
Housing authority uses tax credit model to move projects forward
The Santa Fe Civic Housing Authority — an independent nonprofit that works to ensure rental units remain affordable in the city — has sought out limited partners for projects in the push to get units online. In these cases, the authority serves as the "general partner" and has less than a 1% ownership stake in many properties in its portfolio.
The quasi-governmental organization has an annual budget of around $15 million, Executive Director Ed Romero said, with about $10 million coming in grants and the other $5 million from a combination of federal contracts and tenants' rent payments.
housing-authority.pdf
Among the properties in the housing authority's portfolio are Española Public Housing, which spans 178 units; Villa Hermosa, a 116-unit public housing community in the St. Francis Drive corridor; and Phase 2 of the Tierra Contenta project, which has 80 units. In the town of Bernallillo, it also controls the 96-unit Village in the Bosque.
Romero noted the authority has fewer units on the east side of Santa Fe, a historic area with more stringent restrictions for construction. The nonprofit's affordable housing projects in Santa Fe have land-use restrictive agreements, or LURAs, guaranteeing they receive a specific number of Low-Income Housing Tax Credits from the federal government over a specific time period.
The model is one in which housing authorities have converted public housing stock to project-based rentals, leveraging federal government programs that allow them to convert public units to Housing Choice aid vouchers to ensure affordability for low-income residents. The investor in these projects assumes the role of limited partner and receives tax credits in return.
"The way the tax credit project works is you have a deal in which you bring on an equity investor," Romero said. "The equity investor gets credits, plus they get 99% of the income and losses of a property for the next 15 to 30 years, depending on how long they want to stay in the project.
"But what they bring to it is 70% of the capital that is required to remodel the apartments," he said, "and it's a structure that HUD turned to back in '97, '98 when they stopped funding the construction of affordable housing."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
13 hours ago
- CNBC
Lowe's trades at attractive levels. Using options to capture potential gains ahead
Lowe's (LOW) recently broke out from a major consolidation period and presents a strong upside opportunity. With the anticipated Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and LOW's targeted initiatives aimed at accelerating growth, the current levels provide a compelling entry point for investors to seek bullish exposure with an attractive risk-to-reward ratio. Trade timing The timing for bullish exposure in LOW is optimal, the stock has spent the last 5 months in a range between $210 and $230 consolidating. However, it just broke out above this trading range earlier this week while outperforming the S & P 500 . This suggests that there is potential institutional and retail accumulation on this breakout and we are targeting $265 to the upside, the high of 2025. Fundamentals LOW currently trades at a slight discount to its peers supported by strong profitability, suggesting moderate upside potential. Forward PE ratio: 19.4x vs. retail-cyclical industry average 22.0x Future EPS growth: 7.6% vs. industry average 7.2% Future revenue growth: 2.8% vs. industry average 3.7% Net margins: 8.2% vs. industry average 6.2% Bullish thesis Strategic Initiatives for Pro Customers: Lowe's has achieved a notable 30% Pro penetration, with strategic relaunch of its MyLowe's Pro Rewards loyalty program in 2025. Expanded Product Offerings: Lowe's is expanding its product assortments in nearly 500 stores targeting underserved rural markets. This initiative positions Lowe's uniquely to capture increased market share in regions lacking direct competition. Digital & Technological Investments: Lowe's partnerships with technology leaders such as Nvidia , OpenAI, and Palantir to leverage AI and the launch of the home improvement industry's first product marketplace significantly boost its competitive edge. Service Enhancements: Introduction of the Pro Extended Aisle program, allowing direct supplier engagement and streamlined jobsite delivery, significantly bolsters Lowe's competitive capabilities in servicing large Pro orders. Additionally, the anticipated shift in Federal Reserve policy, with interest rate cuts expected starting in September and potentially continuing through year-end, provides a supportive backdrop for interest rate-sensitive industries such as homebuilding and home improvement retail. Lowe's stands to benefit directly from increased consumer and Pro spending in response to more accommodative financial conditions. The trade To capitalize on this bullish outlook with earnings on deck in two weeks, I'm buying a Sept. 19, $240/$260 Call Vertical @ $6.37 Debit. This entails: Buying the Sep. 19, $240 call @ $8.35 Selling the Sep. 19, $260 call @ $1.98 Maximum reward: $1,363 per contract if LOW is above $260 at expiration. Maximum risk: $637 per contract if LOW is below $240 at expiration. Breakeven point: $246.37 View this Trade with Updated Prices at OptionsPlay . This bullish options strategy leverages Lowe's recent breakout, compelling strategic positioning, and macroeconomic tailwinds, providing you with a clearly defined risk exposure and strong upside potential heading into earnings. DISCLOSURES: (None) All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Click here for the full disclaimer.


