logo
‘Funny way to treat your friends:' Republicans miffed with Trump's threats to ignore funding

‘Funny way to treat your friends:' Republicans miffed with Trump's threats to ignore funding

Yahoo08-05-2025

Republican appropriators are alarmed that the White House is open to unilaterally freezing cash Congress could approve in September, if lawmakers overshoot President Donald Trump's latest budget request.
It marks a shift for top Republicans in charge of writing government funding bills, who have largely hesitated to speak too harshly against the president's funding freezes this year.
As defense hawks on Capitol Hill demand far more funding than Trump is seeking for the military, the president's willingness to withhold congressionally approved cash — known as 'impoundment' — is widening the rift between the White House and GOP lawmakers ahead of the fall fiscal cliff and increasing worries of a government shutdown.
'I've got a real problem with impoundment,' Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), who chairs the House Appropriations panel that funds the EPA and the Interior Department, told reporters this week.
'That's like a line-item veto, and I think it's illegal,' Simpson said. 'That will be a challenge, for sure.'
Withholding federal money is nothing new for Trump, who has spent months freezing billions of dollars signed into law on former President Joe Biden's watch despite lawsuits challenging the tactic. It goes back even further, with Trump's impeachment in 2018 tied in large part to his decision to hold back military aid to Ukraine. But it would be considered far more radical for the president to defy congressional leaders from his own party by locking up congressionally approved funding after nine months of total GOP control in Washington.
Several senior Republicans decried Trump's budget proposal last week to keep the military's funding flat in the upcoming fiscal year while piling on $150 billion more through the party-line package Republican leaders are endeavoring to pass this summer, which is far from guaranteed.
Asked during a call with reporters what Trump would do if lawmakers approve more military funding, a senior official with the Office of Management and Budget said impounding federal cash is always an option.
'Obviously, we have never taken impoundment off the table, because the president and myself believe that 200 years of the president and Executive Branch had that ability,' said the OMB official. 'But we're working with Congress to see what they will pass, and I believe that they have an interest in passing cuts.'
Republican appropriators will soon embark on writing the dozen funding bills for fiscal 2026, which starts in October. Traditionally, they consider a president's budget request a mere suggestion for how to craft those measures, throwing around the old saying: 'The president proposes, Congress disposes.'
That principle would be upended, however, if the White House withholds funding in excess of the budget request, rather than just using the threat of impoundment to influence Congress' funding decisions.
House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said he understood the White House's strategy: 'If I were them, I would too,' he said of the administration's leveraging of the threat of impoundment.
Sen. Shelley Moore Capitol (R-W.V.), a top Senate appropriator and a member of GOP leadership, wasn't so sure.
'I mean, if that's a pressure campaign, I get that,' she said this week. 'If that's reality, I think that there's some fundamental questions there. So that kind of surprises me, actually.'
Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.), another senior appropriator, had a similar reaction to the White House leaving open the possibility of withholding funding that the Republican-led Congress clears in the coming months.
'That's a funny way to treat your friends,' he said in an interview.
The threat of impoundment could undermine the foundation of bipartisan funding negotiations, with Democrats arguing that it's useless to negotiate if Trump isn't going to spend the money as Congress prescribes.
Republicans need Democratic votes to pass their funding bills in the Senate. And with less than five months to go until the next shutdown deadline, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — who was derided earlier this year for helping pass a Republican-crafted funding package — is now under pressure to at least fend off Trump's desire for Congress to cut non-defense programs by more than 20 percent.
At least one Republican, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, said he wasn't surprised by how things are playing out. He predicted that Trump's ultimate objective is to get the nation's highest court to rule that the 51-year-old impoundment law is unconstitutional.
'I think the goal is the Supreme Court,' said Paul, who publicly told a top official from the White House budget office last month that he doesn't think Trump 'can impound direct funds indefinitely' under the Impoundment Control Act.
'It's a reasonable question to ask. And it's never been all the way to the Supreme Court,' Paul, a staunch advocate of limited government, said this week. 'And of course, everybody has to adhere to what the final decision will be.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call
US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call

LONDON (AP) — High-level delegations from the United States and China are meeting in London on Monday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy, A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng is due to meet U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at an undisclosed location in the city. The talks are due to last at least a day. They follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war. The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. The U.K. government says it is providing the venue and logistics but is not involved in the talks. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks,' the British government said in a statement. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

June 8, 2025 - Trump presidency, Los Angeles protest news
June 8, 2025 - Trump presidency, Los Angeles protest news

CNN

time20 minutes ago

  • CNN

June 8, 2025 - Trump presidency, Los Angeles protest news

• On the ground: Police have used flash-bangs and tear gas while dispersing crowds, with some hitting and pushing protesters while making arrests, CNN witnessed. Protesters set at least two self-driving cars on fire. All of Downtown Los Angeles has been declared an unlawful assembly area. • Troop deployment: About 300 National Guardsmen are on the ground after President Donald Trump called them up to protect federal personnel and property. It's the first time a president has called in the National Guard without a state's request or consent in decades. Also prepared to deploy are 500 Marines. • Trump vs Newsom: California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will file a lawsuit against the Trump administration over deployment of the National Guard, which he and LA Mayor Karen Bass have called inflammatory. • Why are there protests? Authorities and demonstrators have clashed for days after dozens of people were detained by immigration agents. Intelligence analysts believe protesters are motivated by several factors, including immigration raids, deployment of the National Guard, and agitators who fit profiles of 'professional rioters.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store