logo
How To Justify 400,000 Palestinian Deaths In Gaza: Ask ‘Zelda'

How To Justify 400,000 Palestinian Deaths In Gaza: Ask ‘Zelda'

Scoop02-07-2025
I have published three previous blog posts on Israel's ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Gaza by means of genocide. Ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank is also occurring although through violent repression rather than genocide.
The first (5 March) discussed Zionist Israel's close supportive relationship with South Africa under apartheid and, since 1948, the former's continued status as an apartheid state: When Apartheid meets Zionism.
The second (28 May) discussed the logic behind supporting ethnic cleansing and genocide: Reasons for supporting ethnic cleansing through genocide in Palestine.
The third (4 June) was a postscript to the second with the added emphasis on the New Zealand government recognising the state of Palestine: Ethnic cleansing, genocide and recognition of Palestine.
All the above posts have been in the context of advocating that the New Zealand government should recognise Palestine as an official state along with sanctions and other actions. Now one Zelda has come to the fore providing further grunt for this advocacy.
How to justify genocide and ethnic cleansing: enter Zelda
My blogs are republished (with permission) on the politically turbocharged Bomber Bradbury's hyperactive The Daily Blog. It led to a prompt strident biblically dogmatic response (5 June) from a person called Zelda.
Zelda may well be a pseudonym. It is a primarily female name of German origin. Some consider it to be a diminutive of the German Griselda, which has a similar meaning of 'dark' or 'gray battle'.
Zelda is also a Yiddish name that means 'fortunate' or 'happy'. It was originally a short form of the name Griselda.
I can do no more that quote verbatim Zelda's justification for the ethnic cleansing through genocide of Palestinians by the Israeli government. There are other claimed justifications but hers goes to the core; it provides the stem for everything else.
In Zelda's words:
Gaza belongs to Israel! This is not just a political claim; it is a sacred, unbreakable decree from Almighty God Himself. If any government from around the world recognises Palestine, the United States needs to declare it part of the Axis of Evil
The land was promised by divine covenant to the people of Israel, chosen by God to be His light in the darkness. No enemy, no terrorist, no foreign power can wrest it away. Those who reject this truth stand against God's will and will face His judgment. If Palestinians want aid and peace, they must recognize Israel's God-given right and leave Gaza forever. Only under God's blessing can this land flourish, and all who defy His plan will be cast down.
What more can one say! If one believes this it is barely a hop, skip and a jump from believing that while Israeli lives are valuable, Palestinians lives are of no value at all.
Further, while Israelis have an absolute right to self-determination by any means necessary, Palestinians have no right at all.
Understanding Palestinian deaths in Gaza
Zelda's justification has to be seen in the context of the reality of Gaza beginning with its size. It is roughly the same geographic size as the Kāpiti Coast in the lower North Island where I live. Both have coastlines running their full lengths.
Putting aside the absence of ethnic cleansing and genocide, the population of my 'home turf' is a mere 2-3% of Gaza's Palestinian population.
The highly regarded British medical journal The Lancet (10 July 2024) provided additional context about Gaza death rates: Counting the Gaza dead.
By 19 June 2024, the official tally of Palestinian deaths since Israel's murderous war in Gaza began was nearly 38,000. These figures are accepted by the United Nations and the World Health Organisation along with official Israeli intelligence but not the Israeli government.
However, the article reports the number of reported deaths is likely an underestimate. Not all names of identifiable victims are included in the list and the number of bodies still buried in the rubble was likely substantial (some estimates were over 10,000).
Further, based on analyses of recent conflicts, indirect deaths (such as through starvation) range from three to 15 times the number of direct deaths.
Consequently, The Lancet concluded that by applying a conservative estimate it was not implausible to estimate that up to 186000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza.
Now contrast this above estimate with the officially recognised tally of nearly 38,000 (around 20% of the estimated actual deaths).
Direct from the Israel Defence Force
If ever a country's army was to be designated a terrorist organisation, it should be the Israel Defence Force (IDF). For its brutality towards Palestinians, it deserved this designation well before its implementation of the current genocide in Gaza.
It should be noted, however, that many Israeli reservists who had served in the IDF have courageously spoken out against this terrorism.
It should also be noted that the IDF does collect useful data on its exploits. Such is the level of repressed internal disgust that it leaks, or brave academics sometime succeed in extrapolating it.
Dr Raj Thamotheram worked for many years in finance, particularly investment. Now he is fully independent. He is the Founder and was the Executive Chair of Preventable Surprises, a 'think-do' tank focused on how investors can better manage systemic risks.
Medical sociologist Professor Peter Davis has done New Zealanders a favour by reposting a LinkedIn post (25 June) by Thamotheram. In the latter's words:
An Israeli academic has just released a report using IDF's own internal estimates, and the findings are staggering.
According to Professor Yaakov Garb from Ben-Gurion University, around 1.85 million Palestinians remain alive in Gaza.
That means over 370,000 people – most of them civilians – may have been killed. This number is echoed by estimates from The Lancet Group and independent researchers, suggesting a death toll that could already exceed 400,000.
Among them, more than 150,000 are likely to be children. That's not a typo – it's a generation of young lives, gone. And many more are at risk today – not just from bombs, but from hunger, disease, and the collapse of basic healthcare.
Garb also analyzed international aid distribution compounds inside Gaza. His conclusion is chilling: these sites, shaped by a military mindset, are making things worse. Instead of providing safety, their chaotic layout is fueling panic and putting civilians in the line of fire.
But this devastation isn't inevitable. It's the result of choices – and that means it can still be changed.
Humanitarian groups, legal experts, and brave citizens across the world are working to stop the killing, get aid where it's needed, and hold those responsible to account.
But a lot depends on those who are still bystanding. On the movable middle.
You have a choice. To speak out. To demand that our governments act. To stand with people fighting not just for survival – but for dignity, justice, and peace.
What's happening in Gaza is not just a tragedy. It's a test of who we are – and what we're willing to stand for.
Time for New Zealand government to belatedly do the right thing
This estimate (give or take) of 400,000 Palestinian deaths due to Israel's genocide strategy has to been seen in the context of the current official estimate of nearly 60,000 (15% of the actual rate estimated from IDF data).
Particularly when put in the context of the core justification for the genocide, as so well enunciated by Zelda, it is time for Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's government to provide ethics based political leadership. To date, its performance has ranged from limp to deplorable.
This leadership should include:
Recognising the Palestinian Territories as an official independent state.
Sanctioning IDF visitors.
Close the Israel Embassy
Trade and bilateral sanctions
Suspend Israel from the United Nations.
Genocide is genocide (no ifs or buts). It should be called out as such and acted upon. Ethically there is no option.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump seeks US-Russia-Ukraine summit after Putin meeting fails to secure ceasefire
Trump seeks US-Russia-Ukraine summit after Putin meeting fails to secure ceasefire

