logo
Secret deportation: 82-year old lost after ICE office visit to replace green card; family was told he died, later found alive in Guatemala

Secret deportation: 82-year old lost after ICE office visit to replace green card; family was told he died, later found alive in Guatemala

Time of India20 hours ago
Luis Leon, an 82-year-old Pennsylvania resident, was unexpectedly deported to Guatemala after visiting a US immigration office to replace his lost green card.
Leon had been living in Allentown for decades after being granted political asylum in the US in 1987, following torture under Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet's regime.
He had lost his wallet containing the physical card that confirmed his legal residency, according to The Morning Call report cited by the Guardian. Therefore, Leonus and his wife had booked an appointment at an immigration office for 20 June to have the card replaced.
However, upon arrival, Leon was suddenly handcuffed by two Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and led away without explanation, his wife said.
She was allegedly held inside the building for 10 hours before relatives came to collect her. The family said they then heard nothing about Leon's whereabouts, despite numerous attempts to contact authorities.
Days later, they received a phone call from a woman claiming to be an immigration lawyer who said she could assist, but she did not explain how she knew about the case or where Leon was being held. On 9 July, the same woman contacted the family again and told them Leon had died.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
When the Camera Clicked at the Worst Possible Time
Lintmit.com
Read More
Undo
However, in a shocking twist, the family learned a week later through a relative in Chile that Leon was, in fact, alive, but hospitalised in Guatemala, a country with which he has no known connection. The relative said Leon had initially been detained in an immigration facility in Minnesota before being deported, although his name did not appear on any public ICE deportation lists.
His family remains in the dark about how and why he was removed to Guatemala.
A recent US Supreme Court ruling had allowed the Trump-era policy permitting deportations to third countries, not just countries of origin, to stand.
Leon, who had spent nearly four decades in the US working at a leather manufacturing plant and raising a family, had since retired. His medical condition remains unclear, but relatives say that he suffers from diabetes, high blood pressure and a heart condition. They now planning to travel to Guatemala to be by his side.
The case is currently under investigation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Student loan forgiveness IBR: Why relief is delayed, and what you can do now
Student loan forgiveness IBR: Why relief is delayed, and what you can do now

Economic Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Student loan forgiveness IBR: Why relief is delayed, and what you can do now

AP The U.S. Education Department has paused student loan forgiveness under the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) plan, despite no legal barriers preventing it. Borrowers who've completed their repayment term are left in limbo as the department cites vague 'system updates' for the delay. (Representative Image) The US Department of Education has quietly paused student loan forgiveness under the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) plan, a move that has surprised many, given that IBR is the only major income-driven repayment plan not affected by ongoing legal battles. While other plans like SAVE, PAYE, and ICR are currently blocked due to federal court injunctions, IBR was created by Congress and explicitly authorizes loan forgiveness after 20 or 25 years of qualifying payments. Also Read: How rich was Malcolm-Jamal Warner? Inside the late actor's career earnings and net worth Despite this legal clarity, thousands of eligible borrowers who have reached their forgiveness milestone have found their relief stalled with no clear explanation. This sudden pause comes amid overall disruption in the federal student loan system, marked by massive processing delays, legal uncertainty, and significant policy shifts under the Trump administration. The Education Department has attributed the IBR freeze to 'system updates' in response to the SAVE-related court rulings, but critics and legal experts argue that no such updates should interfere with IBR discharges. The IBR plan is one of several income-driven repayment (IDR) options for federal student loan borrowers. It helps borrowers by lowering their monthly payments based on their income and family size. After 20 or 25 years of qualifying payments, borrowers are supposed to get their remaining loan balance makes IBR unique is that it was created by Congress, and unlike newer plans such as SAVE, it has clear legal authority for forgiveness. That's why recent court rulings do not apply to IBR. Despite its legal backing, the Education Department has paused forgiveness processing under IBR, citing "system updates."In a recent update, the department said: 'Currently, IBR forgiveness is paused while our systems are updated… forgiveness will resume once those updates are completed.'There is no clear timeline for when this pause will end. Some borrowers who met the 20- or 25-year threshold have been waiting since mid-2024 without getting their promised discharge. Other IDR plans like SAVE, PAYE, and ICR are blocked due to a court injunction from a lawsuit challenging the legality of the SAVE plan. Since these were created by regulation, not by Congress, they are on hold. However, Congress passed IBR into law, and courts have not blocked forgiveness under it. The Department of Education itself confirmed: 'ED can and will still process loan forgiveness for the IBR Plan, which Congress separately enacted.'The IBR pause is happening alongside massive disruptions across the student loan system: Over 1.5 million IDR applications are stuck in a backlog. The Department recently told borrowers on SAVE to switch to IBR, even though IBR forgiveness is currently paused. Interest will restart in August for borrowers previously under SAVE forbearance. Under the recently signed " Big, Beautiful Bill, " a new plan, the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), will replace SAVE, PAYE, and ICR. Current IBR borrowers will be allowed to stay enrolled and qualify for forgiveness, but new borrowers won't have access to the plan once RAP takes you've already reached your IBR forgiveness threshold but haven't received a discharge: You can continue making payments; any extra payments beyond your qualifying 20 or 25 years should eventually be refunded. You can also ask your servicer for a temporary forbearance, but be aware that interest will continue accruing during this time.

