Australian court rejects X Corp.'s appeal in child safety case, orders legal costs
Three federal court judges unanimously rejected X's appeal against a federal court decision in October last year that the company was obliged to respond to a notice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant on child abuse material being shared on X, which is incorporated in Texas.
The judges also ordered X to pay the commissioner's legal costs. Inman Grant's office describes itself as the world's first government agency dedicated to keeping people safe online.
Inman Grant has driven world-first legislation that will ban Australian children younger than 16 from social media platforms including X from December.
The federal court case goes back to early 2023, when Inman Grant asked some of the world's largest technology companies to report on what they were doing about child abuse material appearing on their platforms.
A reporting notice, issued under Australia's Online Safety Act, was sent to Twitter Inc., incorporated in Delaware, in February that year.
Twitter merged with X the following month.
X arguments against complying with Inman Grant's order included that Twitter no longer existed as a legal entity and that X did not carry its predecessor's regulatory obligations in Australia.
Inman Grant, a former Twitter employee, welcomed Thursday's ruling.
'This judgment confirms the obligations to comply with Australian regulations still apply, regardless of a foreign company's merger with another foreign company,' she said in a statement.
She said her agency would continue enforcing the Online Safety Act and 'holding all tech companies to account without fear or favor, ensuring they comply with the laws of Australia.'
'Without meaningful transparency, we cannot hold technology companies accountable,' she said.
X lawyer Justin Quill said he had not yet read the appeals court judges' reasons and could not comment on the possibility of a High Court appeal.
The High Court only hears around 10% of appeal applications, so the federal court full-bench decision could be final in X's case.
In 2023, Inman Grant's office fined X 610, 500 Australian dollars ($385,000) for failing to fully explain how it tackled child exploitation content. X's response was considered incomplete or misleading.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TSLA: Tesla Approves $29 Billion For Musk Amid Falling Sales, Legal Chaos
Aug 4 - Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) is not shy about betting big on Elon Musk. The company just approved a fresh 96 million-share compensation package for its CEO, worth around $29 billion. It's all about keeping Musk locked in, especially after a Delaware court tossed out his original $50 billion pay deal from 2018, calling it unfair to shareholders. Now, Musk is fighting that ruling in court. But in the meantime, Tesla's board put together a new plan. The shares won't vest unless Musk stays in a top executive role through 2027, and even then, they come with a five-year holding period. Tesla also says there won't be any double-dipping if his old package gets reinstated. All this is happening while Tesla faces real challenges. Sales are down, the Cybertruck hasn't delivered, and competition from legacy automakers like General Motors (NYSE:GM), Hyundai (HYMTF), and BMW (BMWYY) is heating up. On top of that, Musk's political moves haven't helped Tesla's brand loyalty. Still, this new award could help steady the ship, at least if Musk sticks around. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's $29B award may raise board independence concerns
Tesla (TSLA) approved a "good faith" award valued at roughly $29 billion for CEO Elon Musk. Yahoo Finance Senior Transportation Reporter Pras Subramanian discusses the special award and what it means for investors as uncertainty around the CEO's pay package looms. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. Tesla's board has approved Elon Musk's massive new $29 billion stock award. Will that be enough to keep the CEO's focus aimed at the EV giant? Joining me now, Yahoo Finance senior Auto's reporter Pras Subramanian. This is less Mhm. than the initial pay package that was approved and then rejected by Delaware court. So what do we know about this one? Sounds like it's going to address some of the issues about his focus and it requires him to be there for a few years and devote a certain amount of time to the business and that's sort of what people like Dan Ives are asking about uh, in terms of what they want from Elon Musk going forward as they the company approaches critical phase with robo taxis and Optimus robots and all sorts of cyber cabs and all these things happening. So, I think it's addressing those those key issues. Still a lot of money. I mean, I don't know any CEO's making that much kind of that much money in the span of three, four, three to five years. But yes, it is significantly less than that original pay package that's still tied up in in the court system still to this day. Um, and they said that they if one of those two gets approved, it wouldn't like be a double dip situation where it would be one of the either. You couldn't get both. So that's going to address that concern, too. So, Okay. What about the sort of ongoing questions about the board independence at Tesla? Those, those haven't really gone away, right? Yeah, I mean the board's confident that almost was going to be okay with this package. Like, well, yeah, he's on the board. He's sort of his friends with everyone there. Uh, Robin Denholm, the chair is something that he someone supposedly hand picked. I mean, so you have to ask that question. Still is it still in play as a whether how independent is this board? There's only one member who's independent. Um, so it's really interesting to me. But Right. And there's also, of course, the cognitive distance between this headline, which, yes, we know was sort of a retroactive pay package and the fact that the stock is down 25% this year. Right. And then the auto the core auto business is, is, is slipping quarter after quarter and there's no indication that's improving. Yes, we have the new Model Y out now, but it was out last quarter and it was still sort of down a bit. So, there needs to be something happening. We're not going to see that cheaper EV not till after the tax credit goes away. So, a lot of question marks here, this is a pretty big pay package, but I guess for some, if you're a Tesla investor, there's kind of some certainty here with what Musk is going to be doing in his, in his time with the company. Right. Yes, to some degree.
