Easily fall asleep in the heatwave tonight by avoiding mistake everyone makes
Staying cool and comfortable during a heatwave is no mean feat, particularly in the UK, where we're so much less equipped than other regions.
And if you are sleeping naked, you are making it worse for yourself. The UK rarely experiences such scorching heat, the majority of Brits don't have air-con units, and since a decent fan can cost upwards of £100 (and, let's be real, won't be needed for 50 weeks of the year), lots of people are stuck with one that feels like it's simply churning out warm air, which is worse than sitting without a fan and infuriating in its own way.
Whilst many can just about function throughout the day, albeit a bit slower and sweatier than usual, the war against the heat begins at nighttime, where the real heatwave discomfort kicks in. Tossing and turning, desperately flipping your pillow and counting down the hours, knowing you're going to feel dreadful the coming morning and sweating through your pyjamas is not restful.
One of the most common mistakes people make during a heatwave is sleeping naked. While it may seem like a good way to keep cool, it's actually not the best approach. Sleep consultant Alison Jones told The Times wearing loose-fitting cotton PJs is a better option than not wearing anything.
She said: 'A light fabric helps to wick away moisture so that you are less likely to feel clammy. Sleeping on your side exposes more of your body to the air, allowing heat to dissipate more effectively and helping to prevent temperature-related disturbance.'
Sleeping naked can actually make you feel hotter and more uncomfortable, especially if you're someone who tends to sleep in a warm bedroom. When you're naked, your body is more exposed to the surrounding temperature, which can make it harder for you to cool down. Additionally, sleeping naked can cause you to overheat, which can lead to a range of problems, including restlessness, insomnia, and even nightmares.
Wearing light, breathable clothing to bed can help to regulate your body temperature and keep you cool. Look for fabrics like cotton, linen, or bamboo, which are natural, breathable, and moisture-wicking. These fabrics will help to keep you cool and dry, even on the hottest nights. Avoid synthetic fabrics like polyester or nylon, which can trap heat and make you feel hotter.
It's also worth considering the benefits of wearing pyjamas that are designed to keep you cool. These can be a great option for hot summer nights, especially if you tend to sleep in a warm bedroom.
A quick fix
Dreams Sleep Expert, Sammy Margo spoke to MailOnline and encouraged people to hang a wet sheet in front of your window, they said: 'Dampen a sheet with cold water, and then hang it in front of an open window.' The breeze blows the sheet and the cold water slowly evaporates, cooling down your room.
Another innovative solution is to invest in a pet cooling mat. These mats, usually around £5, are designed to keep your furry friends cool, but they can also work wonders for humans. Simply cool the gel pad during the day, then place it underneath your fitted sheet before getting into bed. This will help keep you cool throughout the night, and it's a game-changer for hot summer nights and you will wonder why you didn't think of it before.
There are also a few other tricks that can be helpful during the heatwave when it comes to sleep hygiene:
Have a warm shower instead
Don't take a cold shower before bed, take a warm one. 'Strange as it seems, taking a slightly warmer shower is a better idea in warm weather,' Dr Stanley, author of How to Sleep Well. A warmer shower will trick your body into believing that it needs to cool itself down. Instead of a cold show you can try using cold flannels on your pulse points which will be helpful.
Embrace the dark
Whilst the sun might look lovely outside, as it blazes in through your window its heating up your room. Pre-cooling your bedroom is crucial, so keep your curtains and blinds closed during the day to prevent the sun from heating your room, and open a window to let in a cool breeze (unless you have hay fever).
Try to keep your room as dark as possible in the night, you can try and use blackout blinds or opaque curtains to block out any light, and consider wearing an eye mask if necessary.
Change your bedding
Switching to a light top sheet to help regulate your body temperature will definitely help you sleep better. Natural fabrics such as linen are ideal, as they trap less heat than synthetic sheets and have a looser, airier weave than cotton sheets with a high thread count.