NZ Herald

time8 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Trump seeks US-Russia-Ukraine summit after Putin meeting fails to secure ceasefire

'If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin. Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved.' [L-R] US President Donald Trump, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russia's President Vladimir Putin. Photo collage / AFP After the summit, Trump spoke first with Zelenskyy, the White House said. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen later joined the call, officials said. The European leaders, who had been wary of being left out of the Alaska meeting, held their own talks on Saturday and said they supported the proposed three-way summit. 'We are also ready to work with President Trump and President Zelenskyy towards a trilateral summit with European support,' they said in a joint statement that added that pressure must be maintained on Russia. 'As long as the killing in Ukraine continues, we stand ready to uphold the pressure on Russia. We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace,' they said. Russia could not have a 'veto' on Ukraine joining the European Union or Nato, they added. Today, following a conversation with President Trump, we further coordinated positions with European leaders. The positions are clear. A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions. Killings must stop as soon as… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 16, 2025 The war, which has killed tens of thousands and devastated much of Ukraine, went on despite the summit. Ukraine announced that Russia had launched 85 attack drones and a ballistic missile during the night. Russia said it had taken two more villages in Ukraine. Zelenskyy said Trump had laid out the 'main points' of the summit and that he would go to the White House on Monday 'to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war'. Trump and Putin emerged from their talks at a Cold War era air base to offer warm words at a press briefing but took no questions from reporters. 'We're not there yet, but we've made progress. There's no deal until there's a deal,' Trump said. He called the meeting 'extremely productive' with 'many points' agreed, but did not offer specifics. 'There are just a very few that are left, some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant,' Trump said without elaborating. Trump muses second meeting, Putin says 'next time in Moscow' Putin also spoke in general terms of co-operation at the joint press appearance that lasted just 12 minutes. 'We hope that the understanding we have reached will... pave the way for peace in Ukraine,' Putin said. As Trump mused about a second meeting, Putin smiled and said in English: 'Next time in Moscow'. The former KGB agent tried to flatter Trump, who has voiced admiration for the Russian leader in the past. Before the summit, Trump had warned of 'severe consequences' if Russia did not accept a ceasefire. But when asked about those consequences during a Fox News interview after the talks, Trump said that 'because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now.' Putin warns Western allies Trump, whose tone with Zelensky has changed since he berated the Ukrainian President at the White House in February, told Fox that 'now it's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done'. Trump could not get Russian agreement to get Zelensky into Friday's talks. But Zelenskyy, who has rejected suggestions that Ukraine give up territory, said Saturday that he supported the American efforts. 'It is important that America's strength has an impact on the development of the situation,' he said. Putin warned Ukraine and European countries to 'not create any obstacles' and not 'make attempts to disrupt this emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigues'. Russia in recent days has made battlefield gains that could strengthen Putin's hand in any ceasefire negotiations. Although Ukraine announced as Putin was flying in that it had retaken several villages, Russia's army on Saturday claimed the capture of Kolodyazi in Ukraine's Donetsk region and Vorone in the neighbouring Dnipropetrovsk region. - Agence France-Presse

