Johnny Ronan company loses planning appeal for ‘overly dominant' office scheme on Dublin's North Quay
Johnny Ronan
for a big development on Dublin's North Wall quay that would include a 17-storey building.
An Coimisiún Pleanála
(ACP) found the building was 'overly dominant and isolated'.
that would be at odds with the surrounding context' noting it would 'seriously injure' the visual amenity of the area.
ACP said the development would be 'overbearing' on nearby residential properties and would lead to an 'unacceptable and unjustified' loss of sunlight and overshadowing of amenity spaces.
READ MORE
It further noted that the demolition of the existing buildings on the site would 'be both premature and unjustified' and would set an 'unwelcome precedent' for demolition on similar sites in the area.
[
Johnny Ronan company and Fortress confirm sale of Spencer Place residential development to Ardstone for €177m
Opens in new window
]
The appeal was submitted after Dublin City Council (DCC) refused to grant permission to NWQ Devco Limited, a company that is part of Mr Ronan's Ronan Group Real Estate (RGRE), which had sought a 10-year planning permission for a four building development.
Ranging from nine to 17 storeys, the development was set to be located on the site of global banking firm Citigroup's European headquarters on North Wall Quay on the banks of the river Liffey.
The 73.4 metre tall development was set to contain more than 87,200 sqm of floor space, of which some 69,200 sqm would be office space, alongside parking, arts and cultural areas, and a cafe.
In the appeal, Mr Ronan's firm requested an oral hearing and argued that the development would aide in the consolidation of development and promotion of building upwards in line with national planning guidelines and would be a 'key economic driver'.
It said an interactive gallery housed on the 16th floor of the development 'is believed to become one of the city's most important visitor centre and popular tourist destination'.
Dublin City Council (DCC) had refused permission for the 73.4 metre tall redevelopment in April 2024, giving three reasons.
It said the 'height and excessive bulk and scale' of the development would impact on a nearby existing residential development and the surrounding area and that the development would be injurious to the 'key views and vistas' along the river.
The council further stated that granting the demolition of the existing building, instead of retrofitting, would 'set an undesirable precedent'.
Mr Ronan's firm appealed the decision to ACP, with the application being subject to a third party appeal seeking to uphold the council decision.
The Clarion Quay Management Company called for ACP to reject the appeal after the publication of an Irish Times article in which the developer indicated it's theintention to appeal the decision.
The group, which self-described as an 'owners volunteer management company' for an adjacent mixed-use residential and commercial property, cited a series of concerns including of solar glare into residential properties, overlooking issues, and loss of sunlight.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Spending on EVs and retrofitting homes pushes growth in green personal lending, BPFI report finds
Consumers are increasingly going green with their personal loans, according to new figures on personal lending from the Banking and Payments Federation of Ireland (BPFI). The value of the average green personal loan rose by €474 in the first quarter, reaching €22,906 – more than double the value of the average personal loan in the period, at €11,239. Green personal loans made up €35.1 million of all borrowing between January and March. The growth in green loans coincides with the highest value of personal loan drawdowns of any quarter since BPFI began to compile the data in 2020. In total, Irish consumers drew down €683 million in personal loans in the three-month period. READ MORE Green borrowing is made up of car loans, for vehicles with electric batteries and plug-in hybrids, and home improvement loans such as for heat pumps or solar panels, and insulation upgrades. In the year to the end of Q1 2025, 5,500 green loans were issued, valued at €127 million. This represented nearly 900 more such loans than the previous 12-month period, as such lending saw the 'biggest increase in value' of any loan category. 'While increases were seen across all categories,' it was green personal loans that had the 'highest relative jump in value of 29.3 per cent year on year to €35.1 million in Q1 2025 and in volume by 26.6 per cent to 1,531," said Anthony O'Brien, BPFI's head of sector research and analysis. Mr O'Brien said there has been 'continued strong demand for personal loans' with the first three months of the year marking 'a new high for overall drawdown volumes and values'. There were 60,770 personal loans taken out in the period, with growth in the number of loans and their value of 22.1 per cent and 24.1 per cent on a year-on-year basis. On an annual basis, Irish consumers have drawn down 240,423 personal loans in the past four quarters at a value of €2.6 billion. Against this backdrop, the value of car loans reached a record €259 million in the first quarter of the year, following a 25 per cent increase on the €208 million figure in Q1 2024. Mr O'Brien said there has been a 'continued surge in car loans' with the category seeing 21.5 per cent year-on-year growth in numbers to 19,552, alongside an increase in value of 25.0 per cent in the same period. 'These are the highest car loan volumes and values since the data series began in 2020,' he said, noting that growth in electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles 'is likely contributing to these increases'. Home improvement loans increased in value by just over 19 per cent, while other loans, which include education, holidays and special occasions, rose in value by 27.5 per cent to €226 million.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Gareth Sheridan plays down business partner's Moldovan airline controversy as ‘not an issue' for election
Presidential hopeful Gareth Sheridan has said he knows 'very little' about his business partner's involvement in a controversial airline privatisation deal in Moldova . Speaking at the formal launch of his presidential campaign in Dublin, Mr Sheridan said he had not spoken to his business partner Serguei Melnik, who has succeeded him as chief executive of his company Nutriband for the duration of the campaign, about his involvement in the Air Moldova deal and possible links to Russian oligarchs. Mr Sheridan said he knew 'very little about that situation' and added that it was 'not an issue' in terms of the focus of his campaign, housing. The 35-year-old said he was confident he had a proposer and seconder to secure nominations for Laois and Tipperary county councils and declined to name four others he also believed he could secure nominations from. READ MORE Mr Sheridan, who would be the youngest ever presidential candidate if he secures a nomination, has budgeted for a campaign fund of up to €500,000, although he hoped to do it for less from his own funds. He said his net worth was $16 million (€13.7m) based on the current value of his shares in his business Nutriband and he has $500,000 (€429,627) in cash holdings. His campaign is focused on housing, he added, and he wants to 'make Ireland home again', a phrase he denied had Trumpian connotations. He pointed to Article 45.2.1 of the Constitution which obliges the State to direct policy so that citizens 'may through their occupations find the means of making reasonable provision for their domestic needs'. Mr Sheridan said people should be able to afford to buy a home in Ireland, which they are not able to do. Gareth Sheridan with his wife Heidi after the briefing at the Shelbourne hotel. Photograph: Alan Betson/ The Irish Times Launching his campaign at the Shelbourne Hotel, with his wife Heidi in attendance, Mr Sheridan started his address by drawing attention to media coverage of him in the last number of days, which he described as 'a little off'. He addressed his relationship with Sean Gallagher , who twice put himself forward unsuccessfully in presidential elections, and was executive chairman of Nutriband for four years to 2022. [ Mairead McGuinness drops out of presidential race due to health reasons Opens in new window ] Mr Sheridan said that after the company was listed on the Nasdaq in the US, it was decided to replace Mr Gallagher with Serguei Melnik, who had more experience with capital markets. 'We asked [Mr Gallagher] to voluntarily step aside on the same remuneration,' he said. 'Communication broke down at the next shareholder meeting' and Mr Melnik was voted in to replace Mr Gallagher. Mr Gallagher then resigned from the Nutriband board. 'I wish Sean the best in whatever he's working on,' Mr Sheridan said. In 2018, Mr Sheridan and his business associate, Mr Melnik, were fined $25,000 (€21,400) each by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), arising from the issuing of misleading statements by Nutriband in 2017 and 2018, when the two men were the company's only full-time employees. Nutribrand chief executive Gareth Sheridan with chairman Sergei Melnik. Photograph: Instagram Six statements made during the period mischaracterised the company's products as not requiring regulatory approval in the US, the SEC said. Asked about the fines, Mr Sheridan said they had received advice from two attorneys and a dermatologist who had independently advised that FDA approval was not needed. He said in the business he was in, 'you have to rely on people who are experts in that space. I'm not for a second claiming that I'm an FDA attorney'. Mr Sheridan was asked for a response to a report that his business partner Mr Melnik, the US-resident Moldovan lawyer who is chairman and chief executive of Nutriband, was a shareholder in a company that bought Air Moldova in 2018 in a deal that became the subject of controversy in Moldova, leading to an inquiry by a parliamentary committee. 'It's not an issue in terms of trying to put a focus on the housing crisis in Ireland,' he said. Asked if he owned a home or invested in the private rental market he said: 'We have our house in Utah and we have a rental house in Utah. We rent in Dublin.' He added: 'There isn't a housing crisis in Salt Lake City Utah, there is in Dublin.' He drives a 'used 2021 Mercedes hybrid'.