These tips will definitely help but if they don't, rest assured there are millions of others laying awake drenched in sweat and most likely scrolling the internet until they dose off too.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
BBC Gardeners' World star had 'to-do list' as she opens up on battle with devastating illness
Gardeners' World star Rachel de Thame was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2018, and said that it had a knock-on effect to her life and left her feeling "shaken" Gardeners' World presenter Rachel de Thame has opened up about her "desperate" to-do list following her breast cancer diagnosis in 2018, revealing how the news sent "shockwaves" through her life. Penning her thoughts for The Times at the time, Rachel shared: "While one is grateful to have options, treatment is no walk in the park. Strangely, though, I've also found that there are compensations. Top of the list is a renewed, almost desperate desire to get on with some of the things that for too long have lingered on a mental to-do list." The beloved BBC personality reflected on the impact of her health scare, stating: "When you've felt rocked to your foundations, the only sensible thing is to get on with living." With a newfound outlook, Rachel admitted she's now viewing life through a different lens, with ambitions to transform her garden into a sanctuary for herself and others. She elaborated on her aspirations: "On a more immediate and personal level, I'm focusing on next spring and how I want my garden to look and, above all, make me feel." Fortunately, Rachel's condition was detected early, prompting her to take time off from Gardeners' World as she embarked on her treatment journey. Speaking to the BBC during this period, she conveyed optimism: "I'm doing well and coming towards the end of it. It's caught early so that's all very positive, so on the whole it's better not to be working too much just now," reports the Express. Thankfully, she made a complete recovery and has since extolled the virtues of gardening for its role in her physical and mental well-being during that tough time. At the Chelsea Flower Show, Rachel expressed: "I know there's a big message this year at Chelsea about the importance of gardening for your general health and mental health, if you're going through some chronic illness, whatever it is, it's vital to go out and be in a garden." In one of the most recent episodes of Gardeners' World, fans were left in tears after expert Steve opened up about his terminal diagnosis. He shared: "Very recently, I had been diagnosed with a terminal cancer, and I don't know how long I might live. It could be two months or two years, possibly. "I didn't feel down as a result of it, I just saw it as another challenge, I'm going to have to sort something out for this. "And actually, I have had a big, creative burst, I think, as a result of that positive attitude, and I am getting there. I am finding ways in which Pippa and our son, between them, will be able to manage this whole process once I've gone."
Glasgow Times
8 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Warning over 'dangerous' Listeria-contaminated cheeses
The Spanish Food Safety Agency (AESAN) confirmed on 15 August 2025 that two types of French cheeses - Brie Meule (1 kg) and Camembert Viejo Porche - have tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes. The affected products have been distributed across Spain and are being withdrawn from sale. Spain is the most popular travel destination for Brits, with more than 15 million people from the UK visiting every year, and experts are warning holidaymakers to be extra careful this summer. Mark McShane, Food Hygiene Expert from Food Hygiene Certificate, says: 'Listeria is particularly dangerous because it can grow even at fridge temperatures. "Vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, the elderly, newborns, and those with weakened immune systems face the highest risk. If you have purchased these cheeses in Spain or brought them home from holiday, do not eat them under any circumstances.' AESAN has instructed that anyone in possession of the recalled products should not consume them and instead return them to the point of purchase. Symptoms of listeriosis may include: High fever Muscle aches Nausea Vomiting or diarrhoea In severe cases, the infection can spread beyond the digestive system and become life-threatening. Consumers who have eaten the affected products and feel unwell are advised to seek medical attention immediately. Mark McShane added: 'This is a timely reminder of how important food safety is when travelling abroad. "Always check for official recalls, practise strict hygiene when handling dairy products, and avoid high-risk foods if you are in a vulnerable group.' Recommended reading: What is a food recall? A food recall is when a food product may have to be withdrawn or recalled. A withdrawal is when unsafe food is removed from the supply chain before it has reached consumers. A recall is when unsafe food is removed from the supply chain and consumers are advised to take appropriate action, for example to return or dispose of the unsafe food.