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Walmart's Stock Price Is Up Despite New Transshipment Tariffs
Walmart prides itself on its everyday low prices. Being a low-cost retailer has been a key contributor to Walmart's status as the world's largest retailer. A key reason for Walmart's 'everyday low prices' is the procurement of goods from low-wage, low-cost nations, such as China or India. In 2023, goods from China accounted for 60% of product sales. India is the second largest source of imports. Between January and August 2023, 25% of Walmart's U.S. imports originated in India. Higher tariffs, of course, threaten the EDLP strategy. But the new tariffs on transshipments are even more painful for retailers relying on low-cost foreign imports. The New York Times points out that ever since President Trump began raising tariffs on goods from China during his first term, Chinese companies have raced to set up warehouses in Southeast Asia and Mexico to bypass US tariffs through the use of indirect shipments. On July 31st, Trump signed an executive order targeting transshipments. Goods deemed by the Customs and Border Patrol to have been transshipped to evade applicable country of origin duties are now subject to an additional 40% import tax on top of the applicable country of origin tariff rates. These rates will take effect on August 7th. The legal definition of transshipment is a good that did not undergo a 'substantial transformation' in the country through which it passed. For example, the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement requires that at least 75% of cars be manufactured in North America based on North American-sourced components to qualify for duty-free treatment. So, for example, goods that flow to Mexico from China, where final consumer packaging is done, would be a light form of value-add. These goods would almost certainly be considered transhipped products. The executive order did not go into detail on the exact amount of value-add needed to avoid the 'transshipment' designation. Surprisingly, the new transshipment tariffs have not led to a decline in Walmart's stock price. On July 31st, when the new rules were announced, Walmart's stock closed at $97.98. Today, the stock opened at $99.67. Walmart's ability to pass these higher tariff costs on to consumers may be somewhat constrained. In May, Walmart said that it planned to increase prices, possibly by June, to pass along the higher tariff costs. 'We have always worked to keep our prices as low as possible, and we won't stop. We'll keep prices as low as we can for as long as we can, given the reality of small retail margins,' a Walmart spokesperson explained. Trump strongly disagreed with that idea. He wrote on Truth Social that Walmart needs to stop using tariffs as an excuse for increasing prices across its stores. And said that with Walmart having seen enormous profits last year, Walmart should absorb the costs associated with tariffs, instead of passing them on to customers. Walmart has worked to get its foreign suppliers to absorb some of the higher costs. Walmart asked several Chinese apparel and kitchenware suppliers to cut prices by up to 10% per tariff round. For many of these suppliers, Walmart is by far their largest customer and thus has substantial negotiating leverage. But these price decrease requests are much larger than what suppliers are used to. Further, the Chinese government is pushing back. According to The Wall Street Journal, Chinese officials summoned Walmart executives following complaints from suppliers. Authorities criticized the retailer's demands as unfair, warning that forcing suppliers to absorb tariff costs could breach contracts and disrupt market stability. Legal consequences were reportedly mentioned during the discussions. China can help exporters by devaluing its currency, which lowers the price of exports. They're also giving tax breaks and other incentives to their exporters, trying to keep them afloat. These tactics are something they have done in the past. But these things have been roundly criticized by the US and other Western nations. Experts on retailing say that, despite the President's call for retailers to 'eat the tariffs,' retailers will not be willing to absorb all of those increased prices. 'This idea that the president says, 'Listen, retailers, eat the tariffs.' That's not going to happen,' Kevin O'Leary of Shark Tank explained. Suppliers, retailers, and customers will all absorb some of the higher costs driven by tariffs. Even before the transshipment announcement, Walmart was struggling to forecast results. The retail giant did not release a profit outlook for the first quarter of the year due to the uncertainty surrounding the economy and tariff-related costs. Walmart on Thursday shared that its profits slipped in the first quarter of the year to $4.45 billion. It's difficult to understand why Walmart's stock price did not slump. Was it because many don't fully understand the potential impact of the transshipment tariffs? Or is it because Walmart has a strong history of growth despite headwinds? Or do some believe this transshipment rule will be difficult to enforce? How could US Customs and Border Patrol detect transshipments? If we take Walmart as an example, and assume they wanted to avoid transshipment tariffs (which I do not assume), the CBP would look for changing patterns in shipment origins. Walmart operates 20 distribution centers in Mexico. These warehouses are advertised as supporting the Mexican market. If shipments from these DCs started flowing across the border to the US, that would be evidence that Walmart is looking to avoid transshipment tariffs. What would be more challenging for the CPB to detect is a shift from FOB at origin to FOB at destination. FOB stands for "freight on board." The term is used to describe the point in a transaction where a product being shipped becomes the property of the buyer. In an FOB Origin shipping arrangement, the buyer is the owner of the product as soon as it leaves the point of origin. In an FOB Destination shipping arrangement, the shipment becomes the property of the buyer when it reaches a specified destination in the shipping process. In general, in an FOB destination contract, the seller of products plans all the logistics. In FOB origin arrangement, the buyers often designate which shipping company to use and even which lane a shipment should move on. Large companies frequently believe that by taking responsibility for logistics, they can save money. But a shift to FOB at origin contracts could allow suppliers to more easily evade transshipment duties by adding an extra port to the end-to-end shipment and thus sell prices to a retailer at a lower price.


