
German Chancellor Merz goes into summer in crisis mode – DW – 07/14/2025
In the final answer of his 30-minute interview with Germany's public broadcaster ARD on Sunday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz struck a clearer note than in any other part of the discussion: "I have not liked what the Israeli government has been doing in the Gaza Strip for many weeks now." He had also expressed this view in several meetings and telephone calls with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he insisted.
The chancellor said he hoped that the Europeans, together with the US, could bring about a solution to the conflict "that ultimately leads to a two-state solution." The Palestinians have a "right" to a place where they can live, he said. "The way things are going at the moment is unacceptable." Merz did not discuss the fate of the last remaining Israeli hostages in Hamas captivity, or the tens of thousands of Palestinians killed by Israel in Gaza, nor was he asked to.
It was day 69 of Merz's term as chancellor, and nominally day 2 of the German parliament's summer recess. The Bundestag is currently not scheduled to reconvene until September 8 — another two months.
Merz and his government had hoped to usher in a spirit of renewal in Germany by now, which is what he had been promising since shortly after the federal elections at the end of February. In recent days, Merz's loyal supporters have been trying to paint a picture of success, insisting that the economy is showing positive signs, and pointing to the decline in the number of refugees coming to Germany.
But there can be little talk of renewal before the summer vacation, at least not in domestic politics, given the coalition crisis that nearly erupted on Friday. Merz's coalition had wanted the parliament to elect three new judges to the Constitutional Court, Germany's highest court, which requires a two-thirds majority in the Bundestag.
According to accounts by many of those involved, Jens Spahn, leader of the CDU parliamentary group, had promised the Social Democrats (SPD) the CDU's support weeks ago. Yet there was opposition, with dozens of MPs outraged by statements made by one of the candidates to the court. Shortly before the plenary session, the coalition partners withdrew the topic from the agenda, leaving the question unresolved as summer recess arrives.
This is much more than just a row over a personnel decision. The larger issue is how much power Merz and Spahn can exert over members of their conservative bloc in parliament. Consequently, nearly half of the ARD interview focused on this unprecedented incident in German history.
The chancellor referred to each member's freedom to make certain decisions according to their own conscience. Then he sidestepped all subsequent questions, citing upcoming consultations, internal deliberations, dialogue within the coalition, or unresolved issues. Interestingly, Merz did not mention a single active CDU politician by name in the entire interview. And only afterwards, in a shorter ARD roundtable discussion broadcast only online, did he complain about the "wave of outrage" in the past few days, as well as "untruths, unbelievable malice, unbelievable personal insults."
Merz came also under fire again this Sunday — not from parliament, but from Germany's president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier. Hours before the chancellor's interview on ARD, Steinmeier made a statement in an interview on ZDF, Germany's other national public broadcaster.
Steinmeier said he believes that the coalition between the CDU and the SPD has "damaged itself" as a result of the failure to elect the judges. To limit any further damage to Germany's highest court, he added, the Bundestag should take up the "decisions in the immediate future." "If this doesn't happen, we would have cause for concern." Failure to act quickly would endanger the rule of law, said Steinmeier, pointing to the current situation in the US. Neither the interviewer nor the chancellor responded to Steinmeier's statement.
On Friday, the coalition parties set September as the next date for voting on the three judges. The Greens, on the other hand, are pushing for a new vote in a special Bundestag session this week, something Steinmeier signaled he would also prefer. Merz, however, showed no signs of moving in this direction. "The whole thing is overblown," he said. Adding, we will come back to it later. "Next time, we'll do better." But when?
Why did this dramatic Friday cause such a stir and prompt criticism of the coalition in the media? It might be because the new chancellor's first day in office also showed signs of discord in his coalition. Much to the surprise of political observers, and for the first time in the country's history, the chancellor failed to get the required majority in the first round of voting in the Bundestag, normally a formality. This crisis has overshadowed whatever the government has achieved since then.
Meanwhile, as Merz pointed out in Sunday's interview, there are huge reform projects pending for the second half of the year. His coalition plans to reform the social security systems covering health, welfare and pensions, something the CDU and the SPD do not always see eye to eye on. Merz says the coalition acknowledges "that we… have to reform," and work on this is "in full swing."
This could become even more difficult following President Donald Trump's announcement this weekend that the US would impose 30% tariffs on all imports from the EU, starting on August 1. This does not bode well for the German economy, as the US is Germany's most important trading partner. Merz told ARD that the tariffs will "cut to the bone." The EU must now show unity, Merz said, and "ensure that tariffs of this magnitude do not come into effect." Merz visited Trump in early June and warned against such trade barriers, among other things.
