logo
Colombia backs down in face of Trump tariff threats over migrants deported on military planes

Colombia backs down in face of Trump tariff threats over migrants deported on military planes

Independent28-01-2025
The White House says Colombia has agreed to President Donald Trump 's terms following a weekend dispute over deportation flights from the United States using military aircraft, averting a trade war within the first week of Trump 's presidency.
Trump threatened Colombia with 'decisive retaliatory measures' including tariffs and visa sanctions after Colombia denied entry to two U.S. flights on military planes carrying people who were allegedly living in the country without legal permission.
'The Government of Colombia has agreed to all of President Trump's terms, including the unrestricted acceptance of all illegal aliens from Colombia returned from the United States, including on U.S. military aircraft, without limitation or delay,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on Sunday.
In remarks in Spanish, Colombian Foreign Affairs Minister Luis Gilberto Murillo said the country 'will continue to receive Colombians deported, guaranteeing them dignified conditions as citizens subject to rights.'
'The government, under the leadership of Gustavo Petro, has at its disposal the presidential plane to receive the Colombians that would have been deported today,' he said. 'Colombia reiterates that the diplomatic channels for interlocution will be open to maintain the rights, the national interest and the dignity of our citizens.'
The dispute followed Colombia's initial refusal on Sunday to accept military planes carrying immigrants, with Petro arguing that his country wanted to secure the arrival of immigrants in 'dignified conditions' using civilian aircraft.
The flights, carried out on U.S. military C-17 aircraft, each carried roughly 80 people.
'A migrant is not a criminal and should be treated with the dignity a human being deserves,' he wrote. 'We will receive our nationals in civilian airplanes, without treating them as criminals. Colombia must be respected.'
Trump then threatened to impose 25 percent tariffs on Colombia for 'all goods' going to the U.S. In a week, those tariffs will be raised to 50 percent, the president claimed.
He added that a travel ban and visa revocations will be imposed on Colombian government officials, as well as 'all allies and supporters.'
Trump also said that 'visa sanctions' would be levied against 'all Party Members, Family Members, and Supporters of the Colombian Government.'
The American president also promised that there would be 'Enhanced Customs and Border Protection Inspections of all Colombian Nationals and Cargo on national security grounds.'
'These measures are just the beginning,' he said. 'We will not allow the Colombian Government to violate its legal obligations with regard to the acceptance and return of the Criminals they forced into the United States!
Petro had initially said that Colombia would not accept military deportation flights from the U.S. until the Trump White House sets up a process to treat Colombian migrants with 'dignity and respect.'
'I do not authorize the entry of North American planes carrying Colombian migrants into our territory,' Petro said on X. 'The U.S. must establish a protocol of dignified treatment of migrants before we receive them.'
Petro noted that Colombia had already turned away military flights with Colombian deportees.
'I cannot make migrants stay in a country that does not want them, but if that country sends them back, it should be with dignity and respect for them and for our country,' Petro added.
He said he would allow civilian planes carrying deportees to land in his country, but that he would block the arrival of military planes.
'We will receive our fellow citizens on civilian planes, without treating them like criminals,' Petro said.
According to the Pew Research Center, there were 190,000 unauthorized immigrants from Colombia living in the U.S. as of 2022.
The Trump administration is promising to deport millions of undocumented immigrants from the U.S., drawing scrutiny from Latin American leaders who have roundly criticized the president's treatment of immigrants.
The Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs also asked for an explanation for the 'degrading treatment' that 88 deportees were subjected to on a U.S. repatriation flight Friday.
Immigrants were discovered in handcuffs and chains and without any air conditioning, according to Brazilian officials.
Petro's response — and Trump's swift threats in retaliation — tested Colombia's relationship with its most important trading partner and security ally, with remittances to Colombia making up about 3.4 percent of the Colombian economy, and most of those remittances emanate from the U.S.
Petro, the first leftist Colombian president, is close to the presidents of Mexico and Brazil. He wrote on X that more than 15,600 U.S. citizens are living in Colombia without the correct documentation.
Even so, he said he would not raid them and send them back to the U.S. in chains, adding that his government is 'the opposite of Nazis.'
'You won't see me burning a U.S. flag,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US budget deficit forecast $1 trillion higher over next decade, watchdog says
US budget deficit forecast $1 trillion higher over next decade, watchdog says

