&w=3840&q=100)
History Today: When Pakistan copied India and conducted nuclear tests
The Pakistani scientists posing with a nice view of Koh Kambaran in the background. Facebook
Tensions have been simmering between neighbouring countries India and Pakistan since the deadly terrorist attack on Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22 this year. Several nuclear stations were attacked during Operation Sindoor, India's retaliation to the attack. While the situation is now back to normal, it is important to remember that both nations are nuclear-armed.
While India tested its nuclear missiles on May 11, 1998, Pakistan followed suit ten days later on May 28, 1998. It conducted five underground detonations in the Ras Koh Hills of Balochistan. With this, it became the seventh country in the world to possess nuclear weapons.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
If you are a history geek who loves to learn about important events from the past, Firstpost Explainers' ongoing series, History Today will be your one-stop destination to explore key events.
On May 28, 1998, Volkswagen was established under Adolf Hitler's regime in Germany to create a people's car or Volkswagen. Meanwhile, Amnesty International was also founded on this day in 1961 by British lawyer Peter Benenson.
Here is all that took place on this day across the world.
Pakistan conducted nuclear tests
Pakistan conducted nuclear tests for the first time on May 28, 1998. The Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) carried out these five underground nuclear tests near Balochistan's Ras Koh Hills.
The tests, codenamed Chagai-I, were a direct response to India's Pokhran-II nuclear tests on May 11 and May 13 respectively. Pakistan's decision to test was driven by a desire to restore strategic balance in South Asia and to demonstrate its nuclear capabilities.
While India's Pokhran tests evaded US satellite surveillance, Pakistan's preparations were monitored in real-time by Western intelligence, reported Economic Times. It further stated that American satellite surveillance detected the pouring of concrete into test shafts 24 hours preceding the detonations. The report further stated that US President Bill Clinton issued a last-minute plea, proposing $5 billion in aid should Pakistan desist from the tests.
According to reports, the devices tested were primarily uranium-based, with yields estimated between nine to 40 kilotons of trinitrotoluene (commonly known as TNT) equivalent. This was followed up with a second test conducted two days later on May 30, 1998, known as Chagai-II in Kharan Desert.
While May 28 is annually celebrated across Pakistan as Youm-e-Takbir (Day of Greatness) to mark the nation's nuclear advancements, it is viewed differently in Balochistan. Many locals there commemorate the day as a 'black day,' pointing to the environmental damage and health problems caused by the nuclear explosions.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Volkswagen was founded
On this day in 1937, the German Labour Front, operating under the Nazi regime, established the 'Gesellschaft zur Vorbereitung des Deutschen Volkswagens mbH' ('Company for the Preparation of the German People's Car Ltd.') in Berlin. The primary objective of this initiative was to manufacture an affordable automobile for the average German citizen.
A Volkswagen Beetle being unloaded at Emden harbour, Germany to be sent to Mexico. File image/AP
To bring to life Adolf Hitler's vision of a 'people's car' or 'Volkswagen', Ferdinand Porsche was commissioned to design the vehicle. He came up with the KdF-Wagen which later became known as the Volkswagen Beetle. The construction of the Volkswagen factory in 1938 in the town of 'Stadt des KdF-Wagens,' later renamed Wolfsburg. However, the outbreak of World War II shifted the company's focus to military production.
Once the war came to an end, the British took control of the factory and revived the production of the Beetle . The car went on becoming a symbol of Germany's post-war economic recovery.
Today, Volkswagen has evolved into one of the world's leading automobile manufacturers.
Amnesty International was founded
On May 28, 1961, the British newspaper 'The London Observer' featured on its front page an article by British lawyer Peter Benenson titled 'The Forgotten Prisoners.' This publication initiated the Appeal for Amnesty 1961, a campaign advocating for the release of individuals detained globally solely for the peaceful expression of their convictions.
Benenson was inspired to author the appeal after encountering an article detailing the incarceration of two Portuguese students who had publicly offered a toast to freedom. Portugal, at the time, was governed by the dictatorship of Antonio de Oliveira Salazar. Outraged by the situation, Benenson composed the Observer article, presenting a case for the students' liberation and imploring readers to dispatch letters of protest to the Portuguese government.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Amnesty International was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1977 for its efforts to secure the release of prisoners of conscience. AP
The response to the appeal was overwhelming, leading to the formal establishment of Amnesty International in July 1961. The organisation was founded with the support of various individuals, including Quaker activist Eric Baker and Irish statesman Seán MacBride, who became its first chairman, reported History.com.
It was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1977 for its efforts to secure the release of prisoners of conscience and combat human rights abuses worldwide .
This Day, That Year
On this day in 1999, Leonardo da Vinci's Last Supper was reopened to public view in Milan.
