logo
What does the end of the penny mean? Here's what experts are saying

What does the end of the penny mean? Here's what experts are saying

Penny for your thoughts? Or maybe they are worth a nickel now that the Treasury Department is following President Donald Trump's suggestion to stop making pennies.
Last month, the Treasury Department placed its last order of blanks – flat metal discs to make pennies – in a move set into motion by President Donald Trump in February. He argues that the coin costs more than 3 cents to produce (actually 3.69 cents, according to the U.S. Mint).
Now that we know it's curtains for the coin, many questions arise. What does the demise of the penny mean for consumers and collectors? Could the last pennies be valuable? Here's what we know.
MIA Money: $1.7 trillion sits in lost and forgotten 401(k) accounts. Is one of them yours?
Doubtful. The U.S. Mint made about 3.2 billion pennies in 2024, according to its annual report, so there will be billions of 2025 pennies available. "There's nothing, statistically, that says they should become valuable," John Feigenbaum, publisher of rare coin price guide Greysheet and executive director of the Professional Numismatists Guild (PNG), a nonprofit organization composed of many of the nation's rare coin experts, told USA TODAY.
The coin's legacy could be akin to the 1976 bicentennial quarter, Feigenbaum said. "Everybody, at the time, was hoarding them (and) you couldn't find bicentennial quarters in change. Now people have plastic bags full of them and they're still worth 25 cents," he added.
However, the 2025 pennies could have an alternative value as an entry point to collectors. "This would surely spike demand … in other Lincoln pennies, like the ones that go all the way back to 1909," Feigenbaum said, adding that the Lincoln penny, which first featured the 16th president in that year, has had "quite a run."
Parents could get a Lincoln penny coin collecting book – options include those from Whitman Publishing, which also publishes Greysheet – and talk to their children about "American history, and who this Lincoln guy is and what would the different designs be all about," Feigenbaum said.
Not if you are hoping for them to be valuable. Just as there has been misleading hype about the value of some Lincoln wheat pennies, there may be misinformation about the increased value of 2025 pennies.
That's nonsense, Feigenbaum said. They are "not going to be" more valuable, according to Feigenbaum, who said he favored getting rid of the penny.
Maybe it's a good time to take all those coins gathering dust in a cup or piggy bank to the bank or a Coinstar machine. The average home has $60-$90 in coins at home, according to the Federal Reserve.
Are your old pennies worth millions?: Experts say you shouldn't bank on it
Maybe. Not making pennies will nix out the more than $179 million it costs taxpayers to make them, based on figures from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the department formerly connected to Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.
The U.S. Mint estimates that not making pennies will save $56 million in material costs, with additional savings from better and more efficient production, CNBC reported.
'For every penny that the United States government prints, we're actually losing money. So, it's a net cost to the federal government,' said Raymond Robertson, director of the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics and Public Policy at the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University, in a news release.
But the lack of pennies likely means more reliance on nickels, which cost even more to produce – 13.78 cents, the U.S. Mint says.
If the U.S. Mint makes more nickels, "It actually is going to increase costs for the government,' Robertson said. 'So, it's really not clear how much cost savings the government will realize by eliminating the penny," he added.
One of the bills (H.R. 1270) introduced in the House of Representatives (technically, Congress holds the power to eliminate a currency) also proposes getting rid of the nickel, too.
There is no time frame for prices to be set in five-cent increments – a move to change all those prices ending in 49 or 99 cents to the nearest five cents due to lack of pennies – but they will likely eventually, said Bill Maurer, dean of the School of Social Sciences at the University of California, Irvine, and director of UCI's Institute for Money, Technology and Financial Inclusion.
When there are not enough pennies for stores and other retailers to make change, businesses will need to round up or down, the Treasury Department said, according to The Wall Street Journal.
For the time being, merchants can keep prices as they are, but the 18% to 20% of Americans who rely on cash could eventually pay a rounded-up price, based on 5-cent increments. "If someone comes to you with cash, you round up, right? So if you're kind of doubly screwed if you're poorer," Maurer told USA TODAY.
Other countries that have eliminated low-denomination coins – Australia, Canada and New Zealand, among them – have resulted in differing outcomes, with some prices rounding up and some down, according to Money.com.
As the move to eliminate coin and paper currency continues, a publicly-accessible digital payment system will be needed so that consumers of all income levels can participate, Maurer said.
But the loss of physical currency removes a redundancy in the monetary system that's invaluable during disasters and emergencies, according to Maurer. "The more dependent on cashless methods of payment we become, the more risk we place ourselves when there are emergencies or disasters, because you need a well-functioning cash system," he continued.
Contributing: Fernando Cervantes, Daniel de Visé and Melina Khan.
Mike Snider is a reporter on USA TODAY's Trending team. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Native Ukrainian left speechless after ‘no deal' summit
Native Ukrainian left speechless after ‘no deal' summit