Israel in talks to resettle Gazan Palestinians in South Sudan, sources say
Israel in talks to resettle Gazan Palestinians in South Sudan, sources say

RNZ News

time15 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Israel in talks to resettle Gazan Palestinians in South Sudan, sources say

A view of the destruction in the Gaza Strip, from a Jordanian military aircraft before the airdrop operation of aid over Gaza on 14 August, 2025. Photo: AFP/ Middle East Images - Faiz Abu Rmeleh South Sudan and Israel are discussing a deal to resettle Palestinians from war-torn Gaza in the troubled African nation, three sources told Reuters - a plan quickly dismissed as unacceptable by Palestinian leaders. The sources, who have knowledge of the matter but spoke on condition of anonymity, said no agreement had been reached but talks between South Sudan and Israel were ongoing. The plan, if carried further, would envisage people moving from an enclave shattered by almost two years of war with Israel to a nation in the heart of Africa riven by years of political and ethnically-driven violence. South Sudan | Armed conflict has forced thousands from their homes, leaving families struggling to survive. With the South Sudan Red Cross, we supported 4,500 displaced people in the Upper Nile State with cash & household items to improve access to food and living conditions. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said this month he intends to extend military control in Gaza, and this week repeated suggestions that Palestinians should leave the territory voluntarily. Arab and world leaders have rejected the idea of moving Gaza's population to any country. Palestinians say that would be like another "Nakba" (catastrophe) when hundreds of thousands fled or were forced out during the Arab-Israeli war of 1948. The three sources said the prospect of resettling Palestinians in South Sudan was raised during meetings between Israeli officials and South Sudanese Foreign Minister Monday Semaya Kumba when he visited the country last month. Their account appeared to contradict South Sudan's foreign ministry, which on Wednesday dismissed earlier reports on the plan as "baseless". The ministry was not immediately available to respond to the sources' assertions on Friday. News of the discussions was first reported by the Associated Press on Tuesday, citing six people with knowledge of the matter. Wasel Abu Youssef, a member of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organisation, said the Palestinian leadership and people "reject any plan or idea to displace any of our people to South Sudan or to any other place". His statement echoed a statement from the office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Thursday. Hamas, which is fighting Israel in Gaza, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, who visited the South Sudanese capital Juba this week, told Reuters that those discussions had not focussed on relocation. "This is not what the discussions were about," she said when asked if any such plan had been discussed. "The discussions were about foreign policy, about multilateral organisations, about the humanitarian crisis, the real humanitarian crisis happening in South Sudan, and about the war," she said, referring to her talks with Juba officials. Worsening humanitarian situation driven by new arrivals from #Sudan & fighting in #SouthSudan is pushing millions of people to the brink. UNHCR has been forced to reduce its response to solely life-saving aid at such a critical time due to funding cuts. Netanyahu, who met Kumba last month, has said Israel is in touch with a few countries to find a destination for Palestinians who want to leave Gaza. He has consistently declined to provide further details. Netanyahu's office and Israel's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the information given by the three sources on Friday. - Reuters

The Arab, The Left And Those Who Remained Silent: History Will Not Forgive You
The Arab, The Left And Those Who Remained Silent: History Will Not Forgive You