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Man faces possible sale of €1.2m property if €350,000 debt to brothers not paid in six months
A man is facing the possible sale of his €1.2 million family property in Co Meath if he and his wife do not repay a €350,000 debt to his two brothers. The Court of Appeal had in 2023 found Alan and Derek Gaffney were entitled to judgment for US$372,043 (€350,000) against their brother Philip Gaffney, an Irish souvenir manufacturer, and his wife Teresa, of The Naul, Co Meath. The judgment sum arose from payments advanced by the plaintiff brothers so Philip Gaffney could fulfil a lucrative US €1.3 million 2015 order for Irish souvenirs with US-based Quality Value Choice Corporation (QVC), which runs a TV shopping channel and also has an online presence. Mr Gaffney's ceramic Irish products, such as leprechauns, cottages, fairy doors and mushrooms, were to feature as the firm's 'Today's Special Value' item on a date around St Patrick's Day in 2016, but the contract was pulled in February 2016. READ MORE The High Court previously held, on the balance of probabilities, that Philip Gaffney had lost the order or had to relinquish it due to not passing all the required tests and/or not being able to fulfil the order for 67,000 items by mid-March 2016. His brothers claimed they made various payments to Philip Gaffney and his wife between October 2015 and February 2016, as a loan to expand their workshop and obtain raw materials to be able to meet the QVC order. Alan Gaffney said the $372,043 comprised $272,043 from him and $100,000 from Derek Gaffey. In 2022, the High Court determined that $372.043 was owed by Philip Gaffney to his brothers but rejected their claim against Teresa Gaffney. It dismissed Philip Gaffney's proceedings against Alan Gaffney and his wife, alleging they had breached an agreement to invest €400,000 in his business. In May 2023, the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal by Alan and Derek Gaffney against the finding that Teresa Gaffney was not a party to the 2015 contract. It held that she had been an active participant in the business and entered total judgments for $372,043 against both. The judgments of the High Court and Court of Appeal were later registered as a judgment mortgage against the defendants' interests in their 0.75 hectares (1.4 acre) property in Naul, including a substantial family home and a 557sq m workshop. When no monies were paid towards the judgment debt, Alan and Derek Gaffney obtained an order from the Circuit Court in July 2024 declaring the judgment was registered as a burden on the Co Meath property. The Circuit Court orders were stayed pending appeal to the High Court. In opposing the appeal by Philip and Teresa Gaffney, Derek Gaffney said the defendants' products had featured on the Late Late Toy Show in late 2023 and this 'high profile TV placement' was 'galling' as the defendants were clearly still in business and selling their products. Mr Gaffney said, while refusing to pay them anything, the defendants were continuing to trade in the last eight years since they took the loan monies and continued to ignore the 'legal and moral obligation' to repay. Both plaintiffs said the failure to repay had cost them and their families considerable stress and difficulties. In his judgment published this week, Mr Justice Bradly said he proposed to make orders that the judgments totalling $372,043 were well charged against the defendants' interest in their Co Meath property. There has been 'a continuous refusal' by the defendants to repay the debt, he said. He also proposed to order the plaintiffs were entitled to details of any other encumbrances affecting the Co Meath property, and to an order for sale of the property if the judgment sums, plus interest, were not repaid within six months of the date of judgment. Final orders will be made in October when the judge said he will discuss whether there should be any stay on his orders.