Forbes
3 days ago
- Forbes
Property Tax Reductions Can Yield Affordable Multifamily Housing
Reducing or eliminating property tax for projects that include some affordable housing set asides has become a common practice in the United States. The policies and programs are based on the correct assumption that when costs to produce housing go up, so do prices and rents. Property tax is not a trivial element of the costs of producing and operating housing. Building housing increases the value of property, and that increase in value results in higher taxes and operating costs, often dampening incentives to make improvements. Tax abatement and exemption programs to reverse this effect and create incentives take different forms. This brief survey is based on an analysis done by the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) of tax abatement and exemption programs for housing across the country. Property Tax Reductions for Non-Profit Affordable Housing Some states, including Alabama, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and South Carolina, have abatement programs that have tax abatements for non-profits that provide affordable housing at varying income levels. Alabama exempts projects that meet the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Section 202 requirements, and house senior citizens. Arizona offers a property tax exemption for non-profit organizations that have housing under a restrictive covenant, something typical of Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) projects. In Texas, property tax exemptions are available for Public Facility Corporations, non-profit entities created by local government. Property Tax Reductions for Mixed-Income or Workforce Housing A classic example of these sorts of programs is Seattle's Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) program which provides an exemption on improvements to property if the improvement is housing with a set aside of 20% of the units at up to 80% of Area Median Income with a 12 year affordability requirement. The program has produced thousands of affordable units over its decades of operation. Washington DC has a geographic, formula driven abatement that grants a tax abatement equal to 75% of the improved value of the property provided that the development sets aside 5% of the units for low-income households and 10% up to 60% of AMI. The tax abatement lasts for 10 years but the affordability requirement lasts for 20. Other jurisdictions like Tillamook, Oregon and Montgomery, County in Maryland offer similar exchanges of set aside units for an exemption. Historic Rehabilitation & Redevelopment Property Tax Reductions Some jurisdictions offer exemptions for development projects that rehabilitate older, existing buildings. These include Georgia which provides an 8-year abatement, Philadelphia, with a 10-year abatement, Norfolk, Virginia with a 14-year abatement, and New York City with an abatement that can be as long as 34 years. These programs require improvements to properties that either currently provide housing or include some housing component, but none of them appear to have any affordability requirement. The MBA seems to have included them because they are exemption programs that create housing. I'm including them here because these sorts of exemption programs arguably create or preserve housing supply which arguably contributes to affordability. We'll return to this discussion later. Transit-Oriented PropertyTax Reductions Putting more housing near transit, especially light rail stations, is a priority for jurisdictions that have invested in more rail infrastructure. Oregon's Multiple Unit Housing Property Tax Exemption (MUPTE) program offers 10-year exemptions for projects that are adjacent to light rail or transit and include some level of affordability. What each of these approaches has in common is a recognition that the increases in value created by new development create tax consequences that can disincentivize making the improvements in the first place. The concept behind property tax abatement for affordable housing is that reductions in taxes should result in some community benefit, whether in the form of rent restricted housing or more housing of any level of rent. Usually, jurisdictions have to balance the loss of tax revenue with the quantitative benefits of the improvements either in more affordable housing, increased future tax income, or both. Next, we'll take a closer look at a couple of abatement programs, how they work, and whether they've succeeded.