Reuters

time15 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US budget deficit forecast $1 trillion higher over next decade, watchdog says

WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - U.S. federal budget deficits will be nearly $1 trillion higher over the next decade than projected in January by the Congressional Budget Office as a result of tax and spending legislation and tariffs, a budget watchdog said on Wednesday. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget's latest forecasts show a cumulative deficit of $22.7 trillion from fiscal 2026 to 2035, compared to the CBO's January forecast of $21.8 trillion, which was based on laws and policies that were in place before U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January. The CBO, Congress' non-partisan budget referee agency, said on Monday, opens new tab that it will not issue its customary mid-year budget update this year and will issue its next 10-year budget and economic outlook in early 2026, offering no explanation for the move. The CRFB, which advocates for deficit reduction, projected a $1.7 trillion deficit in fiscal 2025 or 5.6% of GDP, down slightly from $1.83 trillion in 2024 and the CBO's 2025 projection of $1.87 trillion in January. But it said deficits steadily rise over the decade, reaching $2.6 trillion or 5.9% of GDP by 2035. The new CRFB estimates include the budget effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act tax and spending bill, as well as Trump's tariffs that are currently in place. But like CBO, they do not include the dynamic economic effects on growth from these changes, a forecasting rule that has drawn criticism from the Trump administration. The group projects the tax cut and spending bill to increase deficits, including interest, by $4.6 trillion through 2035, adding another year to the CBO's $4.1 trillion cost estimate through 2034. But CRFB estimates that this will be offset by $3.4 trillion worth of extra import duty revenue over the next decade due to Trump's new tariffs that are currently in place. New rules restricting eligibility for health insurance subsidies will reduce deficits by another $100 billion through 2035, and Congress' rescission of prior funding to foreign aid, public broadcasting and other programs would save another $100 billion if sustained over a decade, CRFB said. Net interest payments on the national debt will total $14 trillion over the decade, CRFB projected, rising from nearly $1 trillion or 3.2% of GDP in 2025 to $1.8 trillion or 4.1% of GDP in 2035. The forecasts are based on legislative and tariff changes since January but keep CBO's economic forecasts unchanged. Under an alternative scenario forecast by CRFB, the budget picture looks far worse, boosting deficits nearly $7 trillion higher than the CBO baseline. This scenario would see a significant part of Trump's tariffs canceled if the Court of International Trade's ruling against many of Trump's new tariffs is upheld, cutting $2.4 trillion from revenues over a decade. The alternative scenario also assumes extension of a number of temporary tax cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, including tax breaks on overtime, tips, Social Security income and car loan interest, higher state and local tax deduction allowances and full expensing of factory investments, adding $1.7 trillion to deficits over 10 years. CRFB's alternative scenario also ditches the CBO's projection of a decline in 10-year U.S. Treasury yields over the decade to about 3.8%. If that interest rate stays at the current level of about 4.3%, interest costs would grow by about $1.6 trillion through 2035, CRFB said. The total 2035 debt-to-GDP ratio would grow from 118% in the CBO January baseline to 120% under the CRFB's projected baseline scenario and 134% under the CRFB's alternative scenario.

The bleak farce over Ukraine is a typical ‘great power' carve up
The bleak farce over Ukraine is a typical ‘great power' carve up

