Income-Allianz deal timeline: A recap of the scuppered S$2.2 billion sale
Here is a recap of what happened:
Jul 17, 2024: Allianz offered to buy a majority stake in Income Insurance for around 1.5 billion euros, or S$2.2 billion.
Allianz said it would offer S$40.58 per share for 51 per cent of the shares in Income Insurance. The German insurer projected that Income could return some S$1.85 billion in cash to its shareholders within the first three years after the transaction's completion.
At the time, 72.8 per cent of Income was owned by National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) Enterprise Co-operative Limited, with the rest held by institutional and retail investors.
Income had been a public non-listed company limited by shares since a 2022 corporatisation exercise that transformed the insurance business of NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative into Income Insurance.
Jul 23-Aug 5, 2024: The deal raised questions over whether the proposed sale would be at odds with NTUC labour unions' aim to provide affordable insurance.
On Jul 30, NTUC Enterprise said that Income's social enterprise model alone is not sufficient to shoulder growth in Singapore's competitive insurance environment.
On Aug 5, NTUC's secretary-general Ng Chee Meng and president K Thanaletchimi released a joint statement explaining that Income needed adequate capital to remain financially stable. 'As a shareholder, NTUC Enterprise will continue to support Income. But it cannot do so alone,' they said.
Aug 6, 2024: The issue was debated in Parliament, with Members of Parliament raising questions about the affordability and accessibility of insurance for the mass market.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) expected Income to fulfil its obligations to all policyholders under the terms of its existing insurance contracts and would hold Income and Allianz to these commitments, said Second Minister for Finance and MAS board member Chee Hong Tat in Parliament.
Chee also said that MAS' regulations and guidance require insurers to maintain sufficient capital reserves and treat customers of participating policies fairly.
After Aug 6, 2024: The Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) continued with due diligence and inquired further into the proposed deal. MAS provided the ministry with more details including Income's capital optimisation plan, as the regulator felt it could be relevant to the ministry's views on the deal. MCCY had not seen this information earlier.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Oct 14, 2024: The Allianz-Income deal was called off in Parliament, as the Singapore government assessed that it was 'not in the public interest' for the proposed transaction to proceed in its form.
'Our concern is only over the terms and structure of this specific transaction, particularly in the context of the preceding corporatisation exercise,' said Culture, Community and Youth Minister Edwin Tong in a statement. The government was still open to any new arrangement which Income may wish to pursue, whether with Allianz or other partners, as long as the concerns were fully addressed, he added.
In a Facebook post, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong also said that the government's concerns were over the structure and terms of the offer, but that it remained open 'to a new deal that Income may pursue with Allianz or other partners, so long as our concerns are fully addressed'.
Oct 16, 2024: Parliament passed an amendment to the Insurance Act, requiring MAS to consider MCCY's views when approving transactions involving insurers with cooperative roots.
NTUC deputy secretary-general Desmond Tan revealed that NTUC's central committee was unaware of the capital extraction plan until Oct 14.
Nov 14, 2024: Income and Allianz said in a bourse filing that discussions over the deal for a majority stake acquisition in the Singapore insurer were still ongoing, even after the government veto.
Dec 16, 2024: Allianz officially withdrew its offer for a stake in Income, citing respect for the Singapore government's decision and emphasising its financial discipline.
Both Income and NTUC Enterprise acknowledged the withdrawal and mentioned that they will explore other options to strengthen the insurer's financial resilience.
Apr 26, 2025: Workers' Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh resurfaced the failed Income-Allianz deal at the party's second election rally, saying that no People's Action Party (PAP) labour MP had filed questions or spoke during the debate in Parliament when the issue was tabled.
'Elected PAP MPs who champion NTUC... should fight hard in Parliament when NTUC issues are raised, particularly issues that Singaporeans are concerned about,' Singh said.
Apr 27, 2025: Labour chief Ng, who stood as a candidate for Jalan Kayu SMC, addressed at a PAP rally how the Allianz-Income deal was done in 'good faith' and complied with legal regulations.
'In NTUC, we will do our best, and sometimes I'm sorry that it's not good enough. But we will learn the right lessons and we will do better,' he said.
Apr 27, 2025: Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that he did not blame Ng or the labour party for the Income-Allianz deal that fell through. In a PAP rally speech, he flagged how the WP had abstained from voting on a Bill to amend a law that would allow the government to block the deal.
Apr 28, 2025: Speaking to media, Singh said that SM Lee sidestepped the point he had raised about the absence of PAP labour MPs weighing in on the matter. While six PAP MPs and one WP MP had raised questions, the ratio of PAP MPs to WP MPs was about nine to one, he explained.