It seems very unlikely that any of this will happen before the beginning of the eight-week summer recess. Merz's spokesperson has already announced several meetings for Friday, including trips to Munich and London. On July 18, he will answer questions at an annual summer press conference in Berlin, for the first time as chancellor. For his predecessors Angela Merkel and Olaf Scholz this was usually the last public appearance before going on vacation.While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
an hour ago
- DW
Court rejects German responsibility in Yemen drone case – DW – 07/15/2025
The Constitutional Court has ruled that Berlin is not in breach of international law over US drone attacks guided from Germany. The case was brought by two Yemenis whose relatives were killed in a 2012 US drone mission. The German Federal Constitutional Court ruled on Tuesday that Germany did not violate international law by failing to strictly monitor or prevent US drone attacks carried out with the help of signals from the Ramstein air base. The ruling comes after two Yemenis who say they had family members killed in a US drone attack in their home country more than 10 years go invoked the right to life and physical integrity enshrined in the German constitution in a complaint to the court. The court did state that Germany had a certain obligation to protect basic human rights even of foreigners living abroad. However, it said it had been unable to establish that the US had employed unjustificable criteria in its differentiation between military targets and civilians in its attack. The court also ruled that any such attack would have to have a sufficient connection to German state authority for the obligation to hold, something that it said could not be claimed in this case. The two Yemeni men bringing the case, Ahmed and Khalid bin Ali Jaber, said they lost some of their relatives in a US drone strike on the village of Khashamir in 2012 that occurred during a wedding meal of a male family member. They argued that Germany held partial responsibility for the attack, as the drone mission used signals relayed from the Ramstein base, situated near the city of Kaiserslautern in the southwest. The two men were supported in their case by the Berlin-based European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), which has said: "Without the data that flows through Ramstein, the US cannot fly its combat drones in Yemen." The case has been before the courts for more than 10 years, being initially rejected in 2015 before a higher administrative court in the city Münster in 2019 ordered the German government to investigate the legality of the US use of the Ramstein airbase for such attacks. That ruling was then overturned by a federal court. The German Defense Ministry has argued that Berlin has received repeated assurances from Washington that no drones are launched, controlled or commanded from Germany and that US forces have adhered to international law in their actions. For years, the US has carried out drone attacks on suspected militants from the terrorist group al-Qaeda in Yemen. More recently, it has also targeted Iran-backed Houthi rebels in the country, who have been disrupting shipping in the region in attacks they say are in support of Palestinians amid Israel's Gaza.


Local Germany
3 hours ago
- Local Germany
German court to rule on claim over US strikes in Yemen
The case is being brought by two Yemeni men, Ahmed and Khalid bin Ali Jaber, who lost members of their family in a US drone strike on the village of Khashamir in 2012. The survivors say they were there for a wedding of a male family member and eating dinner when they heard the buzz of a drone and then the boom of missile attacks that claimed multiple lives. A ruling in favour of the plaintiffs could have ground breaking implications regarding Germany's responsibility towards third countries in international conflicts. The two men, supported by the Berlin-based European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), argue that Germany is partly responsible for the attack because the strike was aided by signals relayed from the Ramstein base in the west of the country. "Without the data that flows through Ramstein, the US cannot fly its combat drones in Yemen," according to the ECCHR. "The German government must put an end to the use of this base -- otherwise the government is making itself complicit in the deaths of innocent civilians," said Andreas Schueller, programme director for international crimes at the NGO. The plaintiffs first took their case to court in 2014, arguing that Germany had a responsibility to ensure the US military was respecting international law in using the Ramstein base. 'Trusting dialogue' The case was initially thrown out, before the higher administrative court in Muenster ruled in favour of the plaintiffs in 2019. However, the government appealed and a higher court overturned the decision in 2020, arguing that German diplomatic efforts were enough to ensure Washington was adhering to international law. Advertisement In a hearing scheduled for Tuesday morning, the constitutional court must now decide what conditions are necessary for those affected abroad to sue the German state for the protection of their right to life, according to the ECCHR. This includes whether data transmission alone is enough of a connection to German territory for Germany to be held responsible. Ahead of the latest proceedings, which opened in December 2024, the German defence ministry said Berlin was "in an ongoing and trusting dialogue" with the United States about its activities at Ramstein. The government has repeatedly obtained assurances that drones are not launched, controlled or commanded from Germany and that US forces are acting lawfully, the ministry said. Washington has for years launched drone strikes targeting suspected Al-Qaeda militants in Yemen, an impoverished country that has been torn by fierce fighting between its beleaguered Saudi-backed government and Iran-backed rebels. READ ALSO: German military leaders re-examine reliance on US-made weapons


Int'l Business Times
6 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Divided EU Weighs Action Against Israel Over Gaza War
EU foreign ministers on Tuesday will discuss a raft of options for action against Israel over the war in Gaza -- but likely will not agree on any. The bloc's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has put forward 10 potential steps after Israel was found to have breached a cooperation deal between the two sides on human rights grounds. The measures range from suspending the entire accord or curbing trade ties to sanctioning Israeli ministers, imposing an arms embargo and halting visa-free travel. But despite growing anger over the devastation in Gaza, EU states remain divided over how to tackle Israel and diplomats say there appears to be no critical mass for any move. "I was asked to give the inventory of the options that could be taken and it's up to the member states to discuss what do we do with these options," Kallas said Monday. The tone of discussions will be shaped strongly by how Israel is implementing a promise to the EU to improve humanitarian access to Gaza. Kallas said Thursday she had struck a deal with her Israeli counterpart, Gideon Saar, to open more entry points and allow in more food. Gaza's two million residents are facing dire humanitarian conditions as Israel has severely limited aid during its devastating war with Palestinian militant group Hamas. "We see some good signs of more trucks getting in," Kallas said Monday. "But of course we know that this is not enough and we need to push more (so) that the implementation of what we have agreed also happens on the ground." At a meeting of EU and neighbouring countries in Brussels on Monday, Jordanian foreign minister Ayman Safadi said the situation in Gaza remained "catastrophic". Israel's Saar, speaking at the same meeting, sounded confident his country would avoid further EU action. "I'm sure not any of them will be adopted by the EU member states," said the foreign minister. "There's no justification whatsoever." While the EU appears unable for now to take any further moves against Israel, just getting to this stage has been a considerable step. The bloc only agreed to review the cooperation deal after Israel relaunched its devastating operation in Gaza following the collapse of a ceasefire in March. Until then deep divisions between countries backing Israel and those more favourable to the Palestinians had hamstrung any move. The war was sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which led to 1,219 deaths, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Of the 251 people taken hostage by militants that day, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry says that at least 58,386 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in Israel's retaliatory campaign. The UN considers those figures reliable.