
Service log for scuba gear used by British music producer who died off Byron Bay source of confusion at inquest
Karl Bareham was found lying on the ocean floor 2.5km off the coast during a dive tour of Nguthungulli/Julian Rocks on 24 September 2019.
The 37-year-old had arrived in Australia the day before to tour with City and Colour musician Dallas Green.
In the final days of an inquest into Bareham's death, the New South Wales coroner's court heard this week that Sundive, which provided the dive tour, kept a written log of the manual servicing of diving equipment.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
David Robinson, the co-director of Sundive, was interviewed by police on 8 November 2019 as part of investigations into Bareham's death.
The court on Tuesday heard he provided a photo of a page from the service log to police showing that regulator number 32 – the breathing apparatus hired by Bareham – had been 'tuned' by staff member Stephanie Rings on 2 May 2019.
But the full logbook was not in the court brief, nor was it at the dive centre, where it was usually kept in the classroom, the inquest heard.
Rings' barrister, Simon O'Toole, questioned why only one page of the logbook had been provided to the police, rather than all dates up until the day of Bareham's death, including other instances when regulator 32 may have been serviced.
'You can't say whether someone else performed work and recorded it in those documents, can you?' O'Toole asked Robinson. The latter replied: 'No.'
On Wednesday, the counsel assisting the coroner, Rob Ranken, asked Robinson: 'As to … the other pages of that servicing list document, are you able to assist the court in any way as to what may have happened to those?'
He replied: 'I'm not, unfortunately.'
The court heard that Robinson could not recall whether he had handed the entire servicing log to the police. Patrick Barry, acting for Sundive and its directors, suggested that his client could have had unclear recollections given six years had passed since the police interview.
The deputy state coroner, David O'Neil, asked Robinson whether he had in any way concealed the servicing list from police or SafeWork NSW – 'or have you concealed it from this inquest?'
Robinson replied: 'No.'
He added that, to the best of his knowledge, he had revealed all service list material relating to Bareham's regulator.
Over the course of the seven-day inquest which started in December, questions were raised in court about the safety of the diving equipment used by Bareham and practices around its maintenance, including servicing by unqualified technicians.
The inquest also heard on Tuesday that Sundive had in the last two years instigated a zero tolerance policy to alcohol. This meant a customer would not be allowed to dive with even a small amount of alcohol in their systems – a move designed to clarify what being 'under the influence' of alcohol might mean.
Robinson said that he kept a breathalyser in a drawer at work but had never had cause to use it.
Earlier in the inquest, the court heard that Bareham's chronic alcoholism may have triggered a medical event while he was underwater. The court heard that Bareham had a low alcohol blood level while scuba diving – likely equating to two drinks – potentially from drinking the night before.
A possible failure of the diving 'buddy system' was also explored, a claim that was disputed by expert witness Mark Robertson, who said that nobody had separated from the dive group.
Bareham had undertaken 21 dives and had completed a refresher course on the morning of the dive. He held a PADI certification.