Scoop

time18 hours ago

  • Scoop

The Arab, The Left And Those Who Remained Silent: History Will Not Forgive You

The consequences of the Israeli genocide in Gaza will be dire. An event of this degree of barbarity, sustained by an international conspiracy of moral inertia and silence, will not be relegated to history as just another "conflict" or a mere tragedy. The Gaza genocide is a catalyst for major events to come. Israel and its benefactors are acutely aware of this historical reality. This is precisely why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in a race against time, desperately trying to ensure his country remains relevant, if not standing, in the coming era. He pursues this through territorial expansion in Syria, relentless aggression against Lebanon, and, of course, the desire to annex all occupied Palestinian territories. But history cannot be controlled with such precision. However clever he may think he is, Netanyahu has already lost the ability to influence the outcome. He has been unable to set a clear agenda in Gaza, let alone achieve any strategic goals in a 365-square-kilometer expanse of destroyed concrete and ashes. Gazans have proven that collective sumud can defeat one of the most well-equipped modern armies. Indeed, history itself has taught us that changes of great magnitude are inevitable. The true heartbreak is that this change is not happening fast enough to save a starving population, and the growing pro-Palestinian sentiment is not expanding at the rate needed to achieve a decisive political outcome. Our confidence in this inevitable change is rooted in history. World War I was not just a "Great War" but a cataclysmic event that fully shattered the geopolitical order of its time. Four empires were fundamentally reshuffled; some, like the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman, were erased from existence. The new world order resulting from World War I was short-lived. The modern international system we have today is a direct outcome of World War II. This includes the United Nations and all the new Western-centric economic, legal, and political institutions that were forged by the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1944. This includes the World Bank, the IMF, and ultimately NATO, thus sowing the seeds of yet more global conflicts. The fall of the Berlin Wall was heralded as the singular, defining event that resolved the lingering conflicts of the post-WWII geopolitical struggle, supposedly ushering in a new, permanent global realignment, or, to some, the "end of history." History, however, had other plans. Not even the horrific September 11 attacks and the subsequent US-led wars could reinvent the global order in a way that was consistent with US-Western interests and priorities. Gaza is infinitely small when judged by its geography, economic worth, or political import. Yet, it has proven to be the most significant global event defining this generation's political consciousness. The fact that the self-proclaimed guardians of the post-WWII order are the very entities that are violently and brazenly violating every international and humanitarian law is enough to fundamentally alter our relationship with the West's championed "rule-based order." This may not seem significant now, but it will have profound, long-term consequences. It has largely compromised and, in fact, delegitimized the moral authority imposed, often by violence, by the West over the rest of the world for decades, especially in the Global South. This self-imposed delegitimization will also impact the very idea of democracy, which has been under siege in many countries, including Western democracies. This is only natural, considering that most of the planet feels strongly that Israel must end its genocide and that its leaders must be held accountable. Yet, little to no action follows. The shift in Western public opinion in favor of Palestinians is astounding when considered against the backdrop of total Western media dehumanization of the Palestinian people and Western governments' blind allegiance to Israel. More shocking is that this shift is largely the result of the work of ordinary people on social media, activists mobilizing in the streets, and independent journalists, mostly in Gaza, working under extreme duress and with minimal resources. A central conclusion is the failure of Arab and Muslim nations to factor into this tragedy befalling their own brethren in Palestine. While some are engaged in empty rhetoric or self-flagellation, others subsist in a state of inertia, as if the genocide in Gaza were a foreign topic, like the wars in Ukraine or Congo. This fact alone shall challenge our very collective self-definition—what it means to be an Arab or a Muslim, and whether such definitions carry supra-political identities. Time will tell. The left, too, is problematic in its own way. While not a monolith, and while many on the left have championed the global protests against the genocide, others remain splintered and unable to form a unified front, even temporarily. Some leftists are still chasing their own tales, crippled by the worry that being anti-Zionist would earn them the label of antisemitism. For this group, self-policing and self-censorship are preventing them from taking decisive action. History does not take its cues from Israel or Western powers. Gaza will indeed result in the kind of global shifts that will affect us all, far beyond the Middle East. For now, however, it is most urgent that we use our collective will and action to influence one single historical event: ending the genocide and the famine in Gaza. The rest will be left to history, and to those who wish to be relevant when the world changes again. - Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His forthcoming book, ' Before the Flood,' will be published by Seven Stories Press. His other books include 'Our Vision for Liberation', 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter' and 'The Last Earth'. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store