White House drops WSJ from Scotland press pool over Epstein report
White House drops WSJ from Scotland press pool over Epstein report

India Today

time24 minutes ago

  • India Today

White House drops WSJ from Scotland press pool over Epstein report

The White House on Monday droppedThe Wall Street Journal from the press pool for President Donald Trump's upcoming trip to Scotland. This comes just days after Trump filed a $10billion defamation lawsuit against the paper for reporting that he sent Jeffrey Epstein a 'bawdy' birthday note in2003."Due to The Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board,' said press secretary Karoline Leavitt in a news organisation in the entire world wishes to cover President Trump, and the White House has taken significant steps to include as many voices as possible.' Tarini Parti, a White House reporter for The Wall Street Journal, was initially scheduled to serve as the print pool reporter during the final two days of Trump's four-day visit to his golf courses in Turnberry and Aberdeen, Scotland. However, according to Politico, Parti was removed from the official trip manifest by the White will head to Scotland next week, visiting areas where his family owns two golf courses and is opening a third. The President will meet British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to discuss trade ahead of an official state visit to Britain in trip, scheduled from July 25–29, will include stops at Turnberry -- home to a historic golf course and hotel he purchased in 2014 -- and Aberdeen, where one Trump golf course has operated since 2012 and a new one is set to open in August, the White House said last the trip, Trump plans to meet with Starmer to 'refine' a previously announced trade deal, press secretary Karoline Leavitt on the Ayrshire coast, about 200 miles (320 kilometers) southwest of Aberdeen, Trump Turnberry is one of 10 courses on the rotation to host the British Open -- the oldest of the four major championships in men's golf -- but it hasn't staged the event since 2009, before Trump bought the resort.- EndsWith inputs from Associated Press

HC quashes conviction & acquits all 12 accused in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case
HC quashes conviction & acquits all 12 accused in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

HC quashes conviction & acquits all 12 accused in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case