Apr 28, 2025: At a WP rally, Harpreet Singh, who was a candidate in the party's Punggol GRC team, sought accountability from the PAP regarding Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong's involvement in the Income-Allianz deal.
Apr 29, 2025: MAS chairman and DPM Gan clarified that the focus of the Income-Allianz deal was on the transfer of ownership and not capital extraction when MAS saw the proposal in July. He spoke on the sidelines of a walkabout in Punggol GRC and addressed the issue alongside the rest of the PAP slate for the constituency. PM Wong was also present.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Wary US diners shun restaurants, raising prospect of boost for supermarkets, food-delivery firms
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Visits to grocery stores have steadily outpaced those to restaurants and bars in the US. WASHINGTON – Cash-conscious consumers in the United States choosing to eat in rather than dine out have raised the prospect of an upturn in earnings for supermarkets and food delivery firms, according to data, analysts and company executives. US President Donald Trump's tariff policies have added to economic uncertainty, increased the likelihood of stubborn inflation and made consumers question whether restaurants are worth the expense. 'I eat much more at home because first of all eating out is way more expensive lately, and quality is not always guaranteed,' Ms Marilena Graziano, a Florence-based teacher, told Reuters. Dutch retailer Ahold Delhaize, owner of the Food Lion and Giant stores in the United States, said earlier in August that it was increasing its offers tailored to low-cost eating in. 'We have solutions for customers to have a very affordable meal of US$2.50 (S$3.20) per person at home with the family,' Ahold's chief executive Frans Muller said in an interview in August . 'We have increased a lot of that proposition in our stores.' The shift hints at a revival of the boom in eating at home during the Covid-19 pandemic when people could not go out. Home delivery companies such as Just made record sales, although they struggled once lockdown restrictions were lifted. Figures from Rabobank and Eurostat show that food retail sales volumes adjusted for inflation in supermarkets, hypermarkets and similar stores grew by 1.5 per cent in the Eurozone between January and May. That compares with 0.1 per cent growth over the same period in 2024 . For food and beverage services, such as restaurants and bars, the metric fell by 0.3 per cent. Growth in 2024 was flat at 0 per cent. Restaurants lag The inflation-adjusted figures suggest that sales at supermarkets are recovering faster than at restaurants, especially for routine weekday meals, Rabobank's consumer foods sector analyst Maria Castroviejo told Reuters. Ms Castroviejo cited the rising popularity of grab-and-go meals, salads, wraps, and sandwiches. 'This offer has increased and improved a lot and we know that this is taking away some demands from certain foodservice players,' she said. Delivery Hero, which owns Glovo and Foodpanda, said that consumers go out less during times of economic hardship, but will order in as a cheaper alternative. A survey of more than 5,000 US adults commissioned by Hellofresh, a German meal-kit maker that makes most of its revenue in North America, showed 93 per cent of them expect to cook as much as in 2024 or more in 2026 . Among those who plan to cook more at home in 2026 , more than three-quarters say the economy is a factor. Visits to grocery stores have steadily outpaced those to restaurants and bars in the US, data from foot traffic tracking firm showed. The data showed visits to grocery stores grew by 1.3 per cent year-on-year in June, while they fell 0.4 per cent in the same months for restaurants. Ms Jenny Russmann, who works for an international organisation in Vienna, is among those using supermarkets more. 'I switched to eating at home a bit over a month ago due to wanting to just be healthier and especially also costs,' she said. In Milan, Ms Chiara Schiavoni, employed at the regional administration, said she prefers to eat at home as prices rise and restaurants' portions shrink in Italy's financial capital. 'I get €7 (S$10.50) food vouchers at work and I can't even buy a sandwich, which costs around €9 in restaurants around my office,' she said. 'On the other hand, I can use them in supermarkets where all in all it's more convenient.' REUTERS
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Trade partners grow restless waiting for Trump's tariff breaks
[LONDON] UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared at a Jaguar Land Rover factory in May that his world-leading trade deal with US President Donald Trump included a cut in US tariffs on British steel to zero. More than three months later, steel lobbyist Peter Brennan was still waiting for that relief to become reality. Brennan, director of trade and economic policy at industry body UK Steel, said most members had seen US orders fall because of the uncertainty over America's 25 per cent import tax. One producer that makes particularly price-competitive products said that they'd be out of business by year-end if tariffs are not reduced to zero, he added. 'Concern is growing that finalising the deal on steel has fallen down the priority list both for the UK and US governments,' Brennan said last week. 'The will to close the deal may well be faltering on both sides.' Frustration and economic losses like those in the UK are growing in Japan, the European Union and South Korea. Those three made similar announcements over the past month: that Washington granted them leniency on auto exports in the haggling over the level of Trump's across-the-board tariffs that took effect Aug 7. But for the trio of car export powerhouses, which, unlike the UK face a 50 per cent duty on their steel and aluminium, the wait for Trump's concession continues while an American levy justified on national security grounds on imported Toyotas, BMWs, Hyundais and others remains at a crippling 25 per cent. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'We are continuing to see damage, the bleeding hasn't stopped,' Japan's chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Friday in a reference to the country's car industry. 'We want the US to sign the executive order as soon as possible.' Spokesmen for the White House, the US Trade Representative's office and the Commerce Department did not reply to requests for comment. 'Forever negotiations' It was three weeks ago that EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen shook hands with Trump in Scotland over what she called an 'all-inclusive' tariff of 15 per cent that officials in Brussels later understood to be a ceiling that would also apply to cars. VDA, which represents Germany's car industry, is pressing for fast implementation to alleviate a 'considerable burden' on manufacturers and their suppliers. 'The deal between the EU and the US has not yet brought any clarity or improvement for the German automotive industry,' VDA president Hildegard Müller said on Thursday (Aug 14). 'The costs incurred run into the billions and continue to rise.' Cecilia Malmstrom, the former European commissioner for trade who's now a non-resident fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, cautioned that any delays may be purely administrative. But 'if nothing happens, there will be huge pressure on the European Commission to retaliate or to act in some way, especially from carmakers in Germany, Italy, France, Sweden and others', she said. 'There are so many other things that are vague in the EU-US deal, and in the others as well, so it is likely we will see forever negotiations and a lot of filibustering.' At a press briefing on Aug 14, European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said that Washington and Brussels are finalising a joint statement. 'The US has made political commitments to us in this respect and we look forward to them being implemented,' he said. Japan's uncertainty Less than a week before the EU's announcement, the US and Japan clinched a surprise deal on Jul 22 that lowered across-the-board tariffs and car levies to 15 per cent. So far, the broader duties have been implemented, but the added tax on autos remains at 25 per cent. Officials in Asia's No 2 economy are waiting for an executive order from Trump to bring down the car levies, as well as an official directive, like the EU already received, to clarify that the universal tariffs don't stack on top of existing duties. Akazawa has mentioned how a Japanese carmaker is losing 100 million yen (S$870,500) every hour due to the tariffs. Last month, Nissan Motor said that it foresaw a 300 billion yen hit from the lower tariff rate, down from a previous estimate of 450 billion yen. But chief executive officer Ivan Espinosa has warned of the difficulties in giving an accurate forecast as long as it's unclear when the tariffs will take effect and in what way. Akazawa flew to the US earlier this month to confirm that the US will be adjusting its executive order soon to remove the stacking and pay back overcharges on tariffs. Neither has yet to materialise. Hyundai, Kia Facing similar questions is South Korea, which announced a trade agreement with Washington on Jul 31. That pact would impose a 15 per cent tariff on imports to the US, including autos, alongside a US$350 billion Korean investment pledge focused on shipbuilding, and US$100 billion in energy purchases. The 15 per cent universal tariff took effect earlier this month under Trump's order, but like Japan, the sectoral auto tariff remains at 25 per cent. While South Korea's exports overall have stayed resilient in the first half of the year, thanks to front-loading by companies anticipating higher US tariffs, the value of car shipments to the US fell nearly 17 per cent, and steel exports dropped more than 11 per cent, trade data showed. South Korea's top automaker Hyundai Motor and affiliate Kia could face as much as US$5 billion in additional costs this year even under the new 15 per cent auto tariff, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Joanna Chen. While avoiding a 25 per cent levy will save more than US$3 billion, the duty squeezes margins amid softer demand and tighter subsidies, intensifying competition with Japanese automakers, Chen said. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung's planned summit with Trump on Aug 25, their first meeting since Lee took office in June, will test the durability of the US$350 billion investment pledge, as well as their alliance over sensitive issues such as defence spending, US troop levels and North Korea policy. 'Just overwhelmed' For Starmer and the UK, most aspects of the pact have now come into force, including a 10 per cent so-called reciprocal rate that's the lowest among all US trading partners. Yet Trump's 25 per cent tax on British steel still chafes amid the delays in cutting it. Among the issues to resolve is the US's insistence that steel should be melted and poured in the UK in order to qualify. That's a requirement which Tata Steel UK, one of the country's biggest producers, is no longer able to fulfil after closing down its blast furnace last year. Its new electric arc furnace is not due to be ready until late 2027. People familiar with the government's thinking are cautiously optimistic that they might be able to secure exemptions to the melt-and-pour rule, whereby steel imported from certain European countries before being further processed in the UK is allowed to qualify as British. 'It's not for lack of trying by the UK government,' said Tim Rutter, director of public affairs at Tata Steel. 'We hear that US departments are just overwhelmed.' A spokesperson for the UK Department for Business and Trade said officials will continue to work with Washington to implement the deal as soon as possible. Late on Friday in Washington, the US Customs and Border Protection agency issued new inclusions to steel and aluminium product lists for tariffs that take effect Monday, with some of the guidance affecting imports from the UK. Japan's Akazawa acknowledged that even with the UK, actual implementation of key parts of their deal took 54 days. As a result, he's said that it's 'not bad' if an executive order from the US comes by around mid-September. 'It's just further confirmation that negotiations never really end,' especially with more US tariffs coming for sectors including pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, said Sam Lowe, a partner at Flint Global in London and head of its trade and market access practice. BLOOMBERG
