Trump threatens to revoke Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship
"Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Saturday, invoking a deportation rationale the administration has used in attempts to remove foreign-born protesters from the country.
"She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her. GOD BLESS AMERICA!," he added.
Under US law, a president cannot revoke the citizenship of an American born in the United States. O'Donnell was born in New York state.
O'Donnell, a longtime target of Trump's insults and jabs, moved to Ireland earlier this year with her 12-year-old son after the start of the president's second term. She said in a March TikTok video that she would return to the US "when it is safe for all citizens to have equal rights there in America."
O'Donnell responded to Trump's threat in two posts on her Instagram account, saying that the US president opposes her because she "stands in direct opposition with all he represents."
Trump's disdain for O'Donnell dates back to 2006 when O'Donnell, a comedian and host on The View at the time, mocked Trump over his handling of a controversy concerning a winner of the Miss USA pageant, which Trump had owned.
Trump's latest jab at O'Donnell seemed to be in response to a TikTok video she posted this month mourning the 119 deaths in the July 4 floods in Texas and blaming Trump's widespread cuts to environmental and science agencies involved in forecasting major natural disasters.
"What a horror story in Texas," O'Donnell said in the video.
"And you know, when the president guts all the early warning systems and the weathering forecast abilities of the government, these are the results that we're gonna start to see on a daily basis."
The Trump administration, as well as local and state officials, have faced mounting questions over whether more could have been done to protect and warn residents ahead of the Texas flooding, which struck with astonishing speed in the pre-dawn hours of the US Independence Day holiday on July 4 and killed at least 120, including dozens of children.
Trump on Friday visited Texas and defended the government's response to the disaster, saying his agencies "did an incredible job under the circumstances."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
19 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Albanese is ‘pulling' Australia away from US amid China trip
On tonight's episode of Paul Murray Live, Sky News host James Morrow discusses Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's trip to China, slamming him as 'desperate'. 'Honestly, the Prime Minister would look less desperate if he was trying to get Cardi B's autograph at the Met Gala,' Mr Morrow said. 'The problem here is that Anthony Albanese believes he can walk this sort of fine line where he has Australia do all sorts of trade with China … while at the same time enjoying the benefits of the American security umbrella. 'We don't have that language anymore, it seems, to stand up and say, actually, China, look, we'll do business with you, we'll trade with you, but you know what, under your current government … we can't trust that government.'
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
China was the big disruptor in our region. Now the US is determined to take that title
Australia and China, the prime minister told the secretary of the CCP's Shanghai Municipal Committee on Sunday, "deal with each other in a calm and consistent manner". "And we want to continue to pursue our national interests, and it is in our interest to have good relations with China". It's the sort of polite diplomatic language that can often sound eye glazing at bilateral meetings on official trips. But it had a particularly pointed resonance this time, given there is little that feels 'calm and consistent' emanating from our other major international partner: the United States of America. There is the ongoing and escalating trade war that President Trump has unleashed upon the globe, and notably on countries that have close economic relationships with China. And there has also been his continuing pressure on allies to increase their defence spending, facing the prospect of a US withdrawal of its forces — and military spending — around the world. Over the weekend, the US president has made more declarations about tariffs he plans to impose on the European Union and Mexico. To date, Australia hasn't been subjected to talk of any further punitive tariffs. But on the strategic front, an intervention by his Under Secretary of Defence for Strategy, Elbridge Colby, signalled that pressure that has, to date, been most notably seen on NATO countries in Europe to increase their defence spending, is now turning to the Asia Pacific. The Financial Times reported that the Pentagon is pressing Japan and Australia to make clear what role they would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan. Apart from being the latest attempt by the US administration to pressure all its allies on spending, the issue raises a whole set of separate issues for Australia, because of the AUKUS agreement. The AUKUS agreement — which includes, in the shorter term, the purchases by Australia of US nuclear-powered submarines — is built on a so-called 'forward defence' strategy — one that envisages a conflict fought out in the South China Sea, rather than in the maritime approaches to Australia closer to home. AUKUS sceptics have long argued that the increasing intermeshing of Australia's defence capability with that of the US (even before AUKUS), tied us intrinsically into whatever military operations the United States might undertake in the future. The AUKUS deal escalated that possibility, raising the question of whether the submarine deal would link us into a conflict between our biggest trading partner and our biggest ally over Taiwan. The leaking of news about Secretary Colby's pressure on Australia and Japan makes that question over our position on a war over Taiwan — which has tended to be fobbed off as hypothetical until now — a much sharper one. The irony of course is that the United States has always maintained a position of 'strategic ambiguity' about what it would do in the case of China invading Taiwan. Yet now it is pressuring Australia and Japan to say what they would do. What's more the story appeared just as the Australian prime minister touched down in Shanghai: timing that few believe was coincidental and possibly designed to disrupt any improvement in relations between the two countries, and to dominate the coverage of the visit. Prime Minister Albanese and