Three get one-year jail for casteist abuse during temple festival in Tenkasi
TENKASI: The Principal District Court in Tenkasi sentenced three men belonging to the dominant castes to one year of imprisonment for verbally abusing two Schedule Caste (SC) residents. The convicts - K Saravanakumar, V Subramanian, and R Senthurpandi - used casteist slurs against the victims, Vivek Kumar and Kalidass, both from the SC community in Sangupuram village near Vasudevanallur, during the Kaliamman Temple's Vaikasi Visakam festival in 2015.
According to the prosecution, the incident occurred when the two SC men offered prayers in front of the temple car as part of the ritual. The accused objected to their presence, hurled caste-based insults, and stated that individuals from their community had no right to stand before the chariot and worship the deity.
Based on the complaint of a 'nattamai' of scheduled caste community, the Vasudevanallur police booked the trio under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Additionally, the court imposed a fine of Rs 1,000 on each of them. Special Public Prosecutor S Marikutty appeared for the victims.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC push nudges Jharkhand HC to grant child care leave to woman judge
The Supreme Court on Wednesday noted that the Jharkhand High Court has allowed a 92-day child care leave (CCL) to a senior woman judicial officer -- a single parent, after the top court's firm nudge last week. However, the case took a fresh turn as the officer alleged that the high court sought to tarnish her annual confidential report (ACR) in retaliation for her petition seeking leave. A bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan, while taking note of the high court's affidavit allowing part of the officer's requested leave, issued notice to the high court on the judicial officer's additional plea seeking expunging of adverse ACR remarks. The matter will be heard in four weeks. 'In deference to this court's June 6 order, we have taken a decision granting her 92-day leave,' senior advocate Ajit Kumar Sinha, appearing for the Jharkhand High Court, submitted before the bench. Also Read: SC stays Madras HC order, allows toll collection on NH38 However, he added that allowing eight months of continuous leave for an officer heading the district judiciary at Hazaribagh would set an undesirable precedent. 'She has asked for 194 days. Her child has exams in 2026. This kind of stretch leave is not advisable,' Sinha said. Representing the woman officer, advocate Anup Kumar said she had applied for CCL between June 10 and December 20, 2025, to assist her son in preparing for his Class XII board and engineering entrance examinations. He also pointed out that her ACR had been adversely commented upon in a May 23 communication after she moved the Supreme Court. The communication stated that her 'conduct has not been good.' The woman officer's lawyer contended that adverse comments in her ACR dated May 23 appeared part of a retaliatory act by the administration. At this, the bench observed, 'You proceed on leave for 92 days, and we will see later,' before recording the fresh plea regarding her ACR and issuing notice. On June 6, the top court had asked the Jharkhand high court to revisit its decision rejecting the woman judge's CCL application, making it clear that if the matter was not resolved by June 12, it would intervene. The officer, a Scheduled Caste (SC) judicial officer serving since 2002, was transferred in April from Hazaribagh, where her son studies, to Dumka, despite having sought a transfer to Ranchi or Bokaro where better coaching facilities are available. Her request for CCL, soon after, was summarily rejected by the high court on May 10 without assigning reasons. In her plea, the officer pointed out that another judicial officer had recently been granted three months of CCL by the high court and alleged that her case had been treated differently, amounting to discrimination in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. The petition cited Rule 43-C of the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, which entitles eligible female government employees to 730 days of CCL during their service tenure, with full pay for the first 365 days and 80% for the remaining period. A March 2024 resolution of the Jharkhand government and an August 2024 circular by the Registrar General of the Jharkhand High Court reinforced this entitlement, specifically in the context of children's exams, illness, or care requirements. However, the state objected to her petition, with advocate Vishnu Sharma arguing before the court last week that granting such leave would 'open a Pandora's box.' The Supreme Court, on June 6, dismissed the state's apprehensions, clarifying that the matter lay squarely between the high court and its officer. 'There is enough power with the high court unless you think someone is not acting bonafide,' the bench had then remarked.