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

The bleak farce over Ukraine is a typical ‘great power' carve up

Standing on a stage emblazoned with a slogan that proclaimed they were 'pursuing peace', the two men announced – not the promised ceasefire, much less a permanent end to hostilities – but, rather, a vague insistence that progress was being made. This should surprise no-one. The war in Ukraine is not a war of liberation, but a proxy war between Russia and the nominal West (which is represented by Nato and, in particular, the United States). READ MORE: David Pratt: 'Art of the deal' fails again as Donald Trump is outflanked This is reflected in the fact that the Alaska discussions were conducted between Washington and Moscow, bypassing both the Ukrainian government and its European allies. The secondary talks in Washington on Monday – in which Trump hosted Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, various European leaders and Nato secretary general Mark Rutte – only served to underline the fact that the Ukraine war is an inter-imperialist conflict. In a proxy war, it is the puppet master, not the puppet, who ultimately calls the shots. The problem for Zelenskyy and his European allies is that the puppet master is Donald Trump, and he has decided to comprehensively shift American resources from Europe to East Asia, in an attempt to counter the rise of China. In doing so, Trump is extending the Obama-era policy of a 'pivot to Asia'. However, unlike his Democrat predecessors, the current incumbent in the White House has come to the conclusion that the US cannot counter China's threat to US global hegemony while maintaining its post-Second World War commitments in Europe. That – and not Trump's supposed 'pro-Russian' sympathies – is why the US president is seeking to bring the Ukraine war to an end. It is also why at the Nato summit back in June, Trump insisted that Nato's European members and Canada commit to increasing their military expenditure to 5% of their GDP. The direction of travel of the current diplomatic manoeuvres is towards a carve-up of Ukrainian territory agreed, first and foremost, between the Americans and the Russians. For the main European leaders – particularly French president Emmanuel Macron, German chancellor Friedrich Merz and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer – this is a problem because it would mark a further step in the US's uncoupling from Europe. It would be naïve in the extreme to take at face value the European leaders' claims of 'solidarity' with Ukraine and concern for the country's 'territorial integrity'. Since the war began, the Western alliance's interest has been – not Ukrainian victory – but the slow, military diminution of Russia. That is why the Nato powers have provided Ukraine with just enough weapons to keep the conflict grinding on. In other words, Western governments have proven themselves very happy to continue fighting to the last drop of the Ukrainian people's blood. That strategy – which relied, as Nato itself relies, on US leadership and resources – is now in crisis. As Monday's meeting at the White House showed, Trump's policy of a step-by-step reduction in the American commitment to Europe has forced Zelenskyy and the European leaders into the role of supplicants. READ MORE: Nigel Farage claims court ruling removing asylum seekers from hotel as 'victory' The roots of this crisis date back long before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. That invasion was brutal and outrageous, but it was not – as many Western leaders and commentators insist – irrational. In 1990, US secretary of state James Baker assured Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev that Nato would not move 'one inch eastward' in response to the dismantlement of the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union. That was a deliberate, calculated lie. The subsequent, rapid eastward expansion of Nato and the European Union (which, significantly, have worked in tandem throughout) has taken the Western imperialist bloc right up to the borders of Russia. The West's attempt to exploit its perceived 'victory' in the Cold War has backfired catastrophically. Such an explanation of the origins of the Ukraine war is not – as pro-Nato commentators claim – an attempt to justify Putin's invasion. It is, rather, the only way we can understand both why the war started and the deeply unsatisfactory terms on which it is likely to end. It was ever thus with inter-imperialist rivalries. For example, the present cataclysm in the Middle East has its roots in the European powers' carve-up of the territory of the collapsing Ottoman Empire. In his fine stage show Nowhere (which is currently playing at the Traverse Theatre as part of the Edinburgh Festival Fringe), the excellent Scots-Egyptian actor and theatre-maker Khalid Abdalla talks about the Sykes-Picot Agreement. This was the secret arrangement, made in 1916, by which the British and the French drew a line across the map of the Middle East, dividing the Ottoman territories between themselves. The consequences were disastrous and manifold. They included the infamous Balfour Declaration of 1917, by which the British government declared its support for the partition of Palestine and the creation of the State of Israel. The Zionist movement's oft-stated dream of making a deal with the imperialist powers to enable it to drive the Palestinians from their land began to come to fruition. The subsequent British 'mandate' in Palestine, under the Sykes-Picot Agreement, laid the foundations for the Nakba ('Catastrophe') – the mass murder and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, and the creation of the Israeli state – in 1948. READ MORE: It's interesting to see who the British state views as its enemies The rest – from the occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights in 1967 to the current genocide in Gaza – is, as they say, history. Such carve-ups – and their disastrous consequences for the peoples of the affected regions – are the inevitable consequence of inter-imperialist rivalries. The division of Africa – primarily between the British, the French, the Portuguese and the Belgians – had catastrophic consequences that the people of the continent continue to live with to this day. The same is true across Asia, the Americas and Oceania. The coming Russo-American carve-up of Ukraine is part of a long and terrible history of imperialist imposition. Until we break the cycle of nationalism, militarism and power bloc rivalries, we are doomed to repeat the dark farce of the current manoeuvres over Ukraine.

