Mohit Kamboj at helm as Aspect Group CEO
With over 20 years' experience across finance, trade, and policy advocacy, Kamboj's appointment comes during Aspect's global expansion into Dubai, Singapore, US and UK markets. Executive Chairperson Aksha Kamboj stated: "His sector expertise will align our businesses with the group's value-creation objectives."
In response, Kamboj acknowledged the leadership foundation laid by Aksha Kamboj, pledging to "explore global opportunities through technology and collaborative growth." The conglomerate currently operates Aspect Bullion - a market leader in precious metals - alongside hospitality brands including Mumbai establishments Brunch & Cake, OPA Kipos, and Nom Nom.
Its infrastructure division encompasses Ecomix, Aspect Logistics and Aspect PMC, while Aspect Realty handles commercial and residential properties. The group's sports vertical notably participates in the Indian Street Premier League. Aspect maintains offices across four international locations alongside its Indian operations.
UNI AAA PRS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
27 minutes ago
- India.com
Can A Country Survive Without America? These Nations Already Already Do Without U.S. Ties
New Delhi: The global order has long revolved around the United States. Its economic weight, military power and diplomatic reach have shaped how countries operate. But a handful of nations have taken a different path. They have either walked away from Washington or never entered the room. And despite years of pressure, sanctions and isolation, they continue to function. Among them, Iran stands out. For decades, Tehran has maintained one of the most antagonistic relationships with Washington. The rift deepened after the Islamic Revolution of 1979, which led to sweeping sanctions that strangled its economy. But Iran did not collapse. Instead, it shifted its focus inward, developed its oil and gas sector and invested in domestic industries. It strengthened ties with countries like Russia, China and Turkey to keep its economy running. In 2024, U.S. President Donald Trump intensified tariff threats against several countries. India found itself on Washington's radar. He accused New Delhi of buying large quantities of crude oil from Russia and selling it in global markets at a profit. He announced a 25% tariff on Indian trade and lashed out on Truth Social, claiming New Delhi had no concern for the war in Ukraine. India issued a strong rebuttal. Responding to the threat, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) made it clear that India would act in its national interest. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal explained that India had to turn to Russian oil because European suppliers had redirected their energy exports in the aftermath of the Ukraine conflict. At that time, Washington had supported India's decision. 'This is not a matter of choice. It was a response to the global market's limitations,' he said and pointed out the irony that countries that continue to criticise India are themselves engaged in trade with Russia, even when they face no strategic compulsion to do so. This debate has brought up a question: can a nation survive without engaging with the United States? Are there countries that have built an economic and political existence independent of American support? There are. Iran, Cuba, North Korea and Venezuela have managed to chart out such paths. Their experiences are far from smooth. Each of them has faced significant hardships. Still, they have not collapsed under pressure. Instead, they have sought out new alliances, developed local industries and found ways to adapt. After decades of sanctions, Iran signed a 25-year strategic agreement with China. The deal covers Chinese investments in Iran and steady oil purchases. Tehran also expanded military and economic ties with Moscow. Its domestic defence and technology sectors have grown despite external isolation. Its missile and drone programmes are homegrown. The country's education and healthcare systems, while strained, continue to function. Cuba has followed its own model. Since the 1960s, it has faced stringent U.S. sanctions. After embracing communism under Fidel Castro, the country was cut off from American trade. But it built a healthcare system that earned global praise. Cuban doctors and vaccines have been exported to countries across Latin America and Africa. Its tourism and biotechnology have brought in revenue. Partnerships with Russia, Venezuela and other regional allies have helped it remain afloat. North Korea offers a different case. There are no direct economic ties between Pyongyang and Washington. The two countries remain adversaries. Under Kim Jong Un, North Korea has prioritised its nuclear weapons programme and missile development. It has relied heavily on China for energy, food and essential supplies. Russia has also provided limited support. Despite economic difficulties, North Korea has continued to function under its rigid political system. Venezuela, too, has faced American sanctions, especially targetting its oil exports. But Caracas responded by strengthening its ties with Iran, China and Russia. It used its vast oil reserves as leverage, exchanging energy for investment and support. Each of these countries has followed a different model. Some turned to authoritarianism, while others leaned on regional alliances. But all have demonstrated that an economic existence without the United States, while difficult, is not impossible. These examples do not suggest that global engagement with Washington lacks value. The United States remains the world's largest economy and a central force in international diplomacy. But these nations show that with the right strategies, strong internal planning and alternative partnerships, survival outside the American orbit is not only possible, but it is already happening.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Services sector activity hits 11-month high in July
NEW DELHI: Demand for Indian services remained robust, and activity in the sector reached an 11-month high in July, driven by strong global orders, including from the US. Business confidence also strengthened, as shown by a survey released on Tuesday. In July, the HSBC India Services PMI business activity index was at 60.5, slightly changed from 60.4 in June, indicating another sharp increase in output. The rate of expansion was the best since Aug last year. The 50-point mark separates expansion from contraction in the survey, which is compiled from responses to a questionnaire sent to 400 service sector companies. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays .
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Raymond to Dr Reddy's: Textiles, pharma stocks bear tariffs brunt
NEW DELHI: Shares of major pharmaceutical and textile companies have seen a significant fall since US President Trump announced tariffs of 25% on Indian exports. Between July 30 and Aug 5, Gokaldas Exports, among the top textiles players, experienced the steepest fall of 15.9%. The company's shares closed at Rs 1,632 on Tuesday, compared with Rs 1,707 on July 30. Trump had announced the tariffs after markets closed on July 30. The new tariffs are effective Thursday. Other major players such as Vardhman Textiles and Welspun Living also saw value erosion as investors turned nervous due to the exposure of the companies to the US market (see graphic). Almost all these companies have major trade with the US, with Gokaldas exporting around 23% of all its finished goods to American buyers. While pharma is currently exempted from higher tariffs, stocks in the sector were also hit. On Tuesday, Trump threatened 250% additional duty on the sector in coming months. Aurobindo Pharma and Dr Reddy's get nearly half their revenues from the US, while around a third of Lupin and Sun Pharma's revenues are linked to the American market, AngelOne said. Aurobindo Pharma scrip was down 6.8% since the July 30 announcement, with Lupin, Sun Pharma and Dr Reddy's also in the red. In a report, ICRA Research said that Indian pharma companies have a strong presence in the US, which remains one of their most significant sources of revenue. On textiles, it said: "India is currently in a marginally weaker position, and it remains to be seen if it can pass on the steep increase in tariffs to its US customers. The recent imposition of tariffs (and penalties) by the US is likely to disrupt the supply chain and impact volumes and profit margins of Indian apparel exporters in near term. " Textiles exporters are fearing a loss of orders to China and Bangladesh. The unspecified penalty on Indian exports to the US for arms and oil purchases from Russia is adding to the uncertainty for homegrown players. "Within the textiles sector, companies in the garments and home textiles segments, and those with significant exposure to the US market, are likely to be affected by higher tariffs. That said, India has traditionally had a strong position in the cotton value chain, which should help in redirecting sales to other markets," said Anand Shah, chief investment officer - PMS & AIF at ICICI Prudential AMC, told TOI. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays .
