US raises bounty on Venezuela's Maduro
Washington, which does not recognize Maduro's past two election victories, accuses the South American country's leader of leading a cocaine trafficking gang.
"Today, the Department of Justice and State Department are announcing a historic $50 million reward for information leading to the arrest of Nicolas Maduro," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a video on social media.
"He is one of the largest narco-traffickers in the world and a threat to our national security."
The previous bounty was set in January at $25 million.
Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil said Bondi's "pathetic" bounty was "the most ridiculous smokescreen we have ever seen."
"The dignity of our homeland is not for sale. We reject this crude political propaganda operation," Gil said on Telegram.
In 2020, during President Donald Trump's first term in office, Maduro and other high-ranking Venezuelan officials were indicted in federal court in New York on several charges including participating in a "narco-terrorism" conspiracy.
The Justice Department accused Maduro of leading a cocaine trafficking gang called "The Cartel of the Suns" that shipped hundreds of tons of narcotics into the United States over two decades, earning hundreds of millions of dollars.
Investigators say the cartel worked hand-in-hand with the rebel Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), which the United States has labeled a terrorist organization.
Bondi said Maduro also had worked with the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua and Mexico's Sinaloa cartel.
The US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) "has seized 30 tons of cocaine linked to Maduro and his associates, with nearly seven tons linked to Maduro himself," Bondi said.
The US government has also seized more than $700 million in Maduro-linked assets, including two Venezuelan government aircraft, since September last year, according to Bondi.
"Yet Maduro's reign of terror continues," she said. "Under President Trump's leadership, Maduro will not escape justice and he will be held accountable for his despicable crimes."
The 62-year-old Maduro, a former bus driver and trade unionist, faces up to life in prison if he can be tried and is convicted.
At the time of the indictment, Maduro slammed what he called "spurious, false" accusations.
In June, Venezuela's former intelligence chief Hugo Armando Carvajal pleaded guilty to US drug trafficking and narco-terrorism charges.
The Miami Herald, citing sources familiar with the case, said Carvajal had offered to provide US authorities with documents and testimony implicating Maduro.
Relations between Washington and Caracas have been deteriorating for years.
The US government has not recognized Maduro, who first took office in 2013, as the duly elected president of Venezuela since what the State Department has called a "deeply flawed 2018 presidential election."
"In the July 28, 2024 Venezuelan presidential election, Maduro fraudulently declared himself the victor despite evidence to the contrary," the State Department said in an announcement of the earlier bounty in January.
"The United States joined many other countries in refusing to recognize Maduro as the legitimate winner of the July 2024 presidential election."
Washington has placed an array of economic sanctions on Maduro's government.
For its part, Maduro's government has long denounced US interference in Venezuela.
On Thursday, Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello announced that security services had thwarted a bomb attack in a commercial area of the capital Caracas.
As Venezuelan authorities often do in such cases, Cabello accused the US and the Venezuelan opposition of instigating the thwarted attack.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nahar Net
30 minutes ago
- Nahar Net
Brazil's Lula announces $5.5 billion in credits for exporters hit by US tariffs
by Naharnet Newsdesk 14 August 2025, 15:44 The Brazilian government on Wednesday unveiled a plan to support local companies affected by a 50% tariff imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump on several of the country's exports. Dubbed "Sovereign Brazil," the plan provides for a credit lifeline of 30 billion reais ($5.5 billion), among other measures. Hours later, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced new sanctions against at least two Brazilian officials, in a move the South American nation's health minister rebuked. Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva described the plan, which includes a bill to be sent to Congress, as a first step to help local exporters. The leftist leader, whose poll numbers have gone up since the tariffs against his country were announced, once again said he and Trump have never spoken, and claimed the American president does not want to negotiate. Top congressional leaders attended Wednesday's ceremony at the presidential palace in Brasilia, a first in months, in a sign of growing political support for Lula in response to Trump. Brazil's plan Brazil's measures include postponing tax charges for companies affected by U.S. tariffs, providing 5 billion reais ($930,000) in tax credits to small- and medium-sized companies until the end of 2026, and expanding access to insurance against cancelled orders. The plan also incentivizes public purchases of items that could not be exported to the U.S. Brazil's government is also granting a one-year extension of tax credits for companies that import items so they can produce goods for exportation. That mechanism is called "drawback." "We cannot be scared, nervous and anxious when there is a crisis. A crisis is for us to create new things," Lula said. "In this case, what is unpleasant is that the reasons given to impose sanctions against Brazil do not exist." Trump has tied the 50% tariff on many imported Brazilian goods to the judicial situation of his embattled ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is currently under house arrest. Brazil's president added that "for now" he will not use the country's reciprocity law to impose higher tariffs on American imports coming to Brazil. Ricardo Alban, the chairman of the Brazilian industry confederation, said he hopes "this plan is behind us as quickly as possible." He described it as "palliative, but necessary." "Nothing justifies us being on the lowest of tariffs to going to the highest of tariffs," Alban said. Economy or politics? Trump has repeated a narrative pushed by Bolsonaro's allies, which claims the former Brazilian president's prosecution for attempting to overturn his 2022 election loss is part of a "deliberate breakdown in the rule of law," with the government engaging in "politically motivated intimidation" and committing "human rights abuses." "Our American friends, every time they decide to fight with someone, they try to create an image of a devil against the people they want to fight with," added Lula, who pledged to find markets to buy Brazilian goods that will not go to the U.S. Lula repeated on Wednesday that Brazil's judiciary is independent. The executive branch, which manages foreign relations, has no control over Supreme Court justices, who in turn have stated they won't yield to political pressure. Bolsonaro's trial is expected to come to the sentencing phase sometime between September and October. "If what happened at the Capitol (the U.S. riots on Jan. 6, 2021) had happened in Brazil, he (Trump) would be on trial here too," Lula said. Earlier in August, Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case against Bolsonaro, was sanctioned under the U.S. Magnitsky Act, which is supposed to target serious human rights offenders. De Moraes has argued that defendants were granted full due process. Rubio's response Only hours after Lula's plan was announced, Rubio said the U.S. would "restrict visa issuance to Cuban and complicit third-country government officials and individuals responsible for Cuba's exploitative labor export program." Rubio said on X that the Brazilian government program "More Doctors," which was started in 2013 with thousands of Cuban doctors spreading nationwide, was "an unconscionable diplomatic scam of foreign 'medical missions.'" Brazil's Health Minister Alexandre Padilha, who was in the same job when the program was founded, later said the initiative "will survive to unjustifiable attacks from no matter who." "This program saves lives and it is approved by those who matter most: the Brazilian people," Padilha said. "We will not bow to those who are against vaccines, against research, against science and now against two key people in my first tenure as health minister, Mozart Sales and Alberto Kleiman (who had their U.S. visas revoked)." Brazil's government says the initiative currently has almost 25,000 medical professionals operating, but did not provide figures on how many of those are Cuban. Lawmaker Eduardo Bolsonaro, a son of the former president who is seeking amnesty for his father and others implicated in the alleged coup plot, praised the U.S government. "This measure is a clear message: neither ministers, nor lower-tier bureaucrats nor their family members are immune. Sooner or later, everyone who contributed to support those (autocratic) regimes will answer for what they did — and there will be no place to hide," he said. Earlier, Brazil's Finance Minister Fernando Haddad said that his country "is being sanctioned for being more democratic than its aggressor." "We will face, as we have, many difficult situations and we shall overcome," Haddad said. "This one comes from the outside, but unfortunately it has the support of radicalized sections of Brazil's society."
Ya Libnan
2 days ago
- Ya Libnan
Whose Side Is Tom Barrack Really On?
File photo of U.S. Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack and Syria's interim president Ahmed Al sharaa , aka( Abu Mohammad al Golani , the former leader of al Qaeda linked al Nusra front ) By : Ya Libnan Editorial Board U.S. Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack recently stated that 'the Syrian government has pledged to devote all resources to holding accountable the perpetrators of the Sweida atrocities,' adding that Syria will cooperate with the United Nations to investigate the crimes committed there. He further emphasized a commitment to humanitarian aid for southwestern Syria and to protecting 'all components' of Syrian society from forces that seek to tear it apart. But this raises an urgent question: Whose side is Mr. Barrack really on? The whole world knows that Syrian government forces themselves are responsible for the Sweida massacre last July. Eyewitness accounts and credible reports point directly to the regime's involvement — not only in the killings during the attack, but also in the brutal follow-up assault on Suweida's hospital, where patients and medical staff were targeted. It is no secret that Ahmed Sharaa, now posing in a civilian suit, is in fact the same man once known as Abu Mohammad al-Golani, the notorious leader of the the Al Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front. The change of wardrobe has not erased his Islamist extremism or his history of violence. Yet the Syrian regime — now under his influence — continues to present itself to the world as a legitimate authority, while minorities in Syria suffer under its oppression. If Mr. Barrack truly wants the truth, he should skip the photo opportunities in Damascus and visit Sweida itself. He would hear directly from the families of the victims, from the religious and community leaders living under constant threat, and from those who have endured the destruction of their homes, their hospitals, and their future. Only then will he understand the reality: that the so-called Syrian government is not protecting its people — it is preying on them. The United States must stop lending legitimacy to Sharaa's blood-stained regime. Standing with dictators in suits is still standing with dictators — and history will not forgive those who chose comfort in the palace over truth in the streets of Sweida.
