Awarded £12,000, man who had his finger broken by Police Scotland officer
Sheriff Robert Fife ordered Jo Farrell to pay the sum to Ross Lamont following an incident in December 2018 in Glasgow City Centre.
He said the evidence of the officer involved had at times been 'arrogant and dismissive'.
The All Scotland Personal Injury Court heard how Mr Lamont had been on a Christmas night out with colleagues before coming into contact with PCs Nathan Donnelly and Dominic Horn.
The court heard that the officers believed Mr Lamont was involved in an argument with another group of persons outside the Blue Dog bar in the city's West Regent Street.
Sheriff Fife heard how the two police officers tried to de-escalate the situation.
They took Mr Lamont over to a group of railings and asked him for his personal details as they concluded he had committed a breach of the peace.
Mr Lamont disagreed - he believed he had done nothing wrong and refused to provide the information they asked him for..
The court heard that Mr Lamont was then told he was being placed under arrest.
He then started to resist with the cops who struggled to restrain him. They described his resistance as like a man who was displaying 'superhuman' strength.
The court heard that Mr Lamont grabbed hold of the railings behind him with his right hand.
This prompted PC Donnelly to grab and pull the Mr Lamont's right little finger - causing it to break.
Lawyers for Mr Lamont believed their client had subjected to unlawful action. They launched a compensation claim at the court earlier this year against the Chief Constable of Police Scotland.
The court heard evidence that the move used by PC Donnelly on Mr Lamont's finger was not a recognised tactic used by Police in how they restrain people.
Sheriff Fife agreed and awarded Mr Lamont £12,000 compensation.
In a written judgment published by the court, Sheriff Fife wrote about how he was unimpressed by some of PC Donnelly's evidence to the court.
He wrote: 'I had some difficulty with the evidence of PC Donnelly. At times, I formed an unfavourable impression of his answers to questions. PC Donnelly was an inexperienced officer in December 2018 but purported to be more experienced.
'At times, he came across as being arrogant and dismissive. PC Donnelly demonstrated, by use of a court microphone, how he had grabbed the fingers of the right hand of the pursuer to remove the pursuer's
hand from the railings.
'This all seemed to be theatrical and unnecessary.
'In my view PC Donnelly deliberately targeted the pursuer's right little finger, pulling the little finger all the way back and in so doing breaking the little finger.
'PC Donnelly made no attempt at all to grab any of the pursuer's other fingers on the right hand in order to remove the right hand from the railings.'
Sheriff Fife added: 'PC Donnelly failed to use a recognised Operational Safety Training technique to remove the pursuer's right hand from the railings.
'The use of force by PC Donnelly by pulling back the pursuer's right little finger causing a fracture was not reasonable.
'PC Donnelly assaulted the pursuer.
'I will grant decree against the defender for payment to the pursuer in the sum of £12,000.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tragedy as two people die after falling in Sydney CBD
A man and woman have died after falling from the Western Distributor leading to the Sydney Harbour Bridge, as motorists are advised to avoid the area. Emergency services rushed to Harbour Street in the Sydney CBD about 9.45am on Saturday to find the man and woman dead. It is understood the pair, believed to be in their 40s, fell from the Western Distributor overpass onto the street. Police have established a crime scene and are investigating the circumstances surrounding the incident. Bystanders administered CPR, but the man and woman died before paramedics could arrive. Multiple emergency vehicles, including police and paramedics remain on scene. The two southbound lanes on the Sydney Harbour Bridge are currently closed. Traffic is being diverted to the Anzac Bridge. Motorists have been asked to avoid the area. Drivers appear to be able to use the Cahill Expressway lane on the bridge. 'Motorists can detour via the city by using Grosvenor St, Bridge St, and Macquarie St for access to the Eastern Suburbs and airport,' LiveTraffic advised. 'Police are urging anyone with information about the matter – or was in the area at the time with any available dashcam/mobile phone footage – to contact Day Street Police Station or Crime Stoppers,' a NSW Police spokesman said.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
AntiSocial Asylum hotels
Anger has flared outside hotels used to house asylum seekers. Protestors say they are worried about illegal migration, cost to the taxpayer and a lack of consultation, but one issue seems to spark even more concern - the safety of women and children. Opponents have accused protestors of racism and whipping up hate. Is there any evidence that asylum seekers are more likely to commit sexual offences? We trace the clamour for more data to answer that question. Police have been given new guidance on disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects in criminal cases - especially high profile ones. What might be the effect? And why are so many asylum seekers currently housed in hotels anyway? We hear how the system is supposed to work and how it's evolved. Presenter: Adam Fleming Producers: Simon Tulett, Natasha Fernandes, Emma Close and Tom Gillett Editor: Penny Murphy Production coordinator: Janet Staples Studio engineer: Annie Gardiner