Neville Chamberlain became prime minister of the United Kingdom on this day in 1937.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
a few seconds ago
- The Hindu
Birla, Harivansh flag poor productivity, slam Opposition for disruptions as Monsoon Session ends
The stormy Monsoon Session of Parliament ended on Thursday (August 21, 2025) with the Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh blaming the Opposition for repeated disruptions. Follow Parliament Monsoon session Day 21 highlights The session began with the abrupt resignation of Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar on July 21 and ended with Union Home Minister Amit Shah moving a resolution to appoint a joint select committee to study crucial amendments to the Constitution proposing automatic cessation of office if a Prime Minister or a Chief Minister spends 31 days in custody. Throughout the session, the Opposition protested, demanding a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls and the alleged 'vote theft' in the Lok Sabha and recent Assembly elections. The demand for adjournment motions on the issue was rejected, leading to disruptions in both the Houses. The Upper House functioned for only 41 hours and 15 minutes, while the Lok Sabha could work only for 37 hours this session. In their concluding remarks, Mr. Birla and Mr. Harivansh criticised the Opposition members for their behaviour. 'Despite the best efforts of the Chair to facilitate meaningful and disruption-free discussions on the listed business, this session was regrettably marred by repeated disruptions, leading to frequent adjournments. This not only resulted in the loss of precious parliamentary time but also deprived us of the opportunity to deliberate upon several matters of public importance,' Mr. Harivansh said. The Deputy Chairman said the productivity of the Monsoon Session stood at 38.88%, something that calls for serious introspection. 'Members had the opportunity to raise 285 Questions, 285 Zero Hour submissions, and 285 Special Mentions. However, only 14 Questions, seven Zero Hour submissions, and 61 Special Mentions could actually be taken up,' he said, adding that while these contributions are of value, they represent only a fraction of what this House is capable of achieving when it functions to its full potential. During the Session, the Rajya Sabha passed or returned as many as 15 Government Bills. Lok Sabha saw the introduction of 14 Bills of which 12 were passed. Both the Houses discussed Operation Sindoor and the Lok Sabha debated the achievements of India's space programme. Mr. Birla said the members had all decided at the beginning of the session that the House will have 120 hours of discussion and dialogue. 'The Business Advisory Committee also agreed to this. But due to continuous deadlock and planned disruptions, we could barely work for 37 hours in this session,' he said in his valedictory address. In this session, 419 starred questions were included in the agenda, but due to disruptions, only 55 questions could be taken up for oral answers. Mr. Birla said that 'as public representatives, the entire country watches our conduct and functioning'. 'The public has great expectations from us that we have serious and meaningful discussions on their problems and issues of wider public interest, on important Bills, in accordance with the decorum of Parliament,' he said. 'It is the responsibility of all of us to cooperate in building healthy traditions in the House. In this dignified House, we should avoid sloganeering and disruption and take forward serious and meaningful discussions. As Members of Parliament, we should set an example before the country and the world through our work and behaviour. Our language in the House and the Parliament premises should always be restrained and decent'. 'Agreement and disagreement are a natural process of democracy, but our collective effort should be that the House runs with dignity, decorum and decency. We have to think about what message we are sending to the citizens through the country's highest democratic institution. I am sure that all the political parties and honourable members will seriously think and introspect on this issue,' he said.


NDTV
32 minutes ago
- NDTV
Perpetrator Of Terror Can't Be Equated With Victim: Centre On Pak In House
New Delhi: The Indian government has made it clear that Pakistan, the perpetrator of terrorism, "cannot be equated" with India, the victim of cross-border terrorism, the Centre told Parliament on Thursday. Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh said this in a written response to queries in the Rajya Sabha. The Ministry of External Affairs was asked how the government has countered claims of "India-Pakistan hyphenation in global diplomacy" and the diplomatic measures taken by the government to address "China's growing influence over Pakistan" in terms of intelligence and military cooperation. "The government of India has made it clear that the perpetrator of terrorism, i.e., Pakistan, cannot be equated with the victim of cross-border terrorism, i.e., India. This unequivocal message was consistently reiterated during interactions with interlocutors in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor," Singh said. The seven all-party delegations, which visited various global capitals in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, also "emphatically conveyed" the above message while demonstrating India's strong national consensus and resolute approach to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, the MoS said. "The issue of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including cross-border terrorism, was taken up with the Chinese Foreign Minister during his recent visit to India," he added. The MEA was also asked how the government plans to strengthen India's foreign policy narrative in 2025-2026. "The global community widely acknowledges India's robust democracy, economic progress, military might, technological prowess, civilisational heritage, and its contribution in addressing global issues," Singh said. The government's engagement with various stakeholders, including think-tanks and academic and research institutions, serves to highlight India's foreign policy achievements and priorities, he said. "Government undertakes a series of targeted public diplomacy initiatives to carry forward India's message to the world and continues to make all endeavours to further strengthen India's voice in global affairs. "It also constantly monitors all developments having a bearing on India's security and national interest and takes all required steps in this regard," Singh said.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Hostage Review: Intrigue, emotion and high-stakes drama to the last scene
