'New king in making': Internet erupts as Jannik Sinner defeats Novak Djokovic at Wimbledon semi-final
(Also read: 'Vamos Alcaraz': Internet erupts as Carlos books third straight Wimbledon final spot)
Fans hail Sinner's rise
Social media erupted following Sinner's dominant display. Tennis fans around the world showered praise on the young Italian, with many hailing him as the sport's next big icon.
One user wrote, 'I'm not feeling bad for Novak after his semifinal loss to Sinner. He has already won Wimbledon 7 times and achieved everything in the sport. A true legend, no matter the result.' Another commented, 'Sinner — the new king in the making.' A fan added, 'Jannik was excellent, that forehand was just so so good. Sunday at 4pm, we shall see you then.'
Echoing the sentiment, one post read, 'Well deserved. Been knocking on the door for a while—now he's finally through. Final's going to be epic.' Another declared, 'Sinner the GOAT,' while someone else called him the 'favourite for the final.'
Check out the posts here:
Alcaraz powers through to final
Earlier in the day, Carlos Alcaraz, the reigning Wimbledon champion, battled past American Taylor Fritz in a thrilling four-set semi-final. The 22-year-old Spaniard prevailed 6-4, 5-7, 6-3, 7-6 (8/6), advancing to his third consecutive final at the All England Club.
(Also read: Roger Federer's unforgettable Dartmouth College speech: 'Effortless is a myth' and other life lessons)
Final set to be a classic
The stage is now set for a high-voltage final between Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz — two of the sport's brightest stars and fiercest young rivals. With Alcaraz aiming for a hat-trick and Sinner chasing his first Grand Slam title, Sunday's clash promises to be a generational showdown not to be missed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Toronto top seed Zverev got expert insight from retired rival Rafael Nadal
Alexander Zverev returns to tennis with his confidence under repair after losing in the Wimbledon first round a month ago. And the world number three, playing as top seed at the ATP Toronto Masters, is bolstered by the unique insight from one-time rival Rafael Nadal. Zverev confirmed on Sunday in Toronto that he had sought advice -- and possibly a new coach -- as he travelled to Mallorca this month to visit Nadal's training academy on the Spaniard's home island. While apparently failing to sign Nadal's uncle Toni as his travelling coach, Zverev did have a chance to chat with Nadal, who retired last season. '(Toni is) a great coach, no question about that, but he's a personality that I think can give you confidence as well,' the German said. 'When he speaks and when Rafa speaks, you listen. ALSO READ: De Minaur saves three match points against Davidovich Fokina to lift Washington Open title 'They definitely spent a lot of hours talking to me, and Rafa gave me some great insight into what it is actually like to play against me. 'He saw me as a player. He sees me now as a spectator. It was very helpful. We spent hours and hours talking, sometimes past midnight at some dinners. It was great to be there.' Zverev, a 2017 titleholder in Canada who has always been coached by his father, said that after his 10-day visit to Spain, he is still trying to persuade Toni to come join his coaching team. 'I'm trying to convince him to do more weeks with me, and we'll see how it goes, but he's a very busy man,' Zverev said. 'I'm not sure how much of him you'll see this year, because he gave his word to a lot of events. But we're talking about what a potential partnership could look like, for sure.' Zverev said the situation will be clearer 'in a few weeks.' The elder Nadal has previously worked with Canadian Felix Auger-Aliassime after guiding his iconic nephew for much of his career.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
R Ashwin rips into Ben Stokes: 'Your frustration, not our problem!' — Defends Ravindra Jadeja, Washington Sundar century push
Ben Stokes speaking with Ravindra Jadeja during fourth Test in Manchester. (Getty Images) NEW DELHI: Drama and emotion collided in Manchester on Day 5 of the fourth Test as Ravichandran Ashwin came out strongly in support of Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar for choosing to bat on — and complete their centuries — after England skipper Ben Stokes offered to call it a draw with an hour to go. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! With India well and truly having saved the game after being 0/2 in the second innings, Jadeja (89*) and Sundar (80*) stood firm. But when Stokes approached the umpires and offered a handshake to end the match, the Indian pair refused — and stood their ground, quite literally. Poll Do you agree with Ashwin's defense of Jadeja and Sundar's decision to bat on? Yes, they earned their runs. No, they should have walked off. This irked the England captain, who sarcastically questioned whether they wanted to score hundreds against part-time bowler Harry Brook . Jadeja responded with his bat, dispatching Brook for a six to bring up his century. Gautam Gambhir fiery press conference: Slams critics, big update on Jasprit Bumrah, Karun vs Sai Later, Ashwin — speaking on his YouTube channel — tore into the criticism directed at the Indian batters. "Have you heard the term double standards? They played your bowlers all day, batted you out, and suddenly when they're nearing hundreds, you want to walk off? Why should they?!" Ashwin fumed. "You ask, 'You want to make a hundred against Harry?' Not Brook, brother. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo He has to make a hundred. Bring any bowler — they didn't object. It was your call to bring Brook, not ours!" he added, defending the pair's right to play on. Ashwin also laid bare what he believed was the motive behind the early handshake offer: "There were two reasons — one, you didn't want to tire your bowlers. Fine. Second, you were frustrated, and thought 'If I'm not happy, you shouldn't be either.' That's not how cricket works." Ben Stokes press conference: On handshake controversy, India fightback, his own fitness Ashwin argued that if he were captain, he would've played the full quota of overs. "These are Test runs. A century is earned, not gifted. Washington deserved it. Jadeja deserved it. Period." India and England eventually shook hands after both batters got their milestones, with the series poised 2-1, in the hosts' favour, heading into the Oval finale. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Ben Stokes ridicules ‘injury replacement' debate, Gautam Gambhir hits back: 'Imagine if we had to play with 10 people'
Team India head coach Gautam Gambhir and England captain Ben Stokes appear to be at opposite ends of the spectrum regarding the idea of allowing injury replacements in Test cricket. The topic became a hot topic after Rishabh Pant fractured his foot while batting on Day 1 of the Manchester Test and was in no position to keep the wickets. Dhruv Jurel was allowed to keep the wickets as cover for Pant, but the injured star had to come out to bat in pain as no substitution was allowed for injured players. Ben Stokes, Gautam Gambhir differ on injury replacement player debate.(Reuters and PRI Image) Stokes bluntly ridiculed the idea of injury replacement and suggested that if it came into effect, then the team would start exploring loopholes in it for their benefit. 'I think it is absolutely ridiculous there is a conversation around an injury replacement. There would be too many loopholes for a team to go through. You pick an 11 for the game, injuries are part of it. I think that conversation should be shut down,' said Stokes in the post-match press conference. 'I'm all for injury replacement': Gambhir On the other hand, Gambhir had a completely different take on this, suggesting there's no harm in permitting injury replacements—as long as the decision is made after a thorough evaluation by the umpires and match referee. 'Absolutely, I'm all for it, if the umpires and the match referee sees and feels that there's a major injury. It's very important to have this rule, where you can get a substitute. That is, if it's very visible, there's nothing wrong in doing that. Especially in a series like this, where it's been such a closely fought series, in the previous 3 Test matches," Gambhir said. 'Imagine if we would have had to play with 10 people, 10 men against 11. How unfortunate would this be for us," he added. A concussion substitute was introduced in the wake of Australian opener Phil Hughes' untimely death in 2014 after being hit on the head but there is no such provision in case of any other serious injury. Meanwhile, the differing perspectives of two prominent cricket personalities have sparked a renewed debate over the direction Test cricket should take—whether it must adapt to prioritise player safety or risk diluting the essence of the game's traditional format.