USA Today

time7 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Native Ukrainian left speechless after ‘no deal' summit

Native Ukrainians disappointed after no deal was reached Trump and Putin's high stakes summit Ukrainian-American Volodymyr Valchuk said he already had low expectations for the high-stakes summit between President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. But after listening to the world leaders meet in person for the first time in six years to end Russia's war in Ukraine, Valchuk admitted this was a head-shaker. "I'm speechless. I have nothing to say. I really didn't expect much, but this is even worse than I thought," Valchuk, 46, told USA TODAY. "That's what I'm feeling right now." Valchuk, a respiratory therapist who lives in San Rafael, California, said he's "very disappointed" when Trump said "no deal" was reached to end the three-year Ukraine war. 'At least they could've given us a little idea what Putin said the agreement was,' Valchuk said about the summit held in Anchorage, Alaska. 'Trump said he will talk to NATO and (Ukrainian President Volodymyr) Zelenskyy, but I really don't know what that means? 'Yeah, I'm disappointed,' said Valchuk, who came from Ukraine to the US to attend college in 1996. 'Very disappointed.' Valchuk, who gained his American citizenship in 2004, said he doesn't know what will happen next for his homeland. 'I just hope it's not going to cost Ukraine some of its land and more lives,' Valchuk said. 'I hope.' Live updates: Trump, Putin meet in Alaska summit How the war looks for two Ukrainian teens currently in the US For two Ukrainian-born teenagers, Taisiia Grygorova and Sofiia Kopytko, who are spending this summer performing across the East Coast in a play titled "Voices from Ukraine: Stories of War and Hope," they told USA TODAY that no matter what outcome comes from the summit in Anchorage, Alaska, the war can't end soon enough. Grygorova, 19, who lives in Kharkiv, a city near the Ukrainian-Russian border, said despite the constant rocket attacks, drones, air raids, and explosions, her thoughts are always with the people suffering through the continuous combat. Grygorova, who's studying journalism at Warsaw International University, said she regularly returns to Kharkiv to visit her parents and four younger siblings, despite the dangers. "And every time I go there I prepare myself, 'Taia, you're going for two weeks, and it's a 100% chance that you will get under a rocket attack at least four times during this time, but you'll be fine, your younger brothers and sisters live in this nightmare every day, you can handle two weeks,'" Grygorova said. Grygorova said her youngest brother, a six-year-old, is supposed to start school this year, but she wonders how with the threat of bombings. "You will ask, 'What risk?' Well, there is always a possibility that one of those bombs, which are flying over the city, will hit a school where kids are studying," Grygorova said. "My brother is going to study underground, with no sunlight, with no possibility to play outside, to run freely over a football pitch or hear the birds singing." Grygorova said her mother keeps all of the family documents near the front door, just in case they need to leave their house forever. "That's how the war looks for me and my family," Grygorova said. Sofiia Kopytko, 18, from Chernihiv, Ukraine, said the war has not only been about territory, the lack of resources and weapons, but also the doctors who work in critical conditions, and families like Grygorova's who live in occupied territories and face death daily as a result of random air strikes. "Human lives are not statistics, but the most valuable thing that each of us has, and we must protect it," Kopytko said. "After all, you never know what tomorrow holds and whether it will come at all." Grygorova said she desperately wants the war to end so that people can live their lives in peace. "I hope that when the war is over, I'll be able to visit my family without fear," Grygorova said. "I hope that my city will be renovated. I hope I'll be able to help in the rebuilding of my country, where I want my future kids to grow up." Kopytko said her wishes are quite simple. "That there will be no more news of death and destruction, just simple happiness," Kopytko said. "Of course, I can talk about building a career and a family, but for me, these are the components of the happiness I strive for. First and foremost, free people in a free country. In a free Ukraine."