Netflix's latest limited series, Hostage , created by Bridge of Spies writer Matt Charman, has sparked wide discussion for its mix of geopolitical intrigue, emotional stakes, and melodramatic flourishes. Anchored by powerhouse performances from Suranne Jones and Julie Delpy, the five-part drama blends the machinery of state politics with the raw vulnerabilities of personal loss, leaving audiences both shaken and enthralled. The show is being widely appreciated by both audience and critics, and here is a review of the show as mentioned by Variety and The Guardian. Hostage: A Crisis at the Heart of Government Set in present-day London, Hostage introduces viewers to British Prime Minister Abigail Dalton (Suranne Jones), a leader just eight months into office. Dalton is already battling two national crises: a weakened economy after military budget cuts and a crumbling healthcare system marked by severe medicine shortages. Amid this storm, Dalton embarks on a historic Anglo-French summit with French President Vivienne Toussaint (Julie Delpy). The meeting, aimed at negotiating refugee policies and medical aid, quickly spirals into personal turmoil when Dalton learns her husband, Dr. Alex Anderson (Ashley Thomas), has been abducted in French Guiana while working with an aid mission. The kidnappers' demand, that Dalton resign as Prime Minister in exchange for Anderson's safe return, triggers a tense showdown that pushes the boundaries of politics, power, and personal sacrifice. Hostage: Women Leaders in the Crosshairs What sets Hostage apart is its focus on two women at the helm of their nations. Dalton and Toussaint are depicted as capable yet constantly undermined, facing relentless misogyny from colleagues, rivals, and the public. Live Events The series illustrates how female leaders are scrutinized not just for their decisions but for perceived weaknesses. Dalton faces backlash from her cabinet, while Toussaint is confronted with blackmail threats that could destroy her presidency. The result is a layered portrait of leadership under siege, where empathy and pragmatism clash with ruthless political realities. Hostage: Soap Opera Flourishes Amid Serious Stakes Despite its gravitas, Hostage also leans into melodrama. Critics have noted certain implausible plotlines, such as Alex traveling to a conflict zone without adequate security, that stretch believability. Subplots involving family tensions, including Dalton's strained relationship with her teenage daughter Sylvie (Isobel Akuwudike), inject a soapy quality into the narrative. Yet these elements also make the series accessible, reminding viewers that even heads of state must navigate personal pain alongside professional duties. Hostage: The Performances Hold the Center Suranne Jones delivers a nuanced portrayal of a leader balancing stoicism with desperation, while Julie Delpy's icy, calculating Toussaint emerges as both a foil and uneasy ally. Their on-screen chemistry drives the series, turning political negotiations into battles of wit and willpower. Ashley Thomas lends quiet strength as Alex, though some critics argue his character feels more symbolic than fleshed-out. Supporting roles, including James Cosmo as Dalton's ailing father and Lucian Msamati as her skeptical aide, add further texture. Episode Four: The Heart of the Drama The penultimate episode has been widely praised as the series' highlight. Against mounting public outrage and political pressure, Dalton and Toussaint reflect on their journeys into leadership and the compromises they've made. This moment of introspection, critics say, captures the fragility of democracy and the emotional toll of power, forcing viewers to reconsider how far leaders should go in sacrificing themselves, or others, for the so-called greater good. Hostage: A Reminder of Political Fragility Through its high-stakes drama, Hostage underscores how quickly political systems can unravel. Empires, the show suggests, collapse not only through external threats but also through internal weaknesses such as greed, blackmail, and unchecked ambition. The narrative resonates strongly in today's political climate, with its exploration of refugees, healthcare crises, and nationalist movements echoing real-world debates. Hostage: A Propulsive Watch Despite Flaws While some storylines stretch credibility and certain antagonists lack depth, Hostage remains a propulsive political thriller. Its brisk five-episode arc avoids the 'streamer bloat' often criticized in long-form series. With its international scope, from London to French Guiana, and its mix of espionage, terrorism, and personal stakes, the show keeps viewers hooked. As Guardian critic Lucy Mangan observed, the series 'swerves the curse of streamer bloat' while offering a 'rollicking, propulsive and compulsive yarn' that refreshingly centers two middle-aged female leaders. Propulsive: Worth the Ride In the end, Hostage may not achieve the seamless prestige of shows like The Crown or House of Cards , but its combination of political grit and soap opera sheen makes it deeply engaging. For audiences seeking a blend of suspense, emotional drama, and sharp commentary on modern leadership, Hostage delivers a ride worth taking. FAQs What is Netflix's Hostage about? Hostage is a five-part political thriller about British Prime Minister Abigail Dalton, whose husband is kidnapped in French Guiana. The kidnappers demand her resignation, sparking an international crisis that tests her leadership and personal resolve. How does Hostage stand out from other political dramas? Unlike many political thrillers, Hostage centers on two women heads of state navigating both global crises and personal struggles. While it has soapy twists, the show highlights misogyny in politics and the fragility of democracy, making it both entertaining and thought-provoking.