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
In Ecuador, environmentalists worry Noboa is unwinding nation's green reputation
BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — When Ecuadorians voted two years ago to block oil drilling in Yasuni National Park, it was a triumph for environmentalists seeking to protect one of the most biodiverse places on Earth. And it was in character for a country that was first to enshrine the 'rights of nature' in its constitution and is home to parts of the Amazon rain forest and the Galápagos Islands. But recent moves by President Daniel Noboa have alarmed environmentalists and Indigenous leaders who say the country's green reputation — and its protections for civil society — are unraveling. Noboa's administration has moved to scrap the country's independent Environment Ministry. It's pushing legislation ostensibly aimed at choking off illegal mining, but which critics fear will devastate nonprofits. The National Assembly — pressed by Noboa — approved a law last month allowing private and foreign entities to co‑manage conservation zones that critics say weakens protections and threatens Indigenous land rights. And Ecuador just signed a new oil deal with Peru that could accelerate drilling in sensitive areas. Natalia Greene, an environmental advocate with the Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature, said Noboa's decision to fold the Environment Ministry into the Ministry of Energy and Mines will speed up mining just as Ecuador is grappling with a surge in illegal gold mining tied to organized crime. She called it 'like putting the wolf in charge of the sheep.' 'The government's intention is very clear — to be a machine gun of extractivism,' she said. Noboa has defended the ministry moves and other changes as necessary to cut costs, reduce bureaucracy and address Ecuador's financial crisis. Officials argue that consolidating ministries will make decision‑making more efficient. Neither the Ministry of Energy and Mines nor Noboa's office responded to questions from The Associated Press. Indigenous rights at risk In July, Peru and Ecuador signed a deal for Ecuador's state oil company to sell crude directly to Petroperu and link its southern Amazon reserves to Peru's Norperuano pipeline, with drilling eyed for January 2026. Environmental groups say it could fast‑track drilling in sensitive areas while skirting safeguards and Indigenous consultation. Peru's Achuar, Wampis and Chapra nations denounced the plan in a public letter, saying it would gut long-standing protections that require communities be consulted before projects move forward on their lands. They warned the pipeline already averages 146 spills a year and that expanding it would be 'a grave threat to the Amazon and to Indigenous livelihoods.' 'They are going to violate all our rights to enter our territories and extract the resources they want,' said Nemo Guiquita, a Waorani leader with the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of the Ecuadorian Amazon. She said Indigenous communities fear a surge of oil and mining projects across ancestral lands, threatening both ecosystems and livelihoods. 'There will be a weakening of environmental protection,' she said. 'There will be a lot of deforestation, contamination of rivers and destruction of the ecosystem, which is vital for our existence as Indigenous peoples.' Ricardo Buitrón, president of the Quito‑based environmental group Accion Ecologica, noted that the changes come just months after Ecuadorians voted to keep oil in the ground in Yasuni, a decision the government has yet to fully enforce. 'We have gone back decades,' he said. 'A development model is being prioritized that does not care about protecting ecosystems, but about extracting natural resources to the maximum.' Fears that proposed law will harm non-governmental organizations The proposed law that has alarmed nonprofits is formally called the Organic Law for the Control of Irregular Capital Flows. But activists call it the 'anti-NGO' law, saying it could impose heavy burdens on nonprofits and force many to close. The measure applies to more than 71,000 organizations nationwide, giving them six months to re‑register with the government, submit detailed financial records and disclose foreign funding sources. The government says the law is needed to prevent money laundering and political destabilization. Critics warn it could instead silence dissent by placing organizations under sweeping controls. Noboa submitted the bill to the National Assembly on July 29, giving lawmakers until Aug. 28 to act before it automatically becomes law. 'This has been hard for us,' Guiquita said. 'Practically, Indigenous organizations live mostly from donations and NGOs. The government is weakening us in every space.' 'It represents a threat because they could dissolve us under any pretext,' Buitrón said. 'This reminds us of what we already lived through a decade ago, when they tried to shut down some organizations in the country.' Regional and global stakes Kevin Koenig of Amazon Watch, a U.S.-based nonprofit that advocates for Indigenous rights and environmental protection in the Amazon, said the country's changes are part of a wider rollback. 'We are seeing a sweeping package of regressive reforms that are rolling back environmental protections, Indigenous rights guarantees, and threatening basic civil liberties like the freedom of speech and assembly,' he said. 'What it suggests is the massive expansion of oil and mining, particularly in the Amazon region.' Koenig said the changes send troubling signals ahead of COP30, the United Nations climate summit set for Brazil later this year. Similar trends are unfolding in Peru and El Salvador, where governments have limited environmental oversight, and in Brazil, where licensing for Amazon projects has been weakened. Mobilizing resistance Civil society groups are mobilizing against the changes. Greene said organizations have reactivated the Asamblea Nacional Socioambiental, a national coalition of environmental and social movements, and are planning legal challenges, demonstrations and appeals to international bodies. Many fear Ecuador's role as a global green pioneer is unraveling. 'Our only crime here has been protecting our territory, protecting our traditions, protecting our way of life,' Guiquita said. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