Spectator
8 hours ago
- Spectator
Kill the single state pension age
When William Beveridge designed the welfare state in the 1940s, the state pension age was 65 for men and 60 for women. Life expectancy for a man was around 66, and around 71 for a woman. The pension was not designed to fund decades of leisure: it was a modest provision for the last couple of years of life, one that not everyone would receive. Today, life expectancy for a man aged 66 (the current state pension age) is around 85, and a woman aged 66 can expect to live until she is 88. The average person now spends close to a fifth of their life in retirement. What was once a short post-script has become a major chapter – and an increasingly expensive one. This is the backdrop for the latest statutory review of the state pension age (SPA), led this year by Dr Suzy Morrissey. Her terms of reference are technical: consider sustainability, intergenerational fairness, life expectancy, international practice. Behind the dry language sits a political question no one rushes to answer: when should people stop working, and who pays for the years they do not? You know the script here. Britain is ageing. The ratio of workers to pensioners is shrinking. Every review concludes that the SPA must rise. Every opposition grumbles about the cruelty of doing so. Every government, when in office, quietly nudges the age upwards. Nothing fundamental changes. What almost never gets challenged is the model itself: a single age at which everyone, regardless of class, health or occupation, is deemed equally ready for retirement. This is tidy for Whitehall. It is also daft. The Office for National Statistics reports that male life expectancy for a retirement age man in Surrey is 86 years; in Blackpool, it is 81. Healthy life expectancy – the years lived without major illness – shows still sharper divides. Yet we persist in pretending that the 66-year-old accountant in Guildford and the 66-year-old ex-dockworker in Hull should both cross the same finish line. That is unjust, and unsustainable. It loads the cost of longer-lived, healthier retirees onto taxpayers who may not live long enough to see much retirement at all. Here I can almost hear some readers reaching for outrage about contributions. Shouldn't a person's pension entitlement reflect their national insurance contributions? So a Surrey stockbroker who pays more NI than a Sunderland scaffolder has earned the right to draw the state pension for longer? This takes me to the biggest and most persistent misunderstanding in British politics: the state pension isn't really a pension. It's a benefit. And it's funded not from some pot of money patiently built up from each recipient's contributions, but from the taxes of today's workers. National Insurance is just a tax, and one that long ago lost any hypothecated link to the pension system. That means pension policy cannot be treated as a personal contract between citizen and state. It is a collective transfer between generations. Pretending otherwise, with talk of 'I've paid in, I deserve it back', hides the real choices – about fairness between regions, between classes, and between young and old. Other countries are at least edging away from the one-size-fits-all fiction. Denmark and the Netherlands now link their pension ages directly to life expectancy. Countries including Norway and Portugal offer some scope to offer earlier pensions to those who have done physically demanding work. None has yet built a fully 'variable' pension age, but the recognition is spreading: a uniform pension age does not match demographic reality. Britain should be bolder. One approach is to tie entitlement not to age but to years of contributions, recognising that someone who started work at 18 has done their share by 65, while the graduate entering at 25 has not. Another is to give more flexibility to those in arduous jobs: that Sunderland scaffolder is likely to be physically knackered in a way that his stockbroking compatriot is not. More radical still is to abandon the cliff-edge retirement model altogether. Instead of full-time one day and nothing the next, policy should support tapering – part-time, flexible work in the sixties and seventies, subsidised and encouraged so people can scale down, not drop out. This would help individuals, who gain income and purpose. It helps employers, who retain skills and experience. It helps the state, which saves on pensions and collects more tax. Above all, it acknowledges reality: ageing is a spectrum, not a binary switch from 'young' to 'old'. This is politically difficult, to put it mildly. I am recommending electoral hemlock, because it entails higher pension ages for some (who will be angry) and different treatment for some (ditto). No sane politician attempts major change to the state pension. The fury of the Waspi women still haunts ministers. Even tinkering with winter fuel allowances causes uproar. You'd be mad to do it, minister. But it must still be done. The fiscal maths is brutal. By 2075, pensioners will make up more than a quarter of the adult population. The cost of the state pension is projected to rise from around 5 per cent of GDP today to nearly 8 per cent. Absent reform, the money has to come from somewhere: higher taxes on a shrinking workforce, or cuts to other services. Intergenerational politics are already sour. Younger voters see themselves funding entitlements for older cohorts who enjoyed cheaper houses and more generous occupational pensions. A rigid single SPA deepens that resentment. That is the real political danger: not the fury of today's pensioners, but the alienation of tomorrow's workers who simply refuse to pay for the pensions of others. Dr Morrissey's review is framed as technical, but it is inescapably political. She has licence to say what ministers will not: that one pension age for all is outdated, unfair and unaffordable. A braver politics would seize that truth, and act on it. None of this is easy. None of it is popular. But it is necessary. The single state pension age should end.
