India do the same? Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Corrupt and politically motivated': Trump-pardoned Proud Boys sue government for $100 million, allege persecution of political allies
5 Proud Boys sue US government over January 6 prosecutions Five leaders of the far-right Proud Boys group are suing the US government for $100 million, claiming their constitutional rights were violated during their prosecution for involvement in the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot. The lawsuit, filed Friday in Florida, accuses FBI agents and federal prosecutors of political bias and misconduct. The men, Henry "Enrique" Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, and Dominic Pezzola, argue they were targeted because of their support for US President Donald Trump. All five were convicted for plotting or participating in the riot, which aimed to block the certification of former President Joe Biden's 2020 election win. They were sentenced to prison, with Tarrio receiving 22 years, the longest sentence among them, after being found guilty of seditious conspiracy and other charges. Earlier this year, Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of the group members, part of a wave of around 1,500 pardons he issued on Inauguration Day. "These people have been destroyed," Trump said at the time. "What they've done to these people is outrageous. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Click Here - This Might Save You From Losing Money Expertinspector Click Here Undo The lawsuit alleges 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system,' including claims of evidence tampering and witness intimidation. It argues their prosecution was 'corrupt and politically motivated,' aimed at punishing Trump's political allies. The suit is directed at the department of justice, now led by attorney general Pam Bondi under the Trump administration. The department has not yet commented on the case. As of January, more than 1,500 individuals have been charged in connection with the Capitol riot. Over 600 face charges for assaulting or resisting police, with many accused of using dangerous weapons. Trump has continued to defend the events of January 6, calling it a 'day of love,' while critics, including former house speaker Nancy Pelosi, have condemned the pardons as a serious blow to the justice system.


Economic Times
24 minutes ago
- Economic Times
50% off J-35A fighter jets! China's half-price stealth deal to Pakistan ignites online backlash, user says 'we pay the price'
Social media lights up: 'It hasn't even paid for the J-10' Live Events A charity sale or strategic move? The bigger gamble: Selling unfinished products Trying to sell the J-10CE and the story that didn't fly India watches, Pakistan trains, China stays quiet (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Beijing's decision to fast-track the delivery of 30 J-35A stealth fighters to Pakistan has ignited a wave of backlash among Chinese citizens. The deal, reportedly offered at a 50% discount, is scheduled to begin in August 2025. If it proceeds, it would mark China's first-ever export of a fifth-generation jet , as reported by Business online, disbelief is running are asking why China would send an unproven, in-testing aircraft — one not even inducted into its own air force — to a foreign buyer that still depends on IMF funding for economic Chinese platforms, the tone has been blunt and biting. One X user, Yingyang Medical School (@Zhejiang), wrote, 'Pakistan has also made a lot of fake news. How can it afford to buy it? It hasn't even paid for the J-10.' That refers to Islamabad's overdue payments for earlier Chinese J-10C fighter jets Another user, CQL0530, expressed disbelief over Beijing's manufacturing priorities: 'China's own production of the J-35 has not yet been built up. How can it be given to them?'And some didn't bother with nuance. Angry Man 1957 (@Guangdong) wrote, simply, 'Bullshit!' while another, posting as Clouds rise and fall from Sichuan province, said 'I can't afford it all,' seemingly lamenting the financial burden on Chinese phrase '2 more powerful printers are coming', shared by user Cracked Rose (@Guangdong), sparked speculation about whether the government plans to ramp up jet production or metaphorically 'print money' to cover the timing of the announcement is what has drawn particular ire. It comes just days after the deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir. The optics are not lost on either side: India views the move as Beijing arming its ally against Indian forces, while Chinese users question if their government is effectively subsidising weapons for a client state with poor credit user summed up the sentiment: 'It is more in your interest to spend money on building and purchasing industrial equipment and infra.'To them, this isn't about strategy — it's about misplaced J-35A — also known as the FC-31 — is still undergoing testing and has yet to be formally inducted into the People's Liberation Army Air Force. Unlike America's F-35, which has seen over 900 units delivered globally, the Chinese stealth fighter is still China appears eager to use the Pakistani order to market the aircraft internationally. The J-35 is designed to rival Western platforms, but without combat experience or confirmed specs, it remains a say the stealth jet may one day feature advanced sensors and integrated battlefield communication systems. For now, however, it's a concept being sold as a finished product — and critics aren't has also claimed that during Operation Sindoor, its Chinese-supplied J-10CE jets — armed with long-range PL-15 missiles — downed multiple Indian Rafale fighters. Beijing has reportedly leaned on these claims to pitch the J-10CE as 'combat-tested' in marketing outside Pakistan, no one's attempts to sell the J-10CE to Egypt, Brazil, and Uzbekistan have all fallen through. One reason is technical: the jet still depends on Russian engines like the Klimov RD-93 and Saturn AL-31, which many countries consider outdated or risky due to supply chain pilots are already being trained in China to fly the J-35s, according to sources. Meanwhile, the Chinese government and state media have remained silent on the growing online criticism. There's been no confirmation, no denial — just quiet momentum behind the on the other hand, is likely to view the sale as part of a broader strategy to shift the regional power balance. A 50% discount on next-gen jets, timed after a cross-border terror attack, adds fuel to long-standing concerns about China using Pakistan as a military now, the deal is neither confirmed by China nor fully detailed. But the backlash has been clear. Citizens are asking tough questions. Why sell an untested weapon to a financially unstable country? Why offer it at a discount? And who, ultimately, is footing the bill?Beijing may see the move as a long-term strategic investment. But at home, many are calling it what they believe it is — a heavily subsidised, risky gamble, paid for by the Chinese taxpayer.