
Boston city employee facing accessory charges in connection with fatal shooting in Roxbury
A spokesperson for the commission said Friday that the agency 'is aware of the pending criminal charges against the employee. This person has been placed on unpaid administrative leave.'
Advertisement
Payroll records show she was hired by the commission, an independent public agency run by a board appointed by the mayor, in 2019. Her current title is housing coordinator, the commission said.
Her charges were
A statement of the case against Cherisme said she drove Charles Dixon, 40, in her gray Infiniti on April 19 to the area of the Nubian MBTA stop.
They got out of the car and Dixon began arguing with Ellis Santos, 36, on the sidewalk, according to the statement. As a crowd began to form, Cherisme and Dixon got back in the car, the statement said.
Advertisement
As Cherisme drove away, Dixon allegedly fired a gun at Santos from the front passenger seat, missing him but hitting two bystanders and killing one of them, Andrew Owens, officials said.
Dixon last month pleaded not guilty to murder and weapons charges and is being held without bail, records show. Santos allegedly returned fire, striking the Infiniti, and is facing weapons charges, according to court records.
After the shooting, Cherisme dropped Dixon off where she had initially picked him up, the statement said.
A couple of hours later, early on April 20, Cherisme 'walked into the Boston Police Department' and told detectives she was standing on the sidewalk during the shooting, the statement said.
She allegedly told police that Santos was the 'primary aggressor,' and that she didn't recognize the person he argued with since everyone wore masks, the filing said.
'It was not until investigators received video surveillance footage of the incident that they learned that Santos was not the primary aggressor and that the defendant had actually driven the man later identified as Dixon, who was not wearing a mask during any of the interaction,' the statement said.
On May 5, Cherisme spoke to State Police investigators with her attorney present after receiving a 'proffer letter' indicating her statements wouldn't be used 'directly against her' unless she lied, the filing said.
During that session, she gave authorities a phone number that she said she used to call and text Dixon, the cell phone that she said she used to reach him, and her iCloud account information, records show.
She consented to an extraction of her phone's data as well as a search of her vehicle for forensic evidence, telling investigators it hadn't been cleaned or tampered with since the shooting, according to the statement.
Advertisement
Virtually all those statements were false, authorities allege.
'With respect to the phone number she provided for Dixon, it was not a real phone number,' the filing said. 'Her own phone records, obtained by subpoena, revealed the actual number by which she contacted Dixon the night of the shooting. The number she provided appeared nowhere in her records.'
In addition, the phone she gave detectives wasn't the one she was using at the time of the shooting, as she claimed. Rather, it was purchased on April 22, 2025, three days after the shooting, the statement said.
And the iCloud account she provided had no data from the time of the shooting and 'appeared to have been created days after,' the statement said.
There was also a glaring issue with the Infiniti, according to the filing.
State Police observed 'a through-and-through bullet hole in one of the doors to the vehicle, with no corresponding exit hole elsewhere,' the document said. 'This would indicate that the projectile should still be within the vehicle.'
Yet it wasn't.
'A thorough search of the vehicle, including the partial disassembly of some components, was conducted, and no such projectile was located in the vehicle,' the statement said. 'This item, of significant evidentiary value, must have been removed from the vehicle prior to the search.'
A request for comment was sent to Mayor Michelle Wu's press office Friday.
The Middlesex District Attorney's office is handling Cherisme's case because she 'has a family member in law enforcement in Suffolk County,' a spokesperson for that office said.
Advertisement
One of the defendants in the case is related to 'a BPD officer,'
a spokesperson for the Suffolk office said.
City payroll records indicate that someone with the same last name as Cherisme is employed as a Boston police criminalist.
