What Trump-Musk feud means for tech billionaire's businesses – DW – 06/06/2025
Tesla CEO Elon Musk spent some $300 million on Donald Trump's campaign, gaining unprecedented access to the Republican president's administration. What does their public row mean for Musk's empire?
How did Musk and Trump get so close?
Once a vocal critic of Donald Trump during his 2016 United States election campaign, Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, pivoted from his Democratic Party roots to embrace Trump's policies during the Republican's second term.
Frustrated by Obama-era regulations stifling his ventures, Musk embraced Trump's agenda of tax cuts and deregulation.
Their bond grew from mutual respect to a robust political alliance, which saw Musk last year back Trump's reelection campaign to the tune of nearly $300 billion (€263 billion).
When Trump returned to the White House in January, the world's richest man took on an advisory role in the administration, leading the controversial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Tasked with slashing public spending, Musk's role stirred controversy, impacting Tesla's stock price and auto sales. After months of pressure from investors, Musk agreed last month to scale back his work in Trump's government.
Trump and Musk on the outs over Big Beautiful Bill
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
What sparked the public feud between Trump and Musk?
On Thursday, wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with the "The Dogefather," Musk was given an initially cordial farewell by the president in the Oval Office.
But Trump could not contain his frustration at Musk's earlier criticism of his administration's sweeping tax and spending bill, which the Tesla founder called fiscally reckless and a "disgusting abomination."
After Musk then accused the US president of alleged ties to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the news conference ended with Trump threatening to revoke Musk's government contracts, which could cost his business empire billions of dollars.
Over the next few hours, the row spilled over to social media, where both men repeated their White House remarks, prompting the SpaceX owner to announce an immediate decommissioning of its Dragon spacecraft, before appearing to back down.
How did markets react to the Trump-Musk fallout?
Tesla stock lost about $150 billion in market value on Thursday — the largest single-day decline in its history. The stock closed down over 14%.
However, news outlet Politico reported Friday that the two men were scheduled to speak later in the day in the hope of defusing the situation, which caused a sharp reversal in the stock's fortunes. Tesla stock was up 5% in pre-market trade.
However, a White House official said later Friday that Trump had no plans for any call, adding that he may get rid of his Tesla bought in March in a show of support against Musk in the face of anti-Tesla protests.
Tesla shares have been on a wild rollercoaster ride this year after a strong performance around the US election. Having peaked at $428 in January, shares in the electric vehiclemaker plummeted by almost half in March as investors reacted negatively to Musk's involvement in the Trump administration.
Tesla stock then rallied when Trump paused his unprecedented tariffs on the rest of the world and after US regulators eased rules on self-driving vehicles.
Trump came to Musk's aid when Tesla vehicles and dealerships were attacked Image:What's at stake for Musk's empire?
The public spat, as well as Trump's budget plans, have left the fortunes of Musk's companies hanging in the balance.
Tesla, Musk's most profitable firm, could be severely impacted by Trump's plans to cut a subsidy on new electric vehicles that is worth up to $7,500 for buyers.
Despite Musk's aggressive criticism and lobbying by Tesla, Trump plans to eliminate the credit by the end of the year, seven years before it was due to expire.
News agency Bloomberg cited JP Morgan analysts as saying that the cut would reduce Tesla's full-year profit by $1.2 billion. Cuts to state-level credits could further impact the EV maker's bottom line this financial year.
It could, however, encourage EV buyers to bring forward their plans and spur demand for Tesla's vehicles in the short term.
Tesla is already being impacted by Trump's tariffs as the firm relies on Chinese parts for its Cybercab robotaxi and Semi electric truck.
Starlink satellite system shaping modern warfare
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
However, it is unclear whether Trump can unilaterally make good on his threat to tear up federal contracts with Musk's firms like SpaceX.
Since 2000, SpaceX has received more than $22 billion in contracts from the US Defense Department and space agency NASA.
If Trump were to terminate the contracts, it would have a huge financial impact on SpaceX and disrupt the US government's space ambitions.
SpaceX's Crew Dragon is currently the only US spacecraft certified to carry crew to the International Space Station (ISS).
Any ending of Pentagon contracts involving Musk's Starlink satellite internet service would also be a lose-lose for both Musk and the government.
Starlink provides broadband services to rural areas. Terminals are also deployed on US military bases, ships, aircraft, and armored vehicles. The satellite internet service is often used for disaster response.