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Law not a toy to be played with': Karnataka HC quashes case against man accused of abducting neighbour's cat
In an unusual turn of events, a pet cat named Daisy was the subject of criminal proceedings challenged before the Karnataka High Court on Tuesday, with the judge remarking that the pet seemed to have 'driven everyone crazy'. The court subsequently quashed the case against a person who was accused of 'kidnapping' his neighbour's pet cat. Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that the police deserved stern admonishment in this case, stating, 'Law is a solemn instrument and not a toy to be played at the altar of personal pique.' The defendant in the case had filed a complaint in 2022 against a person in the adjacent apartment complex, alleging that her cat Daisy had been kidnapped and confined, causing stress and emotional trauma to the complainant. The police subsequently filed a chargesheet under Indian Penal Code (IPC) provisions relating to intentional insult, intimidation, and insult to a woman's modesty. The accused petitioner's counsel argued that the cat could have jumped from house to house through the windows and might have gone to another place after getting into the petitioner's house, as it had not stayed there. The CCTV footage also demonstrated the cat jumping between windows. When the woman complainant had enquired about the cat, the accused questioned why he would keep her cat in his home. The counsel for the accused also raised the question of how the alleged offences could arise from a missing cat. The court noted that as per the Additional State Public Prosecutor, the complainant had not appeared before the court to answer questions, and it seemed to be a frivolous case. The bench stated, 'It shocks the conscience of the court as to how the jurisdictional police could have registered the complaint, as there is no offence indicated in the complaint, except missing cat and alleged wrongful custody of the cat in the house of the accused…' 'The entire police machinery gets involved in the case of a missing cat, records statements of neighbours, sees CCTV footage and finds nothing, but files a chargesheet dropping the offences under sections 428 and 429 (mischief by killing or maiming animal) of the IPC, but retaining the offences under sections 504, 506 and 509…,' it added. The judge observed that the chargesheet contained 'retrospective embellishments' of hurling abuses, which was not in the complaint, stating, 'The cat named Daisy appears to have driven everyone crazy and even the criminal justice system. The police ought not to have entertained the complaint, which did not indicate any cognisable offence at the outset. As a matter of fact, the complaint does not even indicate a non-cognisable offence. But the police entertained the complaint ostensibly, for extraneous reasons.'
NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Will Marry Raja Raghuvanshi But...": Sonam's Threat To Mother Before Wedding
Sonam Raghuvanshi was in love with Raj Kushwaha and had warned her family of "consequences" if she was pressured to marry Raja Raghuvanshi, who was brutally murdered days after he married the woman, police sources said. In his statement, Raja's elder brother Vipin said Sonam had told her mother about her affair with Raj, who was an employee at the family's business, but her mother objected to the relationship. "Vipin said Sonam had already informed her mother about her affair with Raj. She said she did not want to marry Raja. Her mother, however, objected to the relationship (with Raj) and persuaded her to marry within the society," one of the sources said. "Vipin alleged that Sonam agreed to compromise and marry Raja but warned of consequences. She said 'you will see what I do to that person. You all will have to bear the consequences'. No one thought she would kill Raja," the source added. The details of Vipin's purported statement to the police surfaced at a time when Raja's murder by Sonam, Raj and three of his accomplices have sent shockwaves across the country. Sonam and Raja were on their honeymoon to Meghalaya when the crime took place. The case initially began as that of a "missing couple", after Raja and Sonam could not be traced in the northeastern state, but took a tragic turn and revealed a shocking betrayal. Raj was later identified as the prime conspirator in the case. Vipin alleged that Sonam stayed in a hotel room with Raj after the murder. He later sent her to her hometown in Madhya Pradesh's Indore, where she stayed for two days. Twenty-four-year-old Sonam and 29-year-old Raja from Indore got married on May 11. According to the police, the wedding took place despite Sonam's relationship with Raj, who worked as an accountant at the furniture sheet unit owned by her family. Sonam used to look after the family business. After their wedding in Indore, Raja and Sonam travelled to Meghalaya for honeymoon. They disappeared on May 23, hours after checking out of a homestay at Nongriat village, 20 km from where Raja's body was found on June 2. Raja was killed by Sonam, who went "missing" after the murder, the police said. She had allegedly hired killers to get rid of her husband as she wanted to be with her lover. On Sunday night, Sonam surfaced in Uttar Pradesh's Ghazipur where she surrendered at Nandganj police station. This came hours after Akash Rajput (19), Vishal Singh Chauhan (22), and Anand Kurmi were arrested from Uttar Pradesh and Indore and Sagar towns (in Madhya Pradesh). Raj, the alleged conspirator, was arrested later. Police sources said Sonam offered Rs 20 lakh to the accused to carry out the crime, although an official confirmation or statement is awaited. The sources earlier said the hitmen met the newly wed couple in Bengaluru, from where they took their connecting flight to the northeast.