CNA
2 days ago
- CNA
NDR 2025: WP urges government to engage widely, explore all options amid global uncertainty
SINGAPORE: In response to Prime Minister Lawrence Wong's National Day Rally speech on Sunday (Aug 17), the Workers' Party (WP) urged the government to "engage widely and explore all options" amid global economic uncertainty. The National Day Rally speech is widely seen as the most important political speech of the year. From artificial intelligence (AI) to a new traineeship scheme, Mr Wong touched on several subjects during the speech. In a statement early on Monday morning, the opposition party cited the advance release of the Manpower Ministry's labour force report for the second quarter of this year that said the uncertainty is expected to persist in the coming months and may weigh on hiring and wage growth. "Against this cautious backdrop, the Workers' Party urges the government to engage widely and explore all solutions tabled in good faith, including previously untapped ones," said the party. "Singapore should leave no stone unturned in our collective efforts to build a truly resilient nation for the future and keep our Singapore flag flying high." It said the government should "tackle present concerns" for businesses and employees, including rising rental costs, skills-related unemployment and the "slow rate of real income growth" of 0.7 per cent per year over the past five years. It reiterated its manifesto proposal that JTC Corporation should expand its market share for industrial space and continue offering low-rent options at different price-value points for small- and medium-sized enterprises alongside its private sector-run facilities. The party also called on the government to "urgently track and regularly publish" underemployment measures, as well as to establish a statutory minimum wage. "We agree with the approach of improving jobs matching efforts for Singaporeans, and ask that the relevant organisations accelerate the setting up of this programme with the economic uncertainty ahead," said the WP. "In our experience, many residents referred to e2i often receive career counselling, but not the direct job-matching support they truly need," the party added, referring to the National Trades Union Congress' Employment and Employability Institute. In the 2025 General Election, the Workers' Party retained its 10 seats in parliament by holding on to Aljunied GRC, Sengkang GRC and Hougang SMC. It will also have two Non-Constituency Members of Parliament in the next parliament. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Amid concerns over the impact of AI on jobs, Mr Wong assured Singaporeans that they remain the central focus of the country's economic strategy. While technology will lead to some roles evolving and others disappearing, Mr Wong said new jobs will also emerge. The WP said that while AI and new technologies will help businesses, they will also "alter the employment landscape permanently, leaving many Singaporeans behind". It reiterated its proposal in its manifesto for more collaboration between the ministries of education and manpower, to ensure that Singapore's school curriculum aligns with "evolving needs". Singapore should implement "skill-demand feedback loops" from industries for the design of the curriculum, funding for "structural skill-gap areas" and career guidance. "This targeted approach ensures that our education system can provide students with the knowledge and skills needed to achieve high-value career pathways both domestically and globally," the WP said. It called for an increase in the number of allied educators, which can lead to "a meaningful reduction" in class sizes. The party also urged a shift away from high-stakes examinations and towards continual assessment and a through-train approach. "Ultimately, our goal is to create an education system that develops well-rounded individuals with the confidence and capabilities to succeed in an ever-evolving world," it added. The party also called for improvements to social safety nets, including the introduction of redundancy insurance and the mandating of retrenchment benefits for people who are laid off from companies with at least 25 employees. In his speech, Mr Wong also announced a new government-funded traineeship programme. It will provide training opportunities for graduates from the Institute of Technical Education, polytechnics and universities. The scheme will kick off with a "more focused roll-out" and will be scaled up if the economy worsens, he said. The WP said the programme should be designed with safeguards to ensure that state-sponsored internships and apprenticeships are not used by firms as a "source of cheaper, subsidised labour". "There should be clear performance metrics and a transparent commitment from participating companies to consider trainees for full-time employment once the training period ends," it added. All trainees should also receive basic workplace protections, said the WP, including paid sick leave and safe working conditions.