Edited by: Uwe Hessler
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
8 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Musk Fires Back With Slur After Steve Bannon Called for Trump to Seize SpaceX, Deport the CEO
Elon Musk hurled slurs after former Trump strategist Steve Bannon called for the president to seize SpaceX and deport Musk following his public tirade against President Donald Trump and his support for Republicans' "one big, beautiful bill." Bannon railed against Musk and his work with the Department of Government Efficiency during the Thursday episode of his "War Room" podcast, in which he claimed that Trump was upset that Musk "didn't find any fraud." STEVE BANNON: "President Trump, TONIGHT, should sign an executive order calling up the Defense Production Act, and seize SpaceX TONIGHT, before midnight." — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 5, 2025 "When he threatens to take one of the big programs out of SpaceX, President Trump tonight should sign an executive order calling for the Defense Production Act to be called and seize SpaceX tonight before midnight," Bannon declared. Clips of this part of the podcast were then shared to X, Musk's social media platform, where Musk had some choice words to reveal his thoughts toward Bannon's ideas. Bannon is peak retard — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 6, 2025 "Bannon is peak r*****," the Tesla CEO commented after the video was reposted to by the popular X account "R***** Finder." Musk then doubled down on the sentiment hours later in another comment after another user shared the same clip: "Bannon is a communist r*****." Bannon is a communist retard — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 6, 2025 Earlier in the day, Bannon had called for Musk to be deported, telling the New York Times , "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately." Bannon's support for Trump continued after Musk posted a series of scathing tweets directed at the president over Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" which Trump has expressed support for. Although Musk served as a close ally of Trump for the past several months, he explained that he believes the spending bill would undermine the work of DOGE, as current estimates suggest the bill will raise the national deficit by several trillion dollars. While Musk's tweets initially just railed against the bill and dug up tweets from Trump's past where he expressed opposition to raising the national deficit, the tirade later became more accusatory, claiming that the files on Jeffrey Epstein have not been released yet because Trump's name is in them. Trump and the White House have not addressed this accusation, though he told ABC News Friday that he is "not particularly" interested in talking to Musk anytime soon. Originally published on Latin Times Elon musk Donald trump Spacex
DW
8 hours ago
- DW
EU asked to intervene as US sanctions deal fresh blow to ICC – DW – 06/06/2025
Fresh US sanctions will curb the ICC's capacity to work. With a Slovenian judge on the blacklist, calls for the EU to activate laws to block the sanctions are mounting. It was a consequential case of deja-vu in The Hague on Thursday, as the US issued fresh sanctions against judges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) over what it calls "illegitimate actions targeting the United States and Israel." The move is the latest in a series of diplomatic assaults on the ICC ostensibly aimed at curtailing the court's credibility and ability to function. The ICC has criticized the measure as "a clear attempt to undermine the indepedence of an international judicial institution." While the European Union (EU) has long defended the court as the "cornerstone of international justice," its member states' mixed response to ICC rulings in recent months has exposed cracks in the world's main mechanism for international criminal justice, and its capacity to act. Now calls for the bloc to use legal powers to counter US sanctions are mounting. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions on Thursday Image: Mehmet Eser/Zuma/Imago Why is the US targeting the ICC? The new measures target four ICC judges. Two were involved in proceeding that led to an ICC arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, among others, over alleged crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. Israel denies the allegations. The other two blacklisted judges were part of proceedings that authorized probes into alleged war crimes committed by US armed forces in Afghanistan. During Republican President Donald Trump's first term, the US had already targeted Khan's predecessor over an ICC probe into suspected war crimes in Afghanistan. The subsequent administration under President Joe Biden lifted the sanctions, and the ICC then "deprioritized" alleged US violations in its Afghanistan investigation in 2021. Thursday's new sanctions come on top of measures announced against the court's top prosecutor, Karim Khan, in February. They also come amid turbulent times for the court, with Khan having stepped back last month until a probe into sexual misconduct claims is complete. US citizens and firms are banned from doing business with the sanctioned judges Image: Peter Dejong/AP/picture alliance The ICC was set up in 2002 as a court of last resort to prosecute leaders and other key figures for atrocities when justice cannot, or will not, be served in their own countries. More than 120 nations, including all EU member states, voluntarily signed up to the international treaty which established the court. But China, Russia, the US and Israel are notable non-members — and Washington claims this as the basis for its sanctions. "The ICC is politicized and falsely claims unfettered discretion to investigate, charge, and prosecute nationals of the United States and our allies. This dangerous assertion and abuse of power infringes upon the sovereignty and national security of the United States and our allies," US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement on Thursday. How will sanctions impact the court? In response, the ICC said that its work "provides justice and hope to