Times letters: Spectre of Putin haunts Washington summit
Times letters: Spectre of Putin haunts Washington summit

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Times letters: Spectre of Putin haunts Washington summit

Sir, The real winner from the White House gathering was the man who was not there: Vladimir Putin. After all the fawning over their host, it must have been galling for the leaders of the western world to wait while President Trump left the meeting and talked on the phone to the Russian leader. The significance of that 40 minutes was profound: the veto was in Moscow. Nothing definite was decided, and the rockets and drones sent into Ukraine afterwards demonstrated the reality of what Trump likes to call 'Putin's desire for peace'. Heaping compliments on the head of the US president is failing to open his eyes to the real nature of Putin's war of aggression. Europe must prepare itself for the costly BownLondon E3 Sir, I cannot imagine for a moment that Margaret Thatcher would have sat silently at Monday's summit as EU leaders did, allowing President Trump to spout nonsense and praise Putin. She would have dominated the meeting, condemned Putin and corrected the US president at every opportunity. He would have willingly complied and no doubt Russia would have been sanctioned to the hilt with weapons provided free to Ukraine by the next day. Contrary to belief, I think Trump would love someone strong to steer him firmly as he clearly has no clue about world affairs and even resorts to asking Putin for guidance. However, if Thatcher were PM today the meeting would not have been necessary as Ukraine would be in Nato and Putin would have been put in his place long WiltonBournemouth Sir, The words surrender and appeasement have been used to describe the outcome of President Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska. This is misconceived. Whether through analysis or more likely instinct, Trump seems to view the world as dominated by three centres of coherent power: America, Russia and China. All share a similar commitment to national greatness and a ruthlessness in prosecuting their interests as they understand them. Trump's primary allegiance is to this club, where there is no appetite to challenge decisions taken by other members unless they are seen as a direct threat to national integrity. If this is correct, the outlook for Ukraine is poor and the future for Taiwan equally Cavaghan-PackThurloxton, Somerset Sir, With regard to the discussion of coalition support for Ukraine — whether of the willing or unwilling (letters, Aug 19) — I fear that a more apt description would be a 'coalition of the unable'.Jeffrey PrinceBelfast Sir, Anyone who thinks that Putin is going to enter into an agreement acceptable to Ukraine and Europe is clearly delulu ('We're delulu if we think new words should be resisted', Thunderer, Aug 19).Andrew NewmanLightwater, Surrey Sir, The US vice-president JD Vance and his family have ended their holiday. Has Mr Vance said thank you for the security, support and hospitality he received at public expense on his family holiday here yet?Richard JeffsBirmingham Sir, My recent experience unfortunately chimes entirely with that of Jenni Russell ('Crime is all too real on our meaner streets', comment, Aug 19). I have always been an early morning swimmer and I live close enough to the London Aquatics Centre that I can walk there. Even though I'm out on the streets of east London at 5.15am, I have never considered this a risk or been involved in any nasty altercations. However, in the past year, the end-of- the-night traffic has bled into my journey. Prostitutes and their pimps are now a regular sight, and a fortnight ago I tried to help a distraught young woman who was crouched in a doorway clad only in her T-shirt and underwear. No police or emergency services were around to aid her in her vulnerability. Walking through the shopping centre then, a deranged young man, eyes the size of dinner plates, approached me, shouting into my face that he was going to kill me. I am 63 and have decided that my early morning walking days are over. I've taken to the bike instead, despite the fact that I feel I'm putting my life at risk on the KerinLondon E7 Sir, It does not have to be all-or-nothing ('Ending two-child benefit cap hands £20,000 to big families', Aug 18). It would be financially pragmatic and socially beneficial to ease the benefit cap to three children. We could review this decision in a couple of years with a view to raising it to four. We need our country to live within its means while also supporting families in GrahamRadlett, Herts Sir, Libby Purves's mention of German respect for skilled manual workers (Aug 18; letters, Aug 19) reminds me of a British politician's shock at seeing it in action. The late Malcolm Wicks, when Labour lifelong learning minister, visited the BMW plant in Munich to look at its prestigious apprenticeship scheme. I was among a group of journalists accompanying him, and we arrived just as a class of mechanics was finishing a compulsory lesson in German literature. Wicks asked one young man at the end of the session why on earth motor apprentices were studying Goethe. 