Nahar Net
6 days ago
- Nahar Net
US at plastics treaty talks in rare international participation under Trump
by Naharnet Newsdesk 08 August 2025, 17:32 Under President Donald Trump's leadership, the United States has withdrawn from international negotiations and commitments, particularly around climate. But the U.S. is very much involved in treaty talks for a global accord to end plastic pollution. Nations kicked off a meeting Tuesday in Geneva to try to complete a landmark treaty over 10 days to end the spiraling plastic pollution crisis. The biggest issue is whether the treaty should impose caps on producing new plastic, or focus instead on things like better design, recycling and reuse. About 3,700 people are taking part in the talks, representing 184 countries and more than 600 organizations. Here is a look the U.S. position: Why is the US participating in the negotiations? Hours after he was sworn in to a second term, Trump pulled the U.S. out of the landmark Paris agreement to combat global warming. The United States didn't participate in a vote in April at the International Maritime Organization that created a fee for greenhouse gases emitted by ships, or send anyone to the U.N. Ocean Conference in June. Some wondered whether the United States would even go to Geneva. The State Department told The Associated Press that engaging in the negotiations is critical to protect U.S. interests and businesses, and an agreement could advance U.S. security by protecting natural resources from plastic pollution, promote prosperity and enhance safety. The industry contributes more than $500 billion to the economy annually and employs about 1 million people in the U.S., according to the Plastics Industry Association. "This is an historic opportunity to set a global approach for reducing plastic pollution through cost-effective and common-sense solutions and fostering innovation from the private sector, not unilaterally stopping the use of plastic," the department said in an email. What does the US want in the treaty? The State Department supports provisions to improve waste collection and management, improve product design and drive recycling, reuse and other efforts to cut the plastic dumped into the environment. The international Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development estimates that 22 million tons of plastic waste will leak into the environment this year. That could increase to 30 million tons annually by 2040 if nothing changes. The OECD said if the treaty focuses only on improving waste management and does nothing on production and demand, an estimated 13.5 million tons of plastic waste would still leak into the environment each year. What does the US not want in the treaty? The United States and other powerful oil and gas nations oppose cutting plastic production. Most plastic is made from fossil fuels. Even if production grows only slightly, greenhouse gas emissions emitted from the process would more than double by 2050, according to research from the federal Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The U.S. does not support global production caps since plastics play a critical role throughout every sector of every economy, nor does it support bans on certain plastic products or chemical additives to them because there is not a universal approach to reducing plastic pollution, the State Department said. That's similar to the views of the plastics industry, which says that a production cap could have unintended consequences, such as raising the cost of plastics, and that chemicals are best regulated elsewhere. What has the US done in Geneva so far? On the first day of the negotiations, the United States proposed striking language in the objective of the agreement about addressing the full life cycle of plastics. That idea was part of the original mandate for a treaty. Getting rid of it could effectively end any effort to control plastic supply or production. Under former President Joe Biden's administration, the U.S. supported the treaty addressing supply and production. What are people saying about the US position? Industry leaders praised it and environmentalists panned it. Chris Jahn, president and CEO of the American Chemistry Council, said the Trump administration is trying to get an agreement that protects each nation's rights while advancing effective and practical solutions to end plastic waste in the environment. He said his group supports that approach. Graham Forbes, head of the Greenpeace delegation in Geneva, said the United States wants a weak agreement and is undermining the idea that the world needs strong international regulations to address a global problem. Does the US think the world can agree on a treaty that will end plastic pollution? The United States aims to finalize text for a global agreement on plastic pollution that all countries, including major producers of plastics and plastic products, and consumers, will support, the State Department said in its statement.