millions of victims of unimaginable atrocities." "Targeting those working for accountability does nothing to help civilians trapped in conflict. It only emboldens those who believe they can act with impunity," the court added. Under the sanctions, US businesses and citizens are banned from providing funds, goods or services to the blacklisted judges. Any assets they hold in the US are also frozen. But the implications don't stop there. The Associated Press wrote last month that the ICC's chief prosecutor had lost access to his emails and seen his bank accounts frozen. According to the report, these businesses had discontinued their services out of fear of being targeted by US authorities for supporting blacklisted indivduals. Some non-governmental organizations also reportedly stopped working with the court. Slovania has called on the EU to activate its so-called blocking statute after the US sanctioned a Slovenian judge Image: Yves Herman/REUTERS/REUTERS EU urged to activate laws to block sanctions The European Union said on Friday that it "deeply regrets" the US move and vowed to continue backing the ICC. But some hope the EU will take tougher action. Back in the 1990s, the EU laid out laws known as its "blocking statute" aimed at cushioning the extraterritorial blow of US measures. The legislation bans EU firms from complying with US sanctions the bloc deems illegal, and was designed to prevent US restrictions on Cuba from wiping out European trade with the country. The laws were later updated to include US sanctions on Iran. Now, Slovenia and Belgium are leading a call for the bloc's executive to activate the same laws against the newest US sanctions against the ICC. Slovenian judge Beti Hohler is among those on Washington's blacklist. Asked on Friday whether the European Commission would grant Slovenia's ask, spokesperson Olof Gill told reporters: "All we can do right now is closely monitor the implications before we decide any next steps." While it's up to the European Commission to determine if, how, and when it extends the blocking statute, Brussels will likely be weighing the potential political ramifications — and whether there is enough unity among EU capitals to back the move. An existential crisis at the ICC? It's a recurring theme, as EU member states are not on the same page about the ICC. While the central executive in Brussels regularly styles the bloc as the court's biggest backer, EU countries' actions tell a more complex story — one that adds to a growing sense that the court's future is full of uncertainty. Unlike national judiciaries, the ICC has no police service. Instead, it relies on members to hand over suspects who arrive on their territory. "The ICC is famously described as a giant without arms and legs — it cannot really enforce those arrest warrants. It's up to the political will of states," international criminal law lecturer Mathjiy Holvoet told DW earlier this year. In early 2025, Italy failed to arrest a Libyan police chief wanted by the ICC for alleged war crimes. Libya is seen as a crucial partner in Italy's bid to cut down irregular migration. Earlier this month, Hungary withdrew from the court after rolling out the red carpet for Netanyahu in apparent defiance of the ICC's arrest warrant. Hungary to withdraw from International Criminal Court To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Though other EU governments have issued statements of support for the ICC, several among them have also indicated Netanyahu would not be arrested should he visit their country. France has suggested the Israeli prime minister has immunity because Israel is not an ICC member, and Germany's chancellor said in February he would "find ways" to allow Netanyahu travel to Berlin. Edited by: Maren Sass
DW
9 hours ago
- DW
Bangladesh to hold general election in April 2026 – DW – 06/06/2025
Opposition parties have been calling for a concrete timeline for a democratic transition after the ousting of Sheikh Hasina's government last year. The interim government of Bangladesh on Friday announced that the next general election will be held in the first half of April in 2026. "After reviewing the ongoing reform activities..., I am announcing to the people today that the next national election will be held on any day in the first half of April 2026," Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus said in a televised address to the nation on Friday. "I have repeatedly said the election will be held between December and June next year," Yunus reiterated. Bangladesh's road to elections Yunus said the country's Election Commission would release a detailed road map for the polls at an appropriate time. Yunus' interim unelected government has been leading the politically turbulent South Asian state since student-led unrest in 2024 led to the ousting of then-prime minister Sheikh Hasina in August last year. Hasina is currently in India, and is being tried in absentia by Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal (ICT). Officials are focusing on her government's crackdown against protests that marked the end of her 15-year rule. Prosecutors have accused Hasina of directing the violent crackdown, including ordering the killing of student protester Abu Sayeed, the first to be killed during the uprising. Bangladesh: Ex-PM Sheikh Hasina 'must face trial' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Hasina claims the charges against her are politically motivated. Her party, the Awami League, has been banned, pending the outcome of the trial. The party was effectively barred from taking part in the election, after the elections commission suspended its registration last month. Opposition demands clear election timeline Opposition parties — including the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) — have been calling for a clear timeline for a democratic transition following the toppling of Hasina's government in August. They have warned of instability should the vote not take place by December. BNP's leader and former prime minister, Khaleda Zia, is eligible to run in the next election after being acquitted at the beginning of the year in a 2008 corruption case. Edited by: Rana Taha