'We may be motor apprentices but we still have souls,' came the reply, in English. It still brings a KingstonUpper Milton, Somerset Sir, Libby Purves suggests that 'every humanities degree should devote one term to hands-on training in a tradeable skill' to 'understand the complex structures of modern life'. Likewise it should be a requirement for every councillor and MP to have worked for at least six months in private industry, to understand what drives economic BotsfordLondon W8 Sir, Like Gerald Witt, I too was subjected to a regime of Wednesday afternoon 'Practical studies'. I was offered enamelled jewellery-making. Having spotted a small forge in the corner of the workshop, I found it was for wrought iron work and gleefully signed up. A year later I owned a trivet (wobbly), a table lamp (less so) and a set of fire irons (toast-makers). I gained more sheer happiness from that smithing course than my three A-levels and am still making GreenOdiham, Hants Sir, Cindy Yu's article ('Learning languages helps us to unlock cultures', Aug 18) overlooks a vital point: speaking a second language also delays the onset of dementia symptoms by four to six years, according to a number of peer-reviewed studies. It is surely time for language learning to be made part of our public health ClaffeyLeicester Sir, When I was the manager at C&A in Cardiff the 1980s, we found the best way to deter known shoplifters was to talk to them as soon as they came in the store, as though they were a regular customer ('Meet and greet shoppers to deter thieves', Aug 18). The last thing they wanted was to be recognised. Some known thieves would travel between Cardiff and Reading, exchanging stolen stock at another C&A store for a cash refund. One particular lady had a rail company staff pass that allowed her free travel up and down the line: she would take garments from one store and try to return them to another that didn't sell that particular WilcockLlanblethian, Vale of Glamorgan Sir, The sooner we start calling shoplifting by its true name the better. It is theft, pure and simple, except when it is robbery when violence or the threat of violence is used. Perhaps shopkeepers should be provided with Tasers under the guise of Young KC20 Essex Street, London WC2 Sir, You report that a German zoo has been criticised for feeding surplus baboons to its big cats ('Zoos face up to a beastly dilemma', Aug 16). When I became curator of mammals at London Zoo in 1959 I was confronted with this problem of surplus animals, so I started the International Zoo Yearbook, which listed breeding successes at zoos all over the world so that, for example, if a zoo needed baboons they could get in touch with a zoo that had too many. This yearbook was published for decades before the internet made it redundant, and it must have saved the lives of many unfortunate surplus zoo animals. Of course, it is possible that today zoo animals are breeding so successfully that there are some species that cannot be found alternative homes. This is a new problem that now has to be faced. If zoos do not find a solution to this problem, they will find themselves losing popular support. Every zoo animal is meant to be cared for and protected by its owners, and killing one of them as food for the others is deeply MorrisZoologist, Athgarvan, Co Kildare Sir, As someone due to be promoted to grandparenthood in a few months' time, I was interested to read that hands-on Spanish grandparents are now drawing the line at being used for free childcare. Also interesting was your assumption that grandparents are automatically retired ('Sin Niñera', leading article, Aug 19). Many like me work full time: you can be sure that however besotted we become, an overtime tariff will apply to any contracted childcare FarrChair, Affinitas Education Sir, Dr Morris Charlton's belief that bats seldom hold up work (letter, Aug 19) does not fit with my experience. When my father passed away in 2020 we decided to rebuild the family home, and engaged a consultant to carry out an environmental impact assessment. He found a single bat dropping in the garage, and demanded a repeat survey after the next breeding season (April to September). No more droppings, £700 expense and a year John BurscoughBrigg, Lincs Sir, For the first time both our pairs of swallows are nesting for a third time. Do they know somehow that we are heading for an Indian summer?Edward HineNewark on Trent, Notts Sir, Nigel Farndale (Notebook, Aug 19) quotes some of his wife's letters from boarding school. In his autobiography Life's Rich Pageant, Arthur Marshall recalls that, when he was a housemaster at Oundle, he wrote regularly to his mother. One extract recorded how, after he had explained to two new parents that if their son fell ill the school would write every day to report progress, the mother said: 'Oh please don't bother about that. Just send us a postcard if he's dead.'Jon PettmanEastbourne

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store