his foreign minister Penny Wong have been significantly changing their language about Australia's strategic approach to both the US and China in the past couple of weeks, and China hawks in Australia have been warning that the change in tone in the way the PM has reflected on, and defined the ANZUS alliance, would not be welcomed in Washington. In a major speech, Mr Albanese spoke of the decision of his predecessor John Curtin to turn the United States during World War II involved "an Australian foreign policy anchored in strategic reality, not bound by tradition". It was "dealing with the world as it is, not as we would like it to be", he said, a statement with clear resonances in the present. While Australia's position between the two superpowers is often seen as a binary choice of one or the other, the times compel a different, more nuanced and independent approach. After a decade of discussion in Australia about China seen largely through a national security lens, understandably provoked by China's increasing defence position, the PM's message ahead of this trip to China has been a nod to our huge trade relationship and to people-to-people contacts. Chinese tourism to Australia, for one thing, was worth $9 billion alone last year. But Mr Albanese's foreign minister, Penny Wong, has been taking the role of 'bad cop', putting on record with her counterpart on the sidelines of an ASEAN meeting in Kuala Lumpur that Australia was not happy about China's live fire exercises off our coast, or a range of other issues. For the always carefully spoken, the language was stronger than it has been in the past, and came on the back of a speech in which she expressed Australia's concern about China's military build up, including nuclear weaponry. It seemed to signal a balanced approach to the good and bad of the Australia-China relationship, just as the government was also sending a clear signal that it would take a more independent approach, less frightened of offending the Americans, than has been the case in recent years. But just as Australia is asserting that its national interests are different from those of both China and the US, it seems the United States may force us into a choice we don't want to make. Mr Albanese was careful in his response to the Elbridge story, agreeing that there was some irony in the US expecting Australia to outline its position on an issue which the Americans have not done. And also insisting that Australia's preference is for the status quo over Taiwan to continue. Five years ago it seemed China was the big disruptor in our region. Now the United States appears determined to take that title for itself. Laura Tingle is the ABC's Global Affairs Editor.
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Pauline Hanson claims Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is avoiding Donald Trump after Zelensky's Oval Office ‘dressing down'
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has claimed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is avoiding President Donald Trump after Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky was given a 'dressing down' in the Oval Office earlier this year. Ukraine's leader was accused of being "disrespectful" to the United States after it provided billions worth of military equipment to aid it defence against Russia. Following the heated meeting, President Zelensky received the backing from several world leaders, including Mr Albanese who said Australia 'proudly supported' Ukraine. Speaking to Sky News on Sunday, Senator Hanson said the Prime Minister was not going to 'get in touch' with President Trump despite the US-Australia alliance appearing to be on the rocks. Mr Albanese, who arrived in China late on Saturday evening, beginning a six-day-long trip that will include a meeting with China's President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, has insisted he would 'have a meeting when it's scheduled' with the President and suggested there would be plenty of opportunities in coming months. However, Senator Hanson claimed Mr Albanese saw President Zelensky 'get a dressing down by Trump' and decided to avoid a similar altercation. 'He thought: 'I'm not going to go through that. I will actually not get in touch. I won't have a visit with him',' she said. Mr Albanese's delay in meeting President Trump has prompted criticism over the strength of the alliance and the Prime Minister's personal engagement with the Trump administration. President Trump's former pollster revealed last month that the US President does not like US Ambassador Kevin Rudd. 'I think he doesn't like the current ambassador and that's one of the biggest issues,' US pollster Brent Buchanan said on Monday. 'Donald Trump needs to find an Australian that he likes - or Australia needs to find an Australian that Donald Trump likes and let that person take point.' Senator Hanson said she had travelled with the Prime Minister and witnessed first-hand his interaction with leaders overseas. 'It's not good. He has not got leadership qualities about him to interact with these people. He might have improved over the years, but my impression of him was not very high at all,' she said. The Senator said the Prime Minister was 'very poor' in his conversation with leaders in India, including governors, when a delegation went there in 2017. 'I just didn't feel that he interacted with them. I think he was very poor in his conversation, the questions, even his answers to the questions,' she said. During his first press conference of his China trip, Mr Albanese was asked about what role Australia would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan. 'Our aim of investing in our capability and as well investing in our relationships is about advancing peace and security in our region. That's our objective and that is why we invest in our region,' he replied. Senator Hanson said the Prime Minister was 'not prepared' to say how Australia would use the nuclear submarines bequeathed by the US under the AUKUS agreement. 'I don't trust this government,' she said. 'He has an obligation to tell the people what he thinks… to leave this in the hands of a Prime Minister solely at his whim I think is a big mistake.' Senator Hanson said when it came to defence, she wanted the two major political parties to commit to a long-term goal and objective of 'where we lie as a nation'. 'We've seen a changeover and turnover of too many Prime Ministers in this country. I would like to see a united front that will give us long-term vision for this country and security to the people,' she said.