Mumbai: Severely indicting the prosecution for the case it had made out and the state anti-terror squad for its shoddy probe, the Bombay high court on Monday quashed the conviction of all 12 accused found guilty a decade ago for the July 11, 2006 synchronised Mumbai train blasts between Mahim and Borivli that left 187 dead and 824 injured. The HC refused to confirm death sentences for five and life sentences given on Sept 30, 2015 to seven by the special court set up under the anti-organised crime Act and acquitted all, directing their immediate release. Punishment for an actual criminal is essential to uphold the rule of law, but "creating a false appearance of having solved a case… gives a misleading sense of resolution. This deceptive closure undermines public trust and falsely reassures society, while in reality, the true threat remains at large. Essentially, this is what the case at hand conveys," a special bench of Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak observed in the introduction to their 671-page judgment, before shredding the prosecution case. The identification parade was not conducted properly, witnesses identifying accused in dock after four years lacked credibility and MCOCA was invoked without application of mind, the HC said, discarding confession statements relied on for want of "trustworthiness and completeness." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In IC Markets Learn More Undo The HC also accepted defence arguments of torture of accused vitiating confessional statements. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai "The prosecution utterly failed to establish the offence beyond reasonable doubt against the accused on each count. It is unsafe to reach the satisfaction that the accused committed the offences for which they were convicted and sentenced," the bench held. After over six months of hearing and going through more than 44,000 pages of record, Bombay HC concluded the Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) had no case against the 12 accused in the 11/7 train blasts case. Over two decades ago, bombs planted on first-class compartments exploded during the peak evening commute at seven locations on the Western Railway suburban network. They ripped metal and lives between Khar Road and Santacruz, Bandra and Khar Road, Jogeshwari and Mahim Junction, Mira Road and Bhayander, Matunga and Mahim Junction, and Borivli. The prosecution case was of sophisticated explosive RDX being used, of accused being members of terror outfits like SIMI who received training in Pakistan, and of 15 wanted accused, mainly Pakistanis. While the trial court's special MCOCA judge Y D Shinde in 2015 said special public prosecutor Raja Thakare had rightly described the accused as "merchants of death" and Thakare argued that the trial verdict could not be dislodged and the noose be confirmed, the HC noted the prosecution case had unravelled completely. The HC also held that the prosecution failed to prove what kind of explosive was used. It said no importance can be attached to claims of recovery of RDX, circuit boards and detonators, as prosecution failed to prove custody chain before analysis. The dozen men were in prison all along since their arrests in 2006. While one of them died in 2021, the 11 whose appeals were allowed joined on Monday via video-conferencing from prisons across the state, including Pune's Yerawada and prisons in Nashik, Amravati and Nagpur. "Bahut bahut shukriya Sir," said a convict, in white prison uniform with a white topi, on video conference from Yerawada, when defence lawyer Yug Chaudhri, conveyed to them in Hindi that they all stood freed. The HC, in a detailed analysis of the case and evidence on record, said while "prosecution has referred to Al-Qaeda Manual for many things, nothing is brought on record about it." The prosecution case was that wanted accused Azam Cheema alias Babaji, a Pakistani national, and two of the accused given death sentence as planters had conspired since 1999 to wage war against the govt of India and were in touch with Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Conspiracy meetings were held in Bandra and one accused brought six Pakistanis to Mumbai in 2006, ATS had said. HC wondered why no CDRs were brought on record. "The alleged connection of the accused with Azam Cheema and members of LeT could have been established with the help of CDRs," HC said. The HC classified prosecution witnesses in four categories: for identification, eyewitnesses of bomb assembly, of conspiracy, and taxi drivers who allegedly ferried two planters. The court discarded their testimonies as doubtful. For one who claimed to have been to a planter's (A3, an alleged 'jihadist') house where he allegedly saw a few Pakistanis whose names he recalled but did not know what the meeting was for, the HC, doubting his credibility, said that "at the same time, he could not recollect the name of a particular dancer, with whom he had a close relationship for over a month in the same year. " Kamal Ansari, given death sentence by the trial judge, died in 2021. He too stood acquitted by HC. Apart from convicts' appeals, before the HC was the state's reference for death sentence confirmation, as required by law for capital punishment to become executable. Thakare and Avdhoot Chimalkar for the state argued the appeals were fit to be dismissed. The conviction relied primarily on the confessions of 11 accused under the stringent MCOCA Act to nail them. Before HC, an alleged planter Naved Khan, from Nagpur prison, had said he suffered "needlessly for 19 years" and while lives were lost, innocents could not be hanged.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store