"Next time in Moscow": Putin extends Trump invitation as summit ends
"Next time in Moscow": Putin extends Trump invitation as summit ends

Axios

time7 minutes ago

  • Axios

"Next time in Moscow": Putin extends Trump invitation as summit ends

At the conclusion of Friday's "productive" but inconclusive summit on Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin quipped to President Trump: "Next time in Moscow." The intrigue: Putin made the remark in English, a language he rarely speaks in public. The suggestion drew a surprised chuckle from Trump, who didn't rule it out but said he'd "get a little heat for that one." The big picture: If Trump were to travel to Russia, it would be the first time in over a decade that an American president set foot on Russian soil. Putin is angling for a more friendly relationship with the U.S. after being isolated on the world stage, and would likely consider such a visit a major coup. But there's no sign as of now that it's likely to happen. What they're saying: Putin's "next time in Moscow" quip came just at the end of Trump's televised remarks. "Oh, that's an interesting one," Trump replied. "I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening." The White House did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment on the president's willingness to travel to the Russian capital. Catch up quick: In a joint press briefing, President Trump called the highly-anticipated peace talks "productive" but said that the two leaders "didn't get there" on a ceasefire or on ending the war in Ukraine. Trump said the two agreed on many issues but could not come to an agreement on "the biggest one." Putin said that it was very important for the two countries "to go back to cooperation," and that it was time for the superpowers to shift from "confrontation to dialogue." Neither Putin nor Trump offered any details of a potential agreement. Flashback: Barack Obama was the last U.S. president to visit Russia over a decade ago, according to the State Department.

Putin tries to woo Trump at Alaska meeting, claims he wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if Biden hadn't been president
Putin tries to woo Trump at Alaska meeting, claims he wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if Biden hadn't been president

New York Post

time37 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Putin tries to woo Trump at Alaska meeting, claims he wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if Biden hadn't been president

Russian President Vladimir Putin — an ex-KGB agent and master manipulator — attempted to woo President Trump on stage, claiming he would not have invaded Ukraine if former President Biden hadn't been in office. 'I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous American colleague the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it would come to hostilities,' Putin said following his meeting with Trump. 'And I said it quite directly back then. Trump and Putin shook hands as they met on the tarmac in Alaska. AFP via Getty Images 'That's is a big mistake today, when President Trump is saying that if he was the president back then, there will be no war — and I'm quite sure that it would indeed be, so I can confirm that.' Trained in strategic communications during his time as a KGB agent for the Soviet Union, Putin is known for attempting to manipulate world leaders with flattery. 'I think that, overall, me and President Trump have built a very good business-like [relationship],' he added. Trump has often said that he believed Putin would not have invaded if he were president in 2022, but he did not appear to take the dictator's bait Friday. AP While he called Putin's nine-minute pre-written speech 'profound,' Trump did not mention his longstanding talking point after the Russian leader's assertion. Instead, Trump subtly reminded Putin that he would not be making any business deals with Russia until the Kremlin ends its three-year war on Ukraine, pointing out the US' leverage. 'We … have some tremendous Russian business representatives here, and I think everybody wants to deal with us. We've become the hottest country anywhere in the world in a very short period of time,' he said. 'We look forward to dealing — we're going to try and get this over with. '… We'll have a good chance when this is over.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store