Andrew Ryan of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Travis Andersen can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
‘He was a tough cookie': Vietnam veteran among those lost in fire
Rochon was a veteran of the Vietnam War, according to his niece, Stephanie Johnson. 'He was a tough cookie, but he always made you laugh and smile, Johnson said in a brief phone interview Monday. Advertisement Her mother, Judy, was Rochon's sister, Johnson said. 'I know my mom is taking it pretty hard,' Johnson said, adding that she and her family appreciated the work of first responders. 'I want to thank all of the firefighters and the ambulances and everybody who did show up to help,' Johnson said. 'It is unfortunate that it happened the way it happened.' Deborah Dixon, whose mother-in-law, 'She was a lovely lady, and that's all. She loved everybody, she was easy going. She'd do anything for anybody,' Dixon said in a brief phone interview. Willett had lived with Dixon and her husband — Willett's son — for about 20 years before moving to Gabriel House a little over a year ago. Advertisement 'She made friends, and she enjoyed it,' Dixon said , referring to Gabriel House. 'They were good to her.' As of Monday, the family still didn't know what happened at the facility, she said. 'We're hanging in there, as best we can,' Dixon said. Thirty residents were hospitalized, including one who remained in critical condition Monday afternoon. Five firefighters were also taken to the hospital for minor injuries and have been discharged, according to Quinn's office. The investigation was ongoing Monday, but the cause did not appear to be suspicious, according to Quinn's office. 'My heart goes out to all of the victims, their families and all of those impacted by this terrible tragedy. I would like to commend the first responders for their efforts in bringing many of the residents to safety while being confronted with very difficult circumstances,' Quinn said in a statement. 'We will continue to cooperate with the authorities and provide them with any information they may need throughout the investigative process regarding the cause and origin of this fire,' Etzkorn said in statement. Advertisement John Hilliard can be reached at


Axios
a day ago
- Axios
Pam Bondi ousts ethics watchdog amid DOJ purge
Attorney General Pam Bondi fired the ethics director at the Department of Justice on Friday, removing the staff in charge of advising her and other officials on how to navigate conflicts of interest. Why it matters: The ethics director was fired on the same day that Bondi dismissed more than 20 employees involved in various investigations of President Donald Trump, reflecting an ongoing purge of personnel at the department. Context: On Monday, former director Joseph Tirrell confirmed on LinkedIn that he had been fired from the position without being given a reason for his removal. Tirrell has worked for the DOJ for 16 years, and became director of the departmental ethics office in July of 2023, according to his official staff profile. In the LinkedIn post, Tirrell said he was responsible for "ensuring that the 117,000 Department employees were properly advised on and supported in how to follow the Federal employee ethics rules." The Department of Justice declined to comment on why Tirrell was dismissed. The intrigue: Tirrell advised Special Counsel Jack Smith on ethical considerations during his criminal prosecutions of President Trump, according to Bloomberg Law. That included approving approximately $140,000 in pro bono legal assistance from Covington & Burling law firm, which Smith disclosed after conducting his investigation into the president. Zoom out: The staffers ousted on Friday were identified during an internal investigation carried out by the "Weaponization Working Group," which Bondi established to review"unethical prosecutions" amongst other things in February.


Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Owner of Fall River assisted living facility has come under legal scrutiny in the past
(Etzkorn currently owns Gabriel House through a company called Gabriel Care Inc., state records show.) But two Superior Court judges ruled in 2013 and 2015 that then-Attorney General Martha Coakley's office had obtained some financial records improperly and barred them from being used against Etzkorn during a trial, according to court documents. In the aftermath of the judicial rulings in Etzkorn's favor, prosecutors permanently ended the case against him in 2015, records show. Advertisement 'As reasons therefore, the Commonwealth states it is in the interests of justice,' prosecutors wrote in court papers. Etzkorn, In addition to owning Gabriel House, he owns the Plymouth Center for Behavioral Health and a company called Accurate Care, located in Rhode Island and Connecticut, according to his LinkedIn profile. Etzkorn has been a steady donor to Republican candidates in Massachusetts, including a donation he made while under indictment to then-gubernatorial candidate Charlie Baker in 2014. Baker returned that money, Advertisement In another court case, Etzkorn was found to have wrongly fired a female Gabriel House worker in 2010 when she spoke up in support of a co-worker facing disciplinary action by managers at the Fall River facility, records show. According to Bristol Superior Court records, Etzkorn and Gabriel House managers wanted health care professionals to sign non-compete agreements. The fired employee told co-workers that non-competes were illegal but was fired only after she vowed to testify on behalf of a co-worker if necessary. The original allegation dated to 2010 and wound its way through a Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination hearing officer and then to the full MCAD, which ruled in 2019 that Etzkorn had retaliated against the employee, records show. Etzkorn then challenged the MCAD decision in Bristol Superior Court where Judge Merita A. Hopkins concluded in 2021 that Etzkorn wrongly fired the employee and agreed the female worker had been retaliated against, records show. Etzkorn was ordered to pay the woman $17,500 in lost income, $20,000.00 in damages, and $25,552.50 in attorney's fees at 12 percent interest, records show. It was not immediately known if Etzkorn paid the woman. Etzkorn is a Medfield resident whose home is currently assessed at $1.3 million, town records show. John R. Ellement can be reached at