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Human rights watchdog warns police to rethink 'heavy-handed' Palestine protest clampdown amid fears it could have a 'chilling' effect on free speech
Britain's human rights watchdog has warned against the 'heavy-handed policing' of Palestine protests amid fears it could have a 'chilling' effect on free speech. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Met Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to remind them that the 'right to protest is a cornerstone of any healthy democracy'. The letter, from EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner, said the notion that a peaceful demonstration could attract disproportionate police attention 'undermines confidence in our human rights protections'. Baroness Falkner said any interference with protest rights 'must be lawful and assessed case-by-case'. She added: 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' The letter, from EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner, said the notion that a peaceful demonstration could attract disproportionate police attention 'undermines confidence in our human rights protections' Baroness Falkner also raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. The commission referenced a report by the Guardian newspaper about a woman said to have been threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act for holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. The woman was reportedly told by police that her demonstration in Canterbury, Kent, in July expressed views supportive of Palestine Action, an organisation which has been banned by the Government. The woman said neither of her signs mentioned Palestine Action and that she had told police she did not support any proscribed organisations. Kent Police confirmed it had 'received correspondence from a legal firm representing a person spoken to by officers in Canterbury on July 14 2025' after the Guardian reported the woman is taking legal action against the force. The EHRC said Government and police authorities must 'ensure that all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' when it comes to protests. 'This guidance should ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights,' Baroness Falkner added. Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK Government in July, with the ban meaning that membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. More than 500 people were arrested last weekend on suspicion of displaying an item in support of a proscribed group, as demonstrations took place in central London. Downing Street has described Palestine Action as 'violent' and said it has committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, adding that evidence and security assessments shared in closed court supported its proscription. Palestine Action said Downing Street's accusations were 'false and defamatory' and 'disproven by the Government's own intelligence assessment'. Asked for their response to the EHRC letter, the Home Office referred to Ms Cooper's previous statement about last week's march, in which she said: 'The right to protest is one we protect fiercely but this is very different from displaying support for this one specific and narrow, proscribed organisation.' The Metropolitan Police declined to comment when asked for their response to the letter. It comes after a chaotic London march last Saturday saw more than a staggering 500 activists arrested - bringing the total to over 700 since July 7, when the group was proscribed. During a day of mayhem and farce, Left-wing protesters swamped London's Parliament Square on August 9 in support of the organisation, which was proscribed by the Government last month as a terrorist group. Hundreds held placards declaring 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action' in deliberate 'idiotic' acts of law-breaking designed to overwhelm police resources and the courts. Later that day, the Metropolitan Police announced more than 360 people had been detained following the scenes of disorder - at an estimated cost of about £3million. However, in an update on August 10, the Met said the number of total arrests had skyrocketed to 532 - with 522 of these being for people allegedly displaying placards supporting the proscribed terror group. Protesters were accused of a 'colossal' waste of millions of pounds of taxpayers' money after seemingly getting deliberately arrested by officers. Yesterday, the Metropolitan Police announced that a further 60 people will be prosecuted for 'showing support for the proscribed terrorist group Palestine Action. Stephen Parkinson, Director of Public Prosecutions, said: 'The decisions that we have announced today are the first significant numbers to come out of the recent protests, and many more can be expected in the next few weeks. We are ready to make swift decisions in all cases where arrests have been made. The public has a democratic right to protest peacefully in this country, and I understand the depth of feeling around the horrific scenes in Gaza. 'However, Palestine Action is now a proscribed terrorist organisation and those who have chosen to break the law will be subject to criminal proceedings under the Terrorism Act. 'When protest conduct crosses the line from lawful activity into criminality, we have a duty to enforce the law. 'People should be clear about the real-life consequences for anyone choosing to support Palestine Action. A terrorism conviction can severely impact your life and career – it can restrict your ability to travel overseas and work in certain professions. 'I urge people to think very carefully about their actions at protests. Anyone who chooses to disobey the law will have to face the consequences.'