A finding was expected to be handed down by the end of May.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
Woman sexually assaulted on a plane denied compensation because of loophole
A woman who was sexually assaulted on a flight to the UK can't be compensated due to a legal loophole. Kelly – who is using a fake name for anonymity – was attacked on a Qatar Airways flight from Doha, Qatar, to Gatwick in September last year. Momade Jussab, 66, of Feltham, was sitting next to her and put his hands down her trousers. He was arrested at Gatwick and jailed in May. Kelly, who was 24 at the time of the attack, has been denied a payout under the Criminal Injuries Compensation (CIC) scheme. Officials said that because the incident happened on a plane not registered in Britain, Kelly cannot make a claim. Her lawyers have written to the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, urging her to close what they believe is a gap in the law. Kelly, a Londoner in her 20s, told the BBC that Jussab pulled a second blanket over them both as she slept. She said: 'His hands were down my trousers and I said to him, 'What are you doing?' I said, 'Stop'. He said, 'No, please'. 'And I had to force his hand out of my trousers and that just made me get up straight away. I left my phone, I left my bag, I left my passport, I left everything. I left my shoes and ran into the toilet, left the door open [and] told the flight attendant.' Kelly said she should be entitled to compensation as the incident was investigated and prosecuted by the British authorities. 'I haven't been out in almost a year – to events or summer parties with my friends. I can't do that. I'm too scared,' she added. 'I don't want to be touched or looked at. So it's never leaving me. It's literally there every single day before I sleep, I'm thinking about what happened.' The CIC scheme provides compensation for people 'physically or mentally injured because of a violent crime in England, Scotland or Wales', according to its website. Kelly applied for the payout in April, only to receive a letter from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, which processes applications, denying the claim as it did not happen in a 'relevant place'. Such a 'place' is defined by section 92 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982, which concerns 'British-controlled aircraft'. As the incident happened on a Qatari-registered plane, officials told Kelly, she was ineligible for compensation. Leigh Day says that the law was updated in 1966 to allow crimes that occur on UK-bound foreign aircraft to be prosecuted in British courts. Yet a near-identical loophole in the compensation scheme has not been closed. Solicitor Claire Powell said: 'Our client suffered a horrific sexual attack on a UK-bound flight. 'She was refused compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation scheme simply because it was a foreign flight and the rules have not been amended in line with the updates to the Civil Aviation Act. 'It is a gap that needs closing urgently and we trust the Justice Secretary will agree, particularly in light of this Government's commitment to addressing violence against women and girls.' Jussab was jailed for six and a half years as part of an extended sentence in May for one count of sexual assault by penetration and two counts of sexual assault. In-flight sexual assault incidents have been rising for years – in the US, the FBI investigated 27 sexual misconduct cases aboard aircraft in 2018. More Trending By 2022, that number had more than tripled to 90 cases. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'Our thoughts remain with this victim, and we remain resolute in our mission to halve violence against women and girls in a decade. 'The rules that the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority follows, and the values of payments for injuries, are set by Parliament. 'Other routes are available for victims to receive support.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: EasyJet pilot suspended after walking 'drunk and naked' around five star hotel MORE: Airspace closure that grounded over 120 flights caused by 'software collapse' MORE: London airspace closure: Your rights if your flight is delayed or cancelled

STV News
6 hours ago
- STV News
Friends of mum killed in 'murder-suicide' urged not to attend husband's funeral
The children of a Scots woman who was reportedly killed in murder-suicide at the hands of her husband have asked that her friends not attend his funeral. The bodies of Andrew Searle and Dawn Kerr, originally from Musselburgh, were discovered by a neighbour at their home in Les Pesquiés, south of Villefranche-de-Rouergue, France in February. The couple had lived in the area for around ten years and were 'well integrated' into the community. Following a post-mortem, French police confirmed that Searle died from hanging and Ms Kerr suffered 'several blows to the skull using a blunt and sharp object'. Prosecutor Fabrice Belargent said that 'the analysis carried out did not so far show any evidence that a third party was involved'. In a statement shared on social media, Ms Kerr's son, musician Callum Kerr, and sister Amanda, said that the 'prevailing hypothesis remains that of a murder-suicide'. STV News Dawn Kerr and Andrew Searle were found dead at their home in France They added: 'There is also no evidence whatsoever of any third party's involvement at this stage. 'While the official investigation is still ongoing, we cannot ignore the circumstances as they stand.' The children have asked that their mother not be included in 'any way' in the funeral arrangements being made for Searle. Their statement adds: 'Please do not share photographs of them together. 'Please do not attend Andrew's service if you were a friend of our mother. 'It would be inappropriate for her memory to be associated with a service honouring the man who, based on all available evidence, may have been responsible for her death. 'We ask for understanding, privacy and respect as we continue to grieve and seek justice for our mum.' A statement issued by French prosecutors in February said: 'The two deceased persons, a man and a woman, were the owners of the house in which their bodies were discovered. 'They were British expatriates, retired, and had been living in Aveyron for five years. 'The first victim, Ms Kerr, has a significant head injury. 'A box containing jewellery was found near to her, but no item or weapon which could have caused the injuries were located. 'Mr Searle, who was found hanged … did not show any visible defensive injuries.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Leader Live
6 hours ago
- Leader Live
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'



